Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T19:58:21.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Empirical Analysis of Credibility Assessment in German Asylum Cases – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2024

Björnstjern Baade Open the ORCID record for Björnstjern Baade [Opens in a new window]  and
Leah Gölz
Björnstjern Baade
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Leah Gölz
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

RefugeeAsylumCredibilityQualification DirectiveMigrationQuantitative

Information

Type
Corrigendum
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , May 2024 , pp. 550
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the German Law Journal

During the editing process, an error was introduced that affects footnotes 101 through 191 in the article. The final footnote (191) is actually footnote 101 on page 323. Footnote 101 should thus read: “101. FEDERAL AGENCY, DAS BUNDESAMT IN ZAHLEN 2017: ASYL, MIGRATION UND INTEGRATION (Nuremberg 2018) 61.”

Accordingly, the numbering of footnote 101 and all following footnotes is incorrect. What is published as footnote 101 in the article is in fact footnote 102; what is published as footnote 102 in the article is really footnote 103; and so on. For example, footnote 145, which reads “See supra sect. B.I.2.“ in the published article, should be read as referring to the preceding footnote 144, which reads “See Bingham, supra note 62, at 11. See also SYMES & JORRO, supra note 109, at No. 2.37. Cf. Kälin, supra note 59, at 231–232.”

We apologise to the authors for the error.

References

Baade, B, Gölz, L. An Empirical Analysis of Credibility Assessment in German Asylum Cases. German Law Journal. 2023;24(2):310–341. doi: 10.1017/glj.2023.15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar