Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T13:13:42.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neonatal Morbidity in Growth-Discordant Monochorionic Twins: Comparison Between the Larger and the Smaller Twin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2012

Enrico Lopriore*
Affiliation:
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Carolien Sluimers
Affiliation:
Division of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Suzanne A. Pasman
Affiliation:
Division of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Johanna M. Middeldorp
Affiliation:
Division of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Dick Oepkes
Affiliation:
Division of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Frans J. Walther
Affiliation:
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
*
address for correspondence: Enrico Lopriore, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, J6-S, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: e.lopriore@lumc.nl

Abstract

Fetal growth restriction in singletons has been shown to enhance fetal lung maturation and reduce the risk of respiratory distress syndrome due to increased endogenous steroid production. However, data on lung maturation in growth-discordant monochorionic (thus, identical) twins are lacking. Our objective was to compare the risk of severe neonatal morbidity between the larger and the smaller twin in monochorionic twins with birth weight discordance (BWD). We included in the study all consecutive monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies with severe BWD (≥25%) and two live-born twins delivered at our center (n = 47 twin pairs). We compared the incidence of neonatal morbidity, particularly respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and cerebral lesions between the larger and the smaller co-twin. The incidence of severe neonatal morbidity in the larger and smaller twin was 38% (18/47) and 19% (9/47), respectively (odds ratio (OR) 2.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–7.44) and was due primarily to the higher incidence of RDS, 32% (15/47) and 6% (3/47), respectively (OR 6.88, 95% CI 1.66–32.83). In conclusion, this study shows that the larger twin in monochorionic twin pairs with BWD is at increased risk of severe neonatal morbidity, particularly RDS, compared to the smaller twin.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012
Figure 0

TABLE 1 Baseline Characteristics in the 47 MC Twin Pregnancies With Birth Weight Discordance

Figure 1

TABLE 2 Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality in the Smaller Versus Larger Twin

Figure 2

TABLE 3 Cerebral Lesions Detected on Neonatal Cranial Ultrasound in the Smaller Versus Larger Twin