WBNS-10TV Columbus, “Columbus Man's Organs Donated despite Mom's Plea,” July 11, 2013, available at <http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2013/07/11/columbus-new-father-dies-after-hit-skip-crash.html> (last visited April 27, 2015). (last visited April 27, 2015).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=WBNS-10TV+Columbus,+“Columbus+Man's+Organs+Donated+despite+Mom's+Plea,”+July+11,+2013,+available+at++(last+visited+April+27,+2015).>Google Scholar

The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act stipulates that a person's decision to donate as communicated on a driver's license or through a donor registry can be revoked only by the person and not by his or her family (see National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, UAGA, 2006, section 8). Families may not refuse to donate the organs of a decedent who had agreed to be a donor by signing a driver's license or registering in a state donor registry. The National Conference of Commissioners of Uniform State Laws, which drafted the UAGA, explained that “Section 8 is designed to state firmly the rule that a donor's autonomous decision regarding the making of an anatomical gift is to be honored and implemented and is not subject to change by others. Section 8 not only continues the policy of making lifetime donations irrevocable but also is restated to take away from families the power, right, or authority to consent to, amend, or revoke donations made by donors during their lifetimes.” See Anatomical Gift Act (2006), available at <http://www.uniformlaws.org/Act.aspx?title=Anatomical%20Gift%20Act%20%282006%29> (last visited April 27, 2015). NATCO, a professional organization for transplant professionals, published a position statement supporting the position that families should not be allowed to refuse donation when a person had signed a driver's license or was listed in a registry (First Person Consent, 2009, available at <www.natco1.org/Advocacy/files/First%20Person%20Consent.pdf> (last visited April 27, 2015)). While at one time OPOs hesitated or refused to violate a family's wishes, there has been a significant shift in the force of statements and policies advocating for taking this role away from the family. (last visited April 27, 2015). NATCO, a professional organization for transplant professionals, published a position statement supporting the position that families should not be allowed to refuse donation when a person had signed a driver's license or was listed in a registry (First Person Consent, 2009, available at (last visited April 27, 2015)). While at one time OPOs hesitated or refused to violate a family's wishes, there has been a significant shift in the force of statements and policies advocating for taking this role away from the family.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=The+Uniform+Anatomical+Gift+Act+stipulates+that+a+person's+decision+to+donate+as+communicated+on+a+driver's+license+or+through+a+donor+registry+can+be+revoked+only+by+the+person+and+not+by+his+or+her+family+(see+National+Conference+of+Commissioners+on+Uniform+State+Laws,+UAGA,+2006,+section+8).+Families+may+not+refuse+to+donate+the+organs+of+a+decedent+who+had+agreed+to+be+a+donor+by+signing+a+driver's+license+or+registering+in+a+state+donor+registry.+The+National+Conference+of+Commissioners+of+Uniform+State+Laws,+which+drafted+the+UAGA,+explained+that+“Section+8+is+designed+to+state+firmly+the+rule+that+a+donor's+autonomous+decision+regarding+the+making+of+an+anatomical+gift+is+to+be+honored+and+implemented+and+is+not+subject+to+change+by+others.+Section+8+not+only+continues+the+policy+of+making+lifetime+donations+irrevocable+but+also+is+restated+to+take+away+from+families+the+power,+right,+or+authority+to+consent+to,+amend,+or+revoke+donations+made+by+donors+during+their+lifetimes.”+See+Anatomical+Gift+Act+(2006),+available+at++(last+visited+April+27,+2015).+NATCO,+a+professional+organization+for+transplant+professionals,+published+a+position+statement+supporting+the+position+that+families+should+not+be+allowed+to+refuse+donation+when+a+person+had+signed+a+driver's+license+or+was+listed+in+a+registry+(First+Person+Consent,+2009,+available+at++(last+visited+April+27,+2015)).+While+at+one+time+OPOs+hesitated+or+refused+to+violate+a+family's+wishes,+there+has+been+a+significant+shift+in+the+force+of+statements+and+policies+advocating+for+taking+this+role+away+from+the+family.>Google Scholar

See WBNS-10TV Columbus, supra note 1.Google Scholar

Siminoff, L. A. Burant, C. Youngner, S. J., “Death and Organ Procurement: Public Benefits and Attitudes,” Social Science and Medicine 59, no. 3 (2004): 2325–2334.Google Scholar

See UAGA supra note 2; National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Law, “Enactment Status Map,” available at <http://uniformlaws.org/Act.aspx?title=Anatomical+Gift+Act+%282006%29> (last visited April 27, 2015).+(last+visited+April+27,+2015).>Google Scholar

Board of Health Sciences Policy, Committee on Increasing Rates of Organ Donation, Childress, J. Liverman, C., eds., Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action (Washington D.C.: National Academies Press, 2006).Google Scholar

OPTN/UNOS Organ Procurement Organization Committee, Report to the Board of Directors, June 23–24, Richmond, Virginia, available at <http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/converge/CommitteeReports/board_main_HistocompatibilityCommittee_7_2_2014_15_51.pdf> (last visited April 27, 2015).+(last+visited+April+27,+2015).>Google Scholar

Berg, J. Appelbaum, P. Parker, L. Lidz, C., Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001); Faden, R. Beauchamp, T. L., A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Hall, D. E. Prochazka, A. V. Fink, A. S., “Informed Consent for Clinical Treatment,” Canadian Medical Association Journal 184, no. 5 (2012): 533–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Hall, , supra note 9.Google Scholar

See Berg, et al., supra note 8.Google Scholar

Woien, S. Rady, M. Verheijde, J. McGregor, J., “Organ Procurement Organizations Internet Enrollment for Organ Donation: Abandoning Informed Consent,” BMC Medical Ethics 7, no. 14 (2006): 14.Google Scholar

See NCCUSL, supra note 2; Iltis, A. S. Rie, M. Wall, A., “Organ Donation, Patients’ Rights, and Medical Responsibilities at the End of Life,” Critical Care Medicine 37, no. 1 (2009): 310–315.Google Scholar

See Faden, Beauchamp, , supra note 8, at 35–36.Google Scholar

Bernat, J., Ethical Issues in Neurology (Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008): At 272.Google Scholar

See Iltis, Rie, Wall, , supra note 13.Google Scholar

Childress, J. F. Liverman, C. T., eds., Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2006): At 182.Google Scholar

See ltis, Rie, Wall, , supra note 13.Google Scholar

See Childress, Liverman, supra note 17, at 88 (emphasis added).Google Scholar

Anecdotally, I have found that very few “ordinary” people, such as undergraduate students and friends who are not involved in health care, know what the organ donation signature on their driver's license entails.Google Scholar

See Childress, Liverman, , supra note 17, at 112 (emphasis added).Google Scholar

Beauchamp, T. L., “Informed Consent: Its History, Meaning, and Present Challenges,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20, no. 4 (2011): 515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beauchamp, T. Childress, J., Principles of Biomedical Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009): At Chap. 4.Google Scholar

See Faden, Beauchamp, , supra note 8, at 33 n.2.Google Scholar

See Hall, , supra note 9.Google Scholar

For a discussion of different types of consent, see Whitney, S. N. McGuire, A. L. McCullough, L. G., “A Typology of Shared Decision Making, Informed Consent, and Simple Consent,” Annals of Internal Medicine 140, no. 1 (2004): 54–60. For a discussion of varying degrees of capacity required for consent, see Drane, J. F., “Competency to Give an Informed Consent. A Model for Making Clinical Assessments,” JAMA 252, no. 7 (1984): 925–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engelhardt, H. T. Jr., The Foundations of Bioethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 N.Y. 125, 105 N.E. 92 (1914).Google Scholar

See Berg, et al., supra note 8.Google Scholar

Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972).Google Scholar

Nair-Collins, M., “Brain Death, Paternalism, and the Language of ‘Death,“’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23, no. 1 (2013): 53–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Farragher, R. Laffey, J., “Maternal Brain Death and Somatic Support,” Neurocritical Care 3, no. 2 (2005): 99–106; Dillon, W. Lee, R. Tronolone, M., “Life Support and Maternal Brain Death during Pregnancy,” JAMA 248, no. 9 (1982): 1089–1091; Field, D. Gates, E. Creasy, R. Jonsen, A. Laros, A., “Maternal Brain Death during Pregnancy: Medical and Ethical Issues,” JAMA 260, no. 6 (1988): 816–820; Bernstein, I. Watson, M. Simmons, G. Catalano, P. Davis, G. Collins, R., “Maternal Brain Death and Prolonged Fetal Survival,” Obstetrics & Gynecology 74, no. 3 pt. 2 (1989): 434–437; Nuutinen, L. Alahuta, S. Heikkinen, J., “Nutrition during Ten-Week Life Support with Successful Fetal Outcome in a Case with Fatal Maternal Brain Damage,” Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 13, no. 4 (1989): 432–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Organ Donation: Saying Goodbye before Organ Donation Surgery, 2008, Experiences of Donor Families, available at <http://www.healthtalkonline.org/Organ_donation_and_transplant/organ_donation/Topic/4113> (last visited April 27, 2015); Sque, M. Long, T. Payne, S. Allardyce, D., “Why Relatives Do Not Donate Organs for Transplants” ‘Sacrifice’ or ‘Gift of Life’?” Journal of Advanced Nursing 61, no. 2 (2008): 134–144.Google Scholar

See Youngner, S. J., “Some Must Die,” in Youngner, S. J. Fox, R. O'Connell, L. J., eds., Organ Transplantation: Meanings and Realities (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1996): At 50; Lock, M., “Living Cadavers and the Calculation of Death,” Body and Society 10, no. 2–3 (2004): 135–152.Google Scholar

For example, see Holtkamp, S., Wrapped in Mourning: The Gift of Life and Organ Donor Family Trauma (London: Brunner Routledge, 2001): 6–7, 20–27, 32–51, 60–69.Google Scholar

See Woien, et al., supra note 12.Google Scholar

Carolina Donor Services, “Frequently Asked Questions,” available at <http://carolinadonorservices.org/frequently-asked-questions> (last visited April 27, 2015).+(last+visited+April+27,+2015).>Google Scholar

Vincent, A. Logan, L., “Consent for Organ Donation,” British Journal of Anesthesia 108, S1 (2012): i80–i87; Long, T. Sque, M. Addington-Hall, J., “What Does a Diagnosis of Brain Death Mean to Family Members Approached about Organ Donation? A Review of the Literature,” Progress in Transplantation 18, no. 2 (2008): 118–125; Pearson, I. Y. Baseley, P. Spencer-Plane, T. Chapman, J. R. Robertson, P., “A Survey of Families of Brain Dead Patients: Their Experiences, Attitudes to Organ Donation and Transplantation,” Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 23, no. 1 (1995): 88–95; Siminoff, L. A. Mercer, M. B. Arnold, R., “Families Understanding of Brain Death,” Progress in Transplantation 13, no. 3 (2003): 218–224; see Siminoff, et al., supra note 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See OrganDonor.gov, quoted in Nair-Collins, supra note 31.Google Scholar

See Nair-Collins, , supra note 31.Google Scholar

UNOS, “Theological Perspectives,” available at <http://www.unos.org/donation/index.php?topic=fact_sheet_9> (last visited April 28, 2015) quoted in Nair-Collins, supra note 31.+(last+visited+April+28,+2015)+quoted+in+Nair-Collins,+supra+note+31.>Google Scholar

See Nair-Collins, , supra note 31.Google Scholar

See, for example, Shewmon, D., “The Brain and Somatic Integration: Insights into the Standard Rationale for Equating ‘Brain Death’ with Death,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26, no. 5 (2001): 457–478; Shewmon, D., “Brain Death: Can It Be Resuscitated?” Issues in Law and Medicine 25, no. 1 (2009): 3–14; Bernat, J., “Refinements in the Definition and Criterion of Death,” in Youngner, S. Arnold, R. Schapiro, R., eds., The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999): At 83–92; Halevy, A. Brody, B., “Brain Death: Reconciling Definitions, Criteria, and Tests,” Annals of Internal Medicine 119, no. 6 (1993): 519–525; Brody, B., “How Much of the Brain Must be Dead?” in Youngner, S. Arnold, R. Schapiro, R., eds., The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999): At 71–82.Google Scholar

Taylor, R., “Reexamining the Definition and Criterion of Death,” Seminars in Neurology 17, no. 3 (1997): 265–270; Shah, S. Truog, R. Miller, F., “Death and Legal Fictions,” Journal of Medical Ethics 37, no. 12 (2011): 719–722; Shah, S. Miller, F., “Can We Handle the Truth? Legal Fictions in the Determination of Death,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 36, no. 4 (2010): 540–585.Google Scholar

Youngner, S. Arnold, S., “Philosophical Debates about the Definition of Death: Who Cares?” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26, no. 5 (2001): 527–537; Youngner, S., “Defining Death: A Superficial and Fragile Consensus,” Archives of Neurology 49, no. 5 (1992): 570–572.Google Scholar

For a discussion of the nature of these conflicts, see Nair-Collins, , supra note 31.Google Scholar

Some reject the general definitions-criteria-test framework developed by Capron, A. Kass, L. R., “A Statutory Definition of the Standards for Determing Human Death,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121, no. 1 (1972): 87–118 and Bernat, J. L. Culver, C. M. Gert, B., “On the Definition and Criterion of Death,” Annals of Internal Medicine 94, no. 3 (1981): 389–94. For further discussion of this, see Nair-Collins, , supra note 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See, e.g., Veatch, R., “The Impending Collapse of the Whole-Brain Definition of Death,” Hastings Center Report 23, no. 4 (1993): 18–24; Veatch, R., “The Death of Whole-Brain Death: The Plague of the Disaggregators, Somaticists, and Mentalists,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30, no. 4 (2005): 353–378.Google Scholar

Bernat, J., “The Whole-Brain Concept of Death Remains Optimum Public Policy,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34, no. 1 (2006): 35–43.Google Scholar

Uniform Determination of Death Act (1980, at 5), available at <http://www.uniformlaws.org/shared/docs/determinationofdeath/udda80.pdf> (last visited April 28, 2015).+(last+visited+April+28,+2015).>Google Scholar

As set forth in President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Defining Death: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1981a); President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Biobehavioral Research, “Guidelines for the Determination of Death. Report of the Medical Consultants on the Diagnosis of Death to the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research,” JAMA 246, no. 19 (1981b): 2184–2186; Wijdicks, E., “Determining brain death in adults,” Neurology 45, no. 19 (1995): 1003–1011; and Wijdicks, E., “Quality Standard Subcommittee of American Academy of Neurology: Practice Parameters for Determining Brain Death in Adults,” American Academy of Neurology 45, no. 5 (1995): 1012–1014.Google Scholar

See Halevy, Brody, , supra note 44.Google Scholar

Id., at 520; citing Schrader, H. Krogness, K. Aakvaag, A. Sortland, O. Purvis, K., “Changes of Pituitary Hormones in Brain Death,” Acta Neurochirirgica 52, no. 3 (1980): 239–248; Mollaret, P. Goulon, M., “Le Coma Depasse,” Revue Neurologique 101 (1959): 3–15; Grenvik, A. Powner, D. Snyder, J. Jastremski, M. Babcok, R. Loughhead, M., “Cessation of Therapy in Terminal Illness and Brain Death,” Critical Care Medicine 6, no. 4 (1978): 284–291; Outwater, K. J. Rockoff, M. A., “Diabetes Insipidus Accompanying Brain Death in Children,” Neurology 34, no. 9 (1984): 1243–1246; Fiser, D. Jimenez, J. F. Wrape, V. Woody, R., “Diabetes Insipidus in Children with Brain Death,” Critical Care Medicine 15, no. 6 (1987): 551–553; Hohenegger, M. Vermes, M. Mauritz, W. Redl, G. Sporn, P. Eiselsberg, P., “Serum Vasopressin (avp) Levels in Polyuric Brain-Dead Organ Donors,” European Archives of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences 239, no. 4 (1990): 267–269; Arita, K. Uozumi, T. Oki, S. Ohtani, M. Taguchi, H. Morio, M., “[Hypothalamic Pituitary Function in Brain Death Patients – from Blook Pituitary Hormones and Hypothalamic Hormones],” No Shinkei Geka 16, no. 10 (1988): 1163–1171.Google Scholar

See Halevy, Brody, , supra note 44, at 521, citing Rodin, E. Tahir, S. Austin, D. Andaya, L., “Brainstem Death,” Clinical Electroeacephalogy 16, no. 2 (1985): 63–71; Deliyannakis, I. Ioannou, F. Davaroukas, A., “Brainstem Death with Persistence of Bioelectric Activity of the Cerebral Hemispheres,” Clinical Electroeacephalogy 6, no. 2 (1975): 75–79; Grigg, M. Kelly, M. Celesia, G. et al., “Electroencephalographic Activity after Brain Death,” Archives in Neurology 44, no. 9 (1987): 948–954.Google Scholar

See Halevy, Brody, supra note 44, at 521, Barelli, A. Della Corte, F. Calimici, R. Sandroni, C. Proietti, R. Magalini, S., “Do Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials Detect the Actual Cessation of Cerebral Functions in Brain Dead Patients?” Critical Care Medicine 18, no. 3 (1990): 322–323; Ferbert, A. Buchner, H. Ringelstein, E. Hacke, W., “Isolated Brainstem Death,” Electroencephalogy Clinical Neruophysiology 65 (1986): 157–60.Google Scholar

Bernat, J., “How Much of the Brain Must Die in Brain Death?” Journal of Clinical Ethics 3, no. 1 (1992): 21–26.Google Scholar

See Bernat, supra note 44, at 86.Google Scholar

See Brody, , supra note 44, at 74.Google Scholar

United States President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1981a and 1981b, supra note 52.Google Scholar

See Nair-Collins, , supra note 31.Google Scholar

Shewmon, D., “Chronic “Brain Death:” Meta-Analysis and Conceptual Consequences,” Neurology 51, no. 6 (1998): 1538–1545; Shewmon, D., “Somatic Pathophysiological Equivalence and Implications for the Integrative-Unity Rationale,” Spinal Cord 37, no. 5 (1999): 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Brody, , supra note 44, at 75; Verheijde, J. Rady, M. McGregor, J., “Brain Death, States of Impaired Consciousness, and Physician-Assisted Death for End-of-Life Organ Donation,” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12, no. 4 (2009): 409–421.Google Scholar

See, for example, Falk, V. Taggart, D., “NICE Guidance for Off-Pump CABG: Turn Of the Pump” Heart 97, no. 21: 1731–1733.; Hannan, E. Wu, C. Smith, C. Higgins, R. Carlson, R. Culliford, A. Gold, J. Jones, R., “Off-Pump versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Differences in Short-Term Outcomes and in Long-Term Mortality and Need for Subsequent Revascularization,” Circulation 116, no. 10 (2007): 1145–1152; Takagi, H. Tanabashi, T. Kawai, N. Kato, T. Umemoto, T., “Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Sacrifices Graft Patency: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials,” Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery 133, no. 1 (2007): e2–e3; Hueb, W. Lopes, N. Pepeira, A. Hueb, A. Soares, P. Favarato, D. Ramires, J. A., “Five-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Stable Multi-vessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The MASS III Trial,” Circulation 122, no. 11 Supp. (2010): S48–S52.Google Scholar

Rivkees, S., “Pediatric Graves’Disease: Controversies in Management,” Hormone Research in Pediatrics 74, no. 5 (2010): 305–311. Grave's disease is hyperthyroidism caused by the immune system releasing antibodies that the body recognizes as thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and hence the body responds by making the thyroid work harder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Id., at 309.Google Scholar

Bosworth, T., “Experts Disagree on Role of Transplant in Myeloma,” Clinical Oncology News, 2013, available at <http://www.clinicaloncology.com/ViewArticle.aspx?d=Hematologic+Malignancies&d_id=149&i=August2013&i_id=988&a_id=23817> (last visited July 16, 2014; login required).+(last+visited+July+16,+2014;+login+required).>Google Scholar

On concerns about validity of testing used to establish death using neurological criteria, see Verheijde, et al. supra note 63; Joffe, A., “The Neurological Determination of Death: What Does It Really Mean?” Issues in Law and Medicine 23, no. 2 (2007): 119–140; Karakatsanis, K. G., “‘Brain Death”’ Should it Be Reconsidered?” Spinal Cord 46, no. 6 (2008): 396–401. On concerns about equating brain death with death, see Shewmon, A., “‘Brainstem Death,’ ‘Brain Death’ and Death: A Critical Re-Evaluation of the Purported Equivalence,” Issues in Law and Medicine 14, no. 2 (1998): 125–145.Google Scholar

See Holtkamp, , supra note 35, at 23; citing Hill, D. Munglani, R. Sapsford, D., “Haemodynamic Responses to Surgery in Brain-Dead Organ Donors,” Anaesthesia 49, no. 9 (1994): 835–836; Pennefather, S. Dark, J. Bullock, R., “Hemodynamic Responses to Surgery in Brain-Dead Organ Donors,” Anaesthesia 48, no. 12 (1993): 1034–1038; Wetzel, R. Setzer, N. Stiff, J. Rogers, M., “Hemodynamic Responses in Brain Dead Organ Donor Patients,” Anesthesia & Analgesia 64, no. 2 (1985): 125–128; McCullagh, P., ed., Brain Dead, Brain Absent, Brain Donors: Human Subjects or Human Objects (Hoboken: Wiley, 1993): At 46.Google Scholar

See Wetzel, et al., supra note 70, at 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Holtkamp, , supra note 35, at 24.Google Scholar

See, e.g., Whyte, K. Selinger, E. Caplan, A. Sadowski, J., “Nudge, Nudge or Shove, Shove – The Right Way for Nudges to Increase the Supply of Donated Cadaver Organs,” American Journal of Bioethics 12, no. 2 (2012): 32–39; Shaw, D. Elger, B., “Persuading Bereaved Familities to Permit Organ Donation,” Intensive Care Medicine 40, no. 1 (2014): 96–98.Google Scholar

There are other standards for determining what ought to be disclosed. These include the professional standard and the subjective standard. The professional standard would not require disclosure because, since most physicians do not disclose the controversy, the professional standard is non-disclosure. This approach suffers from a serious weakness, namely that it allows physicians to withhold information that patients might reasonably want simply because the vast majority of physicians choose not to disclose it. The subjective standard would require disclosure for any patient who would want the information. The subjective standard requires clinicians to be able to determine what every individual would care to know.Google Scholar

See Woein, et al., supra note 12, at 5.Google Scholar

Chouhan, P. Draper, H., “Modified Mandated Choice for Organ Procurement,” Journal of Medical Ethics 29, no. 3 (2003): 157–162; Shaw, Elger, , supra note 73.Google Scholar

For further discussion regarding brain death doubts, see DuBois, J. M., “The Ethics of Creating and Responding to Doubts about Death Criteria,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, no. 3 (2010): 365–380. For a critique of this view, see Potts, M. Verheijde, J. L. Rady, M. Y. Evans, D. W., “The Ethics of Limiting Informed Debate: Censorship of Selected Medical Publications in the Interest of Organ Transplant,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38, no. 6 (2013): 625–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Choie, E.-K. Fredland, V. Zachodni, C. Lammers, J. E. Bledsoe, P. Helft, P. R., “Brain Death Revisited: The Case for a National Standard,” Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36, no. 4 (2008): 824–836; Truog, R., “Brain Death – Too Flawed to Endure, Too Ingrained to Abandon,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35, no. 2 (2007): 273–281; Joffe, A. Anton, N. Duff, J. Decaen, A., “A Survey of American Neurologists about Brain Death: Understanding the Conceptual Basis and Diagnostic Tests for Brain Death,” Annals of Intensive Care 2, no. 4 (2012); Greer, D. Varelas, P. Haque, S. Wijdicks, E., “Variability of Brain Death Determination Guidelines in Leading Us Neurologic Institutions,” Neurology 70, no. 4 (2008): 284–289.Google Scholar

See Lock, , supra note 34.Google Scholar

See Youngner, S. J. Landefeld, C. S. Coulton, C. J. Juknialis, B. W. Leary, M., “‘Brain Death’ and Organ Retrieval. A Cross-Sectional Survey of Knowledge and Concepts among Health Professionals,” Journal of the American Medical Association 261, no. 15 (1989): 2205–2210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Holtkamp, , supra note 35, at 45 and 64.Google Scholar

Id., at 7.Google Scholar

DuBois, J. M. Waterman, A. Iltis, A. S., “Is Rapid Organ Recovery a Good Idea? An Exploratory Study of the Public's Knowledge and Attitude,” American Journal of Transplantation 9, no. 10 (2009): 2392–2399.Google Scholar

See <http://www.readability-score.com/> (last visited April 28, 2015).+(last+visited+April+28,+2015).>Google Scholar

Rodrigue, J. Cornell, D. Howerd, R., “The Instability of Organ Donation Decisions by Next-of-Kin and Factors that Predict it,” American Journal of Transplant 8, no. 12 (2008): 2661–2667; Bellali, T. Papadatou, D., “Parental Grief Following the Brain Death of a Child: Does Consent or Refusal to Organ Donation Affect Their Grief?” Death Studies 30, no. 10 (2006): 883–917; Burroughs, T. E. Hong, B. A. Kappel, D. F. Freedman, B. K., “The Stability of Family Decisions to Consent or Refuse Organ Donation: Would You Do It Again?” Psychosomatic Medicine 60, no. 2 (1998): 156–162.Google Scholar

Truog, R., “Consent for Organ Donation – Balancing Conflicting Ethical Obligations,” New England Journal of Medicine 358, no. 12 (2008): 1209–1210.Google Scholar

See Truog, , supra note 86.Google Scholar

Citing Zink, S. Wertlieb, S., “A Study of the Presumptive Approach to Consent for Organ Donation: A New Solution to an Old Problem,” Critical Care Nurse 26, no. 2 (2006): 129–136.Google Scholar

See Truog, , supra note 86.Google Scholar

See Oregon Health Plan, available at <http://www.oregon.gov/OHA/healthplan/Pages/index.aspx> (last visited April 28, 2015); Thorne, J. I., “Oregon Plan Approach,” in Strosber, M. A. Wiener, J. M. Baker, R. Fein, A. I. D., eds., Rationing America's Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond (Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution, 1992): At 24–36; Bodenheimer, T. B., “The Oregon Health Plan – Lessons for the Nation, First of Two Parts,” New England Journal of Medicine 337, no. 9 (1997): 651–655.Google Scholar

DuBois, J. M. Anderson, E., “Attitudes toward Death Criteria and Organ Donation among Healthcare Personnel and the General Public,” Progress in Transplantation 16, no. 1 (2006): 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45CFR46.116.a.4Google Scholar

45CFR46.116.a.8Google Scholar

See Faden, Beauchamp, , supra note 8 at 258–261; For further discussion of manipulation, see Engelhardt, supra note 27, p. 308–309; see Beauchamp and Childress, supra note 23, at 133–135.Google Scholar

O'Neill, O., “Some Limits of Informed Consent,” Journal of Medical Ethics 29, no. 1 (2003): 4–7.Google Scholar

See DuBois, et al., supra note 83.Google Scholar