Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T01:16:50.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mineralogical characteristics of cherts during and after heat treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2025

María de Uribe Zorita
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Enrique Moles Institute, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
Pedro Álvarez-Lloret
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Enrique Moles Institute, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
Beatriz Ramajo
Affiliation:
Scientific-Technical Services, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
Celia Marcos*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Enrique Moles Institute, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Celia Marcos; Email: cmarcos@uniovi.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eleven chert samples from various geographical and geological locations and ages were heat treated, with two of the samples also undergoing in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) during heat treatment. Characterisation was performed using X-ray fluorescence (XRF), XRD and Raman spectroscopy. The results indicated that the presence of moganite in cherts is independent of whether they are quartzitic or cristobalitic/tridymitic. After heating, cherts cannot be differentiated into these two types using XRD, as all the samples might contain quartz, cristobalite and tridymite. Heat treatment induced transformations in both siliceous and non-siliceous phases, forming new crystalline phases. The observed transformations at 1000°C agree with the literature data. The combination of XRD and Raman spectroscopy is crucial for comprehensive chert analysis, with Raman methods detecting lower concentrations and textural variations than XRD. A correlation exists between chert type (quartzitic or cristobalitic/tridymitic), i.e. mineralogy and age, but not between elemental composition and age. In situ XRD during heating shows distinct crystalline transformations. These transformations can affect significantly the properties of the cherts and has implications for conservation and provenance studies of archaeological tools. The analytical tools used to characterise the mineralogy of cherts are a fast and efficient alternative to conventional petrographic microscopy, especially in the case of heat-treated cherts.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Figure 0

Table 1. Summary of the provenance, geological period and geological context of the 11 cherts investigated

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Al2O3–Fe2O3–MnO (wt.%) diagram showing the composition of the cherts; and (b) plot of SiO2 vs. total iron as Fe2O3. The composition of pelagic clay is from Turekian and Wedepohl (1961); the compositions of the basalt and the hydrothermal end-member were taken from Adachi et al. (1986).

Figure 2

Figure 2. XRD patterns: (a) quartzitic cherts in which the majority of the reflections correspond to quartz (Qz) and moganite (Mog), except those marked with * which correspond to dolomite (Dol) and ** which belong to albite (Ab); (b) tridymitic/cristobalitic cherts showing the reflections corresponding to the phases quartz, tridymite (Trd), cristobalite (Crs), gorceixite (Gor), sepiolite (Sep) and phyllosilicates (muscovite: Ms). Mineral abbreviations were taken from Whitney and Evans (2010).

Figure 3

Figure 3. XRD patterns of heat-treated cherts showing reflections corresponding to the phases that make up the cherts: quartz (Qz), tridymite (Trd), cristobalite (Crs), moganite (Mog) and cristobalite–tridymite (*), quartz–tridymite–cristobalite (**), tridymite and wollastonite (Wo) (***). Mineral abbreviations were taken from Whitney and Evans (2010).

Figure 4

Figure 4. In situ XRD patterns of the heated Cerro Almodóvar B sample (a) and the La Marañosa BE sample (b). Mineral abbreviations – quartz (Qz), tridymite (Trd), cristobalite (Crs), moganite (Mog), sepiolite (Sep) and enstatite (En) (from Whitney and Evans, 2010).

Figure 5

Table 2. 2θ and FWHM values and values for quartz reflection (101) and cristobalite reflection (111) for the Cerro Almodóvar B sample

Figure 6

Table 3. 2θ values and FWHM values for the quartz (101) reflection and the cristobalite (111) reflection for the La Marañosa BE sample

Figure 7

Figure 5. Two-dimensional representation with false colour of the in situ thermal XRD patterns of the Cerro Almodóvar B sample.

Figure 8

Figure 6. Two-dimensional representation with false colour of the in situ thermal XRD patterns of the La Marañosa BE sample.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Raman spectra of starting (black) and post-heat treatment (red) samples between 420 and 520 cm–1 showing the bands corresponding to moganite (∼500 cm–1) and quartz (∼463 cm–1) for: (a) quartzitic cherts and (b) tridymitic/cristobalitic cherts.

Supplementary material: File

de Uribe Zorita et al. supplementary material

de Uribe Zorita et al. supplementary material
Download de Uribe Zorita et al. supplementary material(File)
File 380.2 KB