Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T11:48:29.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A proposal for an updated and revised stratigraphical framework of the Miocene in the Achterhoek (eastern Netherlands)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2024

Dirk K. Munsterman*
Affiliation:
TNO - Geological Survey of the Netherlands, Subsurface Modelling, Utrecht, Netherlands
Maarten Van den Bosch
Affiliation:
Geologisch Veldlaboratorium Winterswijk, Winterswijk, Netherlands
Frank P. Wesselingh
Affiliation:
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Marian Helwerda
Affiliation:
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands
Freek S. Busschers
Affiliation:
TNO - Geological Survey of the Netherlands, Subsurface Modelling, Utrecht, Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: Dirk K. Munsterman; Email: dirk.munsterman@tno.nl

Abstract

The comprehensive overview of Neogene lithostratigraphy in the eastern Netherlands dates back to the mid-1970s. In the present study, continuous gamma-ray logs and in situ sediment core samples from six boreholes in the area allowed palynological and mollusc analyses and wireline log-based correlation. These investigations were aimed at updating and revising the existing Neogene lithostratigraphy within the Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands by integrating litho-, bio-, and sequence-stratigraphic approaches. The analytical results yielded the establishment of new holo- and lectostratotype sections, together with cross-border interregional correlation. The lithostratigraphic revision resulted in the modified definition of the Aalten, Eibergen and Delden members and the definition of two new proposed members: the Dale and Doetinchem members. The Ticheloven bed, removed in earlier studies, is proposed to be reinstated, and the Stemerdink Bed is upgraded in its hierarchical status to the Stemerdink member. All lithostratigraphic units are included in the present Miocene subdivision of the Groote Heide and Diessen formations, which include three recognisable unconformities: the Early-Miocene Unconformity (EMU), Mid-Miocene Unconformity (MMU) and Late-Miocene Unconformity (LMU). The new, revised, reintroduced and existing local lithostratigraphic units and sequences are discussed with their counterparts in the south and southeast of the Netherlands, in Germany and Belgium, and from this a regionally consistent framework has emerged of the regional Neogene lithostratigraphy.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Netherlands Journal of Geosciences Foundation
Figure 0

Table 1. Holostratotype sections of Miocene members in the Achterhoek (Van den Bosch et al., 1975).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Location map of the eastern part of the Netherlands showing the E-W transect from Winterswijk to Didam including all boreholes and logs (www.dinoloket.nl). The transect is plotted on the Miocene base (DGM v2.2; TNO-GDN, 2023) with the transition from red to blue colors representing increase in depth. Fault lines are indicated in grey (DGM v2.2; TNO-GDN, 2023; supplemented with one fault line of Van den Bos & Brouwer, 2009 south of borehole B41E0258).

Figure 2

Figure 2. The main structural elements in the eastern part of the Netherlands (after Geluk, 1998).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Palaeogeographic map of the mid-Miocene (after Gibbard & Lewin, 2016).

Figure 4

Table 2. Borehole meta-data information.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Dinoflagellate cyst zonation sensu Munsterman and Deckers (2020).

Figure 6

Figure 5. E-W orientated lithostratigraphic cross-section using 21 boreholes (see Figure 1 for position of the boreholes), including gamma-ray logs and molluscan zones, if available (see Table 3 for lithostratigraphic unit codes). Correlation lines follow the litho-logs (correlatable horizons with the gamma-ray log are linked by dotted lines to the right). For explanation of the colours of the columns showing the mollusc zones, located left of selected litho-logs (Aalten Member and base Stemerdink member), see legend in Figure 13.

Figure 7

Table 3. New (this study) and old (Van den Bosch et al., 1975) lithostratigraphic synthesis of the Miocene Achterhoek (*proposed).

Figure 8

Figure 6. Lithological and lithostratigraphical overview of the temporary Miste-03 outcrop.

Figure 9

Table 4. Overview palynological results including age assessment of the outcrop Miste-03.

Figure 10

Figure 7. Palynological interpretation and distribution chart of the Miste-03 outcrop.

Figure 11

Figure 8. Palynological interpretation and distribution chart of the Barlo borehole (B41B0135).

Figure 12

Table 5. Summary of the palynological results regarding age assessment of the Barlo borehole (B41B0135).

Figure 13

Figure 9. Lithological section of the De Haart borehole (B41G0024).

Figure 14

Figure 10. Lithological section of the Gaanderen borehole (B40F1874).

Figure 15

Table 6. Overview palynological results regarding age assessment borehole De Haart (B41G0024).

Figure 16

Figure 11. Palynological interpretation of the De Haart borehole. The high peak values in the gamma-ray log at 37.7 m depth are associated with phosphorites.

Figure 17

Figure 12. Palynological distribution chart of the De Haart borehole.

Figure 18

Table 7. Molluscan abundances provided for the De Haart/Langeler borehole (this work) and boreholes Miste, De Vlijt and Stemerdink. L = borehole De Haart/Langeler 41G.1-94, S = Stemerdink borehole 41E.4-387 (De Vogel, 1971), M = Miste borehole 41E.3-75 (De Vogel, 1971), DV = De Vlijt borehole 41D.2-7 (De Vogel, 1971). *This taxon contains likely additional taxa of ribbed Dentalium species (J. van der Voort, personal communication).

Figure 19

Figure 13. Correlation of molluscan zones from 4 successions in the Groote Heide Formation, Aalten and Stemerdink members. De Vlijt: the farm “De Vlijt”, De Haart, Aalten. Note the “De Vlijt”quarry. Stemerdink is located in Brinkheurne, Winterswijk.

Figure 20

Table 8. New holo- and lectostratotype sections for the members of the Diessen Formation.

Figure 21

Table 9. Overview age assessment of the Gaanderen borehole (B40F1874), based on palynology.

Figure 22

Figure 14. Palynological interpretation of the Gaanderen borehole.

Figure 23

Figure 15. Palynological distribution chart of the Gaanderen borehole.

Figure 24

Figure 16. Panel showing the correlation of the Groote Heide Formation in the De Haart borehole and the Groote Heide type section borehole.

Figure 25

Figure 17. Panel showing the correlation of the Diessen Formation in the Gaanderen borehole and the Goirle type section borehole.

Figure 26

Figure 18. Schematic cross-section of the Oligocene-Pliocene lithostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy from the south-eastern part (Germany; basin margin) to the northern part (the Netherlands; basin centre) of the RVG, and the Achterhoek and Antwerp area (s.l. Campine & City; basin margin). The lithostratigraphy is modified after Deckers & Louwye (2019), Van Adrichem Boogaert and Kouwe (1993–1997) and Munsterman et al. (2019). The Antwerp (City and Campine) area is adjusted after Vandenberghe & Louwye (2020) and Everaert et al. (2020).