Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-8lnk4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-03T10:07:34.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2025

Ishaan Madan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University , West Lafayette, IN, USA
Shekoufeh Arabi Aliabadi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Johanna Huhtasaari
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Ebba Matic
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Emil Hogedal
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Kinga Kamińska
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Filip Nilsson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Axel Stark
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Fernando Izquierdo-Ruiz
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Hilda Sandström
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Martin Rahm*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Corresponding author: Martin Rahm; Email: martin.rahm@chalmers.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work poses and partially explores an astrobiological hypothesis: might polymeric sulfur and phosphorus-based oxides form heteropolymers in the acidic cloud decks of Venus’ atmosphere? Following an introduction to the emerging field of computational astrobiology, we demonstrate the use of quantum chemical methods to evaluate basic properties of a hypothetical carbon-free heteropolymer that might be sourced from feedstock in the Venusian atmosphere. Our modeling indicates that R-substituted polyphosphoric sulfonic ester polymers may form via multiple thermodynamically favorable pathways and exhibit sufficient kinetic stability to persist in the Venusian clouds. Their thermodynamic stability compares favorably to polypeptides, whose formation is slightly thermodynamically unfavored relative to amino acids in most known abiotic conditions. We propose a combined approach of vibrational spectroscopy and mass spectrometry to search for related materials in Venus’s atmosphere but note that none of the currently planned missions are well suited for their detection. While predicted Ultraviolet–Visible spectra suggest that the studied polymers are unlikely candidates for Venus’s unidentified UV absorbers, the broader possibility of sulfuric acid–based chemistry supporting alternative biochemistries challenges the traditional carbon-centric models of life. We argue that such unconventional lines of inquiry are warranted in the search for life beyond Earth.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. A) An R-substituted poly (phosphoric sulfonic ester), a hypothetical class of Venusian heteropolymers imagined mimicking the structure of polypeptides. B) An R-substituted polypeptide, representative of the building blocks of life as we know it.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Selected examples of sulfur and phosphorus in biology (A-C), and in Venus-relevant conditions (D-E): A) 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS), the most common coenzyme in sulfur-group transfer reactions. B) Sulfoquinovosyl diacylglycerol (SQDG), a sulfolipid found in many photosynthetic organisms (Karvansara et al., 2023). C) A general phospholipid, where the R group can be replaced to form major components of cell membranes (e.g., phosphatidylcholine). D) The cyclic trimer phase of sulfur trioxide (γ-SO3). E) Polymeric phase of sulfur trioxide (α-SO3).

Figure 2

Table 1. Comparison of carbon, sulfur, and phosphorus

Figure 3

Figure 3. Computational models of an R-substituted poly (phosphoric sulfonic ester). 1) S4-symmetric cyclic tetramer. 2) Hypothetical monomer unit, analogous to an amino acid in our comparison with polypeptides.

Figure 4

Table 2. Calculated stretching frequencies of 1, H2SO4, H3PO4, SO3, and SO2 alongside a selection of literature data

Supplementary material: File

Madan et al. supplementary material

Madan et al. supplementary material
Download Madan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 694.5 KB

Author comment: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR1

Comments

Prof. Bengt Nordén

Editor in Chief, QRB Discovery

Dear Prof. Nordén,

We are pleased to submit a manuscript by Ishaan Madan, Shekoufeh A. Aliabadi, Johanna Huhtasaari, Ebba Matic, Emil Hogedal, Kinga Kamińska, Filip Nilsson, Axel Stark, Fernando Izquierdo-Ruiz, Hilda Sandström, and Martin Rahm entitled On the Possibility of Carbon-Free Biopolymers on Venus: A Computational Astrobiology Study for your consideration for publication QRB Discovery.

Our manuscript explores the plausibility of non-carbon biopolymers forming and persisting in Venus’s sulfuric acid clouds. These clouds, at an altitude of about 60 km, exhibit strikingly Earth-like temperatures and pressures. Such features – along with the debated detection of phosphine, a po-tential biosignature (Greaves et al., Nat. Astron. 5, 2021) – have made Venus a highly prioritized target of exploration, with many missions planned in the coming decade.

We frame our analysis around a favorable comparison between the envisioned sulfur- and phos-phorus-based polymers and the polypeptide backbone of conventional biology, whose abiotic formation on Earth remains unresolved, in part due to the unfavorable thermodynamics of amino acid polymerization in water. However, the goal of this study is not to advocate for a specific molecular structure or biological function of the proposed biopolymers. Rather, the chemistry presented here serves as an example of applied computational astrobiology, illustrating a framework for evaluating the baseline feasibility of unconventional chemistries under extreme planetary con-ditions.

Using quantum chemistry, we evaluate thermodynamic viability, basic kinetic stability, and diagnostic spectral fingerprints of hypothetical sulfur- and phosphorus-based polymers in the Venusian cloud decks. Our study exemplifies how established computational tools can be used to interrogate unconventional macromolecular architectures in environments far removed from Earth. We believe this work is valuable because in that it offers a practical, transferable workflow for screening speculative molecules, before committing to resource-intensive experiments or more in-depth modeling.

By exploring the plausibility rather than asserting presence, our work contributes to a broader reframing of life detection strategies for future space exploration: not as a search for Earth-like biology, but as an open inquiry into what life could look like under radically different chemical and physical constraints. Our case study illustrates how the scientific method can anchor speculative curiosity into structured, even testable exploration, which we hope will stimulate cross disciplinary engagement.

We believe this manuscript can offer QRB Discovery readers a forward-looking example of how astrobiology can embrace unorthodox hypotheses without compromising rigor – expanding both our chemical imagination, and readiness to recognize life beyond Earth. We submit to your journal because the study probes the limits of biophysics and should be of interested to a broad scientific audience, including researchers interested in the origin(s) of life, astrochemistry, and planetary science.

Sincerely,

Martin Rahm, on behalf of all co-authors.

Review: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests

Comments

Review of “On the Possibility of Carbon-Free Biopolymers on Venus: A Computational Astrobiology Study”

It is speculated that the atmosphere of Venus might contain polymeric sulfur and phosphorus-based oxides which act as biopolymers. This speculation about the existence of such compounds is carefully supported by computations pointing to the existence of such compounds. I favor publication of this study, but I am not at ease with the choice of title. The authors favor the title “On the Possibility of Carbon-Free Biopolymers on Venus: A Computational Astrobiology Study.” I think what this study shows is the possibility of polypeptide analogs, but it is not clear what, if any, biological activity they might have. Therefore, I am reluctant that these compounds be referred to as biopolymers. I suggest that biopolymers not be in the title of the paper by itself but rather something like possible analogs of biopolymers.

Review: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The paper presents an analysis and discussion of the possibility of development of life on Venous. The issues explored are very intriguing and interesting and should be of interest to the readers . However, the background and the methods used for the actual calculations may not be up to the current state of the art treatments.

My concerns include the argument that the current estimates do not reflect free energies since the chamges in entropic contributions of bond rotations are not expected to be large. However, the main issue is the entropic contributions of the sourounding solvent, In fact, proper calculations should have involved QM/MM free energy calculations that include the assumed polar environments ( e.g. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117 (42), 12807–12819. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4020146

I realize that such calculations are challenging but the readers must be exposed to the possible problems with the current estimates.

Review: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR4

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Madan et al. carried out quantum chemical calculations to assess thermodynamic parameters for the formation and decomposition of cyclic heteropolymers consisting of phosphoric-sulfonic diester subunits under conditions similar to those of the atmospheric cloud decks of Venus. Venusian clouds at high altitude consist of sulfuric acids aerosols with low water content at moderate temperature and pressure. The authors’ modeling suggests that such polymers could form and persist, and thus potentially provide the basis for informational heteropolymers that are thought to be essential for life. They also suggest what distinct wavelengths might be observed in the “signature region” of the infrared spectrum to indicate that such compounds indeed exist in Venusian clouds, should a suitable detection system become available. This is a jaunty manuscript that would be suitable for publication in QRB Discovery, subject to the minor revisions described below.

1. It is not appropriate to refer to the polyphosphoric-sulfonic compounds as “biopolymers”. The central point of this study is that these polymers could plausibly form spontaneously under abiotic conditions similar to those of the atmospheric cloud decks of Venus. Thus, these polymers cannot be regarded as potential biosignatures, but rather agnostic signatures that may reflect either abiotic or biotic processes (for extensive discussion, see An Astrobiology Strategy for the Search for Life in the Universe, National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2019, Ch. 4). A better term would be “heteropolymer”.

2. Although there are some superficial structural similarities between the polyphosphoric-sulfonic compounds and polypeptides, as shown in Figure 1, there are important differences that likely will make the former much less amenable to exhibiting function. There are eight rotatable bonds within each phosphoric-sulfonic subunit of the hypothetical heteropolymer compared to only three rotatable bonds within each amino acid subunit of a polypeptide. The side chains of the hypothetical heteropolymer are more likely to disrupt the backbone structure and perturb polymerization efficiency compared to the side chains of polypeptides. A comparison to teichoic acids might be more apt. In any case, the authors need to tone down the comparative reference to polypeptides.

3. The authors’ discussion of the “phosphate problem” neglects to reference the recent work of Catling and colleagues showing that phosphate can accumulate to high levels within carbonate-rich lakes (see Toner & Catling, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 117, 883–888, 2020).

4. The term “firebrand” (line 178) has the connotation of “agitator”, which is not likely what the authors intended. A better word would be “advocate”.

5. The decision to model cyclic as opposed to linear heteropolymers is understandable as a practical matter, but the authors need to acknowledge the effect this decision may have on their results. Dimer formation may be hindered due to the need to close the macrocycle, whereas subsequent addition reactions may benefit from relieving ring strain. This is another way in which the thermodynamic profile does not “resemble that of terrestrial peptide synthesis” (line 261), which is a linear process. There is an extensive literature on cyclic peptide synthesis, both non-enzymatic and through non-ribosomal peptide synthesis, with the former making use of activating groups and the latter catalyzed by biological enzymes.

6. The authors need to discuss plausible steady-state concentrations for the monomeric building blocks in Venusian clouds. Of course this would be speculative, but it would be beneficial to consider what concentrations would be needed to achieve productive kinetic rates for polymer synthesis.

7. The authors need to consider phosphoester and sulfoester transesterification that would result in disproportionation reactions that both increase and decrease polymer chain length. These reactions likely would occur at a much faster rate than polymer decomposition.

8. It is difficult to understand why such a simple study requires 11 co-authors. The senior author should provide a statement regarding the contributions of each author and consider whether some of the current authors should instead be acknowledged rather than given co-authorship.

Review: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR5

Conflict of interest statement

no conflicts

Comments

I really enjoyed reading the paper. the paper might be a step forward to answer a fascinating question: can life exist without water?

The authors explore the possibility of life in acidic cloud decks of Venus’ atmosphere. They explore carbon-free biopolymer that might be sourced from feedstock in the Venusian atmosphere.

The manuscript is well written and should be disseminated in the scientific literature.

I have a curiosity. To my knowledge Venus atmosphere is mainly composed of carbon dioxide (approximately 96.5%) and nitrogen (around 3.5%) plus some ppm of other gases, including sulfur based compounds,160 ppm. Can the chemical pathways described in the paper be active at so low sulfur derivatives concentrations?

Recommendation: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR7

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R1/PR8

Comments

Please see attached response letter.

Recommendation: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R1/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.