Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-9nbrm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T11:42:13.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the spatio-temporal pattern and determinants of child marriage in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2025

Rofiyat Temitope Oyebisi
Affiliation:
Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria
Oluwafunmilayo Adenike Dawodu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil Department of Statistics, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil
Ezra Gayawan
Affiliation:
Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria
*
Corresponding author: Oluwafunmilayo Adenike Dawodu; Email: oluwafunmilayo@usp.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Millions of young girls in Nigeria have continued to suffer the negative consequences of early marriage such as discontinuation of education and restricting them from achieving their full potential. Successive Nigerian governments have therefore deployed different strategies over the years to mitigate the practice, particularly in the northern part of the country. This study analysed the changes in the pattern of child marriage across space-time in Nigeria using a dataset obtained from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey conducted between 2003 and 2018 at a consecutive interval of 5 years. A Bayesian spatio-temporal random effect model with inference based on integrated nested laplace approximation was considered. Whereas the findings demonstrate a reduction in the practice of child marriage over time everywhere in the country, the prevalence remains highest in States such as Kogi, Niger, Federal Capital Territory Abuja, Taraba, and Kaduna, all in the northern part of the country despite the policies, program and interventions by international organisations, Child Right Acts, and Non-governmental organisations. Over the fifteen years, only slight changes were recorded in the Southwest region. Furthermore, higher levels of education, urban residency, household wealth, being a Yoruba, or belonging to a Christian religious group were found to lower the chances of child marriage. State-specific strategic planning would be useful in deploying suitable local solutions to reduce child marriage in Nigeria.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. The total sample size of the Socio-demographic characteristics used for the analysis of the Binomial model

Figure 1

Table 2. Hyperparameters model displaying the posterior mean, posterior standard deviation with the 95% credible interval where ${{\bf{\tau}}_{\bf{u}}}$ is the precision matrix, ${{\rm{\tau }}_{{\phi _t}}}$ is the spatial effect, ${{\rm{\tau }}_{{{\rm{u}}_t}}}$ is the temporal effect, and ${{\rm{\tau }}_{{{\rm{\gamma }}_{it}}}}$ is the spatio-temporal interaction

Figure 2

Table 3. Parameter estimates for the linear effects showing the odd ratio (OR), standard deviation (STD), and 95% credible intervals (CI) where LCI is lower credible and UCI represents Upper credible interval

Figure 3

Figure 1. A spatial random effect accounting for correlated heterogeneity in the prevalence of child marriage across the 36 states plus Federal Territory Capital, Nigeria showing the (a) odd ratio, (b) lower credible interval (LCI), and (c) upper credible interval (UCI).

Figure 4

Figure 2. The space–time interaction of child marriage across the 37 states in 2003 showing the (a) odd ratios, (b) lower credible interval, and (c) upper credible interval.

Figure 5

Figure 3. The space–time interaction of child marriage across the 37 states in 2008 showing the (a) odd ratio, (b) lower credible interval, and (c) upper credible interval.

Figure 6

Figure 4. The space–time interaction of child marriage across the 37 states in 2013 showing the (a) odd ratio, (b) lower credible interval, and (c) upper credible interval.

Figure 7

Figure 5. The space–time interaction of child marriage across the 37 states in 2018 showing the (a) odd ratio, (b) lower credible interval, and (c) upper credible interval.