Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-5ngxj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T01:23:41.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modes of relating to contingency: An exploration of experiences in advanced cancer patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2016

Renske Kruizinga*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Iris D. Hartog
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Michael Scherer-Rath
Affiliation:
Faculty of Philosophy, Theology, and Religious Studies, Radboud University–Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Hans Schilderman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Philosophy, Theology, and Religious Studies, Radboud University–Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Hanneke Van Laarhoven
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Renske Kruizinga, Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, F4-261, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: r.kruizinga@amc.uva.nl.

Abstract

Objective:

Throughout their lives, people are confronted with unexpected life events, which can be difficult to incorporate into their life narratives. Such a confrontation can result in an experience of contingency. Different ways of relating to contingency have been described by Wuchterl: denying, acknowledging, and “encounter with the Other.” In the present article, we aim to trace these theoretical distinctions in real-life experiences of patients.

Method:

We analyzed 45 interviews using the constant comparative method with a directed content analysis approach in the Atlas.ti coding program. The interviews originated from a randomized controlled trial evaluating an assisted reflection on life events and ultimate life goals. Seven spiritual counselors from six hospitals in the Netherlands conducted the interviews from July of 2014 to March of 2016. All 45 patients had advanced cancer.

Results:

We found four different modes into which relating to contingency can be classified: denying, acknowledging, accepting, and receiving. With denying, patients did not mention any impact of the life event on their lives. In acknowledging, the impact was recognized and a start was made to incorporate the event into their life. In accepting, patients went through a process of reinterpretation of the event. In receiving, patients talked about receiving insights from their illness and living a more conscious life.

Significance of results:

Our study is the first to investigate the different ways of relating to contingency in clinical practice. The defined modes will improve our understanding of the various ways in which cancer patients relate to their disease, allowing caregivers to better target and shape individual care.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable