Some say the law
ought not to bend.
That it should be a neutral,
certain thing.
But there are reasons
judgement and interpretation
are bequeathed
to human
– humane –
hearts, and heads.
Enter women, in coalition:
women, from the wings
of all the world,
who raised the plight
of territories
from the Balkans, to Rwanda.
From fields of conflict,
and beyond.
These women urged the court
to recognise that category of crimes
which, by the horror of their calculation,
target women
– target women, and their daughters
by the tent there, playing catch;
target women, and the sleeping children,
strapped to buckling backs;
target women, and their cheeky nephews,
dirt-drawing twig-in-hand;
target women, and the crawling babes, look,
right by their feet,
and the crimes which target
those whom gender,
(in the minds
of misogynistic men
and their supporters),
make
as vulnerable
as these.
There are some crimes
which, by design,
so make of man
the enemy of all mankind.
So the sisterhood
walked the corridors of power:
lobbied, whispered, woke
and wrangled
in the halls of Rome.
The sisterhood
stole little sleep,
and guided by the hand
of some other-worldly strength,
– and bleary-eyed,
and sure of heart,
to see the statute recognise
the folk the greatest horrors
Whatever you do to the least of my sisters.
Every woman is a sister of mine.
And where war walks,
its bed-friend torture lounges,
to test the very limits
of what a broken body
can bear.
For those who gender makes a mark of
when the world forgets to watch,
for them,
the women guarding the statute of Rome,
they coalesced, they did their best
to weave through law
an equal hand.
To see that women always walk the halls,
and sit the benches:
see that there is always pause
to think of what it means
to be a woman in this world.
And to encourage those there judging
to bring to table, and to thinking,
all their living’s taught them
(and perhaps the very things their living’s
taught them are unimportant).
And oh, they were at pains to see
that academic theorisation
would not prove the enemy
of just interpretation.
And so it was the court,
there writ through treaty,
realised, and recognised
and ratified
for Feminist
consideration.
When, much later,
warm, just printed from the press,
the thing was set to paper,
they had achieved
not all their aims
(and many, true, lamented
that the hand of status quo
stripped back the goals
of progress).
that they so tried,
and would not give in,
that they believed,
to imbed
a gender mandate
in the ICC.
When all was said and done,
and when dawn broke in Rome,
there bled a sunset, peach and golden,
flecked with dappled rose,
that faded out
into the morning blue.
A glimmer of hope
that change would come.
Something had shifted,
everyone knew.