Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-6mz5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T21:33:42.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A review of the treatment options for clozapine-induced hypersalivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Adrian Cree
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
Shameem Mir
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
Thomas Fahy
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims and Method

To develop and introduce an evidence-based drug treatment protocol for clozapine-induced hypersalivation, a review of published literature relating to clozapine-induced hypersalivation and its treatment was undertaken in March 2000. The databases searched were Medline, EMBASE and PsychLit, from 1966 to the present.

Results

This paper reviews the evidence of the benefit of using antimuscarinic agents, adrenergic antagonists and adrenergic agonists. There is alack of good-quality controlled-trials, with most papers reporting aseries of uncontrolled cases dependent on subjective measures of improvement reported by the patients. However, the published literature suggests a benefit for all of the drug categories reviewed. The most effective treatment may be acombination of terazosin and benzhexol.

Clinical Implications

Clozapine-induced hypersalivation is not only an embarrassing problem, but can be difficult to treat. An evidence-based prescribing protocol will encourage the use of those drugs found to be the most effective in treating this problem. It will also offer alternatives if acertain treatment is ineffective or intolerable.

Information

Type
Drug Information Quarterly
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2000, The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.