Book contents
- Market Studies
- Market Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: The Multiple Pasts, Presents and Futures of Markets and Market Studies
- Part I Market Designs and Market Misfires
- Part II Post-Performative Approaches to Studying Markets
- Part III Valuation
- Part IV Markets in Motion: Places and Spaces
- Part V The Secret Life of Market Studies Methods
- Part VI Broadening the Perspectives in Market Studies
- Part VII Future (Im)Perfect Markets
- Index
- References
Part I - Market Designs and Market Misfires
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 November 2024
Book contents
- Market Studies
- Market Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: The Multiple Pasts, Presents and Futures of Markets and Market Studies
- Part I Market Designs and Market Misfires
- Part II Post-Performative Approaches to Studying Markets
- Part III Valuation
- Part IV Markets in Motion: Places and Spaces
- Part V The Secret Life of Market Studies Methods
- Part VI Broadening the Perspectives in Market Studies
- Part VII Future (Im)Perfect Markets
- Index
- References
Summary
At its simplest, the Market Studies discipline is based on the idea that markets are organized – which is one of the reasons why Market Studies scholarship often overlaps with organization studies (Ahrne, Aspers and Brunsson 2015; Geiger and Gross 2018; Palo, Mason and Roscoe 2019). Though often decentrally and organically evolving, this organization typically is at least partly the result of deliberate shaping, engineering or design efforts by some market actors. Much attention in Market Studies has been given to acts of market making, which we define here as the multi-actor efforts of creating a market organization through socio-material assemblages according to certain organizational principles and directed towards certain goals. These efforts typically result in what Koray Çalışkan and Michel Callon (2010) encapsulate through their famous notion of ‘market socio-technical agencements’, or market STAs (or, even shorter, mSTAs).
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Market StudiesMapping, Theorizing and Impacting Market Action, pp. 19 - 96Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
References
Ahrne, G., Aspers, P., and Brunsson, N. (2015) The organization of markets. Organization Studies, 36(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, L., and Mason, K. (2021) Markets, infrastructures and infrastructuring markets. AMS Review, 11(3/4), 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (2010) Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çalışkan, K., and Callon, M. (2010) Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (2010) Performativity, misfires and politics. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., and Roth, A. E. (2021) The design and performation of markets: a discussion. AMS Review, 11(3/4), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chimenti, G., and Geiger, S. (2023) Organizing the sharing economy through experiments: framing and taming as onto-epistemological work. Organization Studies, 44(3), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, J., and Geiger, S. (2010) Positioning and relating: market boundaries and the slippery identity of the marketing object. Marketing Theory, 10(3), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, C., Ossandón, J., and Pallesen, T. (2019) The organization of markets for collective concerns and their failures. Economy and Society, 48(2), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2017) Does hype create irreversibilities? Affective circulation and market investments in digital health. Marketing Theory, 17(4), 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2018) Market failures and market framings: can a market be transformed from the inside? Organization Studies, 39(10), 1357–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2022) Leaning in or falling over? Epistemological liminality and the knowledges that make a market. Journal of Cultural Economy, DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2022.2058057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, H., Azimont, F., and Reid, E. (2015) Market innovation processes: balancing stability and change. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenonen, S., and Storbacka, K. (2021) Market-shaping: navigating multiple theoretical perspectives. AMS Review, 11(3/4), 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyland, D., Ehrenstein, V., and Milyaeva, S. (2019) On the difficulties of addressing collective concerns through markets: from market devices to accountability devices. Economy and Society, 48(2), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossandón, J., and Ureta, S. (2019) Problematizing markets: market failures and the government of collective concerns. Economy and Society, 48(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palo, T., Mason, K., and Roscoe, P. (2020) Performing a myth to make a market: the construction of the ‘magical world’ of Santa. Organization Studies, 41(1), 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, P., and Willman, P. (2021) Flaunt the imperfections: information, entanglements and the regulation of London’s Alternative Investment Market. Economy and Society, 50(4), 565–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storbacka, K., Nenonen, S., Peters, L. D., and Brodie, R. J. (2022) Taking stock of shaping strategies: from firms driving markets for business performance to diverse actors shaping systems for sustainability. Industrial Marketing Management, 107, A1–A10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Araujo, L., and Mason, K. (2021) Markets, infrastructures and infrastructuring markets. AMS Review, 11(3/4), 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avrett, S. (2019) How to support African LGBTQ immigrants at risk for HIV in the US. TheBodyPro, 15 January. Available at www.thebodypro.com/article/supporting-african-lgbtq-immigrants-hiv-risk (accessed 8 April 2024).Google Scholar
Barman, E. (2016) Caring Capitalism: The Meaning and Measure of Social Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bator, F. M. (1958) The anatomy of market failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, A., and Sangaramoorthy, T. (2021) Exceptionalism at the end of AIDS. AMA Journal of Ethics, 23(5), 410–417.Google ScholarPubMed
Boseley, S. (2016) Big Pharma’s worst nightmare. The Guardian, 26 January. Available at www.theguardian.com/society/2016/jan/26/big-pharmas-worst-nightmare (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Bourgeron, T., and Geiger, S. (2022a) Building the weak hand of the state: tracing the market boundaries of high pharmaceutical prices in France. New Political Economy, 27(5), 837–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeron, T., and Geiger, S. (2022b) (De-)assetising pharmaceutical patents: patent contestations behind a blockbuster drug. Economy and Society, 51(1), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, A. M. (2013) How AIDS invented global health. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(23), 2149–2152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Business and Sustainable Development Commission (2017) Better Business, Better World. London: Business and Sustainable Development Commission.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (2009) Civilizing markets: carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3/4), 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (2010) Performativity, misfires and politics. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (2021) Markets in the Making: Rethinking Competition, Goods, and Innovation. New York: Zone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., and Barthe, Y. (2011) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chimenti, G., and Geiger, S. (2023) Organizing the sharing economy through experiments: framing and taming as onto-epistemological work. Organization Studies, 44(3), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloatre, E. (2013) Pills for the Poorest: An Exploration of TRIPS and Access to Medication in Sub-Saharan Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cueto, M., and Lopes, G. (2021) AIDS, antiretrovirals, Brazil and the international politics of global health, 1996–2008. Social History of Medicine, 34(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeks, P. G., Lewin, S. R., and Havlir, D. V. (2013) The end of AIDS: HIV infection as a chronic disease. The Lancet, 382(9903), 1525–1533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doganova, L., and Laurent, B. (2019) Carving out a domain for the market: boundary making in European environmental markets. Economy and Society, 48(2), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S. (1995) The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology & Human Values, 20(4), 408–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzsimons, T. (2019) FDA approves Gilead’s next-generation HIV PrEP pill, Descovy. NBC News, 3 October. Available at www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/fda-approves-gilead-s-next-generation-hiv-prep-pill-descovy-n1062231 (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. (1996) Markets as politics: a political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, N., Calmy, A., and Mills, E. J. (2011) The first decade of antiretroviral therapy in Africa. Global Health, 7(33), DOI: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-33.Google ScholarPubMed
Fraser, J. (2014) Special report: one year on at the Medicines Patent Pool: interview with Greg Perry. Intellectual Property Watch, 1 December. Available at https://medicinespatentpool.org/news-publications-post/bbc-world-service-interview-with-greg-perry (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Galasso, I., and Geiger, S. (2023) Genetic research and the collective good: participants as leaders to reconcile individual and public interests. Journal of Medical Ethics, DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GATT (1988) Existence, scope and form of generally internationally accepted and applied standards/norms for the protection of intellectual property, 5 May. Available at www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/92040090.pdf (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Geiger, S. (ed.) (2021) Healthcare Activism: Markets, Morals, and the Collective Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Bourgeron, T. (2023) In the name of transparency: organizing European pharmaceutical markets through struggles over transparency devices. Organization Studies, 44(11), 1751–1773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2018) Market failures and market framings: can a market be transformed from the inside? Organization Studies, 39(10), 1357–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., Harrison, D., Kjellberg, H., and Mallard, A. (eds.) (2014) Concerned Markets: Economic Ordering for Multiple Values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, C., Morin, S., Røttingen, J.-A., and Kieny, M. P. (2023) Negotiating public-health intellectual property licensing agreements to increase access to health technologies: an insider’s story. BMJ Global Health, 2023, 8, DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012964.Google Scholar
Gruskin, S., and Raad, Z. (2010) Are drug companies living up to their human rights responsibilities? Moving towards assessment. PLoS Medicine, 7(9), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Impact Fund (2023) What is the Health Impact Fund? Available at https://healthimpactfund.org/en/what (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Heins, V. (2008) Human rights, intellectual property, and struggles for recognition. Human Rights Review, 9, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiv.gov (2020) The global HIV/AIDS epidemic. Available at www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/global-statistics (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Hiv.gov (2022) A timeline of HIV and AIDS. Available at www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/history/hiv-and-aids-timeline (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Holm, P., and Nielsen, K. N. (2007) Framing fish, making markets: the construction of Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs). The Sociological Review, 55(2S), 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B. (2004) Multi-level governance and multi-level metagovernance, in Bache, I., and Flinders, M. (eds.), Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krikorian, G., and Torreele, E. (2021) We cannot win the access to medicines struggle using the same thinking that causes the chronic access crisis. Health and Human Rights Journal, 23(1), 119–127.Google ScholarPubMed
Laurent, B. (2022) European Objects: The Troubled Dreams of Harmonization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lezaun, J., and Montgomery, C. M. (2015) The pharmaceutical commons: sharing and exclusion in global health drug development. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyst, F. (2010) Global Institutions and the HIV/AIDS Epidemic: Responding to an International Crisis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Makoni, M. (2016) Report: lifesaving new AIDS drugs remain costly; older versions get cheaper. Intellectual Property Watch, 22 July. Available at www.ip-watch.org/2016/07/22/report-lifesaving-new-aids-drugs-remain-costly-older-versions-get-cheaper (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Mbali, M. (2013) South African AIDS Activism and Global Health Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, D. G. (2019) Gilead will donate Truvada to US for HIV prevention. New York Times, 9 May. Available at www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/health/gilead-truvada-hiv-aids.html (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Medicines Patent Pool (2020) The Medicines Patent Pool 2018–2022 strategy. Available at https://medicinespatentpool.org/who-we-are/strategy (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Medicines Patent Pool (2022) MPP in numbers. Available at https://medicinespatentpool.org/progress-achievements/impact (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Mehrpouya, A., and Samiolo, R. (2016) Performance measurement in global governance: ranking and the politics of variability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 55, 12–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morten, C. J., and Kapczynski, A. (2019) United States v. Gilead: can a lawsuit yield better access to PrEP? Health Affairs, 18 November. Available at www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20191118.218552 (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
MSF (1998) 1998: Big Pharma versus Nelson Mandela, 20 February. Available at https://msfaccess.org/1998-big-pharma-versus-nelson-mandela (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Murphy, T. (2019) Dovato is a newly approved two-drug HIV regimen: do fewer drugs mean a lower-cost HIV treatment? The Body, 11 April. Available at www.thebody.com/article/dovato-approved-two-drug-hiv-regimen-cost (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (n.d.) Antiretroviral drug discovery and development. Available at nih.gov/diseases-conditions/antiretroviral-drug-development (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
New York Times (1989) AZT’s inhumane costs, 28 August. Available at www.nytimes.com/1989/08/28/opinion/azt-s-inhuman-cost.html (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Neyland, D., Ehrenstein, V., and Milyaeva, S. (2019) Can Markets Solve Problems? An Empirical Inquiry into Neoliberalism in Action. London: Goldsmiths Press.Google Scholar
Nzwili, F. (2017) World’s most effective HIV drug rolled out in Africa in generic version. Health Policy Watch, 29 June. Available at https://healthpolicy-watch.news/worlds-effective-hiv-drug-rolled-africa-generic-version (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Parthasarathy, S. (2017) Patent Politics: Life Forms, Markets and the Public Interest in the United States and Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellandini-Simányi, L., and Vargha, Z. (2021) Legal infrastructures: how laws matter in the organization of new markets. Organization Studies, 42(6), 867–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petryna, A., Lakoff, A., and Kleinman, A. (2006) Global Pharmaceuticals: Ethics, Markets, Practices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabeharisoa, V., and Doganova, L. (2021) War on diseases: patient organizations’ problematizations and exploration of market issues, in Geiger, S. (ed.), Healthcare Activism: Markets, Morals, and the Collective Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, S., et al. (2007) Coming back from the dead: living with HIV as a chronic condition in rural Africa. Health Policy and Planning, 22(5), 344–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saez, C. (2015) Medicines Patent Pool at 5 years: promises kept, changes ahead – an interview with Greg Perry. Intellectual Property Watch, 30 July. Available at www.ip-watch.org/2015/07/30/medicines-patent-pool-5-years-along-promises-kept-looking-ahead (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Sagonowsky, E. (2020) Gilead loses again in PrEP patent fight with HHS, sending dispute to federal court. Fierce Pharma, 21 February. Available at www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/gilead-loses-another-prep-patent-challenge-against-hhs-sending-dispute-to-federal-court (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Spotlight (2018) AIDS2018: what has happened to AIDS activism? Views from eight leading activists. 25 July. Available at www.spotlightnsp.co.za/2018/07/25/aids2018-what-has-happened-to-aids-activism-views-from-eight-leading-activists (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
t’Hoen, E. (2020) The Medicines Patent Pool: a remedy for the anti-commons. Commons Network, 23 April. Available at www.commonsnetwork.org/news/the-medicines-patent-pool-a-remedy-for-the-anti-commons (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
t’Hoen, E., Berger, J., Calmy, A., and Moon, S. (2011) Driving a decade of change: HIV/AIDS, patents and access to medicines for all. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 14(15), DOI: 10.1186/1758-2652-14-15.Google Scholar
UN (2008) Human rights responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies in relation to access to medicines. Available at www.who.int/medicines/areas/human_rights/A63_263.pdf (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
UN (2019) TRIPS Agreement: transitional period for implementing the Agreement (Article 66.1). Available at www.un.org/ldcportal/trips-agreement-transitional-period-for-implementing-the-agreement-article-66-1 (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
UNAIDS (2017) New high-quality antiretroviral therapy to be launched in South Africa, Kenya and over 90 low- and middle-income countries at reduced price. 21 September. Available at www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/pressreleaseandstatementarchive/2017/september/20170921_TLD (accessed 8 April 2024).Google Scholar
UNAIDS (2021) Global HIV and AIDS statistics: 2019 fact sheet. Available at www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Vawda, Y. A., and Shozi, B. (2020) Eighteen years after Doha: an analysis of the use of public health TRIPS flexibilities in Africa. SSRN. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3559478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watal, J. (2002) Implementing the TRIPS agreement, in Hoekman, B., Mattoo, A., and English, P. (eds.), Development, Trade and the WTO: A Handbook. Washington, DC: World Bank, 359–368.Google Scholar
Williams, O. D. (2012) Access to medicines, market failure and market intervention: a tale of two regimes. Global Public Health, 7(S2), S127–S143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WorldAtlas (n.d.) Countries with the highest rates of HIV/AIDs. Available at www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-the-highest-rates-of-hiv-aids.html (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
WHO (2019) The DOHA Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health. Available at www.who.int/medicines/areas/policy/doha_declaration/en (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
WHO (n.d.) HIV data and statistics. Available at www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes/hiv/strategic-information/hiv-data-and-statistics# (accessed 5 April 2024).Google Scholar
WTO (2001). DOHA WTO Ministerial Declaration 2001. Available at www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.htm (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
WTO (2019a) The Uruguay Round. Available at www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/fact5_e.htm (accessed 5 December 2019).Google Scholar
WTO (2019b) Part III – enforcement of intellectual property rights. Available at www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_05_e.htm (accessed 5 December 2019).Google Scholar
WTO (2019c) History of the multilateral trading system. Available at www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/history_e/history_e.htm (accessed 5 December 2019).Google Scholar
WTO (n.d.) Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Available at www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htm (accessed 15 June 2023).Google Scholar
Yazbeck, A., and Soucat, A. (2019) When both markets and governments fail health. Health Systems & Reform, 5(4), 268–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Abdulkadiroğlu, A. (2013) School choice, in Vulkan, N., Roth, A. E., and Neeman, Z. (eds.), The Handbook of Market Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 138–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslau, D. (2011) What do market designers do when they design markets?, in Camic, C., Gross, N., and Lamont, M. (eds.), Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 379–404.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2010) Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (1998) An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology, in Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell, 244–269.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (2007) An essay on the growing contribution of economic markets to the proliferation of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7/8), 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (2010) Performativity, misfires and politics. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., and Roth, A. E. (2021) The design and performation of markets: a discussion. AMS Review, 11(3/4), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çalışkan, K., and Callon, M. (2010) Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochoy, F., Deville, J., and McFall, L. (eds.) (2017) Markets and the Arts of Attachment. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochoy, F., and Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2013) The sociology of market work. Economic Sociology (European Electronic Newsletter), 15(1), 4–11.Google Scholar
Cochoy, F., Trompette, P., and Araujo, L. (2016) From market agencements to market agencing: an introduction. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa, J., et al. (2019) School choice in Chile, in Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Souza Leão, L., and Eyal, G. (2019) The rise of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in international development in historical perspective. Theory and Society, 48(3), 383–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, P. G., and Giraud, Y. (2020) Introduction: from ‘economics as engineering’ to ‘economics and engineering’. History of Political Economy, 52(S1), 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2013) A market mediation strategy: how social movements seek to change firms’ practices by promoting new principles of product valuation. Organization Studies, 34(5/6), 683–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duflo, E. (2017) The economist as plumber. American Economic Review, 107(5), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, C. (2015) The multiple-markets problem. Journal of Cultural Economy, 8(4), 538–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, C. (2023) Market failures, in Mica, A., Pawlak, M., Horolets, A., and Kubicki, P. (eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Failure. Abingdon: Routledge, 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, C., Ossandón, J., and Pallesen, T. (2019) The organization of markets for collective concerns and their failures. Economy and Society, 48(2), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1955) The role of government in education, in Solo, R. (ed.), Economics and the Public Interest. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 85–107.Google Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2018) Market failures and market framings: can a market be transformed from the inside? Organization Studies, 39(10), 1357–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2022) Leaning in or falling over? Epistemological liminality and the knowledges that make a market. Journal of Cultural Economy, DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2022.2058057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., Harrison, D., Kjellberg, H., and Mallard, A. (eds.) (2014) Concerned Markets: Economic Ordering for Multiple Values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyck, H. (2015) Age of System: Understanding the Development of Modern Social Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, Y. (2016) On the Existence of Digital Objects. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwicz, L. (1960) On the dimensional requirements for non-wasteful resource allocation systems, in Arrow, K. J., Karlin, K. J., and Suppes, P. (eds.), The Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 27–46.Google Scholar
Jenle, R. P., and Pallesen, T. (2017) How engineers make markets: organizing electricity system decarbonization. Revue Française de Sociologie, 58(3), 375–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, H. (2021) Market expertise at work: introducing Alvin E. Roth and Michel Callon. AMS Review, 11(3/4), 216–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, H., and Helgesson, C.-F. (2006) Multiple versions of markets: multiplicity and performativity in market practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 839–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, H., and Helgesson, C.-F. (2007) On the nature of markets and their practices. Marketing Theory, 7(2), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. (1989) Technology and heterogeneous engineering: the case of Portuguese expansion, in Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. (eds.), The Social Construction of Technology Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 105–128.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (eds.) (2007) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P., and Nik-Khah, E. (2017) The Knowledge We Have Lost in Information: The History of Information in Modern Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitcham, C. (2020) What is engineering?, in Michelfelder, D. P., and Doorn, N. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering. New York: Routledge, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T. (2005) The work of economics: how a discipline makes its world. European Journal of Sociology, 46(2), 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. S. (2001) The formation of ‘modern’ economics: engineering and ideology, Department of Economic History Working Paper 62/01. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. S. (2003) Economics, in Porter, T. M., and Ross, D. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 7, The Modern Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. S. (2020) Technocratic economics: an afterword. History of Political Economy, 52(S1), 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nik-Khah, E., and Mirowski, P. (2019) On going the market one better: economic market design and the contradictions of building markets for public purposes. Economy and Society, 48(2), 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossandón, J. (submitted manuscript). The Concept of the Market (after Market Design).Google Scholar
Ossandón, J. (2020) ‘How to write after performativity?, in Blok, A., Farías, I. & Roberts, C. (Eds.), A Routledge Companion to Actor Network Theory, Routledge. 46–55.Google Scholar
Ossandón, J., and Pallesen, T. (submitted manuscript) The new new economic sociology: the market intervention test.Google Scholar
Ossandón, J., and Ureta, S. (2019) Problematizing markets: market failures and the government of collective concerns. Economy and Society, 48(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallesen, T., and Jacobsen, P. H. (2018a) Solving infrastructural concerns through a market reorganization: a case study of a Danish smart grid demonstration. Energy Research & Social Science, 41, 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallesen, T., and Jacobsen, P. H. (2018b) Articulation work from the middle: a study of how technicians mediate users and technology. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(2), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallesen, T., and Jacobsen, P. H. (2021) Demonstrating a flexible electricity consumer: keeping sight of sites in a real-world experiment. Science as Culture, 30(2), 172–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallesen, T., and Jenle, R. P. (2018) Organizing consumers for a decarbonized electricity system: calculative agencies and user scripts in a Danish demonstration project. Energy Research & Social Science, 38, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallesen, T., and Pedersen, K. Z. (2023) Model of human fallibility: traveling behavioral assumptions in public governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 6(2/3), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N., and Miller, P. (1992) Political power beyond the state: problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(1), 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. E. (2002) The economist as engineer: game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica, 70(4), 1341–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. E. (2007) The art of designing markets. Harvard Business Review, 85(10), 1–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Roth, A. E. (2015) Who Gets What – and Why: The New Economics of Matchmaking and Market Design. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, rev. and exp. ed. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Valdés, J. G. (1995) Pinochet’s Economists: The Chicago School of Economics in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
References
Barman, E. (2016) Caring Capitalism: The Meaning and Measure of Social Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, K. (2020) Technoscientific rent: toward a theory of rentiership for technoscientific capitalism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(1), 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, K., and Muniesa, F. (eds.) (2020) Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeron, T. (2020) Constructing the double circulation of capital and ‘social impact’: an ethnographic study of a French impact investment fund. Historical Social Research, 45(3), 117–139.Google Scholar
Braun, B. (2021) Asset management capitalism as a corporate governance regime, in Hacker, J., Hertel-Fernandez, A., Pierson, P., and Thelen, K. (eds.), The American Political Economy: Politics, Markets, and Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 270–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, B. (2022) Exit, control, and hypocrisy: structural power under asset management capitalism. Politics & Society, 50(4), 630–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (2021) Markets in the Making: Rethinking Competition, Goods, and Innovation. New York: Zone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiapello, E., and Godefroy, G. (2017) The dual function of judgement devices: why does the plurality of market classifications matter? Historical Social Research, 42(1), 152–188.Google Scholar
Chiapello, E., and Knoll, L. (2020) Social finance and impact investing: governing welfare in the era of financialization. Historical Social Research, 45(3), 7–30.Google Scholar
Comité français sur l’investissement à impact (2014) Comment et pourquoi favoriser des investissements à impact social [How and Why to Favour Social Impact Investments]. Paris: Ministère de l’Économie Sociale et Solidaire.Google Scholar
Demontès, C. (2013) Avis sur le projet de loi relative à l’économie sociale et solidaire [Opinion on the bill related to the social economy]. Paris: Sénat.Google Scholar
Doganova, L., and Muniesa, F. (2015) Capitalization devices: business models and the renewal of markets, in Kornberger, M., Justesen, L., Madsen, A. K., and Mouritsen, J. (eds.), Making Things Valuable. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, E. (2017) In the wake of austerity: social impact bonds and the financialisation of the welfare state in Britain. New Political Economy, 22(3), 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, E. (2020) The Care Crisis: What Caused It and How Can We End It? London: Verso.Google Scholar
Dowling, E., and Harvie, D. (2014) Harnessing the social: state, crisis and (big) society. Sociology, 48(5), 869–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenstein, V. (2018) Carbon sink geopolitics. Economy and Society, 47(1), 162–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France Invest (2020) Annuaire 2020 des membres de la Commission Impact [2020 Directory of the Members of the Impact Commission]. Paris: France Invest.Google Scholar
France Invest and PERACS (2020) 2019: surperformance du capital-investissement français à fin 2019 [2019: the French private equity market overperformed]. Paris: France Invest.Google Scholar
Frankel, C., Ossandón, J., and Pallesen, T. (2019) The organization of markets for collective concerns and their failures. Economy and Society, 48(2), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French Impact (2018) Lancement de l’initiative French Impact [Launching of the French Impact initiative]. Paris: Ministère de la Transition Écologique et Solidaire.Google Scholar
Gabor, D. (2021) The Wall Street consensus. Development and Change, 52(3), 429–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Bourgeron, T. (2023) In the name of transparency: organizing European pharmaceutical markets through struggles over transparency devices. Organization Studies, 44(11), 1751–1773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2018) Market failures and market framings: can a market be transformed from the inside? Organization Studies, 39(10), 1357–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., Harrison, D., Kjellberg, H., and Mallard, A. (eds.) (2014) Concerned Markets: Economic Ordering for Multiple Values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golka, P. (2019) Financialization as Welfare: Social Impact Investing and British Social Policy, 1997–1216. Zurich: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golka, P. (2023) The allure of finance: social impact investing and the challenges of assetization in financialized capitalism. Economy and Society, 52(1), 62–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guézennec, C., and Malochet, G. (2013) L’impact investing pour financer l’économie sociale et solidaire? [Developing impact investment to fund the social economy?], Working Paper 2013-02. Paris: Commissariat Général à la Stratégie et à la Prospective.Google Scholar
Hand, D., Dithrich, H., Sunderji, S., and Nova, N. (2020) 2020 Annual Impact Investor Survey. New York: Global Impact Investing Network.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hély, M. (2019) Genèse de ‘l’entreprise de l’ESS’ et désétatisation de l’intérêt general [Genesis of the ‘social business’ and destatization of the public interest]. Informations sociales, 2019(1), 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. P. Morgan (2010) Impact investments: an emerging asset class, research note. New York: J.P. Morgan.Google Scholar
Langley, P. (2021) Assets and assetization in financialized capitalism. Review of International Political Economy, 28(2), 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurent, A., and Mallard, A. (2020) Labelling the Economy: Qualities and Values in Contemporary Markets. Zurich: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, P. (2013) Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (2014) The political movement that dared not speak its own name: the neoliberal thought collective under erasure, Working Paper 23. New York: Institute for New Economic Thinking.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F., et al. (2017) Capitalization: A Cultural Guide. Paris: Presses des Mines.Google Scholar
Nadaï, A., and Cointe, B. (2020) Turning sunlit rooftops and windy sits into energy assets, in Birch, K., and Muniesa, F. (eds.), Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyland, D. (2017) The transformation of children-at-risk into an investment proposition. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 492–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossandón, J., and Ureta, S. (2019) Problematizing markets: market failures and the government of collective concerns. Economy and Society, 48(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social Investment Task Force (2003) Enterprising Communities: Wealth before Welfare. London: UK Social Investment Forum.Google Scholar
Tse, A., and Warner, M. (2020) The razor’s edge: social impact bonds and the financialization of early childhood services. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(6), 816–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. (2020) Surveying the SIB economy: social impact bonds, ‘local’ challenges, and shifting markets in urban social problems. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(6), 907–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Akrich, M. (1992) The de-scription of technical objects, in Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 205–224.Google Scholar
Anastácio, L. D. B., Delmaschio, C. R., Oliveira, D. A., and Chequer, F. M. D. (2017) Synthetic phosphoethanolamine: the state of the art of scientific production. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 53(4), 1–9.Google Scholar
Arora, N. K. (2003) Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians’ communication behavior. Social Science & Medicine, 57(5), 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchet, V., and Depeyre, C. (2016) Exploring the shaping of markets through controversies: methodological propositions for macromarketing studies. Journal of Macromarketing, 36(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brondino-Pompeo, K., and Santana, J. (2022) O mágico e o extraordinário no consumo [The magic and the extraordinary in consumption], in Brondino-Pompeo, K., Morais, I. C., and Abdalla, C. C. (eds.), Aspectos culturais do consumo: Fundamentos, fronteiras e aplicações [Cultural Aspects of Consumption: Fundamentals, Frontiers and Applications]. São Paulo: Pimenta Cultural, 160–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. F. (1986) Tsewa’s Gift: Magic and Meaning in an Amazonian Society. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1991) Techno-economic networks and irreversibility, in Law, J. (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, 132–164.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1998) The embeddedness of economic markets in economics, in Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–58.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (2009) Elaborating the notion of performativity. Le libellio d’AEGIS, 5(1), 18–29.Google Scholar
Chimenti, G. (2020) Conceptual controversies at the boundaries between markets: the case of ridesharing. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(2), 130–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochoy, F., Trompette, P., and Araujo, L. (2016) From market agencements to market agencing: an introduction. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (2011) Cyberfactories: How News Agencies Produce News. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, E. L., Oh, B., Butow, P. N., Mullan, B. A., and Clarke, S. (2012) Cancer patient disclosure and patient–doctor communication of complementary and alternative medicine use: a systematic review. The Oncologist, 17(11), 1475–1481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz Ruiz, C., Baker, J. J., Mason, K., and Tierney, K. (2020) Market-scanning and market-shaping: why are firms blindsided by market-shaping acts? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(9), 1389–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz Ruiz, C., and Holmlund, M. (2017) Actionable marketing knowledge: a close reading of representation, knowledge and action in market research. Industrial Marketing Management, 66, 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz Ruiz, C., and Kowalkowski, C. (2014) Market representations in industrial marketing: could representations influence strategy? Industrial Marketing Management, 43(6), 1026–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz Ruiz, C., and Makkar, M. (2021) Market bifurcations in board sports: how consumers shape markets through boundary work. Journal of Business Research, 122, 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, K. M., et al. (2019) Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2013) A market mediation strategy: how social movements seek to change firms’ practices by promoting new principles of product valuation. Organization Studies, 34(5/6), 683–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, J., and Geiger, S. (2011) Constructing and contesting markets through the market object. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 899–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F. H., et al. (2014) High prevalence but limited evidence in complementary and alternative medicine: guidelines for future research. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 14(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flaig, A., Kindström, D., and Ottosson, M. (2021) Market-shaping strategies: a conceptual framework for generating market outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management, 96, 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, C., Ossandón, J., and Pallesen, T. (2019) The organization of markets for collective concerns and their failures. Economy and Society, 48(2), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo Netto, C. (2018) Fosfoetanolamina, de ‘pílula do câncer’ a caso de polícia [Phosphoetanolamine, from ‘cancer pill’ to police matter]. Jornal da Unicamp, 3 April. Available at www.unicamp.br/unicamp/index.php/ju/noticias/2018/04/03/fosfoetanolamina-de-pilula-do-cancer-caso-de-policia.Google Scholar
Geiger, S., and Finch, J. (2016) Promissories and pharmaceutical patents: agencing markets through public narratives. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2018) Market failures and market framings: can a market be transformed from the inside? Organization Studies, 39(10), 1357–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., Harrison, D., Kjellberg, H., and Mallard, A. (eds.) (2014) Concerned Markets: Economic Ordering for Multiple Values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Kjellberg, H. (2021) Market mash ups: the process of combinatorial market innovation. Journal of Business Research, 124, 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesler, M. (2008) Conflict and compromise: drama in marketplace evolution. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. (2018) Complementary and alternative medicine use and initiatives in Europe. Alternative and Complementary Therapies, 24(1), 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, B. L. (2019) Anti/Vax: Reframing the Vaccination Controversy. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, A. (2010) Semiotic structure and the legitimation of consumption practices: the case of casino gambling. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 490–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, A., and Thompson, C. J. (2014) Branding disaster: reestablishing trust through the ideological containment of systemic risk anxieties. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 877–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, L., and Kirk, R. (2011) High drug attrition rates: where are we going wrong? Nature Reviews, Clinical Oncology, 8(4), 189–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjellberg, H., Azimont, F., and Reid, E. (2015) Market innovation processes: balancing stability and change. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts, in Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 225–258.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2010) On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (2013) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, rev. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenharo, M. (2015) ‘Cápsula da USP’ contra câncer não foi testada clinicamente; entenda [‘USP cancer pill’ has not been clinically tested]. G1, Ciência e Saúde, 15 September. Available at https://g1.globo.com/ciencia-e-saude/noticia/2015/09/pilula-da-usp-contra-cancer-nao-passou-por-testes-clinicos-entenda.html.Google Scholar
Lundahl, O. (2020) Dynamics of positive deviance in destigmatisation: celebrities and the media in the rise of veganism. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(3), 241–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, K. (2012) Market sensing and situated dialogic action research (with a video camera). Management Learning, 43(4), 405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M., and Valenzuela, S. (2020) Setting the Agenda: Mass Media and Public Opinion, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Meryn, S. (1998) Improving doctor–patient communication: not an option, but a necessity. BMJ, 316(7149), 1922–1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molassiotis, A., et al. (2005) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Annals of Oncology, 16(4), 655–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morais, I. C., Brito, E. P. Z., and Quintão, R. T. (2018) Productive consumption changing market dynamics: a study in Brazilian DIY cosmetics. Latin American Business Review, 19(3/4), 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., and Callon, M. (2007) An introduction to market devices, in Callon, M., Millo, Y., and Muniesa, F. (eds.), Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–13.Google Scholar
Oliveira Caetano, N. A., Cavajes Moreira, T., Ugrinovich, L. A., do Carmo, T. A., and Ucelli Simioni, P. (2017) Synthetic phosphoethanolamine as an inhibitor of tumor progression. Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Sorocaba, 19(3), 111–116.Google Scholar
Ossandón, J., and Ureta, S. (2019) Problematizing markets: market failures and the government of collective concerns. Economy and Society, 48(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palo, T., Mason, K., and Roscoe, P. (2020) Performing a myth to make a market: the construction of the ‘magical world’ of Santa. Organization Studies, 41(1), 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivetta, M. (2016) A prova final da fosfoetanolamina [Phosphoethanolamine’s final proof]. Pesquisa FAPESP, 243, 16–23.Google Scholar
Pondé, N., de Azambuja, E., and Ades, F. (2016) Phosphoethanolamine and the danger of unproven drugs. Ecancermedicalscience, 10, DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2016.681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portney, L. G. (2020) Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Evidence-Based Practice, 4th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.Google Scholar
Rilinger, G. (2023) Conceptual limits of performativity: assessing the feasibility of market design blueprints. Socio-Economic Review, 21(2), 885–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, P., and Willman, P. (2021) Flaunt the imperfections: information, entanglements and the regulation of London’s Alternative Investment Market. Economy and Society, 50(4), 565–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. E. (2007) The art of designing markets. Harvard Business Review, 85(10), 1–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Roth, A. E. (2008) What have we learned from market design? The Economic Journal, 118(517), 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. E., and Wang, S. W. (2020) Popular repugnance contrasts with legal bans on controversial markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(33), 19792–19798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
St. James, Y., Handelman, J. M., and Taylor, S. F. (2011) Magical thinking and consumer coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(4), 632–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarraf, J. S., Câmara, T. F., Puty, T. C., and de Carvalho, L. E. W. (2016) Uso inadvertido da fosfoetanolamina sintética no Brasil: por que se preocupar? [Inadvertent use of synthetic phosphoethanolamine in Brazil: why worry?]. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia, 62(1), 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider-Kamp, A., and Askegaard, S. (2021) Do you care or do I have a choice? Expert authority and consumer autonomy in medicine consumption. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(5), 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Styers, R. G. (2004) Making Magic: Religion, Magic, and Science in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. S. (2003) Confronting ‘culture’ in medicine’s ‘culture of no culture’. Academic Medicine, 78(6), 555–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Times Higher Education (2021) Latin America university rankings 2021. 13 July. Available at www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2021/latin-america-university-rankings (accessed 12 April 2024).Google Scholar
WHO (2022) Cancer. 3 February. Available at www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (accessed 12 April 2024).Google Scholar
References
Alderson, W., and Cox, R. (1948) Towards a theory of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almås, R. (1989) Characteristics and conflicts in Norwegian agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 6, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, R. C. (1939) Types of livestock markets and the price structure. Journal of Farm Economics, 21(1), 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azimont, F., and Araujo, L. (2007) Category reviews as market-shaping events. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 849–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. J., Storbacka, K., and Brodie, R. J. (2019) Markets changing, changing markets: institutional work as market shaping. Marketing Theory, 19(13), 301–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchet, V., and Depeyre, C. (2016) Exploring the shaping of markets through controversies: methodological propositions for macromarketing studies. Journal of Macromarketing, 36(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnaud, L., and Anzalone, G. (2021) A perfect match? The co-creation of the tomato and beneficial insects markets. Journal of Rural Studies, 83, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadilhon, J. J., Fearne, A. P., Hughes, D. P., and Moustier, P. (2003) Wholesale markets and food distribution in Europe: new strategies for old functions, discussion paper. London: Department of Agricultural Sciences, Imperial College London.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, K. (2007) Price as a market device: cotton trading in Izmir Mercantile Exchange, in Callon, M., Millo, Y., and Muniesa, F. (eds.), Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell, 241–260.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (2007) An essay on the growing contribution of economic markets to the proliferation of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7/8), 139–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., Millo, Y., and Muniesa, F. (eds.) (2007) Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Callon, M., and Muniesa, F. (2005) Peripheral vision: economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochoy, F. (2012) ‘Modernizing the grocery trade with cartoons in wartimes: humor as a marketing weapon (progressive grocer, 1939–1945)’, in Puyou, F.-R., Quattrone, P., Mclean, C., and Thrift, N. (eds.), Imagining Organizations: Performative Imagery in Business and Beyond. London: Routledge, 173–188.Google Scholar
Cochoy, F., and Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2013) The sociology of market work. Economic Sociology (European Electronic Newsletter), 15(1), 4–11.Google Scholar
Cochoy, F., Trompette, P., and Araujo, L. (2016) From market agencements to market agencing: an introduction. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doganova, L., and Karnøe, P. (2015) Building markets for clean technologies: controversies, environmental concerns and economic worth. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolbec, P.-J., and Fischer, E. (2015) Refashioning a field? Connected consumers and institutional dynamics in markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1447–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, A., and Araujo, L. (2007) Case research in purchasing and supply management: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(3), 170–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, A., and Gadde, L. E. (2002) Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2010) Product tastes, consumer tastes: the plurality of qualification in product development and marketing activities, in Araujo, L., Finch, J., and Kjellberg, H. (eds.), Reconnecting Marketing to Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 74–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edvardsson, B., Kleinaltenkamp, M., and Tronvoll, B. (2014) Institutional logics matter when coordinating resource integration. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, J., Horan, C., and Reid, E. (2015) The performativity of sustainability: making a conduit a marketing device. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(1/2), 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flick, U. (2004) Triangulation in qualitative research, in Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., and Steinke, I. (eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE, 178–183.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. (1996) Markets as politics: a political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Parpet, M.-F. (2007) The social construction of a perfect market, in MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (eds.), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 20–53.Google Scholar
Garcia-Parpet, M.-F. (2008) Markets, prices and symbolic value: grands crus and the challenges of global markets. International Review of Sociology, 18(2), 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., Harrison, D., Kjellberg, H., and Mallard, A. (eds.) (2014) Concerned Markets: Economic Ordering for Multiple Values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesler, M., and Fischer, E. (2017) Market system dynamics. Marketing Theory, 17(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halinen, A., and Törnroos, J.-A. (2005) Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1285–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D., and Kjellberg, H. (2016) How users shape markets. Marketing Theory, 16(4), 445–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, M. (2017) Meat, metrics and market devices: commensuration infrastructures and the assemblage of ‘the schedule’ in New Zealand’s red meat sector. Journal of Rural Studies, 52, 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, M. (2021) Time work: assembling regularity in lamb’s market geographies, in Prince, R., Henry, M., Morris, C., Gallagher, A., and FitzHerbert, S. (eds.), Markets in Their Place: Context, Culture, Finance. London: Routledge, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, H., Azimont, F., and Reid, E. (2015) Market innovation processes: balancing stability and change. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, H., Hagberg, J., and Cochoy, F. (2019) Thinking market infrastructure: barcode scanning in the US grocery retail sector, 1967–2010, in Kornberger, M., et al. (eds.), Thinking Infrastructures. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, H., and Helgesson, C.-F. (2007a) On the nature of markets and their practices. Marketing Theory, 7(2), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, A., Brekelmans, A., and Lawrence, G. (2021) ‘I want to sleep at night as well’: guilt and care in the making of agriculture credit markets, in Prince, R., Henry, M., Morris, C., Gallagher, A., and FitzHerbert, S. (eds.), Markets in Their Place: Context, Culture, Finance. London: Routledge, 122–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., and Suddaby, R. (2006) Institutions and institutional work, in Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Nord, W. R. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd ed. London: SAGE, 215–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Velly, R., and Defeu, I. (2016) Alternative food markets as ‘market agencements’: exploring their multiple hybridities. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L., and Warley, T. (1978) The role of marketing boards in stabilizing commodity markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(5), 878–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, K., Friesl, M., and Ford, C. J. (2017) Managing to make markets: marketization and the conceptualization work of strategic nets in the life science sector. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, C. (2004) Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. Natural Resources Forum, 28, 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, C., and Russo-Spena, T. (2015) Innomediary agency and practices in shaping market innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenonen, S., Storbacka, K., and Frethey-Bentham, C. (2019) Is your industrial marketing work working? Developing a composite index of market change. Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenonen, S., et al. (2014) A new perspective on market dynamics: market plasticity and the stability–fluidity dialectics. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ody-Brasier, A. (2022) The price of belonging: price setting in the market for Champagne grapes. Organization Science, 34(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, P. I. (2012) Below the surface: how (seafood) networks work – and how they change. IMP Journal, 6(3), 186–193.Google Scholar
Palmer, M., and Truong, Y. (2019) Introduction to the special issue on the nature of industrial marketing work. Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 228–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, R., Henry, M., Morris, C., Gallagher, A., and FitzHerbert, S. (eds.) (2021) Markets in Their Place: Context, Culture, Finance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. E. (2018) Marketplaces, markets, and market design. American Economic Review, 108(7), 1609–1658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runfola, A., Perna, A., Baraldi, E., and Gregori, G. L. (2017) The use of qualitative case studies in top business and management journals: a quantitative analysis of recent patterns. European Management Journal, 35, 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stremersch, S., Wuyts, S., and Franbach, R. T. (2001) The purchasing of full-service contracts: an exploratory study within the industrial maintenance market. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulkuniemi, P., Araujo, L., and Tähtinen, J. (2015) Purchasing as market-shaping: the case of component-based software engineering. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesh, A., Penaloza, L., and Fırat, A. F. (2006) The marketing as a sign system and the logic of the market, in Lusch, R. F., and Vargo, S. L. (eds.), The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 251–265.Google Scholar
Veresiu, E., Dolbec, P.-Y., and Castilhos, R. (2014) Conceptualising the space of markets: how spatiality influences market dynamics. Advances in Consumer Research, 42, 265–270.Google Scholar
Yin, R. (2019) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Yngfalk, C. (2019) Subverting sustainability: market maintenance work and the reproduction of corporate irresponsibility. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(17/18), 1563–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.