Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T07:36:57.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fight and rescue or give up and flee? Behavioural responses of different ant species tending the mutualist walnut aphid Panaphis juglandis to native and exotic lady beetles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2023

Enrico Schifani Open the ORCID record for Enrico Schifani [Opens in a new window] ,
Daniele Giannetti Open the ORCID record for Daniele Giannetti [Opens in a new window] ,
Cristina Castracani Open the ORCID record for Cristina Castracani [Opens in a new window] ,
Fiorenza A. Spotti Open the ORCID record for Fiorenza A. Spotti [Opens in a new window] ,
Alessandra Mori Open the ORCID record for Alessandra Mori [Opens in a new window]  and
Donato A. Grasso Open the ORCID record for Donato A. Grasso [Opens in a new window]
Enrico Schifani*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
Daniele Giannetti
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
Cristina Castracani
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
Fiorenza A. Spotti
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
Alessandra Mori
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
Donato A. Grasso
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
*
Corresponding author: Enrico Schifani; Email: enrico.schifani@unipr.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing hemipterans is a highly successful evolutionary innovation that attains the status of ecological keystone across many terrestrial ecosystems, involving a multitude of actors through direct or cascading effects. In these relationships, ants often protect their hemipteran partners against their arthropod natural enemies, sometimes interfering with the biological control of pest species. However, the dynamics of these interactions are highly variable based on the specific identity of all the actors involved, and baseline data remain scarce. We performed a field experiment exposing colonies of the walnut aphid Panaphis juglandis attended by five European ant species (Camponotus piceus, Ca. vagus, Crematogaster scutellaris, Dolichoderus quadripunctatus, Lasius emarginatus) to a native and an exotic lady beetle (Adalia bipunctata and Harmonia axyridis), documenting the behavioural interactions between these insects and the performance of ants in the protection of the aphids. Our results reveal a significant behavioural diversity among the ant species involved, with D. quadripunctatus and L. emarginatus being the most aggressive and having the best performance as aphid defenders, and Ca. piceus being least effective and often fleeing away. Cr. scutellaris displayed a rare rescue behaviour attempting to pull away the aphids that the lady beetles grabbed. On the other hand, behavioural responses to A. bipunctata and H. axyridis were similar. Further investigations are needed to understand the eco-ethological implications of these differences, while a better understanding of ant behavioural diversity may help refine biological control strategies.

Keywords

CamponotusCoccinellidaeCrematogasterDolichoderusLasius

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 113 , Issue 6 , December 2023 , pp. 808 - 813
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brown, PMJ, Adriaens, T, Bathon, H, Cuppen, J, Goldarazena, A, Hägg, T, Kenis, M, Klausnitzer, BEM, Kovář, I, Loomans, AJM, Majerus, MEN, Nedved, O, Pedersen, J, Rabitsch, W, Roy, HE, Ternois, V, Zakharov, IA and Roy, DB (2007) The harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis: global perspectives on invasion history and ecology. Biological Invasions 18, 997–1044.Google Scholar
Buckley, R and Gullan, P (1991) More aggressive ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) provide better protection for soft scales and mealybugs (Homoptera: Coccidae, Pseudococcidae). Biotropica 23, 282–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campolo, O, Palmeri, V, Malacrinò, A, Laudani, F, Castracani, C, Mori, A and Grasso, DA (2015) Interaction between ants and the Mediterranean fruit fly: new insights for biological control. Biological Control 90, 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castracani, C, Bulgarini, G, Giannetti, D, Spotti, FA, Maistrello, L, Mori, A and Grasso, DA (2017) Predatory ability of the ant Crematogaster scutellaris on the brown marmorated stink bug Halyomorpha halys. Journal of Pest Science 90, 1181–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castracani, C, Giannetti, D, Spotti, FA, Schifani, E, Ghizzoni, M, Delaiti, M, Penner, F, Leonardi, S, Mori, A, Ioriatti, C and Grasso, DA (2023) Ants as mealybug detectors: a novel tool for monitoring Planococcus ficus infestation based on ant behaviour. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 25, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocco, A, Pacheco da Silva, VC, Benelli, G, Botton, M, Lucchi, A and Lentini, A (2021) Sustainable management of the vine mealybug in organic vineyards. Journal of Pest Science 94, 153–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, CM and Leather, SR (2002) Ant-mediated dispersal of the black willow aphid Pterocomma salicis L.; does the ant Lasius niger L. judge aphid-host quality? Ecological Entomology 27, 238–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czechowski, W, Trigos-Peral, G, Maák, I and Vepsäläinen, K (2019) Alate gyne of the ant Dolichoderus quadripunctatus (L.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) follows foraging trail to aphids. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 71, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dao, HT, Meats, A, Beattie, GAC and Spooner-Hart, R (2014) Ant-coccid mutualism in citrus canopies and its effect on natural enemies of red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 104, 137–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Depa, Ł, Kaszyca-Taszakowska, N, Taszakowski, A and Kanturski, M (2020) Ant-induced evolutionary patterns in aphids. Biological Reviews 95, 1574–1589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franco, JC, Suma, P, Da Silva, EB, Blumberg, D and Mendel, Z (2004) Management strategies of mealybug pests of citrus in Mediterranean countries. Phytoparasitica 32, 507–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, G, Liu, S, Feng, L, Wang, Y and Lu, Z (2020) Effect of temperature on predation by Harmonia axyridis (Pall.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on the walnut aphids Chromaphis juglandicola Kalt. and Panaphis juglandis (Goeze). Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 30, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannetti, D, Castracani, C, Spotti, FA, Mori, A and Grasso, DA (2019) Gall-colonizing ants and their role as plant defenders: from ‘bad job’ to ‘useful service’. Insects 10, 392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giannetti, D, Mandrioli, M, Schifani, E, Castracani, C, Spotti, FA, Mori, A and Grasso, DA (2021) First report on the acrobat ant Crematogaster scutellaris storing live aphids in its oak-gall nests. Insects 12, 108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giannetti, D, Schifani, E, Gugliuzzo, A, Zappalà, L, Biondi, A and Grasso, DA (2022) Native European ants can discourage host colonization and reduce reproductive success of the invasive ambrosia beetle Xylosandrus compactus. Biological Control 174, 105032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölldobler, B and Wilson, EO (1990) The Ants. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kök, Ş, Aktaç, N, Özdemir, I and Kasap, I (2018) The new association records on ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in the Central Province of Çanakkale. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 58, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H, Li, B, Lövei, GL, Kring, TJ and Obrycki, JJ (2021) Interactions among native and non-native predatory Coccinellidae influence biological control and biodiversity. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 114, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liere, H and Perfecto, I (2008) Cheating on a mutualism: indirect benefits of ant attendance to a coccidophagous coccinellid. Environmental Entomology 37, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majerus, ME, Sloggett, JJ, Godeau, JF and Hemptinne, JL (2007) Interactions between ants and aphidophagous and coccidophagous ladybirds. Population Ecology 49, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarrete, B, McAuslane, H, Deyrup, M and Peña, JE (2013) Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) associated with Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) and their role in its biological control. Florida Entomologist 96, 590–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, C, Agrawal, AA and Hajek, AE (2010) Ants defend aphids against lethal disease. Biology Letters 6, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novgorodova, TA (2015) Interaction of ants with aphid enemies: do inexperienced ants specializing in honeydew collection recognize aphidophages at their first contact? Entomological Review 95, 1182–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novgorodova, TA and Gavrilyuk, AV (2012) The degree of protection different ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) provide aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) against aphidophages. European Journal of Entomology 109, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obrycki, JJ and Kring, TJ (1998) Predaceous Coccinellidae in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 43, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Offenberg, J and Damgaard, C (2019) Ants suppressing plant pathogens: a review. Oikos 128, 1691–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offenberg, J, Nielsen, JS and Damgaard, C (2019) Wood Ant (Formica polyctena) services and disservices in a danish apple plantation. Sociobiology 66, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, TH, Leather, SR and Cook, JM (2008) Macroevolutionary patterns in the origin of mutualisms involving ants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21, 1597–1608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, J and Kronauer, DJC (2021) How ants shape biodiversity. Current Biology 31, R1208–R1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Queiroz, JM and Oliveira, PS (2001) Tending ants protect honeydew-producing whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environmental Entomology 30, 295–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
RStudio Team (2022) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC. Available at http://www.rstudio.com/.Google Scholar
Schifani, E, Castracani, C, Giannetti, D, Spotti, FA, Reggiani, R, Leonardi, S, Mori, A and Grasso, DA (2020) New tools for conservation biological control: testing ant-attracting artificial Nectaries to employ ants as plant defenders. Insects 11, 129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schifani, E, Giannetti, D, Csősz, S, Castellucci, F, Luchetti, A, Castracani, C, Mori, A and Grasso, DA (2022) Is mimicry a diversification-driver in ants? Biogeography, ecology, ethology, genetics and morphology define a second West-Palaearctic Colobopsis species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 194, 1424–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schifani, E, Peri, E, Giannetti, D, Colazza, S and Grasso, DA (2023 a) Ant attendance does not necessarily imply protection of aphids from their arthropod natural enemies. Ecological Entomology 48, 384–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schifani, E, Giannetti, D and Grasso, DA (2023 b) Predatory abilities of two Mediterranean ants on the eggs and larvae of the codling moth Cydia pomonella. Insects 14, 97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schifani, E, Peri, E, Giannetti, D, Alınç, T, Colazza, S and Grasso, DA (2023 c) Mediterranean ants can increase nymph mortality in the stink bug Nezara viridula without interfering with its egg parasitoid Trissolcus basalis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 171, 739–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, B (2018) Ants of Northern and Central Europe. Tauer, Germany: Lutra Verlags-und Vertriebsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Styrsky, JD and Eubanks, MD (2007) Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274, 151–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanek, SJ and Potter, DA (2010) Ant-exclusion to promote biological control of soft scales (Hemiptera: Coccidae) on woody landscape plants. Environmental Entomology 39, 1829–1837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Völkl, W (1992) Aphids or their parasitoids: who actually benefits from ant-attendance? Journal of Animal Ecology 61, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Völkl, W, Liepert, C, Birnbach, R, Hübner, G and Dettner, K (1996) Chemical and tactile communication between the root aphid parasitoid Paralipsis enervis and trophobiotic ants: consequences for parasitoid survival. Experientia 52, 731–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B, Lu, M, Peng, Y and Segar, ST (2021) Direct and indirect effects of invasive vs. native ant-hemipteran mutualism: a meta-analysis that supports the mutualism intensity hypothesis. Agronomy 11, 2323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar