Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T18:54:28.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metamorphic P-T evolution and tectonic implications of UHT metamorphism from the Shillong Meghalaya Gneissic Complex, India: evidence from phase equilibria modelling, monazite U-Pb-Th geochronology, K-Ar dating and geochemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2024

Bikash Mahanta
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi – 221005; India
Divya Prakash*
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi – 221005; India
Saurabh Singh
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi – 221005; India
C.K. Singh
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi – 221005; India
Manish Kumar
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi – 221005; India
Rajeev Pandey
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi – 221005; India
Suparna Tewari
Affiliation:
Central University of Punjab, Bathinda-151001, India
*
Corresponding author: Divya Prakash; Email: dprakash@bhu.ac.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study area Sonapahar is an integral part of Shillong Meghalaya Gneissic Complex (SMGC), which is located in the Northeastern part of India. This complex mainly comprises metamorphic formations spanning from Upper Amphibolite to Ultra-high temperature granulite, interspersed with various igneous intrusions. In this study, particular attention is directed towards unravelling the metamorphic history of Mg-Al granulite. For the very first time, we establish the pressure–temperature (P-T) trajectory of the Mg-Al granulite from Sonapahar, SMGC. Employing conventional thermobarometry along with winTWQ analysis, the inferred metamorphic conditions for this granulite reveal temperatures exceeding 900°C and pressures of approximately >8 kbar. These conditions firmly indicate the presence of ultra-high-temperature metamorphism. By utilizing the Perple_X software in the MnO-Na2O-CaO-K2O-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O-TiO2-Fe2O3 compositional system, we construct a P-T pseudosection. This gives a clockwise P-T path, signifying an episode of cooling (+ minor decompression). Such a pattern also suggests rapid cooling of the tectonically-thickened crust. Concurrently, a geochemical exploration of trace and rare earth elements in the rocks offers further insights. These investigations give an idea about the protolith, having a clay-to-sandstone in nature. Additionally, chemical data from monazite within the studied rock provide a weighted mean age of 682 Ma for the peak metamorphic stage. This age aligns with the global Pan-African orogenic events. The biotite K-Ar isotopic geochronology from the symplectite position provides decompression history or cooling age of 442 Ma. This age corresponds to a period after the last peak metamorphic phase that occurred during the Pan-African thermal event.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Geological map of Shillong Meghalaya Gneissic Complex (SMGC) (modified after Dwivedi et al.2020), (b) geological map of Sonapahar (Riangdo) area of central SMGC (modified after Lal et al.1978).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Field photograph showing the exposure of MG-Al granulite in a rock quarry, (b) photograph showing contact between Mg-Al granulite and massive sillimanite in a sillimanite mine, (c) photograph showing the Mg-Al granulite, (d) close view of Mg-Al granulite showing quartz and cordierite association.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Photomicrographs of the representative sample in plane polarised light showing the evidence of prograde (a-b), peak (c-d) and retrograde (e-f) stages of ultra-high temperature metamorphism.

Figure 3

Table 1. Representative analyses of garnet (12 oxygen basis) and cordierite (18 oxygen basis)

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Triangular plot of garnet showing Fe-rich (almandine) composition, (b) triangular plot of feldspar showing a higher concentration of sanidine and oligoclase composition, (c) XMg vs Altotal plot showing the composition of biotite, (d) triangular plot showing the composition of spinel.

Figure 5

Table 2. Representative analyses of Biotite (24 oxygen basis), feldspar (8 oxygen basis) and spinel (24 oxygen basis)

Figure 6

Figure 5. (a) P-T pseudosection calculated for the spinel + quartz bearing Mg-Al bearing granulite in the model system MnO-Na2O-CaO-K2O-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O-TiO2-Fe2O3 (MnNCKFMASHTO), b) distribution of the calculated modal isopleths of different minerals for the calculated pseudosection: biotite (Bt), cordierite (Crd), spinel (Spl) and garnet (Grt).

Figure 7

Figure 6. (a) Distribution of the calculated XMg [= Mg/ (Mg+ Fe)] isopleths for biotite, cordierite, spinel and garnet for the calculated pseudosection. The inferred cooling (+ minor decompression) P–T path is indicated by a black arrow and (b) comparison of metamorphic P-T evolution path from Sonapahar, SMGC. Metamorphic boundaries displayed in the background are modified after Vernon and Clarke (2008).

Figure 8

Table 3. Whole rock geochemistry of the pelitic granulite, major oxide (wt %), trace element and REE (ppm) (Sn-7F)

Figure 9

Table 4. P-T calculation at peak stage using winTWQ (version 2.34) program

Figure 10

Figure 7. Results of the simultaneous calculations of pressure (P) and temperature (T) obtained using the winTWQ program.

Figure 11

Table 5. Average temperature and pressure obtained using different geothermobarometer

Figure 12

Figure 8. (a) Chondrite-normalised REE pattern for the pelitic granulites; (b) multi-element spider diagram normalized by the primitive mantle.

Figure 13

Figure 9. Classification diagrams of the samples in the Sonapahar area. (a) Ternary plot of A-C-FM (secondary source after Wang et al.1987); (b) (al + fm)-(c + alk)-Si diagram (Simonen, 1953); (c) Log(Fe2O3/K2O)-Log(SiO2/Al2O3) diagram (Herron, 1988); (d) La/Yb-ΣREE diagram (Gromet et al.1984).

Figure 14

Figure 10. Geochemical diagrams of the samples in the Sonapahar area. (a) Molecular proportions Al2O3-(Na2O + CaO*)-K2O triangular plot (after Fedo et al.1995). Ka, kaolinite; Gi, gibbsite; Chl, chlorite; Sm, smectite; Il, illite; Pl, plagioclase; Kfs, K-feldspar; (b) plot of Th/Sc versus Zr/Sc (McLennan, 1993); (c) Al-Ti-Zr triangular diagram. The solid contour encloses the compositions observed in clastic sediments; CAS represents the field of calc-alkaline suites; SPG represents the field of strongly peraluminous granites (after Garcia et al.1994); (d) La/Th-Hf source rock discrimination diagram (Floyd and Leveridge, 1987); (e) K2O-Rb provenance discrimination diagram (after Floyd and Leveridge, 1987); (f-g) tectonic discrimination diagrams of samples in the Liumao area (after Bhatia and Crook, 1986). Ternary diagrams of La-Th-Sc (f) and Th-Sc-Zr/10 (g). PM = passive margin; ACM = active continental margin; CIA = continental island arc; OIA = oceanic island arc.

Figure 15

Figure 11. (a) K/Rb vs. Rb/Sr discrimination diagram for orogenic and anorogenic processes; (b) SiO2 vs. Rb/Zr discrimination diagram for syn-collision, post-collision and volcanic arcs; (c) Th vs. La plot showing the dominance of the derived sediments from the passive continental margins and oceanic island arcs.

Figure 16

Table 6. Age calculations with Ω = 0.492. Each age corresponds to a single biotite ablation with the following laser parameters: 50 Hz, 50 pulses by run, 6 runs per analysis (300 pulses in total), 70 μm diameter, 2025 μm depth, fluence 3.5 J/cm2

Figure 17

Figure 12. The weighted average of mean ages from biotite in the sample (Sn-7F).

Figure 18

Figure 13. Representative BSE image of monazite grains from sample Sn-7F.

Figure 19

Table 7. EPMA dating age of monazite crystal of the studied rock (Sn-7F)

Figure 20

Figure 14. (a) Representative graphs of weighted average of the distributions showing a mean age of 1527 Ma for the old thermal event; (b) representative graphs of weighted average of the distributions showing a mean age of 682 Ma for the thermal reworking event; (c) representative graph, combinedly showing the probability density plot of two thermal events.

Figure 21

Figure 15. Phase relations shown in the (SiO2-6K2O)-(Fe-Mg)O-(Al, Fe3+, Cr2O3-K2O) for Spinel + quartz bearing granulites (modified after Prakash et al. 2020).

Figure 22

Figure 16. Reconstruction of the early Neoproterozoic supercontinent showing the correlation between Greater Indian Landmass and Eastern Antarctica. SMGC – Shillong Meghalaya Gneissic Complex, CGC – Chotanagpur Gneissic Complex, NSMB – Northern Singhbhum Mobile Belt, SC – Singhbhum Craton, and EGMB – Eastern Ghats Mobile Belt. A Possible extent of the Pan-African suture through Prydz Bay and the SMGC is shown by the Dotted line (modified after Chatterjee et al.2007).

Supplementary material: File

Mahanta et al. supplementary material

Mahanta et al. supplementary material
Download Mahanta et al. supplementary material(File)
File 5.8 MB