Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-n8gtw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T10:27:03.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of network analysis to identify interactive systems of eating disorder psychopathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2016

K. T. Forbush ,
C. S. Q. Siew  and
M. S. Vitevitch
K. T. Forbush*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
C. S. Q. Siew
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
M. S. Vitevitch
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: K. T. Forbush, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Fraser Hall, 1400 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA. (Email: kforbush@ku.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Traditional approaches for the classification of eating disorders (EDs) attribute symptoms to an underlying, latent disease entity. The network approach is an alternative model in which mental disorders are represented as networks of interacting, self-reinforcing symptoms. This project was the first to use network analysis to identify interconnected systems of ED symptoms.

Method

Adult participants (n = 143; 77.6% women) with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) ED were recruited from the community to take part in a larger ongoing longitudinal study. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID-I) was used to establish diagnoses. An undirected network of ED symptoms was created using items from the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) and the R package qgraph.

Results

Body checking emerged as the strongest and most important single symptom in the entire network by having the shortest average distance to other symptoms in the network, and by being the most frequent symptom on the path between any two other symptoms. Feeling the need to exercise every day and two symptoms assessing dietary restraint/restricting emerged as ‘key players’, such that their removal from the network resulted in maximal fracturing of the network into smaller components.

Conclusions

Although cognitive–behavioral therapy for EDs focuses on reducing body checking to promote recovery, our data indicate that amplified efforts to address body checking may produce stronger (and more enduring) effects. Finally, results of the ‘key players analysis’ suggested that targeting interventions at these key nodes might prevent or slow the cascade of symptoms through the ‘network’ of ED psychopathology.

Keywords

Body checkingdisordered eating symptomsDSMeating disordersnetwork analysis

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 46 , Issue 12 , September 2016 , pp. 2667 - 2677
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Advanced Analytics LLC (2010). AgreeStat for Excel (Mac). Advanced Analytics LLC: Gaithersburg, MD.Google Scholar
Agras, WS, Crow, SJ, Halmi, KA, Mitchell, JE, Wilson, GT, Kraemer, HC (2000). Outcome predictors for the cognitive behavior treatment of bulimia nervosa: data from a multisite study. American Journal of Psychiatry 157, 1302–1308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, KL, Byrne, SM, Oddy, WH, Crosby, RD (2013). DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 eating disorders in adolescents: prevalence, stability, and psychosocial correlates in a population-based sample of male and female adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 122, 720–732.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Berg, KC, Peterson, CB, Frazier, P, Crow, SJ (2012). Psychometric evaluation of the Eating Disorder Examination and Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Eating Disorders 45, 428–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blondel, VD, Guillaume, J-L, Lamboitte, R, Lefebvre, E (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 10, P10008.Google Scholar
Bohn, K, Doll, HA, Cooper, Z, O'Connor, M, Palmer, RL, Fairburn, CG (2008). The measurement of impairment due to eating disorder psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy 46, 1105–1110.Google Scholar
Borgatti, SP (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 27, 55–71.Google Scholar
Borgatti, SP (2006). Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 12, 21–34.Google Scholar
Borgatti, SP (2008). Keyplayer 1.44. Analytic Technologies: Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D, Cramer, AO (2013). Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 9, 91–121.Google Scholar
Bringmann, LF, Lemmens, LH, Huibers, MJ, Borsboom, D, Tuerlinckx, F (2015). Revealing the dynamic network structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychological Medicine 45, 747–757.Google Scholar
Brody, ML, Walsh, BT, Devlin, MJ (1994). Binge eating disorder: reliability and validity of a new diagnostic category. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62, 381–386.Google Scholar
Castellini, G, Lo Sauro, C, Mannucci, E, Ravaldi, C, Rotella, CM, Faravelli, C, Ricca, V (2011). Diagnostic crossover and outcome predictors in eating disorders according to DSM-IV and DSM-V proposed criteria: a 6-year follow-up study. Psychosomatic Medicine 73, 270–279.Google Scholar
Costantini, G, Epskamp, S, Borsboom, D, Perugini, M, Mõttus, R, Waldorp, LJ, Cramer, AO (2015). State of the aRt personality research: a tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality 54, 13–29.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, BN (2014). The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry 13, 28–35.Google Scholar
Eddy, KT, Dorer, DJ, Franko, DL, Tahilani, K, Thompson-Brenner, H, Herzog, DB (2008). Diagnostic crossover in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: implications for DSM-V. American Journal of Psychiatry 165, 245–250.Google Scholar
Epskamp, S, Cramer, AO, Waldorp, LJ, Schmittmann, VD, Borsboom, D (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software 48, 1–18.Google Scholar
Fairburn, CG (2008). Shape concern, shape checking, feeling fat, and mindsets. In Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders, pp. 96–123. The Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Fairburn, CG, Bohn, K (2005). Eating disorder NOS (EDNOS): an example of the troublesome “not otherwise specified” (NOS) category in DSM-IV. Behaviour Research and Therapy 43, 691–701.Google Scholar
Fairburn, CG, Cooper, Z, Shafran, R (2008). Enhanced cognitive behavior therapy for eating disorders (“CBT-E”): an overview. In Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders (ed. Fairburn, C. G.), pp. 23–34. Guilford Press: New York.Google ScholarPubMed
Fairweather-Schmidt, AK, Wade, TD (2014). DSM-5 eating disorders and other specified eating and feeding disorders: is there a meaningful differentiation? International Journal of Eating Disorders 47, 524–533.Google Scholar
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, JBW (2007 Revision). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition With Psychotic Screen (SCID-I/P W/PSY SCREEN). Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York.Google Scholar
Forbush, KT, Wildes, JE, Hunt, TK (2014). Gender norms, psychometric properties, and validity for the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory. International Journal of Eating Disorders 47, 85–91.Google Scholar
Forbush, KT, Wildes, JE, Pollack, LO, Dunbar, D, Luo, J, Patterson, K, Pollpeter, M, Stone, A, Bright, A, Watson, D (2013). Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI). Psychological Assessment 25, 859–878.Google Scholar
Furnham, A, Badmin, N, Sneade, I (2002). Body image dissatisfaction: gender differences in eating attitudes, self-esteem, and reasons for exercise. Journal of Psychology 136, 581–596.Google Scholar
Hovrud, L, De Young, KP (2015). Unique contributions of individual eating disorder symptoms to eating disorder-related impairment. Eating Behaviors 18, 103–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. IBM Corp: Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
Insel, TR (2014). The NIMH research domain criteria (RDoC) project: precision medicine for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry 171, 395–397.Google Scholar
Jansen, A, Voorwinde, V, Hoebink, Y, Rekkers, M, Martijn, C, Mulkens, S (2015). Mirror exposure to increase body satisfaction: should we guide the focus of attention towards positively or negatively evaluated body parts? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 50, 90–96.Google Scholar
Keel, PK, Brown, TA, Holland, LA, Bodell, LP (2012). Empirical classification of eating disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 8, 381–404.Google Scholar
Kindermann, R, Snell, JL (1980). Markov Random Fields and their Applications. American Mathematical Society Providence: Providence, RI.Google Scholar
Latner, JD, Mond, JM, Vallance, JK, Gleaves, DH, Buckett, G (2012). Body checking and avoidance in women: associations with mental and physical health-related quality of life. Eating Behaviors 13, 386–389.Google Scholar
Lavender, JM, De Young, KP, Wonderlich, SA, Crosby, RD, Engel, SG, Mitchell, JE, Crow, SJ, Peterson, CB, Le Grange, D (2013). Daily patterns of anxiety in anorexia nervosa: associations with eating disorder behaviors in the natural environment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 122, 672–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNally, RJ, Robinaugh, DJ, Wu, GW, Wang, L, Deserno, MK, Borsboom, D (2015). Mental disorders as causal systems a network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychological Science 3, 836–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountford, V, Haase, AM, Waller, G (2007). Is body checking in the eating disorders more closely related to diagnosis or to symptom presentation? Behaviour Research and Therapy 45, 2704–2711.Google Scholar
Newman, ME (2006). Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Physical Review E 74, 036104.Google Scholar
Raykos, BC, Watson, HJ, Fursland, A, Byrne, SM, Nathan, P (2013). Prognostic value of rapid response to enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy in a routine clinic sample of eating disorder outpatients. International Journal of Eating Disorders 46, 764–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reas, DL, Whisenhunt, BL, Netemeyer, R, Williamson, DA (2002). Development of the body checking questionnaire: a self-report measure of body checking behaviors. International Journal of Eating Disorders 31, 324–333.Google Scholar
Regier, DA, Kuhl, EA, Kupfer, DJ (2013). The DSM-5: classification and criteria changes. World Psychiatry 12, 92–98.Google Scholar
Scott, J (2012). Lines, neighbourhoods, and densities. In Social Network Analysis, pp. 63–82. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Shafran, R, Fairburn, CG, Robinson, P, Lask, B (2004). Body checking and its avoidance in eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders 35, 93–101.Google Scholar
Shafran, R, Lee, M, Payne, E, Fairburn, CG (2007). An experimental analysis of body checking. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45, 113–121.Google Scholar
Stice, E, Marti, CN, Rohde, P (2013). Prevalence, incidence, impairment, and course of the proposed DSM-5 eating disorder diagnoses in an 8-year prospective community study of young women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 122, 445–457.Google Scholar
Stice, E, Telch, CF, Rizvi, SL (2000). Development and validation of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale: a brief self-report measure of anorexia, bulimia, and binge-eating disorder. Psychological Assessment 12, 123–131.Google Scholar
Swanson, SA, Crow, SJ, Le Grange, D, Swendsen, J, Merikangas, KR (2011). Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. Archives of General Psychiatry 68, 714–723.Google Scholar
Tabri, N, Murray, H, Thomas, J, Franko, D, Herzog, D, Eddy, K (2015). Overvaluation of body shape/weight and engagement in non-compensatory weight-control behaviors in eating disorders: is there a reciprocal relationship? Psychological Medicine 45, 2951–2958.Google Scholar
Tang, X, Forbush, KT, Lui, PP (2015). Development and validation of the Chinese-Language Version of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (CEPSI). International Journal of Eating Disorders 48, 1016–1023.Google Scholar
Thelen, MH, Farmer, J, Wonderlich, S, Smith, M (1991). A revision of the Bulimia Test: The BULIT–R. Psychological Assessment 3, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiggemann, M, Martins, Y, Kirkbride, A (2007). Oh to be lean and muscular: body image ideals in gay and heterosexual men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity 8, 15–24.Google Scholar
Wildes, JE, Forbush, KT, Markon, KE (2013). Characteristics and stability of empirically derived anorexia nervosa subtypes: towards the identification of homogeneous low-weight eating disorder phenotypes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 122, 1031–1041.Google Scholar
Wildes, JE, Marcus, MD (2013). Alternative methods of classifying eating disorders: models incorporating comorbid psychopathology and associated features. Clinical Psychology Review 33, 383–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Forbush supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Forbush supplementary material(File)
File 157.7 KB