No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Military Command and Imperial Knowledge in the Anonymous Chronicle Tevārīḫ-i Futuḥ-i Şirvān
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2025
Abstract
This article examines MS Török O. 176 from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Vambery Collection, Tevārīḫ-i Futuḥ-i Şirvan, an anonymously authored manuscript of the Ottoman campaign in the Caucasus in 1578. The text under study emphasizes the importance of leadership and memorializes the commanders of the campaign, showing how an Ottoman author presented proper military leadership, with an emphasis on rigid adherence to authority. The factional context of the chronicle also is analyzed, as the author indirectly criticizes the campaign leaders’ rivals. Finally, consideration is given to the reason the text was copied in 1722–23, at a time when the Ottoman Empire was competing with Russia in the Caucasus shortly after the collapse of the Safavid dynasty.
Information
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Iranian Studies.
References
ʿAbdullāh, Ebūbekir b. Şarḳ Seferleri. Ed. Süleyman Lokmacı. Akıl Fikir, 2018.Google Scholar
Adlī, . Manzūme-i Feth-i Şirvan ve Demirkapı. Ed. C, Kürşat Şamil Şahin. T.. Kültür ve Turzim Bakanlığı, 2017.Google Scholar
Albèri, Eugenio, ed. Relazioni Degli Ambasciatori Veneti al Senato. Vol. 6. Società editrice fiorentina, 1844.Google Scholar
ʿĀlī, Gelibolulu Muṣṭafā. Künhü’l-Ahbār: 4. Rükün. Ed. Suat Donuk. Vol. 5. Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı Yayınları, 2024.Google Scholar
ʿĀlī, Gelibolulu Muṣṭafā. Muṣṭafā ʿĀlī’s Counsel for Sultans of 1581: Edition, Translation, Notes. Ed. Andreas Tietze. 2 vols. Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1979, 1982.Google Scholar
Eravcı, H. Mustafa. “Muṣṭafā Ali’s Nuṣret-Nāme with the Exception of the Section Dealing with the Rebuilding of the Fortress of Kars: Edition and Study on the History of the Persian Campaign under Lala Muṣṭafā Paşa.” PhD diss., University of Edinburgh, 1998.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Cornell H. Bureaucrat and Intellectual in the Ottoman Empire: The Historian Muṣṭafā ʿĀlī (1541–1600). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Pál. The Business of State: Ottoman Finance Administration and Ruling Elites in Transition (1580s–1615). Klaus Schwartz Verlag, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İpşirli, Mehmed. “Hasan Kāfī El-Akhisarī ve Devlet Düzenine Ait Eseri Usūlüʾl--Hikem Fī Nizāmi’ʾ-ʿĀlem.” Tarih Enstitüsü Dergisi 10/11 (1979) /80: 239–78.Google Scholar
Javanshir, Lale. “History and Literature Interwoven Yet Distinct: The Paşanāme, a Seventeenth-Century Ottoman Turkish Mes̠nevī on Conflicts in Rumelia and the Northern Black Sea Region.” PhD diss., University of Toronto, 2020.Google Scholar
Kortepeter, C. M. “Ġāzī Girāy, II, Khan of the Crimea, and Ottoman Policy in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus, 1588–94.” The Slavonic and East European Review 44, no. 102 (1966): 139–66.Google Scholar
Maeda, Hirotake. “Against All Odds: The Safavids and the Georgians.” In The Safavid World, ed. Matthee, Rudi. Routledge, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthee, Rudi. “The Ottoman–Safavid War of 986–998/1578–90: Motives and Causes.” International Journal of Turkish Studies 20, no. 1/2 (2014): 1–20.Google Scholar
Matthee, Rudi. Persia in Crisis: Safavid Decline and the Fall of Isfahan. I. B. Tauris, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minadoi, Giovanni-Tommaso, and Hartwell, Abraham. The War between the Turks and the Persians: Conflict and Religion in the Ottoman and Safavid Worlds. I. B. Tauris, 2019.Google Scholar
Parlatır, Ismail, Hazai, György, and Kellner-Heinkele, Barbara. Catalogue of the Turkish Manuscripts in the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 2007.Google Scholar
Peacock, Andrew. “Between Georgia and the Islamic World: The Atabegs of Samc’xe and the Turks.” In At the Crossroads of Empires: 14th–15th Century Eastern Anatolia; Proceedings of the International Symposium Held in Istanbul, 4th–6th May 2007, ed. Beyazıt, Deniz. Institut Français d’Études Anatoliennes, 2012.Google Scholar
Sacmalı, Habib. “Strategic Diplomacy in Eurasia: Ottoman–Russian Rivalry in Iran, 1722–1735.” Ab Imperio, no. 4 (2024): 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şahin, Kaya. “To Observe, to Record, to Depict: Memorializing Circumcision of an Ottoman Prince, c.1582–c.1600.” History and Theory 57 (2019): 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şahi̇n, Kürşat Şamil. “Gazavātnāmeler Üzeri̇ne Yapilan Çalişmalar Hakkinda Bi̇r Bi̇bli̇yografya Denemesi̇.” Turkish Studies 7, no. 2 (2012): 997–1022.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jan. Pure Water for Thirsty Muslims: A Study of Muṣṭafā ʿĀlī of Gallipoli’s Künhü l-Ahbār. Het Oosters Instituut, 1991.Google Scholar
Selānikī, Muṣṭafā. Tārīḫ-i Selānikī. Ed. İpşirli, Mehmed. Vol. 1. Turk Tarihi Kurumu, 1999.Google Scholar
Şuayib, Izgi. “986 (1578) Tarihili 32 Numaralı Mühīmme Defteri.” MA thesis, Maramara University, 2006.Google Scholar
Yaşar, Murat. The North Caucasus Borderland: Between Muscovy and the Ottoman Empire, 1555–1605. Edinburgh University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeyrek, Yunus. Tārīḫ-i ʿOsmān Paşa: Özdemiroğlu ʿOsmān Paşa Kafkasya Fetiḥleri (H.986–988/M.1578–1580) ve Tebriz’in Fetḥi (H.993/M.1585). Kültür Bakanlığı, 2001.Google Scholar