Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T03:49:07.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemistry and Performance of Blended Cements and Backfills for use in Radioactive Waste Disposal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

S. Duerden
Affiliation:
Environmental Agency, 2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 3EB
F. P. Glasser
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, Scotland.
K. Goldthorpe
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, Scotland.
J. Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, Scotland.
K. Quillin
Affiliation:
Building Research Establishment, Garston, Watford, WD2 7JR, England.
D. Ross
Affiliation:
W.S. Atkins, Epsom, Surrey, England.
S. A. Stronach
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, Scotland.
M. Tyrer
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, SW7 2BP, England.
Get access

Abstract

The ability of NaCl and MgSO4 to impair the performance of Portland cement, blended cements containing slag and fly ash and of a permeable backfill have been measured. Performance is determined by decrease in pH, changes in mineralogy and loss of physical coherence. Experiments have been made at 25°, 55° and 85°C and extensively backed up by chemical models of cement performance. NaCl, up to 1.5M, has a comparatively slight impact on performance but MgSO4 rapidly and almost quantitatively reacts, lowering system pH's to < 10, conditioned by mixtures of Mg(OH)2 and magnesium silicates with gypsum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Glasser, F.P., Pedersen, J., Goldthorpe, K., Atkins, M., Tyrer, M., Bennett, D., Ross, D. & Quillin, K., ‘The chemistry of blended cement and backfill for radioactive waste disposal’. Rep UKEA (in preparation)Google Scholar
2. Quillin, K.C., Duerden, S.L. & Majumdar, A.J., ‘Accelerated ageing of blended Portland Cement for use in radioactive waste disposal’. UK DoE report DoE/HMIP/RR/93.023 (1993)Google Scholar
3. Quillin, K.C., Duerden, S.L. & Majumdar, A.J., ‘Formation of zeolites in OPC - pfa mixtures’. Cem. Cone. Res. 23, 991 (1993)Google Scholar
4. Quillin, K.C., Duerden, S.L. & Majumdar, A.J., ‘Accelerated ageing of blended OPC cements’. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol 333, 341 - 348 (1994)Google Scholar
5. Crammond, N.J., ‘Quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis of ettringite, thaumasite and gypsum in concretes and mortars’. Cem. Cone. Res., 15, 431 (1985)Google Scholar
6. Parkhurst, D.L., Thorstenson, D.C. & Plummer, N.L., ‘PHREEQE - A computer program for geochemical calculations’. Rep. USGS WRI-80–96 (1985)Google Scholar
7. Falck, W.E., Read, D. & Thomas, J.B., ‘Chemval 2: thermodynamic database’. Final report. European Commission Contract no FI2W/CT92/0122Google Scholar
8. Berner, U.R., ‘Modelling the incongruent dissolution of hydrated cement minerals’. Radiochimica Acta 44/45, 387393 (1988)Google Scholar
9. Atkins, M., Glasser, F.P., Moroni, L.P. & Jack, J. J., ‘Thermodynamic modelling of blended cements at elevated temperatures’. Rep DoE/HMIP/RR/94.011 (1993)Google Scholar
10. Atkinson, A., Hearne, J.A. & Knights, C.F., ‘Aqueous chemistry and thermodynamic modelling of CaO-SiO2-H2O gels at 80°C’. Rep DoE/HMIP/RR/91/045 (1991)Google Scholar