Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-r8qmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T14:41:19.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Despite reductions in muscle mass and muscle strength in adults with CHD, the muscle strength per muscle mass relationship does not differ from controls

Part of: Interventional Cardiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2021

Camilla Sandberg Open the ORCID record for Camilla Sandberg [Opens in a new window] ,
Albert G Crenshaw ,
Christina Christersson ,
Joanna Hlebowicz ,
Ulf Thilén  and
Bengt Johansson
Camilla Sandberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Albert G Crenshaw
Affiliation:
Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden
Christina Christersson
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Joanna Hlebowicz
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Ulf Thilén
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Bengt Johansson
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
*
Author for correspondence: Camilla Sandberg, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Cardiology, Umeå University hospital, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden. Tel: +46907858441. E-mail: camilla.sandberg@umu.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Patients with CHD exhibit reduced isometric muscle strength and muscle mass; however, little is known how these parameters relate. Therefore, the aim was to investigate the relation between isometric limb muscle strength and muscle mass for patients in comparison to age- and sex-matched control subjects.

Methods:

Seventy-four patients (35.6 ± 14.3 years, women n = 22) and 74 matched controls were included. Isometric muscle strength in elbow flexion, knee extension, and hand grip was assessed using dynamometers. Lean mass, reflecting skeletal muscle mass, in the arms and legs was assessed with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Results:

Compared to controls, patients had lower muscle strength in elbow flexion, knee extension, and hand grip, and lower muscle mass in the arms (6.6 ± 1.8 kg versus 5.8 ± 1.7 kg, p < 0.001) and legs (18.4 ± 3.5 kg versus 15.9 ± 3.2 kg, p < 0.001). There was no difference in achieved muscle force per unit muscle mass in patients compared to controls (elbow flexion 0.03 ± 0.004 versus 0.03 ± 0.005 N/g, p = 0.5; grip strength 0.008 ± 0.001 versus 0.008 ± 0.001 N/g, p = 0.7; knee extension 0.027 ± 0.06 versus 0.028 ± 0.06 N/g, p = 0.5). For both groups, muscle mass in the arms correlated strongly with muscle strength in elbow flexion (patients r = 0.86, controls, r = 0.89), hand grip (patients, r = 0.84, controls, r = 0.81), and muscle mass in the leg to knee extension (patients r = 0.64, controls r = 0.68).

Conclusion:

The relationship between isometric muscle strength and limb muscle mass in adults with CHD indicates that the skeletal muscles have the same efficiency as in healthy controls.

Keywords

CHDskeletal muscleisometric muscle strengthbody compositionlean massmuscle mass

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , May 2021 , pp. 792 - 798
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Aerobic capacity is commonly reduced in patients with CHD, and skeletal muscle function (e.g., muscle strength, muscle endurance) is suggested to contribute to this reduction. Reference Diller, Dimopoulos and Okonko1–Reference Greutmann, Le and Tobler4 Accordingly, in adults with CHD, lower isometric muscle strength has been reported in some studies in comparison to control subjects. Reference Greutmann, Le and Tobler4–Reference Sandberg, Johansson and Christersson6 However, one study found no difference in isometric muscle strength in patients when compared to a reference population. Reference Kröönström, Johansson and Zetterström7 We recently showed a high prevalence of sarcopenia, i.e., loss of skeletal muscle mass, due to ageing or to secondary causes in patients with CHD. Reference Sandberg, Johansson and Christersson6 It is generally acknowledged that muscle strength and muscle size are strongly related; however, this may not be constant across all settings. For example, some studies show that trained individuals (increased muscle size) had a larger strength to size ratio than untrained individuals and elderly individuals (decreased muscle size) had a lower strength to size ratio than young adults. Reference Jones, Bishop and Woods8 Currently, it is unknown if patients with CHD have the same efficiency (i.e., produce the same force in relation to muscle mass) as healthy controls, or how well muscle strength correlates with muscle size within the patient group. These types of data are important to help in abetting future designs of exercise programmes.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the limb isometric muscle strength and the limb muscle mass, and to determine the relation between these parameters in adults with complex CHD in comparison to age- and gender-matched control subjects. Our hypothesis was that the isometric muscle strength and muscle mass would be lower in adults with complex CHD, but that the muscle strength to size ratio would be similar in patients and controls.

Materials and methods

Study population

In this cross-sectional study, 74 adults (mean age 35.6 ± 14.3 years, females n = 22) with complex CHD were included. The inclusion criteria were adult age (≥18 years old), clinically stable condition the past 3 months and complex CHD. The exclusion criteria were cognitive impairment affecting independent decision capacity, comorbidity (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis), or other circumstances (e.g., pregnancy) affecting the ability to participate.

The patients were recruited from three centres specialised in CHD in Sweden (Umeå, Uppsala, and Lund). In total, 112 patients identified via the national register on CHD (SWEDCON) were found to be eligible. These patients were then contacted by phone and asked for participation; of these, 38 declined participation or were not possible to reach by phone, i.e., did not answer or had no official phone number. In total, 74 patients (female n = 22) were included. More detailed information regarding the inclusion process has been presented previously. Reference Sandberg, Crenshaw and Elçadi9

In parallel to the recruitment of patients, an age- and sex-matched control was recruited for each patient. One hundred thirty-one persons were identified using the national register. These subjects were contacted via phone and asked to participate. Seventy-four persons fulfilled the inclusion criteria and accepted participation, i.e. 57 subjects (44%) were excluded or declined participation.

A post hoc analysis showed that there were no differences regarding age, sex, and type of lesion between the patients included in the study and those who declined or were excluded. Also, the corresponding analysis between the participating controls and those who declined or were excluded showed no differences (data not shown).

All participants gave their written informed consent for study participation. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board, Umeå (Dnr 2016-18-31M, 2016-462-32M, 2017-203-32M).

Isometric muscle strength

Isometric muscle strength in elbow flexion and knee extension was assessed using a dynamometer (333 A 500 kg model, KTOYO co, Ltd 289-7, Uijeongbusi, South Korea) – hereafter referred to as a load cell. The tests were performed on the dominant side of the participants. For each limb, tests were repeated three times with 1 minute of rest between each repetition. One minute of rest was reported to be sufficient recovery in maximal strength assessments. Reference Parcell, Sawyer and Tricoli10 The investigator provided verbal guidance for when to start the contraction (three-two-one-go), encouragement during the entire contraction, and when participants should stop. The peak force was registered and used in the analysis. The isometric muscle tests are briefly described below and were described in detail in a previous publication. Reference Sandberg, Johansson and Christersson6

Elbow flexion

When assessing isometric muscle strength in elbow flexion, the participants were standing with the shoulder adducted and with 90 degrees flexion in the elbow. An inelastic strap was connected to the load cell on one end and on the other end to a handle that subjects held in their hand. The forearm was in a supine position holding the handle. The subjects were instructed to flex their forearm with maximum force and to hold the contraction for 5 seconds.

Knee extension

Peak isometric force in knee extension strength was assessed while subjects were sitting on a gurney with back support and with 90 degrees of flexion in the hip and knee. A strap was connected to the load cell on one end and on the other end to a cuff that was attached around the ankle. The subjects were instructed to extend their knee with maximum force and to hold the contraction for 5 seconds.

Hand grip

The unilateral grip strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer (SAEHAN Digital Hand Dynamometer SH5003, Saehan Corp, Masan City, South Korea). Three repeated measurements, separated by 1 minute of rest, were performed, and the peak force was registered.

Limb muscle mass

Full and regional body composition was assessed with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (Lunar iDXA, ME-200149, 210492, 210494, 212003; General Electrics Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America). Lean body mass refers to the total body weight minus bone and fat, thus representing the skeletal muscle mass. In the present report, only data on the total lean mass of the legs and arms are presented and will be referred to as limb muscle mass.

Self-reported physical activity

Self-reported physical activity level was assessed using the short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. International Physical Activity Questionnaire includes four generic items with reference to time spent at different intensity levels of physical activity (vigorous, moderate, walking). The physical activity was categorised into three levels of physical activity expressed as metabolic equivalents minutes/week – low (≤600 metabolic equivalents min/week), moderate (601–2999 metabolic equivalents min/week), and high (≥3000 metabolic equivalents min/week). 11

Background data

Data containing diagnosis, cardiovascular medication, and NYHA class were collected via patient records (Tables 1 and 2).

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23–25 (SPSS, IBM corp., Armonk, New York, United States of America). Variables were tested for normality. The data are presented as means with standard deviations and ratios with percentages. Comparisons between patients and controls were analysed using Students t-test (means), Mann-Whitney U-test (ranks), and chi2 test (ratios). There is a known association between body height and muscle mass and muscle strength. Additionally, a shorter stature is common in adults with complex congenital heart lesions. Reference Sandberg, Rinnström and Dellborg12 Therefore, a one-way analysis of variance was conducted to determine differences between patients and controls subject regarding lean mass and isometric strength variables correcting for height. Correlation analyses between muscle mass of arms/legs and isometric muscle strength were performed with Pearson correlation analysis. The null hypothesis was rejected on p-values <0.05.

Results

A total of 74 patients and 74 age- and sex-matched controls were included in the analysis. There were no differences regarding weight, BMI or physical activity between patients and controls. The patients, however, were shorter and more often had prescribed cardiovascular medication (Table 1).

Table 1.

Descriptive data of patients with complex CHD and sex- and age-matched controls

Data are presented as the mean ± SD and n (%).

BMI = body mass index; IPAQ = international physical activity questionnaire – Low, <600 MET (metabolic equivalents) min per week; Moderate, 600–2999 MET min per week; High>3000 MET min per week; Comparisons between patients and controls were performed using Students t-test and chi2 test. Bold values denotes p-values <0.05.

* The most common cardiovascular medications were angiotensin renin blockers, angiotensin conversion enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics, warfarin, and aspirin. More details regarding medications have been reported previously. Reference Sandberg, Johansson and Christersson6

Table 2.

Distribution of diagnoses, NYHA class, and ejection fraction

ccTGA = congenital corrected transposition of the great arteries; dTGA = dextro transposition of the great arteries; EF = ejection fraction; NYHA class = New York Heart Association classification; TCPC = total cavopulmonary connection; ToF = tetralogy of Fallot.

* Limited by joint-related problem while walking/running (n = 2), impaired balance post stroke (n = 1).

Isometric muscle strength

The adults with CHD had lower isometric knee extension strength, elbow flexion strength, and grip strength in comparison to the control subjects (Fig 1a, b and c). When adjusted for height, the isometric knee extension strength and grip strength in patients remained lower, while the elbow flexion strength was borderline lower (knee extension strength; adjusted means ± SEM; 443 ± 15 N versus 494 ± 15 N, F[1, 145]5.7, p = 0.018, grip strength; adjusted means ± SEM; 46 ± 1 N versus 49 ± 1 N, F[1, 145]5.1, p = 0.026, elbow flexion strength; adjusted means ± SEM; 190 ± 6 N versus 206 ± 6 N F[1, 145] 3.8, p = 0.054).

Figure 1.

( a–c ) Comparison of isometric muscle strength between patients with complex CHD and age- and sex-matched control subjects. Data are presented as the mean and 95% CI. N, Newton. *p < 0.05, **p > 0.01.

Limb muscle mass

The patients had lower muscle mass in both the arms and legs in comparison to the controls (Fig 2a and b). When adjusted for height, the muscle mass in legs remained lower in patients, while the muscle mass in arms was borderline lower (muscle mass in legs; adjusted means ± SEM, 16,417 ± 248 g versus 17,877 ± 247 g, F[1, 144] 17.1, p < 0.001, muscle mass in arms; adjusted means ± SEM, 6019 ± 144 g versus 6389 ± 143 g, F[1, 144] 3.3, p = 0.072).

Figure 2.

( a, b ) Comparison of lean mass in arms and legs between patients with complex CHD and age- and sex-matched control subjects. Data are presented as the mean and 95% CI. **p > 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Muscle force to mass ratio

There was no difference in the achieved muscle force per muscle mass in patients compared to controls (Fig 3a, b and c).

Figure 3.

( a–c ) Comparison of mean muscle force per muscle mass in elbow flexion, hand grip, and knee extension in arms and legs, respectively, between patients with complex CHD and age- and sex-matched control subjects. Data are presented as the mean and 95% CI.

Correlation

For both groups, there were strong correlations between muscle mass in the arms and peak isometric elbow flexion strength (patients r = 0.86, p < 0.001, controls r = 0.89, p < 0.001) and hand grip strength (patients r = 0.84, p < 0.001, controls r = 0.81, p < 0.001). Also, there were strong correlations between muscle mass in the legs and peak isometric knee extension strength for both groups (patients r = 0.64, p < 0.001, controls r = 0.68, p < 0.001) (Fig 4a, b and c).

Figure 4.

( a–c ) ( a ) Correlations between isometric elbow flexion strength and the muscle mass in the arms, for patients (r = 0.86, p < 0.001) and controls (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). ( b ) Correlations between grip strength and the muscle mass in the arms for patients (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) and controls (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). ( c ) Correlations between isometric knee extension strength and the muscle mass in the legs for patients (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) and controls (r = 0.68, p < 0.001).

Discussion

Our results showed that patients with complex CHD had lower isometric muscle strength and lower muscle mass in the arms and legs in comparison to matched control subjects. Also, we found that the achieved muscle force per unit of muscle mass did not differ between patients and controls. Further, the isometric muscle strength in arms and legs strongly correlated with limb muscle mass for both patients and controls. Thus, our hypotheses were not rejected.

The finding of impaired isometric muscle strength in elbow flexion, knee extension, and hand grip in patients with complex CHD confirms previous findings. Reference Greutmann, Le and Tobler4,Reference Sandberg, Thilén and Wadell5 When added together with previous research, our information provides a picture of a generalised muscle weakness in this population. However, no differences between patients with CHD and a reference group in isometric muscle strength in knee extension, hand grip, and shoulder abduction have been reported. Reference Kröönström, Johansson and Zetterström7 The finding in the latter study may be explained by the fact that the reference population was significantly older than the patients. Reference Kröönström, Johansson and Zetterström7 In addition to the lower isometric muscle strength in the patients in our study, we also found a lower limb muscle mass. This finding is in agreement with the rather high prevalence of lower muscle mass and muscle strength recently reported in patients with Fontan circulation. Reference Cordina, O’Meagher and Gould13 Our results highlight that this is also the case over a much wider range of different complex congenital heart lesions. The combination of impaired isometric muscle strength and lower skeletal muscle mass in our rather young population (mean age 35.6 years) of adults with complex CHD is a matter of concern. In patients with acquired heart failure, impaired muscle strength and loss of muscle mass are markers of both more severe disease and worse prognosis. Reference Hulsmann, Quittan and Berger14–Reference Fülster, Tacke and Sandek16 However, in comparison to patients with CHD, patients with acquired heart failure are in general significantly older and their disease progression is relatively fast. Reference Vasan, Xanthakis and Lyass17 As stated previously, the present study population was relatively young; also, the majority were asymptomatic (NYHA I-II) and 61% had an ejection fraction >40% (systemic ventricle). Therefore, further investigations are needed to clarify the prognostic impact of lower isometric muscle strength and lower skeletal muscle mass in adults with complex CHD. It may also be of importance to follow the development over time and to evaluate the ability for these patients to improve their isometric strength and possibly prevent further deterioration with interventions such as strength training. This may be of particular importance in the subgroup of patients with Fontan circulation since they are dependent on the skeletal muscle pump for venous return. Reference Gewillig and Brown18

Although the patients had lower limb muscle mass, there were no differences in BMI or activity level. Also, the patients were shorter but weighed similar as the controls. This suggests that other components of body composition than muscle mass may be deviant in patients with CHD. However, fat mass and bone mass were not addressed in the present work. The cause of the lower limb muscle mass in patients with CHD is probably multifactorial. One reasonable factor to consider is reduced physical activity; however, previous and present studies report that persons with CHD are physically active to the same extent as reference populations. Reference Sandberg, Pomeroy and Thilén19,Reference Hedlund, Lundell and Villard20 Patients with Fontan circulation and those with systemic right ventricles have a limited ability to increase systemic blood flow, Reference Diller, Dimopoulos and Okonko1 which could possibly impact muscle development. Another factor that could impact muscle development is the time with cyanosis prior to correcting or palliating surgery in patients with cyanotic heart lesions. It is currently unknown when in time the lower limb muscle mass first presents, and how it progresses over time, thus further research is needed.

The relation between limb muscle mass and produced force was similar in patients and controls with both groups showing strong correlations. This was also verified by the finding that the muscle force per unit of muscle mass did not differ between patients and controls. This leads one to question whether it is possible through strength training to increase muscle strength and muscle mass in this population. Therefore, there is a need for research regarding the effects of strength training in adults with complex CHD.

Although speculative, the strong correlation between isometric strength and skeletal muscle mass could have the potential to create a metric in a clinical setting. For example, a low performance in grip strength could indicate the need of assessing the body composition and more specifically the muscle mass with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, whereas a strong performance could represent a higher muscle mass. Additionally, it could be possible to follow the development of skeletal muscle mass over time by measuring progress or regress in isometric strength. However, further studies are needed before a clinical implementation.

Limitations

The cross-sectional design of the present study is a limitation since it only provides data of the present state, and thus there is no indication of the development of muscle strength and muscle mass over time. Therefore, we recommend that repeated measurements should be included in future study protocols. Another limitation is that the present study protocol did not include any data on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity, and there is a known relation between aerobic capacity and muscle performance. Reference Greutmann, Le and Tobler4

Conclusion

Impaired isometric muscle strength together with a proportional reduction in limb skeletal muscle is common in this young population with CHD. That the relationship between isometric muscle strength and limb muscle mass in adults with CHD was similar to controls indicates that the skeletal muscles have the same efficiency as in healthy subjects. Although speculative, if strength training proves efficient, this might in turn impact prognosis.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Cecilia Jakobsson and Linda Ternrud for recruitment of patients and logistics in Uppsala and Lund, respectively, and Mikael Therell and Roger Andersson of the Sports laboratory at Umeå University for assessment of tests.

Financial support

This work was supported by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (20100355, 20130472, and 20170483), the Heart Foundation of Northern Sweden, research foundation of The Swedish Heart and Lung Association (E140-15, E109-16, FA2017:13), research foundation of Healthcare Professions within Cardiology, Umeå University and Region Västerbotten (the County of Västerbotten) (VLL-574081), and the research foundation VISARE NORR (the Northern County Councils Regional Federation).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008, and was approved by the regional Ethics Review Board, Umeå, Sweden (Dnr 2016-18-31M, 2016-462-32M, 2017-203-32M).

References

Diller, GP, Dimopoulos, K, Okonko, D, et al. Exercise intolerance in adult congenital heart disease: comparative severity, correlates, and prognostic implication. Circulation 2005; 112 (6): 828–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimopoulos, K, Diller, GP, Piepoli, MF, et al. Exercise intolerance in adults with congenital heart disease. Cardiol Clin 2006; 24 (4): 641–660, vii.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempny, A, Dimopoulos, K, Uebing, A, et al. Reference values for exercise limitations among adults with congenital heart disease. Relation to activities of daily life--single centre experience and review of published data. Eur Heart J 2012; 33 (11): 1386–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greutmann, M, Le, TL, Tobler, D, et al. Generalised muscle weakness in young adults with congenital heart disease. Heart 2011; 97 (14): 1164–1168.10.1136/hrt.2010.213579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandberg, C, Thilén, U, Wadell, K, et al. Adults with complex congenital heart disease have impaired skeletal muscle function and reduced confidence in performing exercise training. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015; 22 (12): 1523–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandberg, C, Johansson, K, Christersson, C, et al. Sarcopenia is common in adults with complex congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2019; 296: 57–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kröönström, LA, Johansson, L, Zetterström, AK, et al. Muscle function in adults with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2014; 170 (3): 358–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, EJ, Bishop, PA, Woods, AK, et al. Cross-sectional area and muscular strength: a brief review. Sports Med 2008; 38 (12): 987–994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandberg, C, Crenshaw, AG, Elçadi, GH, et al. Slower skeletal muscle oxygenation kinetics in adults with complex congenital heart disease. Can J Cardiol 2019; 35 (12): 1815–1823.10.1016/j.cjca.2019.05.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parcell, AC, Sawyer, RD, Tricoli, VA, et al. Minimum rest period for strength recovery during a common isokinetic testing protocol. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34 (6): 1018–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Physical Activity Questionnaire [Internet]. The IPAQ group. Retrieved December 2018 [cited 2019–12–01], from https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/ Google Scholar
Sandberg, C, Rinnström, D, Dellborg, M, et al. Height, weight and body mass index in adults with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2015; 187 (0): 219–226.10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordina, R, O’Meagher, S, Gould, H, et al. Skeletal muscle abnormalities and exercise capacity in adults with a Fontan circulation. Heart 2013; 99 (20): 1530–1534.10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulsmann, M, Quittan, M, Berger, R, et al. Muscle strength as a predictor of long-term survival in severe congestive heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2004; 6 (1): 101–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anker, SD, Ponikowski, P, Varney, S, et al. Wasting as independent risk factor for mortality in chronic heart failure. Lancet 1997; 349 (9058): 1050–1053.10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07015-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fülster, S, Tacke, M, Sandek, A, et al. Muscle wasting in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the studies investigating co-morbidities aggravating heart failure (SICA-HF). Eur Heart J 2013; 34 (7): 512–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasan, RS, Xanthakis, V, Lyass, A, et al. Epidemiology of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure in the Framingham study: an echocardiographic study over 3 decades. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018; 11 (1): 1–11.10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.08.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gewillig, M, Brown, SC. The Fontan circulation after 45 years: update in physiology. Heart 2016; 102 (14): 1081–1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandberg, C, Pomeroy, J, Thilén, U, et al. Habitual physical activity in adults with congenital heart disease compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Can J Cardiol 2016; 32 (4): 547–553.10.1016/j.cjca.2015.08.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedlund, ER, Lundell, B, Villard, L, et al. Reduced physical exercise and health-related quality of life after Fontan palliation. Acta Paediatr (Oslo, Norway: 1992) 2016; 105 (11): 1322–1328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Descriptive data of patients with complex CHD and sex- and age-matched controls

Figure 1

Table 2. Distribution of diagnoses, NYHA class, and ejection fraction

Figure 2

Figure 1. (a–c) Comparison of isometric muscle strength between patients with complex CHD and age- and sex-matched control subjects. Data are presented as the mean and 95% CI. N, Newton. *p < 0.05, **p > 0.01.

Figure 3

Figure 2. (a, b) Comparison of lean mass in arms and legs between patients with complex CHD and age- and sex-matched control subjects. Data are presented as the mean and 95% CI. **p > 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Figure 4

Figure 3. (a–c) Comparison of mean muscle force per muscle mass in elbow flexion, hand grip, and knee extension in arms and legs, respectively, between patients with complex CHD and age- and sex-matched control subjects. Data are presented as the mean and 95% CI.

Figure 5

Figure 4. (a–c) (a) Correlations between isometric elbow flexion strength and the muscle mass in the arms, for patients (r = 0.86, p < 0.001) and controls (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). (b) Correlations between grip strength and the muscle mass in the arms for patients (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) and controls (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). (c) Correlations between isometric knee extension strength and the muscle mass in the legs for patients (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) and controls (r = 0.68, p < 0.001).