Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-f6s65 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-30T16:50:59.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of radiofrequency radiation generated by a Global System for Mobile Communications source on cochlear development in a rat model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2014

E Seckin ,
F Suren Basar ,
S Atmaca ,
F F Kaymaz ,
A Suzer ,
A Akar ,
E Sunan  and
M Koyuncu
E Seckin
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
F Suren Basar
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey Subdepartment of Audiology, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
S Atmaca*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
F F Kaymaz
Affiliation:
Department of Histology and Embryology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
A Suzer
Affiliation:
Department of Histology and Embryology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
A Akar
Affiliation:
Department of Biophysics, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
E Sunan
Affiliation:
Department of Electric and Electronic Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Engineering, Samsun, Turkey
M Koyuncu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Dr S Atmaca, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine, 55139, Samsun, Turkey Fax: + 90 362 4576041 E-mail: sinanatmaca@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to determine the effect of radiofrequency radiation generated by 900 and 1800 MHz Global System for Mobile Communications sources on cochlear development in the rat model.

Methods:

Eight pregnant albino Wistar rats were divided into three groups: control, 900 MHz and 1800 MHz. The latter two groups of pregnant rats were exposed to radiofrequency radiation for 1 hour per day starting on the 12th day of pregnancy until delivery. The rats in the control, 900 MHz and 1800 MHz groups gave birth to 24, 31 and 26 newborn rats respectively. Newborn rats in the 900 MHz and 1800 MHz groups were exposed to radiofrequency radiation for 1 hour per day for 21 days after delivery. Hearing evaluations of newborn rats were carried out using distortion product otoacoustic emissions testing. Eight newborn rats were randomly selected from each group for electron microscopic evaluation.

Results:

Distortion product otoacoustic emission tests revealed no significant difference among the groups, but electron microscopic evaluation revealed significant differences among the groups with regard to the number of normal, apoptotic and necrotic cells.

Conclusion:

The findings indicated cellular structural damage in the cochlea caused by radiofrequency radiation exposure during cochlear development in the rat model.

Keywords

Electromagnetic FieldsCochleaRatModels, AnimalEar, InnerPathologyOtoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 128 , Issue 5 , May 2014 , pp. 400 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Presented orally at the 28th Politzer Society Meeting, 28 September–1 October 2011, Athens, Greece.

References

1Kayabasoglu, G, Sezen, OS, Eraslan, G, Aydın, E, Coskuner, T, Unver, S. Effect of chronic exposure to cellular telephone electromagnetic fields on hearing in rats. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:348–53Google Scholar
2Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones. In: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs193/en/ [18 March 2014]Google Scholar
3Stanislaw, S, Sobiczewska, E. Cellular phone systems and human health – problems with risk perception and communication. Environ Manage Health 2000;11:352–68Google Scholar
4Otto, M, von Muhlendahl, KE. Electromagnetic fields (EMF): do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)? Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007;6:187–95Google Scholar
5International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 1998;74:494–522Google Scholar
6Vecchia, P, Matthes, R, Ziegelberger, G, Lin, J, Saunders, R, Swerdlow, A (eds). Exposure to High Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Biological Effects and Health Consequences (100 kHz-300 GHz). Oberschleißheim: ICNIRP, 2009Google Scholar
7Esmekaya, MA, Seyhan, N, Omeroglu, S. Pulse modulated 900 MHz radiation induces hypothyroidism and apoptosis in thyroid cells: a light, electron microscopy and immunohistochemical study. Int J Radiat Biol 2010;86:1106–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Sievert, U, Eggert, S, Goltz, S, Pau, HW. Effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by cellular phone on auditory and vestibular labyrinth [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 2007;86:264–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Ozturan, O, Erdem, T, Miman, MC, Kalcioglu, MT, Oncel, S. Effects of the electromagnetic field of mobile phones on hearing. Acta Otolaryngol 2002;122:289–93Google Scholar
10Uloziene, I, Uloza, V, Gradauskiene, E, Saferis, V. Assessment of potential effects of the electromagnetic fields of mobile phones on hearing. BMC Public Health 2005;5:39Google Scholar
11Monnery, PM, Srouji, EI, Bartlett, J. Is cochlear outer hair cell function affected by mobile phone radiation? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:747–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Parazzini, M, Bell, S, Thuroczy, G, Molnar, F, Tognola, G, Lutman, ME et al. Influence on the mechanisms of generation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions of mobile phone exposure. Hear Res 2005;208:68–78Google Scholar
13Galloni, P, Parazzini, M, Piscitelli, M, Pinto, R, Lovisolo, GA, Tognolo, G et al. Electromagnetic fields from mobile phones do not affect the inner auditory system of Sprague-Dawley rats. Radiat Res 2005;164:798–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Sage, C, Johansson, O, Sage, SA. Personal digital assistant (PDA) cell phone units produce elevated extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field emissions. Bioelectromagnetics 2007;28:386–92Google Scholar
15Gabriel, C. Dielectric properties of biological tissue: variation with age. Bioelectromagnetics 2005;(suppl 7):S12–18Google Scholar
16Peyman, A, Rezazadeh, AA, Gabriel, C. Changes in the dielectric properties of rat tissue as a function of age at microwave frequencies. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:1617–29Google Scholar
17Sage, C, Carpenter, DO. Public health implications of wireless technologies. Pathophysiology 2009;16:233–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Challis, LJ. Mechanisms for interaction between RF fields and biological tissue. Bioelectromagnetics 2005;(suppl 7):98–106Google Scholar
19Moussa, MM. Review on health effects related to mobile phones. Part II: results and conclusions. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2011;86:79–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Oktay, MF, Dasdag, S. Effects of intensive and moderate cellular phone use on hearing function. Electromagn Biol Med 2006;25:13–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Kizilay, A, Ozturan, O, Erdem, T, Kalcioglu, MT, Miman, MC. Effects of chronic exposure of electromagnetic fields from mobile phones on hearing in rats. Auris Nasus Larynx 2003;30:239–45Google Scholar
22Angula, A, Merchan, JA, Merchan, MA. Morphology of the rat cochlear primary afferents during prenatal development: a Cajal's reduced silver and rapid Golgi study. J Anat 1990;168:241–55Google Scholar
23Roth, B, Bruns, V. Postnatal development of the rat organ of Corti. II. Hair cell receptors and their supporting elements. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1992;185:571–81Google Scholar