Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-f97m6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-21T09:35:38.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on the laying performance, egg quality, and gut microbiota of Taihe silk chicken during the peak laying period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2025

Yang Fu
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Lutong Zhou
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Yutian Shen
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Weifa Su
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Wentao Li
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Lixia Kai
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Wei Wei
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Yuanzhi Cheng
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Fengqin Wang
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Yizhen Wang
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Jianjun Peng
Affiliation:
Xichang Fengxiang Poultry Industry Co., Ltd, Taihe County, Ji’an, China
Zeqing Lu*
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Centre for Green Feed and Healthy Farming, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Breeding for High-Quality Animal Products, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author: Zeqing Lu; Email: zqlu2012@zju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Taihe silk chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus Brisson) are prized for their nutritional value but face challenges like low productivity and feed efficiency. Broussonetia papyrifera (BP), rich in nutrients, is mainly used in ruminant feed. This study investigates the effects of fermented BP (FBP) on the laying performance, egg quality, and gut microbiota of Taihe silk chicken during peak laying period. A total of 240 chickens were randomly assigned to four treatments (five replicates/treatments) with a basal diet (CON), a basal diet + 2% FBP (T2), a basal diet + 4% FBP (T4), and a basal diet + 8% FBP (T8) for 75 d. Results showed that the average daily feed intake and yolk color in the 8% FBP group were significantly increased by 12.21% and 11.78%, respectively (P < 0.05). Yolk folate content of the 4% and 8% FBP groups was significantly increased by 32.73% and 59.76%, respectively (P < 0.05). Zinc content in the yolk of the 8% FBP group was significantly increased by 14.22% (P< 0.05). The FBP group influenced the fatty acid composition of the yolk, and 8% FBP significantly decreased the n-6 unsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) to n-3 PUFA ratio (P< 0.05). FBP also increased the ratio of villus height, and crypt depth significantly increased in the duodenum, jejunum and ileum (P< 0.05). The 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that FBP altered cecal microbiota, increasing the relative abundance of Bacteroides, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, and Alistipes, while reducing the relative abundance of Olsenella and Ruminococcaceae UCG-005. Correlation analysis suggests that the FBP may enhance the growth performance and egg composition by modulating gut microbiota. In conclusion, this study confirms that adding FBP to the diet improves egg quality, composition, intestinal structure, and gut microbiota in Taihe silk chicken. These insights are valuable for optimizing FBP utilization in Taihe silk chicken production.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Zhejiang University and Zhejiang University Press.
Figure 0

Table 1. Nutrient composition of Broussonetia papyrifera and fermented Broussonetia papyrifera

Figure 1

Table 2. Ingredients and nutrient levels of experimental diets (as-fed basis)

Figure 2

Table 3. The effect of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on the laying performance of Taihe silk chicken aged 24–35 weeks

Figure 3

Table 4. The effect of different days and supplemental amounts of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on egg quality of Taihe silk chicken

Figure 4

Table 5. The effect of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on the egg yolk composition of Taihe silk chicken (wet basis)

Figure 5

Table 6. The effect of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on the amino acid of Taihe silk chicken egg yolk (wet basis)

Figure 6

Table 7. The effect of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on the fatty acid of Taihe silk chicken egg yolk (wet basis)

Figure 7

Figure 1. The effect of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on the intestinal morphology of Taihe silk chicken. (A) The effect of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on the villus height, crypt depth, and the ratio of villus height and crypt depth of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. (B) The effect of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on the morphology of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. CON = basal diet; T2 = basal diet + 2% fermented Broussonetia papyrifera; T4 = basal diet + 4% fermented Broussonetia papyrifera; T8 = basal diet + 8% fermented Broussonetia papyrifera. P: P-value for ANOVA. PL: P-value for linear effect. PQ: P-value for quadratic effect. a–d Means with unlike letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). Data are presented as the mean and SEM (n = 5).

Figure 8

Figure 2. The effect of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on gut microbiota of Taihe silk chicken. (A) Alpha diversity of gut microbiota of Taihe silk chicken. (B) The Venn analysis of Taihe silk chicken. (C) PCoA and NMDS analysis of Taihe silk chicken. (D) The relative abundance on phylum level of Taihe silk chicken. (E) The relative abundance on genus level of Taihe silk chicken. (F) The LEfSe analysis of Taihe silk chicken (LDA score > 4). CON = basal diet; T2 = basal diet + 2% fermented Broussonetia papyrifera; T4 = basal diet + 4% fermented Broussonetia papyrifera; T8 = basal diet + 8% fermented Broussonetia papyrifera. P: P-value for ANOVA. PL: P-value for linear effect. PQ: P-value for quadratic effect. a–d Means with unlike letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). All the values contained six repetitions.

Figure 9

Figure 3. Metabolic function of gut microbiota of Taihe silk chicken. (A) Level 1 metabolic functional prediction. (B) Level 2 metabolic functional prediction. (C) Level 3 significantly different metabolic functional prediction. CON = basal diet; T2 = basal diet + 2% fermented Broussonetia papyrifera; T4 = basal diet + 4% fermented Broussonetia papyrifera; T8 = basal diet + 8% fermented Broussonetia papyrifera. Significant correlation is represented by ***P < 0.001, **0.001 < P < 0.01, *0.01 < P < 0.05 respectively. All the values contained six repetitions.

Figure 10

Figure 4. Spearman correlation analysis of gut microbiota, laying performance, and egg composition in Taihe silk chicken. Significant correlation is represented by ***P < 0.001, **0.001 < P < 0.01, *0.01 < P < 0.05 respectively. All the values contained six repetitions.