Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T14:44:07.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geomorphological mapping and palaeoglacial reconstruction of the Admiralty Bay, King George Island, Maritime Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2025

Cleiva Perondi*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Sedimentologia e Geomorfologia Glacial, Centro Polar e Climático, Departamento de Geografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Kátia K. Rosa
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Sedimentologia e Geomorfologia Glacial, Centro Polar e Climático, Departamento de Geografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Jefferson C. Simões
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Sedimentologia e Geomorfologia Glacial, Centro Polar e Climático, Departamento de Geografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Rosemary Vieira
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Processos Sedimentares e Glaciais, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal Fluminense - Av. Gal. Milton Tavares de Souza, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Arthur Ayres Neto
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Processos Sedimentares e Glaciais, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal Fluminense - Av. Gal. Milton Tavares de Souza, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Fabio Magrani
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Processos Sedimentares e Glaciais, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal Fluminense - Av. Gal. Milton Tavares de Souza, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Carina Petsch
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
Luiz F. Velho
Affiliation:
Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Cleiva Perondi Email: cleivaperondi@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Submarine landforms in polar fjords provide essential insights into glacier responses to climate change in the Maritime Antarctic. This work aims to reconstruct the groundline of a palaeo-ice stream throughout the Holocene in Admiralty Bay, King George Island. The landforms were investigated using multi-resolution topobathymetric data based on seismic and multibeam surveys. The inner sector features shallow moraine banks and elongated glacial lineations, in contrast to the deeper moraine banks observed in the middle and outer regions of the fjord. Elongated glacial lineations indicate a north-east to south-west ice flow and a wet-based thermal regime. At ~9000 years bp, the grounding line was at the Admiralty Bay fjord’s mouth. In the middle of the fjord, a prominent morainal bank reveals the palaeoglacier’s grounding line. The grounding line significantly changed position after this stillstand in response to climatic variability (Mid-Holocene, at 4500–2800 years bp) and was conditioned by the deep bathymetry. The continued retreat of the ice in the Holocene possibly led to a division of the palaeo-ice stream into outlets or tidewater glaciers. MB7 and MB9 indicate the position of the grounding line during a major stillstand at the end of the inlets. The bedrock topography and fjord geometry influenced the deglaciation pattern of Dobrowolski Glacier in Martel Inlet, and the moraine banks recorded two final major stillstands. The retreat rates in Martel Inlet have increased due to the loss of anchoring points and rising temperatures after the Neoglacial period. The morainal banks present in the proximal environments at Martel Inlet are smaller, discontinuous and spaced, indicating the retreat behaviour in the last 7 decades.

Information

Type
Earth Sciences
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antarctic Science Ltd
Figure 0

Figure 1. Localization map of Admiralty Bay, King George Island, Antarctica: a. Antarctic Peninsula; b. King George Island. Coastlines by Gerrish et al. (2022); Antarctic Specially Managed Area (ASMA) limits by Simões et al. (2001).

Figure 1

Table I. Geospatial data used for the integrated geomorphological mapping of the study area. The use of data from different years and scales is due to data scarcity for Antarctica.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Geochronology of glacimarine environments and dating in the study area.

Figure 3

Table II. Dating for Admiralty Bay (AB).

Figure 4

Figure 3. a. Hypsometric map of the study area and geochronology of the fjord environment by sector. b. Slope map of the study area and geochronology of the fjord environment by sector.

Figure 5

Figure 4. a. Smok Peak. b. Wawell Mount. c. O’Connor Rock. Photographs a.–c. taken by Santos Nascimento (2021). d. Striated pavement. Photograph taken by Luiz Felipe Velho and Carina Petsch (2023).

Figure 6

Figure 5. Geomorphological map of glacial landforms.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Morainal bank. a. Transect of the hill-shaded map. b. Seismic profile of morainal bank MB9 located at 250 m depth between Shag Rock Point and the south of Icefall Committee Glacier.

Figure 8

Figure 7. a. Transect of the hill-shaded map. b. Topographic profile of Admiralty Bay illustrating MB10 and MB7 in the fjord. Letter A indicates the start of the profile and B indicates the end of it.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Evolution of the deglaciation on the fjord and morainal banks, morainic ridges (glacier-free areas) and grounding-line positions.

Figure 10

Figure 9. a. Bathymetry of Martel Inlet. b. Length of the glacial palaeoflow at 3500 years bp. Letter A indicates the start of the profile and B indicates the end of it.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Reconstruction of the glacier’s extension in Admiralty Bay since 9000 years bp. a. The ice margin at the end of the fjord. b. Ice-margin position during the stillstand in the middle region and the calving bay configuration. c. Ice-margin position during the stillstand in the inner region (Neoglacial at 2600 years bp). d. Glacial area in 2022.