Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T09:14:50.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dry storage alters intraspecific variation in phenotypic traits at early life stages: evidence from a dominant alpine meadow species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

Dali Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Haiying Yuan
Affiliation:
Wuwei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuwei 733000, China
Jinglong Bao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Xiaohua Zhao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Xiuzhen Fu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Xiaowen Hu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Corresponding author: Xiaowen Hu; Email: huxw@lzu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The intraspecific variations of phenotypic traits in the early life stages, such as seed germination and seedling establishment, are important components affecting species adaptation and differentiation. As one of the most common ways in which seeds are maintained, dry storage usually affects these traits, by either increasing or decreasing variation among populations. However, little is known about how the interaction between dry storage and population variation of a species affects the performance and adaptability of early life-cycle traits. In this study, we conducted experiments with seeds from ten populations of Elymus nutans along an altitudinal gradient on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Fresh seeds and seeds stored dry for 6 months were used to quantify the temperature thresholds for germination, determine seedling emergence and survival in two common gardens and examine the correlation between these traits and environmental conditions of population provenance. Dry storage increased germination percentage, germination speed and seedling emergence, and decreased intraspecific variation in germination traits of seeds (reduced by 33.36, 52.05 and 20.45% for Tb, θT(50) and σθT, respectively). Dry storage had little effect on the intraspecific variation of seedling emergence and survival. In addition, the temperature threshold for germination cannot be used to predict seedling emergence and survival in either common garden, regardless of whether seeds were stored or not. These results indicated that it is feasible to use dry-stored seeds to evaluate and select suitable provenances in ecological restoration, and using dry-stored seeds in ecological restoration projects is expected to achieve better vegetation restoration results than fresh seeds. On the other hand, the status of seeds (fresh vs. dry stored) should be considered in an evaluation of the adaptive value of plant functional traits, especially in the early life stages, otherwise, inconsistent conclusions may be drawn.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. A conceptual model: reaction norm curves of phenotypic traits for fresh and stored seeds to environmental gradient. The solid blue and orange lines represent the reaction norm curves for fresh and stored seeds, respectively. These curves demonstrate the increasing trend of a specific trait along an environmental gradient, such as altitude, longitude, latitude, etc. The left graph indicates that the impact of dry storage on phenotypic traits does not alter their intraspecific variation (a). On the other hand, the middle and right graphs depict that the effect of dry storage is population-dependent, leading to an increase (b) or decrease (c) in the intraspecific variation of traits.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Locations of seed collection sites and common garden sites.

Figure 2

Table 1. Effect of storage, population, temperature and their interactions on germination percentage and speed of E. nutans seeds using generalized linear mixed models.

Figure 3

Table 2. Germination parameters of fresh and stored seeds (6-month storage) of E. nutans populations based on the thermal time model.

Figure 4

Figure 3. The relationships between the altitude and base temperature for fresh and stored seeds. The correlation coefficient (R) and P values are shown in each figure. The fitted lines are from OLS regression. Significant relationships (P < 0.05) are denoted with solid lines, and grey areas indicate the 95% confidence interval of the fit.

Figure 5

Figure 4. The results of redundancy analysis (RDA) between environmental conditions and temperature thresholds for germination of fresh and stored seeds. Red and blue arrows indicate response and explanatory variables, respectively. Tb, base temperature; θT(50), thermal time for 50% of seeds to germinate at suboptimal temperature ranges; σlnθT, standard deviation for ln(θT); MAT, mean annual temperature; MAP, mean annual precipitation; NON, ${\rm NO}_3^-$-N; NHN, ${\rm NH}_4^ +$-N; AP, available phosphorus.

Figure 6

Table 3. Effect of common garden, storage, population and their interactions on seedling emergence and survival of E. nutans using generalized linear mixed models.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Seedling emergence and survival for fresh and stored seeds of seven E. nutans populations in both common gardens. Bars with different uppercase and lowercase letters indicate that significant differences in phenotypic traits among populations for fresh and stored seeds at the level of 0.05, respectively. *, ** and *** indicate significant effects of dry storage on phenotypic traits at the level of 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively.

Figure 8

Figure 6. The relationships between the altitude and seedling emergence and survival for fresh and stored seeds. The correlation coefficient (R) and P values are shown in each figure. The fitted lines are from OLS regression. The solid black lines indicate significant relationships (P < 0.05), and grey areas indicate the 95% confidence interval of the fit.

Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material
Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 844.3 KB