Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g98kq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T08:59:26.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES AND INFANT MORTALITY IN TURKEY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2016

İsmet Koç  and
Mehmet Alİ Eryurt
İsmet Koç*
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ankara, Turkey
Mehmet Alİ Eryurt
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ankara, Turkey
*
1 Corresponding author. Email: iskoc@hacettepe.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Turkey has high levels of infant mortality and consanguineous marriages. It has had a high level of infant mortality for its economic level for many years. Over recent decades, although adult mortality rates have not been very different from those of other countries with similar socioeconomic structures, its life expectancy at birth has remained low due to its high infant mortality rate. This has been called the Turkish Puzzle. According to the Turkey Family Structure and Population Issues Survey, 27% of women had a consanguineous marriage in 1968. Subsequent Turkish Demographic and Health Surveys (TDHSs) found the rate of consanguineous marriages to be stagnated at 22–24%, with a resistance to reduction. According to the TDHS-2008, 24% of women had a consanguineous marriage. Numerous studies in various countries of the world have indicated that consanguineous marriages, particularly of first-degree, have the effect of increasing infant mortality. The main aim of this study was to assess the causal impact of consanguineous, particularly first-degree consanguineous, marriages on infant mortality, controlling for individual, cultural, bio-demographic and environmental factors. Data were merged from four Turkish DHS data sets (1993, 1998, 2003 and 2008). Multivariate analysis revealed that first-degree consanguineous marriages have increased infant mortality by 45% in Turkey: 57% in urban areas and 39% in rural areas. The results indicate that there is a causal relationship between consanguineous marriages and infant mortality. This finding should be taken into account when planning policies to reduce infant mortality in Turkey, and in other countries with high rates of consanguineous marriage and infant mortality.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , July 2017 , pp. 536 - 555
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abuqamar, M., Coomans, M. & Louckx, F. (2011) Correlation between socioeconomic differences and infant mortality in the Arab World (1990–2009). International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 3(1), 15–21.Google Scholar
Allison, P. D. (1984) Event History Analysis, Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Sage Publications, CA.Google Scholar
Behar, C., Courbauge, Y. & Gürsoy, A. (1999) Economic growth or survival? The problematic case of child mortality in Turkey. European Journal of Population 15, 241–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, A. & Hussain, R. (2006) Consanguineous unions and child health in the state of Qatar. Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 372–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (2003) Consanguineous marriage and childhood health. Development Medicine and Child Neurology 45, 571–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. (2008) A community genetics perspective on consanguinity marriage. Community Genetics 60, 89–98.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. & Black, M. L. (2010) The impact of consanguinity on neonatal and infant health. Early Human Development 86, 737–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blossfeld, H. P., Golsch, K. & Rohwer, G. (2007) Techniques of Event History Modeling using Stata: New Approaches to Causal Analysis. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
Blossfeld, H. P. & Rohwer, G. (2002) Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis, 2nd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
Charafeddine, L., Ammous, F., Kobeissi, L., De Ver Dye, T., Matar, M., Faddous Khalife, M-C. & Yunis, K. (2012) In-hospital neonatal mortality and the role of consanguinity. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 26(5), 398–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El–Hazmi, M. A., Al-Swailem, A. R., Warsy, A. S., al-Swailem, A. M., Sulaimani, R. & al-Meshari, A. A. (1995) Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population. Journal of Medical Genetics 32(8), 623–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eryurt, M. A. & Koç, İ. (2009) Yoksulluk ve Çocuk Ölümlülüğü: Hanehalkı Refah Düzeyinin Çocuk Ölümlüğü Üzerindeki Etkisi [Poverty and child mortality: the impact of household wealth on child mortality]. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi 52, 113–121.Google Scholar
Grant, J. C. & Bittles, A. H. (1997) the comparative role of consanguinity in infant and childhood mortality in Pakistan. Annals of Human Genetics 61, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gürsoy-Tezcan, A. (1992) Infant mortality: a Turkish Puzzle? Health Transition Review 2(2), 131–149.Google ScholarPubMed
Hammami, A., Chalbi, N., Ben Abdallah, M. & Elgazzeh, M. (2005) Effects of consanguinity and social factors on mortality and fertility in Mauritania. La Tunisie Medicale 83(4), 221–226.Google ScholarPubMed
Hancıoğlu, A. & Tunçbilek, E. (1998) Akraba Evliliklerinin Sosyo-demografik Özellikleri ve Çocuk Ölümleri Üzerindeki Etkileri [Socio-demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages and its impact on child mortality]. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi 41, 139–153.Google Scholar
Hosseini-Chavoshi, M., Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J. & Bittles, A. H. (2014) Consanguineous marriage, reproductive behaviour and postnatal mortality in contemporary Iran. Human Heredity 77(1–4), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, R. (1999) Community perceptions of reasons for preference for consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science 31, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, R., Bittles, A. H. & Sullivan, S. (2001) Consanguinity and early mortality in the Muslim populations of India and Pakistan. American Journal of Human Biology 13(6), 777–787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jemai, H., Messaoudi, I., Chaouch, A. & Kerkeni, A. (2007) Protective effect of zinc supplementation on blood antioxidant defense system in rats exposed to cadmium. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 21(4), 269–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph, S. E. (2007) “Kissing Cousins”: consanguineous marriage and early mortality in a reproductive isolate. Current Anthropology 48(5), 756–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurdi, R. & Saxena, P. C. (2003) The prevalence and correlates of consanguineous marriages in Yemen: similarities and contrasts with other Arab countries. Journal of Biosocial Science 35(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keskin, N., Bozkurt, A. İ. & Keskin, A. (2011) Consanguineous marriages and the relationship between consanguineous marriages and abortion, infant mortality in Acipayam, a rural area of Denizli. HealthMED 5(2), 334–337.Google Scholar
Khayat, R. G. & Saxena, P. C. (2007) Consanguinity and its effects on infant and child mortality and fertility in Egypt. Demography India 36(1), 73–85.Google Scholar
Khoury, S. A. & Massad, D. (2000) Consanguinity, fertility, reproductive wastage, infant mortality and congenital malformations in Jordan. Saudi Medical Journal 21(2), 150–154.Google ScholarPubMed
Koç, İ. (2007) Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of consanguineous marriages in Turkey. Journal of Biosocial Science 40, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koç, İ., Eryurt, M. A., Adalı, T. & Çağatay, P. (2010) Türkiye’nin Demografik Dönüşmü: Doğurganlık, Aile Planlaması, Anne-Çocuk Sağlığı ve Beş Yaş Altı Ölümlerdeki Değişimler: 1968–2008 [Demographic Transition of Turkey: Changes in Fertility, Family Planning, Mother and Child Health and Under Five Mortality, 1968–2008]. Ankara. ISBN: 978-975-491-285-2.Google Scholar
Mokhtar, M. & Abdel-Fattah, M. (2001) Consanguinity and advanced maternal age as risk factors for reproductive losses in Alexandria, Egypt. European Journal of Epidemiology 17(6), 559–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosley, W. H. & Chen, L. C. (1984) An analytical framework for the study of child survival in developing countries. Population and Development Review 10 (Supplement), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, J. (2002) The influence of consanguineous marriage on infant and child mortality among Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. Public Health Genomics 5(3), 178–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, T. P. K., Reddy, K. K. & Reddy, P. G. (2007) Ancestral consanguinity and mortality among three endogamous populations of Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Human Biology 79(4), 413–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riddle, L. A. (1998) The Turkish Child Mortality Puzzle Continues: Evidence from the 1993 Demographic and Health Survey. Texas Population Research Center Papers, Paper No. 97-98-06, TX.Google Scholar
Shami, S. A., Schmitt, L. H. & Bittles, A. H. (1989) Consanguinity related prenatal and postnatal mortality of the populations of seven Pakistani Punjab cities. Journal of Medical Genetics 26(4), 267–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timur, S. (1972) Türkiye’de Aile Yapısı: 1968 Türkiye Aile Yapısı ve Sorunları Araştırması Sonuçları [Family Structure in Turkey: Results of Survey on Family Structure and Population Problems]. Hacettepe University, Ankara.Google Scholar
Tunçbilek, E. & Koç, İ. (1994) Consanguineous marriage in Turkey and its impact on fertility and mortality. Annals of Human Genetics 58, 321–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulusoy, M. & Tunçbilek, E. (1987) Türkiye’de Akraba Evlilikleri ve Çocuk Ölümlerine Etkisi [Consanguineous marriage and its impact on child mortality in Turkey]. Nüfusbilim Dergisi 9, 7–26.Google Scholar
UNDP (2010) Human Development Report 2010: The Real Wealth of Nations Pathways to Human Development. UNDP, New York.Google Scholar
UNICEF (2009) The State of the World’s Children 2009: Maternal and Newborn Health. UNICEF, New York.Google Scholar
United Nations (2009) The Millennium Development Goals Report 2009. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Weinreb, A. A. (2008) Characteristics of women in consanguineous marriages in Egypt, 1988–2000. European Journal of Population 24(2), 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (2006) Medical Genetic Services in Developing Countries: The Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Genetic Testing and Screening. WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar
World Bank (2010) World Development Report, 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. The World Bank, Washington.Google Scholar
World Bank (2013) World Development Report, 2012. The World Bank, Washington. ISBN: 978-0-8213-8985-0.Google Scholar
Yüksel, İ. & Koç, İ. (2010) Türkiye’de Bebek Ölüm Hızı Halen Bir Bilmece mi? [Is infant mortality rate still a puzzle in Turkey?]. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi 53, 78–97.Google Scholar