Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8v9h9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T23:26:52.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Satellite-derived dry-snow line as an indicator of the local climate on the Antarctic Peninsula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2021

Chunxia Zhou*
Affiliation:
Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
Yong Liu
Affiliation:
Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
Lei Zheng
Affiliation:
Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
*
Author for correspondence: Chunxia Zhou, E-mail: zhoucx@whu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent regional cooling has impacted the natural systems of the Antarctic Peninsula (AP); however, little is known concerning the changes in the high parts of the glacial systems. Dry-snow line (DSL), situated in the high parts of glaciers, is the uppermost limit of frequent or occasional surface melt. We analyse dry-snow line altitude (DSLA) changes on the AP during 2004–2020 using C-band synthetic aperture radar time series data. We demonstrate that the DSLA in the eastern part of the AP is usually higher than that of the western part. Moreover, using simulated climatic variables from regional climate models, the lowering in altitude of DSL of glaciers in most areas is identified as a response to a decrease in snowmelt and an increase in precipitation. Furthermore, correlation analyses between simulated climatic variables and the DSLA are conducted. These results present the sensitive response of variations in DSLA to meteorological conditions, and the capability of DSLA being a proxy of polar local climate in high-altitude areas with no in situ meteorological observations.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Specifications of SAR sensors used in this study

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Flowchart for DSL extraction with SAR images.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. DSL detection of the Breitfuss Glacier (66.97°S, 64.87°W). (a) Subset of the Landsat Image Mosaic of Antarctica (LIMA; link: https://lima.usgs.gov/access.php) (Bindschadler and others, 2008). (b) Subset of the Sentinel-1B SAR images acquired on 2 May 2019. (c) DSZ classification. The blue line denotes the edge line of the glacier that flows from A to B. White and grey areas in (c) represent DSZ and other zones, respectively. The red line in (c) represents the DSL of the Breitfuss Glacier.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Mapping of the DSL. Spatial distribution of the DSL on the AP in the balance year of (a) 2017/18 derived from Sentinel-1 A/B, (b) 2015/16 from Sentinel-1 A/B, (c) 2006/07 from Envisat and (d) 2012/13 from Radarsat-2.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Spatial distribution of mean values of DSLA. (a) Mean DSLA (in m) for different sectors divided by latitude on the AP for 2017/18. (b) Altitude histogram of glaciers in 2017/18. Red line in (a) shows the boundaries of the sectors used for analysis. Red and blue lines in (b) represent distribution curves of the west and east sides of the AP, respectively. Numbers in (b) indicate the number of glaciers for each range.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Annual changes in the DSLA, precipitation anomalies and snowmelt anomalies in sectors along the east side of the AP. Numbers indicate the sample size of glaciers for each period. Error bars represent standard errors of the DSLA, which are calculated by dividing the std dev. by the sample size of glaciers.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Annual changes in the DSLA, precipitation anomalies and snowmelt anomalies in sectors along the west side of the AP. Numbers indicate the sample size of glaciers for each period. Error bars represent standard errors of the DSLA, which are calculated by dividing the std dev. by the sample size of glaciers.

Figure 7

Table 2. Total annual precipitation, total annual snowmelt (in mm w.e. (snow water equivalent)) and changes in DSLA on the east side of the AP from 2004/05 to 2018/19

Figure 8

Table 3. Total annual precipitation, total annual snowmelt and changes in DSLA on the west side of the AP from 2004/05 to 2018/19

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Relationship between DSLA and total annual snowmelt on the east side of the AP. The solid line denotes the fitting curve. R2 indicates the goodness of fit.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Relationships between DSLA and (a) total annual snowmelt and (b) total annual precipitation on the west side of the AP. Solid line in (a) denotes the fitting curve. R2 indicates the goodness of fit.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Total annual precipitation, snowmelt and SMB on both sides of the AP in the balance year 2017/18.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Trends in the RACMO-based (a) snowmelt flux and (b) precipitation flux at each location on the AP between 2004/05 and 2018/2019. Shaded regions indicate the areas significant at 95% confidence level.

Supplementary material: File

Zhou et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S3 and Table S1

Download Zhou et al. supplementary material(File)
File 35.7 MB