Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T18:03:26.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Late Neoarchaean tectonic environment in the Anshan-Benxi area: evidence of metamorphic supracrustal rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2025

Guoyu Fan
Affiliation:
College of Earth Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Natural Resources, Changchun 130061, China
Xiaojie Dong*
Affiliation:
College of Earth Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Natural Resources, Changchun 130061, China
Kai Zhu
Affiliation:
Center for Lunar and Planetary Science, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China
Zhenghong Liu
Affiliation:
College of Earth Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Natural Resources, Changchun 130061, China
Zhongyuan Xu
Affiliation:
College of Earth Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Natural Resources, Changchun 130061, China
Qingying Zhao
Affiliation:
College of Earth Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Natural Resources, Changchun 130061, China
*
Corresponding author: Xiaojie Dong; Email: dxj@jlu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zircon U-Pb geochronology, geochemistry and Hf isotope analysis of supracrustal rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area in the northeastern part of the North China Craton can help constrain their petrogenesis and tectonic background, providing evidence for a further investigation of the late Neoarchaean tectonic environment in the Anshan-Benxi area. The primary rock types observed among the supracrustal rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area comprise amphibolite, metamorphic rhyolite, metamorphic sandstone, chlorite schist, actinolite schist, among others. SHRIMP zircon U-Pb dating indicates that magmatic zircons from the amphibolite (GCN-1) formed at 2553 ± 18Ma. Similarly, LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating reveals that magmatic zircons from the metamorphic rhyolite (G2304-1) were formed at 2457 ± 35Ma. The peak age of the metamorphic sandstone is determined to be approximately 2500Ma, suggesting that the supracrustal rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area originated in the late Neoarchaean. The protoliths of sericite quartz schist and metamorphic rhyolite are identified as rhyolitic volcanic rocks, displaying a right-leaning distribution pattern of rare earth elements (REEs). On the other hand, actinolite schist, chlorite schist and amphibolite are classified as basaltic volcanic rocks, exhibiting a flat REE pattern with a weak negative Eu anomaly. The εHf(t) value of metamorphic rhyolite ranges between -1.19 and -1.47, with a two- stage depleted mantle model age of tDM2(Ma) = 2922–3132 Ma. The protolith magma of sericite quartz schist and metamorphic rhyolite originates from partial melting of 3.0Ga basaltic crust, while the source of actinolite schist, chlorite schist and amphibolite are mainly derived from the mantle. In summary, the findings suggest that plate already existed in the late Neoarchaean or earlier, with magmatism in the Anshan-Benxi area likely occurring within an arc tectonic environment linked to plate subduction.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geological map of North China Craton and the Anshan-Benxi area Modified from Guo et al. (2022). (a) Structural map of North China Craton; (b) Geological map of the Anshan-Benxi area and results of previous studies.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Column diagram of the Anshan group in the Anshan-Benxi area.

Figure 2

Table 1. Sample information of Anshan-Benxi area

Figure 3

Figure 3. Photographs of supracrustal rocks of the Anshan Group in the Anshan-Benxi area. (a) Slaty cleavage in actinolite schist; (b) Actinolite schist; (c) Sericite quartz schist; (d) Augen structure in meta-rhyolite; (e) Meta-rhyolite; (f) Meta-sandstone; (g) Chlorite schist; (h) Amphibolite. Act-Actinolite, Amp-Amphibole, Bi-Biotite, Chl-Chlorite, Grt-Garnet, Mic-Microcline, Ms-Muscovite, Or-Orthoclase, Pl-Plagioclase, Q-Quartz, Ser-Sericite.

Figure 4

Figure 4. CL image of representative zircon (The red solid circle is the U-Pb spot, and the yellow dotted circle is the Lu-Hf isotope spot.).

Figure 5

Table 2. Analysis results of Zircon U-Pb isotope

Figure 6

Figure 5. U-Pb concordia diagrams of zircons from supracrustal rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area.

Figure 7

Table 3. Results of zircon Hf isotope analyses of meta-rhyolite from the Anshan-Benxi area

Figure 8

Figure 6. Zircon Age-εHf(t) diagram of meta-rhyolite in supracrustal rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area and supracrustal rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area of Zhu et al., 2015, Dai et al., 2013a and Wang et al., 2016.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Chondrite normalized REE (a,c: normalized values after Boynton 1984), and primitive mantle normalized spider diagrams (b,d: normalized values after Sun and McDonough 1989) of sericite quartz schist, meta-rhyolite, chlorite schist, actinolite schist and amphibolite in the Anshan-Benxi area; PAAS-normalized REE patterns (e: normalized value after McLennan, 1989) and upper crust-normalized trace element spider diagram (f: normalized value after Taylor and McLennan, 1985) of meta-sandstones in the Anshan-Benxi area. (a,b) Metamorphic basic volcanic rock; (c,d) Metamorphic acidic volcanic rock; (e,f) Meta-sandstone.

Figure 10

Figure 8. (a) A/CNK-A/NK diagram (Shand, 1943); (b) MgO-CaO-FeOT diagram (Walker et al., 1959); (c) La/Yb-∑REE diagram (Gromet et al., 1984); (d)TAS diagram (Bas et al., 1986); (e) SiO2 vs. Zr/TiO2 diagram (Winchester and Floyd, 1977); (f) SiO2 vs. AR diagram (Wright, 1969); (g) TiO2 vs. SiO2 diagram (Tarney, J., 1976); (h) La vs. Yb diagram (Ross and Bédard, 2009); (i) FeOT/MgO vs. SiO2 diagram (Miyashiro, 1974) of supracrustal rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area.

Figure 11

Figure 9. Al2O3/TiO2 and Zr vs. selected elements variation diagrams for supracrustal rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Tectonic setting discrimination diagrams of metamorphic acidic volcanic rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area. (a) Rb/30-Hf-3Ta, after Harris et al., 1986; (b) R1-R2, R1 = 4Si-11(Na+K)-2(Fe+Ti), R2 = 6Ca+2Mg+Al, after Batchelor + Bowden, 1985; (c) Rb-Y+Nb; (d)Nb-Y; (e) Rb-Ta+Yb; (f) Ta-Yb, after Pearce et al., 1984.

Figure 13

Figure 11. Tectonic setting discrimination diagrams of metamorphic basic volcanic rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area (Agrawal et al., 2008).

Figure 14

Figure 12. Tectonic setting discrimination diagrams of metamorphic basic volcanic rocks in the Anshan-Benxi area. (a) Hf/3-Th-Nb/16, after Wood, 1980; (b) Zr-Ti, after Pearce, 1982; (c) 10MnO-TiO2-10P2O5, after Mullen, 1983; (d) Zr/4-2Nb-Y, after Meschede, 1986.

Figure 15

Table 4. Analysis results of major and trace elements

Figure 16

Table 5. Geochemical parameters (all in ppm) of the Anshan Group meta-sandstones versus tectonic setting (after (Bhatia, 1983; Bhatia and Crook, 1986))

Figure 17

Figure 13. Tectonic setting discrimination diagrams of meta-sandstones. (a) after Pearce J A, 1973; (b) after M. R. Bhatia, 1988; A, oceanic island arc; B, continental island arc; C, active continental margin; D, passive continental margin.