Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:15:43.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A five year follow up of incus transposition in relation to the first stage tympanoplasty technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

I. Donaldson*
Affiliation:
Birmingham
D. G. Snow
Affiliation:
Birmingham
*
Mr I. Donaldson, Dept. of Otolaryngology, Selly Oak Hospital, Raddlebarn Road, Selly Oak, Birmingham B29 6JD

Abstract

This study was set up, prospectively, to determine factors affecting the long-term hearing results of patients undergoing incus transposition as a second stage in ossicular reconstruction, following a successful drumhead repair in non-cholesteatoma ears. Seventy-one patients were entered into the study over five years from 1980–1985, 66 were available to be studied throughout the five year follow-up period.

Nine weeks post-operatively, 74 per cent of all patients has an air-bone gap of less than 15 dB (48/66). The type of first stage procedure had a significant effect on the hearing levels in the final five year assessment. The most successful sub-group were those patients who had a cortical mastoidectomy and silastic sheeting inserted in the first staging procedure. The air-bone gap, of less than 15 dB, was maintained in 71 per cent of this group (17/24). The sub-group who had a simple myringoplasty as the primary procedure had a good initial hearing level. By five years, however, only 30 per cent of the patients had maintained the air-bone gap of less than 30 dB (3/11).

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frootko, N. J. (1987) Reconstruction of the ear. In Scott-Brown's Otolaryngology, 5th ed. Vol. 3. The Ear. (Booth, J. B. & Kerr, A. G., eds.) Butterworth, London, p.238263.Google Scholar
Glasscock, M. E. (1976) Ossicular chain reconstruction. Laryngoscope, 86: 211221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hough, J. V. D. (1970) Tympanoplasty with inferior fascial graft technique and ossicular reconstruction. Laryngoscope, 80: 13851413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, W. E, Patterson, M. E., Linthicum, E. H. (1966) Incus homografts in chronic ear surgery. Archives of Otolaryngology, 84: 148153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mawson, S. R. (1979) Ossiculoplasty 1966 to 1978. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 93: 10751080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennington, C. L. (1973) Incus interposition technique. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 82: 518531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanna, M., Gamoletti, R., Scanderlarri, R., Delogu, P., Magnari, M., Zini, C. (1985) Autologous fitted incus versus plastipore PORP in ossicular chain reconstruction. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 99: 137141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, G. D. L. (1976) Tympanic reconstruction. Fifteen year report of tympanoplasty. Part 2. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 90: 713741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjellstrom, A., Albektsson, T. (1985) A five year follow up of preformed autologous ossicles in tympanoplasty. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 99: 724733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wehrs, R. E. (1974) The homograft notched incus in tympanoplasty. Archives of Otolaryngology, 100: 251–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed