Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T11:52:53.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of the sheep coat: the impact of domestication on its structure and development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2020

Neville Jackson
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Animal Production, Prospect, NSW2148, Australia
Ian G. Maddocks
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Animal Production, Prospect, NSW2148, Australia
James E. Watts
Affiliation:
PO Box 2604, Bowral, NSW2576, Australia
David Scobie
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Lincoln Research Centre, Private Bag 4749, Christchurch8140, New Zealand
Rebecca S. Mason
Affiliation:
Discipline of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, Australia
Clare Gordon-Thomson
Affiliation:
Discipline of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, Australia
Sally Stockwell
Affiliation:
CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, Queensland4067, Australia
Geoffrey P.M. Moore*
Affiliation:
Discipline of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Geoffrey Philip Moore, E-mail: philip.moore@sydney.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wild sheep and many primitive domesticated breeds have two coats: coarse hairs covering shorter, finer fibres. Both are shed annually. Exploitation of wool for apparel in the Bronze Age encouraged breeding for denser fleeces and continuously growing white fibres. The Merino is regarded as the culmination of this process. Archaeological discoveries, ancient images and parchment records portray this as an evolutionary progression, spanning millennia. However, examination of the fleeces from feral, two-coated and woolled sheep has revealed a ready facility of the follicle population to change from shedding to continuous growth and to revert from domesticated to primitive states. Modifications to coat structure, colour and composition have occurred in timeframes and to sheep population sizes that exclude the likelihood of variations arising from mutations and natural selection. The features are characteristic of the domestication phenotype: an assemblage of developmental, physiological, skeletal and hormonal modifications common to a wide variety of species under human control. The phenotypic similarities appeared to result from an accumulation of cryptic genetic changes early during vertebrate evolution. Because they did not affect fitness in the wild, the mutations were protected from adverse selection, becoming apparent only after exposure to a domestic environment. The neural crest, a transient embryonic cell population unique to vertebrates, has been implicated in the manifestations of the domesticated phenotype. This hypothesis is discussed with reference to the development of the wool follicle population and the particular roles of Notch pathway genes, culminating in the specific cell interactions that typify follicle initiation.

Information

Type
Perspective
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Approximate phases for the appearance of changes in sheep types and fleece and fibre traits from wild sheep to the Merino.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Transverse skin section and fibre diameter distribution of Barbary sheep. (a) Primary (P) follicles in a trio group; fibres are large, medullated and of variable diameters (P Ø: 32, 53 and 26 μm, respectively). Secondary (S) follicles are in wedge-shaped clusters, adjacent to P follicles and have finer, shorter fibres (S Ø: 9 μm). Bar = 100 μm. (b) Histogram of the distribution of P and S fibre diameters (Dp, Ds) in the skin sample. P fibre frequencies are shaded.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Transverse skin section and fibre diameter distribution of a modern Merino sheep. (a) Primary (P) follicles in a trio group; P fibres are fine, not medullated and have similar diameters (Ø: 20 μm). Secondary (S) follicles are numerous and are also of uniform diameter (Ø: 22 μm). Bar = 100 μm. (b) Histogram of the distribution of P and S fibre diameters (Dp, Ds) in the skin sample. P fibre frequencies are shaded.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Comparisons of (a) primary and secondary fibre diameters and (b) primary and secondary follicle densities in a range of modern breeds; the primitive Soay sheep is designated ℗. Data from Carter (1968). Corriedales (Merino × Longwool) display intermediate characteristics. A primary to secondary fibre diameter ratio of 1 is shown as a diagonal line in (a).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Transverse skin section and primary (P) and secondary (S) fibre diameter distribution of a ewe from the follicle size and number selection experiment. (a) The fibre of the P follicle (P at centre) is large and medullated (arrowhead); also shown is an adjacent P follicle with an unmedullated fibre. Bar = 100 μm. (b) Fibre diameter histogram from the same skin sample, showing P and S fibre diameter (Dp, Ds) distributions. Ds values range from coarse to fine. P frequencies are shaded.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Transverse skin section and fibre diameter distribution of Arapawa Island sheep. (a) Trio group of primary (P) follicles. Secondary (S) follicles located are in wedge-shaped clusters between the P follicles. Bar = 100 μm. (b) Fibre diameter histogram from the same skin samples, showing P and S fibre distributions (Dp, Ds). P fibre frequencies are shaded.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Comparisons between (a) primary and secondary fibre diameters and (b) primary and secondary follicle densities in modern Merino breeds (Carter, 1968) and in Arapawa sheep. The Arapawa mean fibre diameters in (a) are from the data of Fig. 5b. The follicle density measurement in (b) is from Orwin & Whitaker (1984); the Soay sheep ℗ and Merino values are from Carter (1968).