Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T21:35:21.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intra-individual and intra-species heterogeneity in nuclear rDNA ITS region of Vigna species from subgenus Ceratotropis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2008

AJAY SAINI
Affiliation:
Molecular Biology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
SREENIVASULU K. REDDY
Affiliation:
Nuclear Agriculture and Biotechnology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
NARENDRA JAWALI*
Affiliation:
Molecular Biology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
*
*Corresponding author. Molecular Biology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India. Tel: +91-22-25595078. Fax. +91-22-25505151. e-mail: enjay@barc.gov.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The extent of intra-individual and intra-species heterogeneity in the nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) was investigated among the ‘Asiatic Vigna’ species (subgenus Ceratotropis). High intra- and inter-individual ITS polymorphism was observed among Vigna radiata accessions, where multiple ITS length variants ranging from ~700 to ~770 bp were detected on PCR amplification. Subsequent analysis revealed that the variants are ‘heteroduplex ITS fragments’ generated during the PCR process. Analysis of ITS from wild and cultivated forms of ten Vigna species from subgenus Ceratotropis revealed substantial intra-species divergence in four species: Vigna umbellata, Vigna trilobata, V. radiata and Vigna minima. However, no other species analysed showed intra-individual ITS heterogeneity as observed in V. radiata. The results demonstrate differential evolution of ITS sequence among wild and cultivated forms of V. radiata. Evidence indicates that intra-species hybridization and a slow ‘molecular drive’ are responsible for this phenomenon. Sequence analysis of 5·8S, ITS1 and ITS2 and secondary-structure analysis of ITS regions indicate that the ITS variants do not belong to pseudogenic rDNA repeat units. Further, reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis showed that rDNA repeat units harbouring certain intra-individual ITS variants were transcriptionally inactive, indicating the regulation of these loci by epigenetic gene silencing. The V. radiata ITS variants, when analysed together, did not cause any phylogenetic errors at the species level.

Information

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (A) Schematic representation of ITS region of 18S–5·8S–26S rDNA repeat unit. Binding sites of primers used (G1, C2, VRD1 and VRD2) and the position of the EcoRV site are indicated. (B) ITS length variants among some V. radiata accessions as observed on a 2·0% high-resolution agarose gel. Lane 1, PUSA-93-72 (a single ITS band); lane 2, PUSA-90-31; lane 3, PUSA-96-22; lane 4, TARM-22; lane 5, TARM-18; lane 6, TARM-2; lane 7, PUSA-102; lane 8, PUSA-106; lane 9, TPM-1; lane 10, JL-781; lane 11, S-24-1; lane 12, TARM-21; lane 13, Marker (100 bp ladder); lane 14, PUSA-105; lane 15, PUSA-95-31; lane 16, PUSA-95-71; lane 17, PDM-1. Arrows indicate expected and additional ITS fragments. (C) EcoRV digestion of ITS (to see variations in ITS1 and ITS2 fragments) from some V. radiata accessions as observed on a 2·5% high resolution agarose gel: lane 1, PUSA-93-72 (single ITS1 and ITS2 fragments); lane 2, PUSA-90-31; lane 3, PUSA-96-22; lane 4, TARM-22; lane 5, TARM-18; lane 6, TARM-2; lane 7, PUSA-102; lane 8, PUSA-106; lane 9, TPM-1; lane M, marker (50 bp ladder). Arrows indicate expected and additional fragments harbouring ITS1 and ITS2.

Figure 1

Table 1. List of V. radiata (mungbean) accessions used

Figure 2

Table 2. List of Vigna accessions belonging to the subgenus Ceratotropis analysed

Figure 3

Fig. 2. (A) ITS region PCR-amplified from individual clones (lanes 1–16) of TARM-2. No ITS length variants are observed. The expected-size ITS band is indicated by arrow. (B) EcoRV digestion of individual ITS variants, A (lane 1), B (lane 2), C (lane 3) and D (lane 4), of TARM-2 after denaturing and reannealing and a mixture of ITS variants (lane 5) without denaturing and reannealing. Arrow indicates expected ITS1 and ITS2 fragments, however, no additional fragments are observed. (C) ‘EcoRV analysis’ of the heteroduplexes obtained by mixing ITS variants (A, B, C and D) of TARM-2 in different combinations. Lane 1, D; lane 2, A+B; lane 3, A+C; lane 4, A+D; lane 5, B+C; lane 6, B+D; lane 7, C+D; lane 8, A+B+C+D; lanes 9 and 10, EcoRV-digested ITS product amplified from genomic DNA (different amounts loaded). ‘M’ is the 50 bp DNA ladder used as a marker. Homo- and hetero-duplex fragments are indicated. Arrows indicate absence of heteroduplex ITS1 in the combination A+C and ITS2 in the combination B+C. (D) Mixed-template PCR analysis of different combinations of ‘ITS variants’ (A, B, C and D) from TARM-2 followed by ‘EcoRV analysis’. Lane 1, A type; lane 2, A+B; lane 3, A+C; lane 4, A+D; lane 5, B; lane 6, B+B; lane 7, B+C; lane 8, B+D; lane 9, A+B+C+D; lane 10, TARM-2 ITS products from genomic DNA. ‘M’ is the 50 bp DNA ladder used as a marker. Homo- and hetero-duplex fragments are indicated. Arrows indicate the absence of heteroduplex ITS1 in the combination A+C and ITS2 in the combination B+C. Note: No new/additional (other than expected) ITS fragments were observed.

Figure 4

Table 3. Correlation between the presence of indel regions in ITS1 and ITS2 and heteroduplex ITS1 and ITS2 fragments observed, in ITS variants from TARM-2 and JL-781

Figure 5

Fig. 3. EcoRV profiles’ of ITS products of 25 Vigna accessions as observed on a 2·5% high resolution agarose gel. Arrows indicate expected and additional ITS1 and ITS2 fragments. Lane numbers (1–25) indicate the accessions listed in Table 2. Arrows indicate V. radiata accessions that showed single ITS1 and ITS2 fragments. ‘M’ indicates the 50 bp DNA ladder.

Figure 6

Table 4. Indel variation among the ITS variants identified in wild and cultivated type V. radiata accessions

Figure 7

Fig. 4. ITS1 region amplified by RT-PCR among the V. radiata accessions NI 1607 (lanes 2–4), NI 1012 (lanes 5–7) and NI 127 (lanes 8–10). C (control), G (genomic DNA), −RT (DNAse-treated total RNA with no reverse transcriptase in RT-PCR) and +RT (DNAse-treated total RNA with reverse transcriptase in RT-PCR). The arrows indicate the heteroduplex fragments indicative of variants present in the genome but transcriptionally silent.

Figure 8

Table 5. Variation in length and percentage G+C content in ITS, ITS1 and ITS2 of the Vigna accessions

Figure 9

Fig. 5. Rooted NJ tree based on ITS1+ITS2 sequence data of Vigna species using MEGA software (version 2.1). V. unguiculata was used as the outgroup. The numbers near the nodes indicate bootstrap values (in percentage) for a 1000-replicate analysis. The ‘*’ indicate accessions of Vigna species showing high intra-species heterogeneity. (A) NJ tree of all Vigna accessions along with the intra-genomic ITS variants from V. radiata accessions (compressed as a sub-tree). (B) Expanded sub-tree of the V. radiata ITS variants (A–K type).

Figure 10

Fig. 6. Consensus MP-Tree (CI: 0·746; RI: 0·883; RCI: 0·659) generated using CNI option of MEGA software (version 2.1). The numbers near the nodes indicate bootstrap values (in percentage) for a 500-replicate analysis. The ‘*’ indicate accessions of Vigna species showing high intra-species heterogeneity.

Figure 11

Fig. 7. Schematic representation of alignment of ITS1+ITS2 sequences of Vigna species from subgenus Ceratotropis. Eight major indels (#1 to #8) that were found to be variable among V. radiata ITS variants are indicated. These regions were absent in the remaining Vigna species as evident from the profile representing three Vigna species (V. mungo, V. aconitifolia and V. trilobata) and the profile representing the rest of the Vigna species analysed. The numbers on the top indicate approximate position in the ITS1+ITS2 sequence alignment file (Supplementary Fig. S6).

Supplementary material: File

Saini et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Table S1 and Figs S1 S2 S3A and S3B

Download Saini et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.8 MB
Supplementary material: File

Saini et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Table S2 and Figs S4 and S5

Download Saini et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.5 MB