Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-vdhp9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T03:06:06.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Swedish population-based study of the mechanisms of parent–offspring transmission of criminal behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2014

K. S. Kendler ,
H. Ohlsson ,
N. A. Morris ,
J. Sundquist  and
K. Sundquist
K. S. Kendler*
Affiliation:
Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
H. Ohlsson
Affiliation:
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
N. A. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Criminal Justice, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
J. Sundquist
Affiliation:
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
K. Sundquist
Affiliation:
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
*
* Address for correspondence: K. S. Kendler, M.D., Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics of VCU, Box 980126, Richmond, VA 23298-0126, USA. (Email: kendler@vcu.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background.

While children of parents with criminal behavior (CB) are at increased risk for CB, we have limited knowledge about the causes of this cross-generational transmission.

Method.

We examined intergenerational continuity in CB in the Swedish population ascertained from the national conviction registers in three family types: intact (n = 21 11 074), ‘not-lived-with’ (n = 16 53 15 where biological parents never lived with their offspring) and ‘step’ (n = 1 24 800 offspring) which reflected, respectively, the effects of genes + rearing, genes only and rearing only. We also examined three criminal conviction subtypes: violent CB (VCB), property CB (PCB) and white-collar CB (WCCB).

Results.

Combined across mothers and fathers, the hazard ratio (HR) for CB in offspring given parental CB was 1.95 in intact, 1.56 in ‘not-lived-with’ and 1.28 in stepfamilies. In all three family types, all forms of CB in parents (VCB, PCB and WCCB) significantly predicted risk for all forms of CB in offspring. However, VCB in offspring was most strongly predicted by VCB in parents in intact, not-lived-with and stepfamilies. In intact families only, some specific parent–offspring transmission was also seen for WCCB.

Conclusions.

Both genetic and environmental factors contribute substantially to parent–offspring resemblance for CB. With respect to criminal subtypes, much of parent–offspring transmission appears to be non-specific. However, specific genetic and environmental risk factors for VCB are transmitted across generations. A limitation of these analyses is that CB was assessed only via official criminal convictions.

Keywords

Adoptioncriminal behaviorcriminal convictionsenvironmentgeneticsparent–offspringSweden

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , April 2015 , pp. 1093 - 1102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bandura, A (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Besemer, S (2012). Specialized versus versatile intergenerational transmission of violence: a new approach to studying intergenerational transmission from violent versus non-violent fathers: latent class analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 28, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besemer, S, Farrington, DP, Bijleveld, CC (2013). Official bias in intergenerational transmission of criminal behaviour. British Journal of Criminology 53, 438–455.Google Scholar
Bijleveld, CC, Farrington, DP (2009). The importance of studies of intergenerational transmission of antisocial behaviour. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 19, 77–79.Google Scholar
Bijleveld, CC, Wijkman, M (2009). Intergenerational continuity in convictions: a five-generation study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 19, 142–155.Google Scholar
Black, MM, Nair, P, Kight, C, Wachtel, R, Roby, P, Schuler, M (1994). Parenting and early development among children of drug-abusing women: effects of home intervention. Pediatrics 94, 440–448.Google Scholar
Bohman, M (1970). Adopted Children and their Families: A Follow-up Study of Adopted Children, their Background, Environment and Adjustment, ASIN: B0006C3F18 ed. Proprius: Solna, Seelig.Google Scholar
Bohman, M (1978). Some genetic aspects of alcoholism and criminality. A population of adoptees. Archives of General Psychiatry 35, 269–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brennan, PA, Raine, A (1997). Biosocial bases of antisocial behavior: psychophysiological, neurological, and cognitive factors. Clinical Psychology Review 17, 589–604.Google Scholar
Burt, SC (1925). The Young Delinquent. University of London Press: London, UK.Google Scholar
Cadoret, R (1986). Adoption studies: historical and methodological critique. Psychiatric Developments 1, 45–64.Google Scholar
Christiansen, KO (1974). Seriousnes of criminality and concordance among danish twins. In Crime, Criminology and Public Policy (ed. Hood, R.), pp. 63–77. The Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
Crowe, RR (1972). The adopted offspring of women criminal offenders. A study of their arrest records. Archives of General Psychiatry 27, 600–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalgard, O, Kringlen, E (1976). A norwegian twin study of criminality. British Journal of Criminality 16, 213–232.Google Scholar
Delisi, M, Beaver, KM, Vaughn, MG, Wright, JP (2009). All in the family gene x environment interaction between DRD2 and criminal father is associated with five antisocial phenotypes. Criminal Justice and Behavior 36, 1187–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugdale, RL (1887). ‘The Jukes’:A Study in Crime, Pauperism, Disease and Heredity. G.P. Putnam and Sons: New York, NY.Google Scholar
Farrington, DP (1997). Human development and criminal careers. In The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 2nd edn (ed. Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R.), pp. 361–408. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Farrington, DP (2002). Key results from the first forty years of the Cambridge study in delinquency. In Taking Stock of Delinquency: An Overview of Findings from Contemporary Longitudinal Studies (ed. Thornberry, T. P. and Krohn, M. D.), pp. 137–183. Kluwer: New York, NY.Google Scholar
Farrington, DP, Barnes, GC, Lambert, S (1996). The concentration of offending in families. Legal and Criminological Psychology 1, 47–63.Google Scholar
Farrington, DP, Coid, JW, Harnett, LM, Jolliffe, D, Soteriou, N, Turner, RE, West, DJ (2006). Criminal Careers up to Age 50 and Life Success up to Age 48: New Findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, 2nd edn. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate: London, UK, Home Office Research Study 299.Google Scholar
Farrington, DP, Coid, JW, Murray, J (2009). Family factors in the intergenerational transmission of offending. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health 19, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrington, DP, Gundry, G, West, DJ (1975). The familial transmission of criminality. Medicine Science and Law, 15, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrington, DP, Jolliffe, D, Loeber, R, Stouthamer-Loeber, M, Kalb, LM (2001). The concentration of offenders in families, and family criminality in the prediction of boys' delinquency. Journal of Adolescence 24, 579–596.Google Scholar
Farrington, DP & Welsh, BC (2007). Saving Children from a Life of Crime: Early Risk Factors and Effective Interventions. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Gabrielli, WF Jr., Mednick, SA (1984). Urban environment, genetics, and crime. Criminology 22, 645–652.Google Scholar
Giordano, PC (2010). Legacies of Crime: A Follow-Up of the Children of Highly Delinquent Girls and Boys. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY.Google Scholar
Glueck, S, Glueck, ET (1950). Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency, 1st edn. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS, Larsson Lönn, S, Morris, NA, Sundquist, J, Långström, N, Sundquist, K (2013 a). A Swedish national adoption study of criminality. Psychological Medicine NOV 4, 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Kendler, KS, Maes, HH, Sundquist, K, Ohlsson, H, Sundquist, J (2013 b). Genetic and family and community environmental effects on drug abuse in adolescence: a Swedish national twin and sibling study. American Journal of Psychiatry 171, 209–217.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS, Myers, J, Prescott, CA (2000). Parenting and adult mood, anxiety and substance use disorders in female twins: an epidemiological, multi-informant, retrospective study. Psychological Medicine 30, 281–294.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS, Ohlsson, H, Sundquist, K, Sundquist, J (2014 a). Peer deviance, parental divorce, and genetic risk in the prediction of drug abuse in a nationwide Swedish sample: evidence of environment-environment and gene-environment interaction. JAMA Psychiatry 71, 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendler, KS, Ohlsson, H, Sundquist, K, Sundquist, J (2014 b). The causes of parent–offspring transmission of drug abuse: a Swedish population-based study. Psychological Medicine. Published online: 14 May 2014. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714001093.Google Scholar
Kim, HK, Capaldi, DM, Pears, KC, Kerr, DC, Owen, LD (2009). Intergenerational transmission of internalising and externalising behaviours across three generations: gender-specific pathways. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 19, 125–141.Google Scholar
Kolvin, I, Miller, FJ, Fleeting, M, Kolvin, PA (1988). Social and parenting factors affecting criminal-offence rates. Findings from the Newcastle Thousand Family Study (1947–1980). British Journal of Psychiatry 152, 80–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lange, J (1929). Verbrechen als Schicksal: Studien an Kriminellen Zwillingen. Thieme: Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mantel, N, Haenszel, W (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of National Cancer Institute 22, 719–748.Google Scholar
McCord, J (1977). A comparative study of two generations of Native Americans. In Theory in Criminology: Contemporary Views (ed. Meier, R.F.), pp. 83–92. SAGE Publications Inc.: Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
Mednick, SA, Gabrielli, WF Jr., Hutchings, B (1984). Genetic influences in criminal convictions: evidence from an adoption cohort. Science 224, 891–894.Google Scholar
Otowa, T, Gardner, CO, Kendler, KS, Hettema, JM (2013). Parenting and risk for mood, anxiety and substance use disorders: a study in population-based male twins. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology 48, 1841–1849.Google Scholar
Patterson, GR (1982). Coercive Family Process. Castalia Publishing Company: Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
Rhee, SH, Waldman, ID (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: a meta- analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin 128, 490–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosanoff, AJ, Handy, LM, Plesset, IR (1934). Criminality and delinquency in twins. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 24, 923–934.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2011). I. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Stein, JA, Newcomb, MD, Bentler, PM (1993). Differential effects of parent and grandparent drug use on behavior problems of male and female children. Developmental Psychology 29, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (2008). Victims' tendency to report crime, report 2008: 12, Brottsforebyggande radet, Stockholm, 2008: 12.Google Scholar
Thornberry, TP (2009). The apple doesn't fall far from the tree (or Does It?): intergenerational patterns of antisocial behavior-the American Society of Criminology 2008 Sutherland address. Criminology 47, 297–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornberry, TP, Freeman-Gallant, A, Lovegrove, PJ (2009). Intergenerational linkages in antisocial behaviour. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health 19, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Rakt, M, Nieuwbeerta, P, Apel, R (2009). Association of criminal convictions between family members: effects of siblings, fathers and mothers. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health 19, 94–108. available from: PM:19274627.Google Scholar
West, DJ, Farrington, DP (1977). The Delinquent Way of Life. Heinemann: London, UK.Google Scholar