Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-ntvhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T21:14:17.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes towards and personal use of complementary and alternative medicine amongst clinicians working in audiovestibular disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2016

G Crundwell  and
D M Baguley
G Crundwell*
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
D M Baguley
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK Department of Audiology, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Ms Gemma Crundwell, Department of Audiology (Box 94), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK E-mail: gemma.crundwell@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Literature indicates that complementary and alternative medicine is used by patients with auditory and vestibular symptoms. This study sought to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine uptake, and examine attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine in clinicians working with audiovestibular disorder patients.

Method:

The Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire and a devised questionnaire about recent and lifetime use of complementary and alternative medicine were used.

Results:

Fifty-four individuals, including audiologists, ENT surgeons, nurses and rehabilitationists, completed the questionnaires (67 per cent response rate). Lifetime prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine uptake was 44 per cent, and 12-month prevalence was 22 per cent. Uptake was more common in females, but there was no significant difference in use when comparing age, seniority or profession. Attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine were mildly adverse, but sizeable standard deviation indicates wide-ranging attitudes.

Conclusion:

Clinicians working with patients with audiovestibular disorders have a range of attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine. Personal uptake of complementary and alternative medicine was lower than that of the general UK population, but remains sizeable.

Keywords

Complementary TherapiesHearing LossTinnitus

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 130 , Issue 8 , August 2016 , pp. 730 - 733
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Harris, P, Cooper, K, Relton, C, Thomas, K. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: a systematic review and update. Int J Clin Pract 2012;66:924–39Google Scholar
2 Fischer, F, Lewith, G, Witt, C, Linde, K, von Ammon, K, Cardini, F et al. High prevalence but limited evidence in complementary and alternative medicine: guidelines for future research. BMC Complement Altern Med 2014;14:46–55 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Frass, M, Strassl, RP, Friehs, H, Muller, M, Kundi, M, Kaye, A. Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review. Ochsner J 2012;12:145–56Google Scholar
4 Posadzki, P, Watson, LK, Alotaibi, A, Ernst, E. Prevalence of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by patients/consumers in the UK: systematic review of surveys. Clin Med (Lond) 2013;13:126–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Baguley, DM, Humphriss, RL, Butler, K, Knight, R, Dawson, L, Vickers, D et al. The incidence of complementary therapy use in patients undergoing vestibular assessment. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:272–5Google Scholar
6 Andersson, G. Prior treatments in a group of tinnitus sufferers seeking treatment. Psychother Psychosom 1997;66:107–10Google Scholar
7 Wolever, RQ, Price, R, Hazelton, AG, Dmitrieva, N, Bechard, E, Shaffer, J et al. Complementary therapies for significant dysfunction from tinnitus: treatment review and potential for integrative medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;2015:931418 Google Scholar
8 Low, WK. Idiopathic sudden hearing loss: is there a role for complementary treatment? J Altern Complement Med 2013;19:785–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Hyland, ME, Lewith, GT, Westoby, C. Developing a measure of attitudes: the holistic complementary and alternative medicine questionnaire. Complement Ther Med 2003;11:33–8Google Scholar
10 Kersten, P, White, PJ, Tennant, A. Construct validity of the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicines Questionnaire (HCAMQ) – an investigation using modern psychometric approaches. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011;2011:396327 Google Scholar
11 Choi, SS, Miller, RH. Women otolaryngologist representation in specialty society membership and leadership positions. Laryngoscope 2012;122:2428–33Google Scholar
12 Hearing Health and Technology Matters. Sex and audiology. In: http://hearinghealthmatters.org/hearingviews/2012/sex-and-audiology [5 January 2016]Google Scholar
13 US Census Bureau. Men in Nursing Occupations. In: https://www.census.gov/people/io/files/Men_in_Nursing_Occupations.pdf [5 January 2016]Google Scholar