Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-23T14:19:35.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retrospective analysis of 351 patients with vocal fold leukoplakia: impact of smoking, lesion size and histopathological grade on treatment outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2025

Xueqian Yang Open the ORCID record for Xueqian Yang [Opens in a new window] ,
Liang Peng ,
Ruihua Fang ,
Lin Chen ,
Zhangwei Hu ,
Dan Wang ,
Renqiang Ma ,
Jie Deng ,
Xiaolin Zhu Open the ORCID record for Xiaolin Zhu [Opens in a new window]  and
Zhangfeng Wang
...Show all authors
Xueqian Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Liang Peng
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Ruihua Fang
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Lin Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Zhangwei Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Dan Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Renqiang Ma
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Jie Deng
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Xiaolin Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Zhangfeng Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Weiping Wen*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Wenbin Lei*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Wei Sun*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author: Weiping Wen;Email: wenwp@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Wenbin Lei;Email: leiwb@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Wei Sun; Email: sunwei26@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Corresponding author: Weiping Wen;Email: wenwp@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Wenbin Lei;Email: leiwb@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Wei Sun; Email: sunwei26@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Corresponding author: Weiping Wen;Email: wenwp@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Wenbin Lei;Email: leiwb@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Wei Sun; Email: sunwei26@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To explore the treatment options and prognostic factors of vocal fold leukoplakia.

Methods

The study examined conservative and surgical treatment approaches, and analysed prognostic factors influencing vocal fold leukoplakia outcomes.

Results

In the conservative treatment group, lesion size (p = 0.035) and smoking (p < 0.001) were identified as independent factors influencing treatment outcomes. In the surgical treatment group, lesion size (p = 0.018) was identified as an independent factor affecting recurrence. There was no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment for patients with hyperplasia (p = 0.223), mild dysplasia (p = 0.634) and moderate dysplasia (p = 0.758).

Conclusion

Smoking and lesion size are key factors influencing the outcome of conservative treatment, while lesion size is a significant factor affecting recurrence in surgically treated patients. More importantly, conservative treatment should be prioritised for patients with moderate dysplasia and milder vocal fold leukoplakia.

Keywords

larynxendoscopytherapeuticsprognosis

Information

Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 139 , Issue 11 , November 2025 , pp. 1095 - 1101
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Wei Sun takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Ali, SA, Smith, JD, Hogikyan, ND. The white lesion, hyperkeratosis, and dysplasia. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2019;52:703–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrel, R, Uro Coste, E, Costes-Martineau, V, Woisard, V, Atallah, I, Remacle, M. Vocal-fold leukoplakia and dysplasia. Mini-review by the French Society of Phoniatrics and Laryngology (SFPL). Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2020;137:399–404CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weller, MD, Nankivell, PC, McConkey, C, Paleri, V, Mehanna, HM. The risk and interval to malignancy of patients with laryngeal dysplasia: a systematic review of case series and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 2010;35:364–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C, Zhang, N, Wang, S, Cheng, L, Wu, H, Chen, J, et al. A new classification of vocal fold leukoplakia by morphological appearance guiding the treatment. Acta Otolaryngol 2018;138:584–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, M, Chen, J, Cheng, L, Wu, H. Recurrence of vocal fold leukoplakia after carbon dioxide laser therapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274: 3429–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, L-J, Wang, J, Xiao, Y, Ye, J-Y, Xu, W, Yang, Q-W. Clinical classification and treatment of leukokeratosis of the vocal cords. Chin Med J 2013;126(18):3523–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, J-Y, Park, YM, Kang, M, Lee, SJ, Baek, K, Na, J, et al. Angiolytic laser stripping versus CO2 laser microflap excision for vocal fold leukoplakia: long-term disease control and voice outcomes. PloS One 2018;13:e0209691CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, L-J, Yu, Z, Zhu, J-Q, Wang, M-L, Li, Z-X, Yang, C, et al. Laryngoscopic characteristics related to the risk of cancerization of vocal cord leukoplakia. Acta Otolaryngol 2021;141:802–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, TJ, Lin, WN, Lee, LY, Young, CK, Lee, LA, Chang, KP, et al. Classification of vocal fold leukoplakia by clinical scoring. Head & Neck 2016;38(Suppl 1):E1998–2003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, CK, Lin, WN, Lee, LY, Lee, LA, Hsin, LJ, Liao, CT, et al. Laryngoscopic characteristics in vocal leukoplakia: inter‐rater reliability and correlation with histology grading. Laryngoscope 2015;125:E62-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, N, Cheng, L, Chen, M, Chen, J, Yang, Y, Xie, M, et al. Relationship between laryngoscopic and pathological characteristics of vocal cords leukoplakia. Acta Otolaryngol 2017;137:1199–203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, L. World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. Ear Nose Throat J 2006;85:74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gale, N, Poljak, M, Zidar, N. Update from the 4th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumours: what is new in the 2017 WHO Blue Book for Tumours of the Hypopharynx, Larynx, Trachea and Parapharyngeal Space. Head Neck Path 2017;11:23–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, FL. Management of advanced premalignant laryngeal lesions. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;11:462–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remacle, M, Friedrich, G, Dikkers, FG, de Jong, F. Phonosurgery of the vocal folds: a classification proposal. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003;260:1–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehanna, H, Paleri, V, Robson, A, Wight, R, Helliwell, T. Consensus statement by otorhinolaryngologists and pathologists on the diagnosis and management of laryngeal dysplasia. Clin Otolaryngol 2010;35:170–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, Y, Liu, H. Histopathological variability and the prognosis of laryngeal premalignant lesions. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2014;49:979–85Google ScholarPubMed
McLaren, KM, Burnett, RA, Goodlad, JR, Howatson, SR, Lang, S, Lee, FD, et al. Consistency of histopathological reporting of laryngeal dysplasia. Histopathology 2000;37:460–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, M, Li, C, Yang, Y, Cheng, L, Wu, H. A morphological classification for vocal fold leukoplakia. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2019;85:588–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, M, Cheng, L, Li, C-J, Chen, J, Shu, Y-L, Wu, H-T. nonsurgical treatment for vocal fold leukoplakia: an analysis of 178 cases. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:1–7Google ScholarPubMed
Yang, S-W, Chao, W-C, Lee, Y-S, Chang, L-C, Hsieh, T-Y, Chen, T-A, et al. Treatment outcome of vocal cord leukoplakia by transoral laser microsurgery. Lasers Med Sci 2017;32:19–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, S, Huang, H, Sun, P, Zhang, D. Analysis of prognostic factors for vocal fold leukoplakia based on 344 cases at a two-year follow up. J Laryngol Otol 2023;137:1170–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, DH,Yoon, TM, Lee, JK, and Lim, SC , Predictive factors of recurrence and malignant transformation in vocal cord leukoplakia. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2015;272:1719–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isenberg, JS, Crozier, DL, Dailey, SH. Institutional and comprehensive review of laryngeal leukoplakia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008;117:74–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jabarin, B, Pitaro, J, Marom, T, Muallem-Kalmovich, L. Dysplastic changes in patients with recurrent laryngeal leukoplakia: importance of long-term follow-up. Isr Med Assoc J 2018;20:623–6Google ScholarPubMed