Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T01:05:31.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nasal airflow in inspiration and expiration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Laura Viani
Affiliation:
Liverpool
Andrew S. Jones*
Affiliation:
Liverpool
Ray Clarke
Affiliation:
Liverpool
*
A. S. Jones, University Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, PO Box No 147, Prescot Street, Liverpool L69 3BX.

Abstract

Inspiratory and expiratory airflow rates were measured in 30 subjects during quiet respiration (at a pressure gradient of 150 Pa) and at peak flow rates.

For low flow rates airflow rate was greater for inspiration than for expiration. Conversely at peak flow rates flow was greatest during expiration. Thus there was a reversal in the phase relationship between inspiration and expiration as flow rate increased.

It was also found that peak inspiratory flow rate correlated better with values for nasal resistance than did peak expiratory flow rate. Flow rate measured by rhinomanometry during quiet respiration was more sensitive to physiologically induced changes in nasal resistance than was peak flow rate.

The findings are discussed with reference to previous work on the physiology of nasal airflow.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable