Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T18:07:29.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Opportunities and challenges of metamaterial-based wireless power transfer for electric vehicles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2017

Zhen Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China. Phone: +86 22-27402293
Bowen Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China. Phone: +86 22-27402293
Bin Deng
Affiliation:
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China. Phone: +86 22-27402293
Xile Wei
Affiliation:
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China. Phone: +86 22-27402293
Jiang Wang
Affiliation:
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China. Phone: +86 22-27402293
*
Corresponding author: B. Zhang Email: zhangbowen7@cumt.edu.cn

Abstract

This paper reviews previous studies on metamaterials and its application to wireless power transfer (WPT) technologies, as well as discussing about development opportunities and technical challenges for the contactless charging of electric vehicles (EVs). The EV establishes a bridge between sustainable energies and our daily transportation, especially the park-and-charge and move-and-charge for EVs have attracted increasing attentions from the academia and the industry. However, the metamaterials-based WPT has been nearly unexplored specifically for EVs by now. Accordingly, this paper gives an overview for the metamaterial-based WPT technologies, with emphasizes on enhancing efficiency, increasing distance, improving misalignment tolerance, and compacting size. From the perspective of EV wireless charging, this paper discusses about the breakthrough to current WPT technique bottlenecks and prospective EV charging scenarios by utilizing the left-handed material. Meanwhile, the technical issues to be addressed are also summarized in this paper, which aims to arouse emerging research topics for the future development of EV wireless charging systems.

Information

Type
Special Issue on Contactless Charging for Electric Vehicles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Classification of materials with respect to ε and μ.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Schematics of DPS (x ≤ 0) and DNG (x ≥ 0) slabs.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Single unit cell.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Proposed open-ended coaxial line probe.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Proposed metamaterial slab. (a) Unit cell; (b) multiple-cell topology.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Exemplified WPT prototype (a) with one metamaterial slab; (b) with two metamaterial slabs.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Classification of previous studies on metamaterial-based WPT technologies.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Schematics of proposed HMS. (a) Structure; (b) magnetic boundary conditions of negative-permeability metamaterials; (c) magnetic boundary condition of zero-permeability metamaterials.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Impact of proposed HMS on magnetic distribution for WPT systems.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Two-dimensional metamaterial slab [13].

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Experimental WPT prototype. (a) Using no metamaterial slab; (b) using 3D metamaterial slab; (c) using planar double-side metamaterial slab [23].

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Geometry of metamaterial slab [24].

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Exemplified 15-W WPT prototype. (a) No metamaterial slab, (b) using single metamaterial slab; (c) with two metamaterial slabs, (d) using 2D metamaterial slab; (e) using 3D metamaterial slab [25].

Figure 13

Fig. 14. Three-dimensional metamaterial slab. (a) Experimental prototype; (b) schematic representation of proposed CLSRR.

Figure 14

Fig. 15. Exemplified WPT setup. (a) no metamaterials; (b) using metamaterials.

Figure 15

Fig. 16. Measured energy efficiency with respect to transmission distance.

Figure 16

Fig. 17. Schematic of metamaterial-based WPT system with misaligned receiving coil.

Figure 17

Fig. 18. Distribution of H-field. (a) Lateral misalignment of Δ = 30 cm; (b) angular misalignment of θ = 45° [28].

Figure 18

Fig. 19. Schematic representation of WPT systems; (a) coil-to-coil; (b) array-to-coil.

Figure 19

Fig. 20. Diagram of efficiency [29].

Figure 20

Fig. 21. (a) WPT via magnetic resonant coupling; (b) WPT system with PMC reflectors.