Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g4pgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-13T12:33:05.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Table of Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2025

Alezini Loxa
Affiliation:
Lunds Universitet, Sweden

Information

Table of Cases

  • Judgment of 5 February 1963, Van Gend & Loos v Administratie der Belastingen, 26/62, ECLI:EU:C:1963:1

  • Judgment of 19 March 1964, (Hoekstra) Unger v Bedrijfsvereniging voor Detailhandel en Ambachten, 75/63, ECLI:EU:C:1964:19

  • Judgment of 9 June 1964, Nonnenmacher v Sociale Verzekeringsbank, 92/63, ECLI:EU:C:1964:40

  • Judgment of 15 July 1964, Van der Veen v Sociale Verzekeringsbank, 100/63, ECLI:EU:C:1964:65

  • Judgment of 2 December 1964, Dingemans v Sociale Verzekeringsbank, 24/64, ECLI:EU:C:1964:86

  • Judgment of 11 March 1965, Betriebskrankenkasse der Heseper Torfwerke v Van Dijk, 33/64, ECLI:EU:C:1965:19

  • Judgment of 11 March 1965, Sociale Voorzorg v Bertholet, 31/64, ECLI:EU:C:1965:18

  • Judgment of 1 December 1965, Dekker v Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte, 33/65, ECLI:EU:C:1965:118

  • Judgment of 9 December 1965, Hessische Knappschaft v Singer et Fils, 44/65, ECLI:EU:C:1965:122

  • Judgment of 30 June 1966, Vaassen-Goebbels v Beambtenfonds voor het Mijnbedrijf, 61/65, ECLI:EU:C:1966:39

  • Judgment of 13 July 1966, Hagenbeek v Raad van Arbeid, 4/66, ECLI:EU:C:1966:4

  • Judgment of 5 July 1967, Ciechelsky v Caisse regionale de sécurité sociale du Centre, 1/67, ECLI:EU:C:1967:27

  • Judgment of 5 July 1967, Colditz v Caisse d’assurance vieillesse des travailleurs salariés, 9/67, ECLI:EU:C:1967:30

  • Judgment of 5 July 1967, De Moor v Caisse de pension des employés privés, 2/67, ECLI:EU:C:1967:28

  • Judgment of 5 July 1967, Guerra v INAMI, 6/67, ECLI:EU:C:1967:29

  • Judgment of 30 November 1967, Caisse regionale de sécurité sociale du Nord v Goffart, 22/67, ECLI:EU:C:1967:47

  • Judgment of 30 November 1967, Cossutta v Office national des pensions pour ouvriers, 18/67, ECLI:EU:C:1967:46

  • Judgment of 5 December 1967, Landesversicherungsanstalt Rheinland-Pfalz v Welchner, 14/67, ECLI:EU:C:1967:48

  • Judgment of 5 December 1967, Soziale Verzekeringsbank v Van Der Vecht, 19/67, ECLI:EU:C:1967:49

  • Judgment of 12 December 1967, Office national des pensions pour ouvriers v Couture, 11/67, ECLI:EU:C:1967:52

  • Judgment of 19 December 1968, De Cicco v Landesversicherungsanstalt Schwaben, 19/68, ECLI:EU:C:1968:56

  • Judgment of 7 May 1969, Caisse regionale de sécurité sociale du Nord v Torrekens, 28/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:17

  • Judgment of 15 October 1969, Württembergische Milchverwertung Südmilch AG v Ugliola, 15/69, ECLI:EU:C:1969:46

  • Judgment of 13 December 1972, Marsman v Rosskamp, 44/72, ECLI:EU:C:1972:120

  • Judgment of 11 April 1973, Michel S. v Fonds national de reclassement social des handicapés, 76/72, ECLI:EU:C:1973:46

  • Judgment of 3 July 1974, Casagrande v Landeshauptstadt München, 9/74, ECLI:EU:C:1974:74

  • Judgment of 29 January 1975, Alaimo v Préfet du Rhône, 68/74, ECLI:EU:C:1975:11

  • Judgment of 17 June 1975, Mr and Mrs F. v Belgian State, 7/75, ECLI:EU:C:1975:80

  • Judgment of 30 September 1975, Cristini v S.N.C.F., 32/75, ECLI:EU:C:1975:120

  • Judgment of 23 November 1976, Kermaschek v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, 40/76, ECLI:EU:C:1976:157.

  • Judgment of 16 December 1976, Inzirillo v Caisse allocations familiales Lyon, 63/76, ECLI:EU:C:1976:192

  • Judgment of 31 May 1979, Ministère public v Even, 207/78, ECLI:EU:C:1979:144

  • Judgment of 14 January 1982, Reina v Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg, 65/81, ECLI:EU:C:1982:6

  • Judgment of 9 February 1982, Polydor and others / Harlequin and others, 270/80, ECLI:EU:C:1982:43

  • Judgment of 26 October 1982, Hauptzollamt Mainz / Kupferberg & Cie., 104/81, ECLI:EU:C:1982:362

  • Judgment of 23 March 1983, Peskeloglou v Bundesanstalt Für Arbeit, 77/82, ECLI:EU:C:1983:92

  • Judgment of 13 July 1983, Forcheri v Belgian State, 152/82, ECLI:EU:C:1983:205

  • Judgment of 12 July 1984, Castelli v ONTPS, 261/83, ECLI:EU:C:1984:280

  • Judgment of 13 February 1985, Diatta v Land Berlin, 267/83, ECLI:EU:C:1985:67

  • Judgment of 13 February 1985, Gravier v Ville de Liège, 293/83, ECLI:EU:C:1985:69

  • Judgment of 27 March 1985, Hoeckx v Openbaar Centrum voor Maatschappelijk Welzijn Kalmthout, 249/83, ECLI:EU:C:1985:139

  • Judgment of 6 June 1985, Frascogna v Caisse des dépôts et consignations, 157/84, ECLI:EU:C:1985:243

  • Judgment of 20 June 1985, ONEM v Deak, 94/84, ECLI:EU:C:1985:264

  • Judgment of 11 July 1985, Ministère public v Mutsch, 137/84, ECLI:EU:C:1985:335

  • Judgment of 17 April 1986, Netherlands v Reed, 59/85, ECLI:EU:C:1986:157

  • Judgment of 7 May 1986, Gül v Regierungspräsident Düsseldorf, 131/85, ECLI:EU:C:1986:200

  • Judgment of 18 June 1987, CPAS de Courcelles v Lebon, 316/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:302

  • Judgment of the Court of 9 July 1987, Federal Republic of Germany and others v Commission of the European Communities, Joined cases 281, 283, 284, 285, and 287/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:351

  • Judgment of 30 September 1987, Demirel / Stadt Schwäbisch Gmünd, 12/86, ECLI:EU:C:1987:400

  • Judgment of 2 February 1988, Barra v Belgian State, 309/85, ECLI:EU:C:1988:42

  • Judgment of 2 February 1988, Blaizot v Université de Liège and others, 24/86, ECLI:EU:C:1988:43

  • Judgment of 21 June 1988, Brown / Secretary of State for Scotland, 197/86, ECLI:EU:C:1988:323

  • Judgment of 21 June 1988, Lair v Universität Hannover, 39/86, ECLI:EU:C:1988:322

  • Judgment of 27 September 1988, Belgian State v Humbel and Edel, 263/86, ECLI:EU:C:1988:451

  • Judgment of 27 September 1988, Matteucci v Communauté française de Belgique, 235/87, ECLI:EU:C:1988:460

  • Judgment of 15 March 1989, Echternach and others / Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen, 389/87 and 390/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:130

  • Judgment of 31 May 1989, Bettray v Staatssecretaris van Justitie, 344/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:226

  • Judgment of 27 September 1989, Lopes da Veiga v Staatssecretaris van Justitie, 9/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:346

  • Judgment of 27 March 1990, Rush Portuguesa v Office national d’immigration, C-113/89, ECLI:EU:C:1990:142

  • Judgment of 20 September 1990, Sevince / Staatssecretaris van Justitie, C-192/89, ECLI:EU:C:1990:322

  • Judgment of 13 November 1990, Di Leo v Land Berlin, C-308/89, ECLI:EU:C:1990:400

  • Judgment of 31 January 1991, Office national de l’emploi / Kziber, C-18/90, ECLI:EU:C:1991:36

  • Judgment of 26 February 1992, Raulin v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen, C-357/89, ECLI:EU:C:1992:87

  • Judgment of 7 July 1992, The Queen / Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Surinder Singh, ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department, C-370/90, ECLI:EU:C:1992:296

  • Judgment of the Court of 7 July 1992, European Parliament v Council of the European Communities, C-250/90, ECLI:EU:C:1992:294

  • Judgment of 8 July 1992, Belgian State v Taghavi, C-243/91, ECLI:EU:C:1992:306

  • Judgment of 16 December 1992, Kus / Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden, C-237/91, ECLI:EU:C:1992:527

  • Judgment of 26 May 1993, Tsiotras / Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, C-171/91, ECLI:EU:C:1993:215

  • Judgment of 20 April 1994, Yousfi / Belgian State, C-58/93, ECLI:EU:C:1994:160

  • Judgment of 5 October 1994, Eroglu/Land Baden-Württemberg, C-355/93, ECLI:EU:C:1994:369

  • Judgment of 5 April 1995, Krid / Caisse nationale d’assurance vieillesse des travailleurs salaries, C-103/94, ECLI:EU:C:1995:97

  • Judgment of 10 September 1996, Taflan-Met and others, C-277/94, ECLI:EU:C:1996:315

  • Judgment of 3 October 1996, Hallouzi-Choho / Bestuur van de Sociale Verzekeringsbank, C-126/95, ECLI:EU:C:1996:368

  • Judgment of 23 January 1997, Tetik / Land Berlin, C-171/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:31

  • Judgment of 17 April 1997, Kadiman / Freistaat Bayern, C-351/95 ECLI:EU:C:1997:205

  • Judgment of 5 June 1997, Kol / Land Berlin, C-285/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:280

  • Judgment of 30 September 1997, Ertanir / Land Hessen, C-98/96, ECLI:EU:C:1997:446

  • Judgment of 30 September 1997, Günaydin and others / Freistaat Bayern, C-36/96, ECLI:EU:C:1997:445

  • Judgment of 15 January 1998, Babahenini / Belgian State, C-113/97, ECLI:EU:C:1998:13

  • Judgment of 12 May 1998, Martínez Sala / Freistaat Bayern, C-85/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:217

  • Judgment of 19 November 1998, Akman / Oberkreisdirektor des Rheinisch-Bergischen-Kreises, C-210/97, ECLI:EU:C:1998:555

  • Judgment of 26 November 1998, Birden / Stadtgemeinde Bremen, C-1/97, ECLI:EU:C:1998:568

  • Judgment of 2 March 1999, Eddline El-Yassini, C-416/96, ECLI:EU:C:1999:107

  • Judgment of 4 May 1999, Sürül, C-262/96, ECLI:EU:C:1999:228

  • Judgment of 11 November 1999, Belgian State / Mesbah, C-179/98, ECLI:EU:C:1999:549

  • Judgment of 16 March 2000, Ergat, C-329/97, ECLI:EU:C:2000:133

  • Judgment of 11 May 2000, Savas, C-37/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:224

  • Judgment of 22 June 2000, Eyüp, C-65/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:336

  • Judgment of 20 March 2001, Fahmi and Esmoris Cerdeiro-Pinedo Amado, C-33/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:176

  • Judgment of 20 September 2001, Grzelczyk, C-184/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:458

  • Judgment of 29 January 2002, Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer, C-162/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:57

  • Judgment of 11 July 2002, Carpenter, C-60/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:434

  • Judgment of 11 July 2002, D’Hoop, C-224/98, ECLI:EU:C:2002:432

  • Judgment of 25 July 2002, MRAX, C-459/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:461

  • Judgments of 17 September 2002, Baumbast and R, C‑413/99, EU:C:2002:493

  • Judgment of 19 November 2002, Kurz, C-188/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:694

  • Order of 12 February 2003, Alami, C-23/02, ECLI:EU:C:2003:89

  • Judgment of 8 May 2003, Deutscher Handballbund, C-438/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:255

  • Judgment of 23 September 2003, Akrich, C-109/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:491

  • Judgment of 2 October 2003, Garcia Avello, C-148/02, ECLI:EU:C:2003:539

  • Judgment of 21 October 2003, Abatay and others, C-317/01 and C-369/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:572

  • Judgment of 23 March 2004, Collins, C-138/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:172

  • Judgment of 7 September 2004, Trojani, C-456/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:488

  • Judgment of 30 September 2004, Ayaz, C-275/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:570

  • Judgment of 19 October 2004, Zhu and Chen, C-200/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:639

  • Judgment of 11 November 2004, Cetinkaya, C-467/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:708

  • Judgment of 15 March 2005, Bidar, C-209/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:169

  • Judgment of 12 April 2005, Simutenkov, C-265/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:213

  • Judgment of 7 July 2005, Aydinli, C-373/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:434

  • Judgment of 7 July 2005, Gürol, C-374/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:435

  • Judgment of 7 July 2005, Dogan, C-383/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:436

  • Order of 13 June 2006, Echouikh, C-336/05, ECLI:EU:C:2006:394

  • Judgment of 27 June 2006, Parliament/Council, C-540/03, ECLI:EU:C:2006:429

  • Judgment of 14 December 2006, Gattoussi, C-97/05, ECLI:EU:C:2006:780

  • Order of 17 April 2007, El Youssfi, C-276/06, ECLI:EU:C:2007:215

  • Judgment of 18 July 2007, Derin, C-325/05, ECLI:EU:C:2007:442

  • Judgment of 11 December 2007, Eind, C-291/05, ECLI:EU:C:2007:771

  • Judgment of 24 January 2008, Payir and others, C-294/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:36

  • Judgment of 25 July 2008, Metock and others, C-127/08, ECLI:EU:C:2008:449

  • Judgment of 25 September 2008, Er, C-453/07, ECLI:EU:C:2008:524

  • Judgment of 19 February 2009, Soysal and Savatli, C-228/06, ECLI:EU:C:2009:101

  • Judgment of 4 June 2009, Vatsouras and Koupatantze, C-22/08 and C-23/08, ECLI:EU:C:2009:344

  • Judgment of 17 September 2009, Sahin, C-242/06, ECR 2009, ECLI:EU:C:2009:554

  • Judgment of 21 January 2010, Bekleyen, C-462/08, ECLI:EU:C:2010:30

  • Judgment of 4 February 2010, Genc, C-14/09, ECLI:EU:C:2010:57

  • Judgment of 23 February 2010, Ibrahim and Secretary of State for the Home Department, C‑310/08, EU:C:2010:80

  • Judgment of 23 February 2010, Teixeira, C‑480/08, EU:C:2010:83

  • Judgment of 4 March 2010, Chakroun, C-578/08, ECLI:EU:C:2010:117

  • Judgment of 29 April 2010, Commission / Netherlands, C-92/07, ECLI:EU:C:2010:228

  • Judgment of 18 November 2010, Xhymshiti, C-247/09, ECLI:EU:C:2010:698

  • Judgment of 9 December 2010, Toprak and Oguz, C-300/09 and C-301/09, ECLI:EU:C:2010:756

  • Judgment of 22 December 2010, Bozkurt, C-303/08, ECLI:EU:C:2010:800

  • Judgment of 8 March 2011, Ruiz Zambrano, C-34/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:124

  • Judgment of 5 May 2011, McCarthy, C-434/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:277

  • Judgment of 26 May 2011, Akdas and others, C-485/07, ECLI:EU:C:2011:346, paras 80–82.

  • Judgment of 16 June 2011, Pehlivan, C-484/07, ECLI:EU:C:2011:395 54

  • Judgment of 29 September 2011, Unal, C-187/10, ECLI:EU:C:2011:623

  • Judgment of 15 November 2011, Dereci and others, C-256/11, ECLI:EU:C:2011:734s

  • Judgment of 8 December 2011, Ziebell, C-371/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:809

  • Judgment of 21 December 2011, Ziolkowski and Szeja, C-424/10 and C-425/10, ECLI:EU:C:2011:866

  • Judgment of 29 March 2012, Kahveci and Inan, C-7/10 and C-9/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:180

  • Judgment of 24 April 2012, Kamberaj, C-571/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:233

  • Judgment of 26 April 2012, Commission / Netherlands, C-508/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:243

  • Judgment of 19 July 2012, Dülger, C-451/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:504 62

  • Judgment of 18 October 2012, Singh, C-502/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:636

  • Judgment of 8 November 2012, Gülbahce, C-268/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:695

  • Judgment of 6 December 2012, O. and S., C-356/11 and C-357/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:776

  • Judgment of 8 May 2013, Ymeraga and Ymeraga-Tafarshiku, C-87/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:291

  • Judgment of 19 September 2013, Brey, C-140/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:565

  • Judgment of 19 September 2013, Hliddal and Bornand, C-216/12 and C-217/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:568

  • Judgment of 24 September 2013, Demirkan, C-221/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:583

  • Judgment of 26 September 2013, United Kingdom / Council, C-431/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:589

  • Judgment of 10 October 2013, Alokpa and Moudoulou, C-86/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:645

  • Judgment of 7 November 2013, Demir, C-225/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:725

  • Judgment of 27 February 2014, United Kingdom / Council, C-656/11, ECLI:EU:C:2014:97

  • Judgment of 12 March 2014, O., C-456/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:135

  • Judgment of 12 March 2014, S. and G., C-457/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:136

  • Judgment of 19 June 2014, Saint Prix, C-507/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2007

  • Judgment of 10 July 2014, Dogan, C-138/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2066

  • Judgment of 10 September 2014, Ben Alaya, C-491/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2187

  • Judgment of 5 November 2014, Tümer, C-311/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2337

  • Judgment of 11 November 2014, Dano, C-333/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2358

  • Judgment of 18 December 2014, United Kingdom / Council, C-81/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2449

  • Judgment of 14 January 2015, Demirci and others, C-171/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:8

  • Judgment of 4 June 2015, P and S, C-579/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:369

  • Judgment of 9 July 2015, K and A, C-153/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:453

  • Judgment of 3 September 2015, CGIL and INCA, C-309/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:523

  • Judgment of 15 September 2015, Alimanovic, C-67/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:597

  • Judgment of 19 November 2015, Bukovansky, C-241/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:766

  • Judgment of 25 February 2016, García-Nieto and others, C-299/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:114

  • Judgment of 12 April 2016, Genc, C-561/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:247

  • Judgment of 21 April 2016, Khachab, C-558/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:285

  • Judgment of 14 June 2016, Commission / United Kingdom, C-308/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:436

  • Judgment of 6 September 2016, Petruhhin, C-182/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:630

  • Judgment of 13 September 2016, Rendón Marín, C-165/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:675

  • Judgment of 13 September 2016, CS, C-304/14 ECLI:EU:C:2016:674

  • Judgment of 21 September 2016, Radgen, C-478/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:705

  • Judgment of 21 December 2016, Ucar, C-508/15 and C-509/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:986 75

  • Judgment of 29 March 2017, Tekdemir, C-652/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:239

  • Judgment of 4 April 2017, Fahimian, C-544/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:255

  • Judgment of 10 May 2017, Chavez-Vilchez and others, C-133/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:354

  • Judgment of 21 June 2017, Martinez Silva, C-449/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:485

  • Judgment of 20 December 2017, Gusa, C-442/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:1004

  • Judgment of 6 February 2018, Altun and others, C-359/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:63

  • Judgment of 8 May 2018, K.A. and Others, C 82/16, EU:C:2018:308

  • Judgment of 28 June 2018, Crespo Rey, C-2/17, ECLI:EU:C:2018:511

  • Judgment of 7 August 2018, Yön, C-123/17, ECLI:EU:C:2018:632

  • Judgment of 7 November 2018, C and A, C-257/17, ECLI:EU:C:2018:876

  • Judgment of 7 November 2018, K, C-484/17, ECLI:EU:C:2018:878

  • Judgment of 14 March 2019, Y.Z. and others, C-557/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019

  • Judgment of 15 May 2019, Çoban, C-677/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:408

  • Judgment of 19 September 2019, Dakneviciute, C-544/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:761

  • Judgment of 2 October 2019, Bajratari, C-93/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:809

  • Judgment of 3 October 2019, A and others, C-70/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:823

  • Judgment of 3 October 2019, X v Belgische Staat, C-302/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:830

  • Judgment of 20 November 2019, Belgische Staat, C-706/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:993

  • Order of 13 February 2020, Solak, C-258/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:98

  • Judgment of 27 February 2020, Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real v RH, Case C-836/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:119

  • Judgment of 2 April 2020, Ruska Federacija, C-897/19 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2020:262

  • Judgment of 16 July 2020, Belgian State, C-133/19, C-136/19, and C-137/19, ECLI:EU:C:2020:577

  • Judgment of 6 October 2020, Jobcenter Krefeld v JD, C-181/19, ECLI:EU:C:2020:794

  • Judgment of 25 November 2020, INPS, C-302/19, ECLI:EU:C:2020:957

  • Judgment of 25 November 2020, INPS, C-303/19 ECLI:EU:C:2020:958

  • Judgment of 10 June 2021, Land Oberösterreich, C-94/20, ECLI:EU:C:2021:477

  • Judgment of 2 September 2021, INPS, C-350/20, ECLI:EU:C:2021:659

  • Judgment of 2 September 2021, Udlændingenævnet, C-379/20, ECLI:EU:C:2021:660

  • Judgment of 2 September 2021, Belgian State, C-930/19, ECLI:EU:C:2021:657

  • Judgment of 28 October 2021, ASGI and others, C-462/20, ECLI:EU:C:2021:894

  • Judgment of 20 January 2022, Landeshauptmann von Wien, C-432/20, ECLI:EU:C:2022:39

  • Judgment of 7 September 2022, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, C-624/20, ECLI:EU:C:2022:639.

  • Judgment of 21 December 2023, Chief Appeals Officer and others, C-488/21, ECLI:EU:C:2023:1013

Opinions of Advocate Generals

  • Opinion of Advocate General Mancini delivered on 31 March 1987 in Federal Republic of Germany and others v Commission of the European Communities, Joined cases 281, 283, 284, 285, and 287/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:169

  • Opinion of Advocate General Van Gerven delivered on 6 December 1990 in Office national de l’emploi v Kziber, C-18/90, ECLI:EU:C:1990:447

  • Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs delivered on 9 December 1992 in Konstantinidis, C-168/91 ECLI:EU:C:1992:504

  • Opinion of Advocate General Elmer delivered on 28 March 1995 in Bozkurt / Staatssecretaris van Justitie, C-434/93, ECLI:EU:C:1995:86

  • Opinion of Advocate General Fennelly delivered on 28 May 1998 in Birden / Stadtgemeinde Bremen, C-1/97, ECLI:EU:C:1998:262

  • Opinion of Advocate General La Pergola delivered on 17 December 1998 in Sürül, C-262/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:55

  • Opinion of Advocate General Léger delivered on 19 May 1998 in El-Yassini, C-416/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:243

  • Opinion of Advocate General Léger delivered on 9 July 1998 in Akman, C-210/97, ECLI:EU:C:1998:344

  • Opinion of Advocate General La Pergola delivered on 18 November 1999 in Eyüp, C-65/98, ECLI:EU:C:1999:561

  • Opinion of Advocate General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered on 6 April 2006 in Gattoussi, C-97/05, ECLI:EU:C:2006:243

  • Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 19 January 2012 in Commission v Netherlands, C-508/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:25

  • Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 30 April 2014 in Dogan, C-138/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:287

  • Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 12 June 2014 in Ben Alaya, C-491/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:1933

  • Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 12 June 2014 in Tümer, C-311/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:1997

  • Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 10 July 2014 in Demirci and others, C-171/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2073

  • Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 4 June 2015 in García-Nieto and others, C-299/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:366

  • Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 28 January 2015 in P and S, C 579/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:39

  • Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 29 November 2016 in Fahimian, C-544/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:908

  • Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 27 June 2018 in C and A, C-257/17, ECLI:EU:C:2018:503

  • Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 6 June 2019 in X v Belgische Staat, C-302/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:469

  • Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 19 June 2019 in Bajratari, C-93/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:512

  • Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 14 May 2020 in JD, C-181/19, ECLI:EU:C:2020:377

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Table of Cases
  • Alezini Loxa, Lunds Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: Sustainability and EU Migration Law
  • Online publication: 02 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009573122.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Table of Cases
  • Alezini Loxa, Lunds Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: Sustainability and EU Migration Law
  • Online publication: 02 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009573122.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Table of Cases
  • Alezini Loxa, Lunds Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: Sustainability and EU Migration Law
  • Online publication: 02 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009573122.001
Available formats
×