Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lcgwf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T18:17:44.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unpacking the ‘black box’ of total pathogen burden: is number or type of pathogens most predictive of all-cause mortality in the United States?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

A. M. SIMANEK
Affiliation:
Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
J. B. DOWD
Affiliation:
CUNY School of Public Health, Hunter College, City University of New York, NY, USA
A. ZAJACOVA
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA
A. E. AIELLO*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
*
* Author for correspondence: Dr A. E. Aiello, Professor of Epidemiology, Social Epidemiology Program Leader, Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 2101C McGavran-Greenberg Hall, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA. (Email: aaiello@unc.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A ‘black box’ paradigm has prevailed in which researchers have focused on the association between the total number of pathogens for which individuals are seropositive (i.e. total pathogen burden) and various chronic diseases, while largely ignoring the role that seropositivity for specific combinations of pathogens may play in the aetiology of such outcomes and consequently mortality. We examined the association between total pathogen burden as well as specific pathogen combinations and all-cause mortality in the United States. Data were from individuals aged ⩾25 years tested for cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1, HSV-2 and Helicobacter pylori, with mortality follow-up to 31 December 2006 in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (N = 6522). We did not observe a statistically significant graded relationship between total pathogen burden level and all-cause mortality. Furthermore, compared to those seronegative for all four pathogens, the greatest statistically significant rate of all-cause mortality was for those CMV+/HSV-2+ (hazard ratio 1·95, 95% confidence interval 1·13–3·35) adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education level, body mass index (kg/m2) and smoking status. Interventions targeting prevention or treatment of particular pathogens may be more effective for reducing mortality than those focused solely on reducing overall pathogen burden.

Information

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Table 1. Population-weighted proportion of individuals seropositive for each combination of pathogens by total pathogen burden level in subjects aged ⩾25 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1988–1994)

Figure 1

Table 2. Population-weighted demographic and clinical characteristics by total pathogen burden level in subjects aged ⩾25 years assessed for mortality status in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1988–1994)

Figure 2

Table 3. Population-weighted demographic and clinical characteristics by mortality status in individuals aged ⩾25 years tested for pathogens in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1988–1994)

Figure 3

Table 4. Association between total pathogen burden level and all-cause mortality in subjects aged ⩾25 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1988–1994)

Figure 4

Table 5. Association between each pathogen combination and all-cause mortality in subjects aged ⩾25 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1988–1994)