Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T08:25:14.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A brief history of olfaction and olfactometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2008

C M Philpott ,
A Bennett  and
G E Murty
C M Philpott*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Essex County Hospital, Colchester, UK
A Bennett
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Ipswich Hospital, UK
G E Murty
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Carl M Philpott, The Cottage, Middlewood Green, Stowmarket, Suffolk IP14 5EZ, UK. E-mail: carl.philpott@btinternet.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sense of smell has been a cause for speculation and fascination over the centuries. An appreciation of odours has been deeply rooted in many cultures, including ancient civilisations such as the Egyptians. The level of understanding of the anatomy and physiology of olfaction which our ancestors had was slight, and much remains to be discovered. This paper explores the progression of knowledge over the years to the present day. Particular emphasis is placed on odour classification and olfactometry, and on the techniques whereby great scientific minds have sought to quantify that human sense which is arguably least quantifiable. A review of some of the current methods of olfactometry is included within this remit.

Keywords

SmellSpecial Senses DisordersHistory

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 122 , Issue 7 , July 2008 , pp. 657 - 662
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Presented at the History of ENT section of the British Academic Conference in Otolaryngology, 5–7 July 2006, Birmingham ICC, Birmingham, UK.

References

1 Shakespeare, W. Romeo and Juliet.Google Scholar
2 Smell. http://www.cf.ac.uk/biosi/staff/jacob/teaching/sensory/olfact1.html [15 May 2007]Google Scholar
3 Amoore, JE, Ollman, BG. Practical test kits for quantitatively evaluating the sense of smell. Rhinology 1983;21:49–54Google ScholarPubMed
4 Ottoson, D. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 1956;35:1Google Scholar
5 Weinstock, J. Contemporary Perspectives on Linneaus. 1985Google Scholar
6 Poucher, W. Odour Classification and Fixation. In: Poucher's Perfumes, Cosmetics and Soaps, 9th edn. Chapman & Hall, 1995Google Scholar
7 Linneus, C. Odores Medicamentorum. 1752Google Scholar
8 Zwaardemaker, H. Measurement of the sense of smell in clinical examination. Lancet 1889;1300–2Google Scholar
9 Henning, H. Smell [in German]. Barth 1916Google Scholar
10 Ohloff, G. Smell – A Description of Emotions [in German]. Zurich: Wiley-VCH, 2004Google Scholar
11 Anonymous. Chem Rundschau 1970;37:821Google Scholar
12 Kerl, S. Dracogo Rep 1997;7:45Google Scholar
13 Valentin, G. Essential development of animal tissue [in German]. In: Wagner, R, ed. Lehrbuch der Speziellen Physiologie. 1842Google Scholar
14 Valentin, G. Textbook of Human Physiology [in German]. Braunschweig, 1848;292Google Scholar
15 Valentin, G. Textbook of Human Physiology For Doctors and Students [in German], 2nd edn. Braunschweig, 1850Google Scholar
16 Passy, M. Odour in a series of alcohols [in French]. C R Soc Biol 1892;4:447–9Google Scholar
17 Zwaardemaker, H. L'Annee Psychologique 1898;203Google Scholar
18 Wysocki, CJ, Gilbert, AN. National Geographic Smell Survey. Effects of age are heterogenous. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1989;561:12–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Doty, RL, Frye, RE, Agrawal, U. Internal consistency reliability of the fractionated and whole University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. Perception & Psychophysics 1989;45:381–4Google Scholar
20 Doty, RL, Shaman, P, Dann, M. Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav 1984;32:489–502Google Scholar
21 Doty, RL, Shaman, P, Kimmelman, CP, Dann, MS. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope 1984;94:176–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Cain, WS, Gent, JF, Goodspeed, RB, Leonard, G. Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center. Laryngoscope 1988;98:83–8Google Scholar
23 Doty, R, Marcus, A, Lee, W. Development of the 12-item Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT). Laryngoscope 1996;106:353–6Google Scholar
24 Viswanthan, H, Carrie, S. Olfaction – the forgotten sense. ENT News 2002;63–5Google Scholar
25 Hummel, T, Sekinger, B, Wolf, SR, Pauli, E, Kobal, G. ‘Sniffin sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 1997;22:39–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Kobal, G, Hummel, T, Sekinger, B, Barz, S, Roscher, S, Wolf, S. ‘Sniffin' sticks’: screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 1996;34:222–6Google Scholar
27 Wolfensberger, M, Schnieper, I, Welge-Lussen, A. Sniffin' Sticks : a new olfactory test battery. Acta Oto Laryngolog (Stockh) 2000;120:303–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Mueller, C, Grassinger, E, Naka, A, Temmel, A, Hummel, T, Kobal, G. A self-administered odor identification test procedure using the “‘Sniffin’ Sticks”’. Chem Senses 2006;31:595–8Google Scholar
29 Thomas-Danguin, T, Rouby, C, Sicard, G, Vigouroux, M, Farget, V, Johanson, A et al. Development of the ETOC: a European test of olfactory capabilities. Rhinology 2003;41:142–51Google Scholar
30 Cardesin, A, Alobid, I, Benitez, P, Sierra, E, Haro, JD, Bernal-Sprekelsen, M et al. Barcelona Smell Test - 24 (BAST-24): validation and smell characteristics in the healthy Spanish population. Rhinology 2006;44:83–9Google Scholar
31 Robson, AK, Woollons, AC, Ryan, J, Horrocks, C, Williams, S, Dawes, PJ. Validation of the combined olfactory test. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1996;21:512–18Google Scholar
32 Philpott, CM, Rimal, D, Tassone, P, Premachandra, DJ, Prinsley, PR. A study of olfactory testing in patients with rhinological disease. Rhinology 2007Google Scholar
33 Saito, S, Ayabe-Kanamura, S, Takashima, Y, Gotow, N, Naito, N, Nozawa, T et al. Development of a smell identification test using a novel stick-type odor presentation kit. Chem Senses 2006;31:379–91Google Scholar
34 Devos, M, Patte, F, Rouault, J, Laffort, P, van Gemert, L. Standardised Human Olfactory Thresholds. Oxford: IRL Press at Oxford University Press, 1990Google Scholar
35 Philpott, C, Goodenough, P, Robertson, A, Passant, C, Murty, G. The effect of temperature, humidity and peak inspiratory nasal flow on olfactory thresholds. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:24–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36 Pierce, J, Doty, R, Amoore, J. Analysis of position of trial sequence and type of diluent on the detection threshold for phenyl ethyl alcohol using a single staircase method. Percept Motor Skills 1996;82:451–8Google Scholar
37 Lotsch, J, Lange, C, Hummel, T. A simple and reliable method for clinical assessment of odor thresholds. Chem Senses 2004;29:311–17Google Scholar
38 Philpott, C, Wolstenholme, C, Goodenough, P, Clark, A, Murty, G. A comparison of subjective perception with objective measurement of olfaction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:488–90Google Scholar
39 Philpott, CM, Wolstenholme, CR, Goodenough, PC, Clark, A, Murty, GE. Which variables matter in smell tests in the clinic? J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:952–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40 Doty, RL, Yousem, DM, Pham, LT, Kreshak, AA, Geckle, R, Lee, WW. Olfactory dysfunction in patients with head trauma. Arch Neurol 1997;54:1131–40Google Scholar
41 Harada, H, Shiraishi, K, Kato, T. Olfactory event-related potentials in normal subjects and patients with smell disorders. Clin Electroencephalogr 2003;34:191–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42 Thesen, T, Murphy, C. Reliability analysis of event-related brain potentials to olfactory stimuli. Psychophysiology 2002;39:733–8Google Scholar
43 Buck, L, Axel, R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 1991;65:175–87Google Scholar
44 Witt, M, Georgiewa, B, Knecht, M, Hummel, T. On the chemosensory nature of the vomeronasal epithelium in adult humans. Histochem Cell Biol 2002;117:493–509Google Scholar
45 Philpott, C, Wolstenholme, C, Goodenough, P, Clark, A, Murty, G. Superosmia – a vomeronasal organ mediated phenomenon? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133(Suppl 2):103Google Scholar
46 Trinh, K, Storm, DR. Vomeronasal organ detects odorants in absence of signaling through main olfactory epithelium. Nat Neurosci 2003;6:519–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47 Zhang, J, Webb, DM. Evolutionary deterioration of the vomeronasal pheromone transduction pathway in catarrhine primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:8337–41Google Scholar
48 Dawes, PJ, Dawes, MT, Williams, SM. The smell map: commonality of odour perception confirmed. Clin Otolaryngol 2004;29:648–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49 Carrie, S, Scannell, JW, Dawes, PJ. The smell map: is there a commonality of odour perception? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1999;24:184–9Google Scholar