Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T07:51:00.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design, modeling and control of a reconfigurable serial quadrotor for agile aerial manipulation and navigation through narrow gaps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2026

Ayoub Daadi Open the ORCID record for Ayoub Daadi [Opens in a new window] ,
Yasser Bouzid Open the ORCID record for Yasser Bouzid [Opens in a new window] ,
Oualid Araar Open the ORCID record for Oualid Araar [Opens in a new window] ,
Saddam Hocine Derrouaoui Open the ORCID record for Saddam Hocine Derrouaoui [Opens in a new window] ,
Moussa Dahmani  and
Ghada Dellali
Ayoub Daadi*
Affiliation:
Complex Systems Control and Simulators (CSCS) Laboratory, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Bordj el Bahri, Algeria
Yasser Bouzid
Affiliation:
Complex Systems Control and Simulators (CSCS) Laboratory, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Bordj el Bahri, Algeria
Oualid Araar
Affiliation:
Autonomous and Intelligent Systems Group, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Bordj el Bahri, Algeria
Saddam Hocine Derrouaoui
Affiliation:
Control Laboratory, Ecole Supérieure Ali Chabati, Réghaia, Algeria
Moussa Dahmani
Affiliation:
Complex Systems Control and Simulators (CSCS) Laboratory, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Bordj el Bahri, Algeria
Ghada Dellali
Affiliation:
Complex Systems Control and Simulators (CSCS) Laboratory, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Bordj el Bahri, Algeria
*
Corresponding author: Ayoub Daadi; Email: a.daadi.ayoub@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the design, modeling and control of a reconfigurable serial quadrotor (RSQ) with experimental validation. The proposed platform features servo-driven joints between its arms, enabling both ground and in-flight morphological reconfiguration. This capability allows the RSQ to adapt its geometry for navigation in confined environments and for aerial manipulation tasks without additional robotic arms. A comprehensive nonlinear dynamic model is developed to capture the effects of structural reconfiguration, explicitly accounting for time-varying inertia properties, their time derivatives, control allocation variations, and centre of gravity (CoG) shifts. These parameters are derived analytically and validated using high-fidelity computer-aided design (CAD) models across multiple configurations, enabling online model updating for simulation and control purposes. To address the strong dynamic coupling introduced by reconfiguration, a dedicated control architecture based on a proportional integral derivative (PID) controller is proposed. Closed-loop stability is analysed by casting the PID controller into a static output feedback form within a linear parameter varying (LPV) framework. The synthesis conditions are formulated as linear matrix inequalities (LMIs), and the resulting constrained optimisation problem is solved using the whale optimisation algorithm (WOA) to guarantee uniform exponential stability of the closed-loop system. The proposed approach is validated through nonlinear simulations and experimental tests on a custom-built test bench for multiple configurations. The results demonstrate accurate trajectory tracking and stable behaviour during structural changes, highlighting the potential of the RSQ for reconfigurable aerial robotics and manipulation applications.

Keywords

aerial manipulationlinear parameter varyingproportional integral derivativereconfigurable serial quadrotorwhale optimisation algorithm

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , First View , pp. 1 - 36
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Liu, K., Xiao, J., Peng, H., Zhang, Y., Zhao, S., Lu, H. and Huang, K. Transition strategy for unmanned aerial-aquatic vehicles (uaavs): a survey, J. Field Rob., 2026.10.1002/rob.70138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwivedi, A.K. and Singh, V. Literature survey on designing and application of unmanned aerial vehicles for surveillance systems, Proceedings of International Conference on Innovations in Data Science: ICIDS 2024. Springer Nature, 2026, p 249.10.1007/978-981-96-6329-3_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslan, S. and Oktay, T. Path planning of an unmanned combat aerial vehicle with an extended-treatment-approach-based immune plasma algorithm, Aerospace, 2023, 10, (5), p. 487.10.3390/aerospace10050487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabour, M., Jafary, P. and Nematiyan, S. Applications and classifications of unmanned aerial vehicles: a literature review with focus on multi-rotors, Aeronaut. J., 2023, 127, (1309), pp 466–490.10.1017/aer.2022.75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naser, H.N., Hashim, H.A. and Ahmadi, M. Aerial assistive payload transportation using quadrotor uavs with nonsingular fast terminal smc for human physical interaction, Results in Eng., 2025, 25, p 103701.10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocamer, A., Kose, O., Sal, F. and Oktay, T. Conceptual design of simultaneous wing dihedral adjustment and control system for a mini vtol UAV, Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 2025, 97, (9), pp 1149–1158.10.1108/AEAT-11-2024-0313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahangar, A.R., Ohadi, A. and Khosravi, M.A. A novel firefighter quadrotor uav with tilting rotors: modeling and control, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2024, p 109248.10.1016/j.ast.2024.109248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, N., Zhang, B. and Shi, X. Situational nmac risk assessment using conditional random field for uav tiered aerial passage operations, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2024, 152, p 109397.10.1016/j.ast.2024.109397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berra, A., Mellet, J., Seisa, A.S., Sankaranarayanan, V.N., Gamage, K.N.U.G.W., Satpute, S.G., Ruggiero, F., Lippiello, V., Tolu, S., Fumagalli, M. et al. Manipulator design and target localization for safe aerial physical inspection mission, IEEE Transactions on Field Robotics, 2025.10.36227/techrxiv.173707435.52851305/v1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, S., Wang, X., Sanalitro, D., Franchi, A., Tognon, M. and Alonso-Mora, J. Agile and cooperative aerial manipulation of a cable-suspended load, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2501.18802 , 2025.Google Scholar
Housseyn, Z., Yasser, B. and Mohamed, G. Path planning strategy for unmanned aerial manipulators in pick-and-place applications, Unmanned Syst., 2025, pp 1–23.Google Scholar
Lou, H., Wu, Q., Wang, H., Li, M., Liu, H. and Sun, N. Structure, modeling, and control of morphing quadrotors: a review, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 2026, 27, pp 825–842.10.1007/s12541-025-01405-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daadi, A., Bouzid, Y., Araar, O., Derrouaoui, S.H., Chellal, L. and Belmouhoub, A. A new design of a multi-link quadrotor, 2023 International Conference on Networking and Advanced Systems (ICNAS). IEEE, 2023, pp 1–6.10.1109/ICNAS59892.2023.10330479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, J., Jung, I., Kim, Y. and Lee, S. A comprehensive framework for modelling and control of morphing quadrotor drones, Aerospace, 2025, 13, (1), p 5.10.3390/aerospace13010005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugihara, K., Zhao, M., Nishio, T., Okada, K. and Inaba, M. Design and control of delta: Deformable multilinked multirotor with rolling locomotion ability in terrestrial domain, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2403.06636 , 2024.Google Scholar
Daadi, A., Bouzid, Y., Araar, O., Derrouaoui, S.H., Dahmani, M. and Dellali, G. Toward a novel generic model of a transformable multi-link multirotor, 2024 2nd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Automatic Control (ICEEAC). IEEE, 2024, pp 1–6.10.1109/ICEEAC61226.2024.10576374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z., Huang, K. and Zhang, J. Modelling, design, and control of a central motor driving reconfigurable quadcopter, Drones, 2025, 9, (11), p 736.10.3390/drones9110736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, N., Luo, Y., Deng, H. and Shen, Y. The deformable quad-rotor: design, kinematics and dynamics characterization, and flight performance validation, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2017, pp 2391–2396.10.1109/IROS.2017.8206052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falanga, D., Kleber, K., Mintchev, S., Floreano, D. and Scaramuzza, D. The foldable drone: A morphing quadrotor that can squeeze and fly, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett., 2018, 4, (2), pp 209–216.10.1109/LRA.2018.2885575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrouaoui, S., Bouzid, Y. and Guiatni, M. Towards a new design with generic modeling and adaptive control of a transformable quadrotor, Aeronaut. J., 2021, 125, (1294), pp 2169–2199.10.1017/aer.2021.54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Liu, C. and Zhang, K. A novel morphing quadrotor uav with sarrus-linkage-based reconfigurable frame, 2024 6th International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots (ReMAR). IEEE, 2024, pp 283–289.10.1109/ReMAR61031.2024.10619988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, D., Pei, Z., Shi, J. and Tang, Z. Design, modeling and control of a novel morphing quadrotor, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett., 2021, 6, (4), pp 8013–8020.10.1109/LRA.2021.3098302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayakumar, S.S., Subramaniam, I.P., Stanislaus Arputharaj, B., Solaiappan, S.K., Rajendran, P., Lee, I.E., Madasamy, S.K., Gnanasekaran, R.K., Karuppasamy, A. and Raja, V. Design, control, aerodynamic performances, and structural integrity investigations of compact ducted drone with co-axial propeller for high altitude surveillance, Sci. Rep., 2024, 14, (1), p 6330.10.1038/s41598-024-54174-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modi, H., Su, H., Liang, X. and Zheng, M. Morphocopter: design, modeling, and control of a new transformable quad-bi copter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07204 , 2025.Google Scholar
Bai, Y. and Gururajan, S. Evaluation of a baseline controller for autonomous “figure-8” flights of a morphing geometry quadcopter: Flight performance, Drones, 2019, 3, (3), p 70.10.3390/drones3030070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desbiez, A., Expert, F., Boyron, M., Diperi, J., Viollet, S. and Ruffier, F. X-morf: a crash-separable quadrotor that morfs its x-geometry in flight, 2017 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED-UAS). IEEE, 2017, pp 222–227.10.1109/RED-UAS.2017.8101670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L., Clarke, R., Akbari, A., Jovan, F., Marafie, J., Marjanovic, O., Bernardini, S., Richardson, T. and Watson, S. Subterranean mine inspection using the prometheus re-configurable drone, J. Field Rob., 2025, 43, pp 1646–1660.10.1002/rob.70112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouman, A., Nadan, P., Anderson, M., Pastor, D., Izraelevitz, J., Burdick, J. and Kennedy, B. Design and autonomous stabilization of a ballistically-launched multirotor, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020, pp 8511–8517.10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Y., Yang, F., Wang, Z., Wang, K., Cao, Y., Xu, C. and Gao, F. Ring-rotor: a novel retractable ring-shaped quadrotor with aerial grasping and transportation capability, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett., 2023, 8, (4), pp 2126–2133.10.1109/LRA.2023.3245499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, M., De, Q., Yu, D., Hu, A., Liu, Z. and Wang, H. Biomimetic morphing quadrotor inspired by eagle claw for dynamic grasping, IEEE Trans. Rob., 2024, 40, pp 2513–2528.10.1109/TRO.2024.3386616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, T., Xu, M. and Han, L. Design and control of an actively morphing quadrotor with vertically foldable arms, 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2025, pp 5420–5425.10.1109/IROS60139.2025.11247663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M., Anzai, T., Shi, F., Chen, X., Okada, K. and Inaba, M. Design, modeling, and control of an aerial robot dragon: a dual-rotor-embedded multilink robot with the ability of multi-degree-of-freedom aerial transformation, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett., 2018, 3, (2), pp 1176–1183.10.1109/LRA.2018.2793344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M., Anzai, T. and Nishio, T. Design, modeling, and control of a quadruped robot spidar: spherically vectorable and distributed rotors assisted air-ground quadruped robot, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett., 2023, 8, (7), pp 3923–3930.10.1109/LRA.2023.3272285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M., Kawasaki, K., Okada, K. and Inaba, M. Transformable multirotor with two-dimensional multilinks: modeling, control, and motion planning for aerial transformation, Adv. Rob., 2016, 30, (13), pp 825–845.10.1080/01691864.2016.1181006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzai, T., Zhao, M., Nozawa, S., Shi, F., Okada, K. and Inaba, M. Aerial grasping based on shape adaptive transformation by halo: horizontal plane transformable aerial robot with closed-loop multilinks structure, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2018, pp 6990–6996.10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Wit, A., van den Brink, W. and Moghadasi, M. Multiple unmanned aerial systems collision impacts on wing leading edge, Aeronaut. J., 2022, 126, (1304), pp 1648–1677.10.1017/aer.2022.23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, F., Zhao, M., Murooka, M., Okada, K. and Inaba, M. Aerial regrasping: Pivoting with transformable multilink aerial robot, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020, pp 200–207.10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daadi, A., Bouzid, Y., Araar, O., Derrouaoui, S.H., Djekrif, A. and Boukabour, A. Modeling and simulation of trajectory tracking for a reconfigurable serial drone using simscape multibody, 2025 International Conference on Control, Automation and Diagnosis (ICCAD). IEEE, 2025, pp 1–6.10.1109/ICCAD64771.2025.11099299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesij, Ü., Yahya, Ö., Elif Albina, Ü. et al. Enhancing aerodynamic performance of a two-dimensional airfoil using plasma actuators, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2025, 158, p 109882.Google Scholar
Hassani, H., Mansouri, A. and Ahaitouf, A. Performance evaluation of control strategies for autonomous quadrotors: a review, Complexity, 2024, 2024, (1), p 8820378.10.1155/2024/8820378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jatsun, S., Emelyanova, O. and Leon, A.M. Design of an experimental test bench for a uav type convertiplane, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 714, 1. IOP Publishing, 2020, p 012009.10.1088/1757-899X/714/1/012009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daadi, A., Bouzid, Y., Araar, O., Derrouaoui, S.H., Dahmani, M. and Dellali, G. Inertial parameters computation for a novel design of multi-link quadrotor, 2024 2nd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Automatic Control (ICEEAC). IEEE, 2024, pp 1–7.10.1109/ICEEAC61226.2024.10576360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daadi, A., Boulebtinai, H., Derrouaoui, S.H. and Boudjema, F. Sliding mode controller based on the sliding mode observer for a qball 2+ quadcopter with experimental validation, Int. J. Robot. Control Syst., 2022, 2, (2), pp 332–356.10.31763/ijrcs.v2i2.693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khattab, A., Mizrak, I. and Alwi, H. Fault tolerant control of an octorotor uav using sliding mode for applications in challenging environments, Annu. Rev. Control., 2024, 57, p 100952.10.1016/j.arcontrol.2024.100952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kose, O. and Oktay, T. Simultaneous design of morphing hexarotor and autopilot system by using deep neural network and spsa, Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 2023, 95, (6), pp 939–949.10.1108/AEAT-07-2022-0178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattei, M. Robust multivariable pid control for linear parameter varying systems, Automatica, 2001, 37, (12), pp 1997–2003.10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00156-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, L. and Yang, J. An improved approach to robust stability analysis and controller synthesis for lpv systems, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2011, 21, (13), pp 1574–1586.10.1002/rnc.1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar