Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-l4t7p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T04:05:01.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Snow replica method for three-dimensional X-ray microtomographic imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Martin Heggli
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: heggli@slf.ch
Esther Frei
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: heggli@slf.ch
Martin Schneebeli
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos-Dorf, Switzerland E-mail: heggli@slf.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Visualization and quantification of snow structures at a scale of a few millimetres is important in understanding the mechanical, thermal and electromagnetic properties of snow. Surface sections and, to an even greater degree, three-dimensional (3-D) reconstructions of cast snow samples are difficult to prepare, and automatic image processing is notoriously difficult and often requires manual evaluation. Here, we present a new method to measure the 3-D structure of cast snow samples. Snow samples cast with diethyl phthalate (DEP) and frozen are cut to a sample size a few centimetres in diameter and up to 10 cm in height. The ice of these samples is then sublimated in high vacuum and the remaining negative structure (replica) is imaged using X-ray microtomography (micro-CT). The accuracy of the method is demonstrated by comparing micro-CT scans of the original snow structure and the replica. The method described here allows easy transportation of samples, requires little manual interaction, has a very high spatial resolution of up to 10 μm and is environmentally friendly.

Information

Type
Instruments and Methods
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sample holder used for verification of micro-CT measurements. This sample holder was used to make micro-CT scans of the original snow sample, then cast the sample with DEP, perform the sublimation and finally acquire a second micro-CT scan of the replica. The aluminium strip serves to prevent the snow sample from rotating or floating on the DEP. Note that DEP (1130 kg m−3) is denser than ice (917 kg m−3).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Grey-level histograms of the filtered micro-CT images. The arrows indicate the local minima between the two peaks. The corresponding grey-level values have been used for image segmentation. The threshold values for the original snow sample and for the DEP replica differ slightly. They are 4247 for the threshold between air and ice (snow) and 3624 for air–DEP (replica).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Weight loss (solid symbols) and pressure (open symbols) during the vacuum treatment of two samples. Sample A (squares) was kept in the vacuum without drying agent; sample B (circles) was stored in the vacuum together with a drying agent. The connecting lines serve as a visual guide.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Sequence of micro-CT scans that shows a cross-section of one sample. The sample was stored under vacuum without drying agent. The sublimation front propagates towards the centre of the sample. The length of the scale bar is 5 mm.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The raw micro-CT images show that the DEP replica (b) is the negative of the original snow structure (a). The middle row shows the segmented images of snow (c) and replica (d). By direct inversion of the segmented image of the replica we get an image (not shown) that corresponds to the image of the snow structure (c). Differences between the two segmented images (e,f) are caused by small misalignments of the sample. The enlarged region (f) shows that the differences are not more than 1 voxel thick. Positive differences are shown in grey and negative differences in black. The size of the slices is 3.6 mm × 3.6 mm (0.9 mm × 0.9 mm for the zoom). All image processing was performed in 3-D, but here a single slice is shown for clarity.

Figure 5

Table 1. Relative errors (in %) between structural parameters of the digital replica and the original snow sample. Values for the density, the specific surface area (SSA), the average ice thickness and the average pore thickness are given for two samples: A (11 sub-volumes) and B (5 sub-volumes). Sample A (sample B) has a density of 361 ±18 kg m−3 (444 ± 6 kg m−3)and an SSA of 18.8 ± 0.4 mm−1 (14.9 ± 0.2 mm−1). The average ice thickness is 0.168 ± 0.004 mm (0.200 ± 0.003 mm) and the average pore thickness is 0.198 ± 0.015 mm (0.196 ± 0.005 mm)

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Typical example of the frequency distribution of (a) ice and (b) pore thickness of subsample B.4 (Table 1) with a size of 2003 voxels, i.e. (3.6 mm)3. The distributions are calculated using the distance transform method (Hildebrand and Rüegsegger, 1997). The bold lines indicate the distributions in the original snow sample. The dotted lines show the difference between the digital replica and the original snow.