Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6c7dr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T00:51:46.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bitemporal v. high-dose right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2017

E. Kolshus ,
A. Jelovac  and
D. M. McLoughlin
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Corrigendum
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , March 2018 , pp. 703 - 704
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

An error was included in Fig 3 of the above article. The data for item 3.1 Reorientation time were mistakenly switched around with regards to the Bitemporal and Unilateral groups. The corrected Figure 3 is presented below. The results are otherwise correct and conclusions unchanged. The authors would like to apologise for this error.

Fig. 3. Forest plots of cognitive outcomes.

References

Kolshus, E, Jelovac, A, McLoughlin, DM (2017). Bitemporal v. high-dose right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychological Medicine; 47 (3): 518–530. doi:10.1017/S0033291716002737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 3. Forest plots of cognitive outcomes.