Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T00:56:23.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re Hagley Municipal Cemetery

Worcester Consistory Court: Mynors Ch, July 2010 Exhumation – Roman Catholicism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2010

Ruth Arlow
Affiliation:
Barrister, Deputy Chancellor of the Dioceses of Chichester and Norwich
Will Adam
Affiliation:
Vicar of St Paul, Winchmore Hill
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Case Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2011

The deceased and his widow were both Roman Catholics. The widow petitioned for the exhumation of the deceased's remains from the consecrated area of the local municipal cemetery for their re-interment in the local Roman Catholic cemetery. She argued that exceptional circumstances existed on the basis of mistake in that she had not previously known that a Roman Catholic cemetery existed in the area, that the plot in which her husband was buried was unsafe and vulnerable to a landslip and that the direction in which her husband had been buried was incorrect. The evidence did not support these arguments and the chancellor rejected them accordingly. Nevertheless, the chancellor considered the decision in Re Putney Vale Cemetery Footnote 4 and held that a mistake had been made sufficient to amount to exceptional circumstances in that the widow had no understanding of the nature and significance of consecration and therefore did not fully appreciate the permanence of burial in consecrated ground. A faculty was granted. [RA]

References

4 (2011) 13 Ecc LJ 118.