Constitutional degradation – Gender populism – Democratic decay – Rule of law – Right-wing populism – Anti-gender rhetoric – ‘Gender ideology’ – Women’s rights – LGBTQI+ rights

Constitutional degradation – Gender populism – Democratic decay – Gender equality – Right-wing populism – Constitutional nationalism – Legal exclusion – Majoritarianism – Rule of law corrosion – Anti-Europeanism – Women’s rights – LGBTQI+ rights – Reproductive rights – Surrogacy – Face-veil ban – Female genital cutting – EU Gender Equality Strategy 2020-25

Regressive constitutional erosion: the gradual rescue of the traditional gender order through constitutional interpretation – Regressive constitutional reform: rendering explicit the traditional gender order – Preemption: constitutional supremacy and the traditional gender order as a matter of sovereignty and national identity – Constitutional backsliding or problematic constitutional origins to start with

The rule of law crisis in Europe seen as a gendered phenomenon – The rule of law as a concept is itself gendered – The gendered dimension of democratic backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe is a central, not peripheral feature – Responses to authoritarian populist attacks on the rule of law should also address its gendered elements – Opposition to the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence – The rise of a war against so-called ‘gender ideology’ – Increasingly restrictive reproductive rights regimes – The retrenchment of the ‘traditional’ family and traditional gender roles – EU response weak and ambivalent – European Court of Human Rights’ gender equality case law a work in progress

Populism, gender-related rights and science – The use of medical and scientific concepts and data vis-à-vis populist agendas – Science-related and science-based populism – Science as constitutional bulwark – The role of constitutional review and constitutional interpretation – Science as tool or object of constitutional review – The idea of scientific reasonableness of laws and policies

Anti-immigrant claims as key to the success of populist radical right parties in Europe – Increasing barriers to immigration and integration, and growing uncertainty as migration governance strategy – Misuse of gender equality and women’s rights by populist radical right parties to legitimise the restriction of the access to Europe as legal paradox – Comparative analysis (Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden)