Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-n8gtw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T11:38:23.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tracheostomy self care: The Nottingham System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

J. Mason ,
G. E. Murty ,
H. Foster  and
P. J. Bradley
J. Mason
Affiliation:
Nottingham
G. E. Murty
Affiliation:
Nottingham
H. Foster
Affiliation:
Nottingham
P. J. Bradley*
Affiliation:
Nottingham
*
Mr P. J. Bradley, F.R.C.S., Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 5EU.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tracheostomy self care at home can be a problem for some patients. The Nottingham System attributes a competence ratio to each patient. Those liable to develop problems can be identified early and the appropriate support provided. The Nottingham System is described.

Keywords

TracheostomySelf-care

Information

Type
Short Communications
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 106 , Issue 8 , August 1992 , pp. 723 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beillby, E. (1983) Laryngectomy—an investigation of reactions, requirements and rehabilitations after discharge from hospital. M.Sc. Dissertation, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., Wills, T. A. (1985) Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98: 310–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardener, W. H. (1966) Adjusted problems of laryngectomized women. Archives of Otolaryngology, 83: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natvig, K. (1983) Study no. 1. Social, personal and behavioural factors related to present mastery of the laryngectomy event. Journal of Otolaryngology, 12: 155–162.Google ScholarPubMed