Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-f97m6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-10T19:24:41.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential use of clays from Zemlet El Beidha (southern Tunisia) as aluminosilicate precursors for geopolymer synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2026

Zainab Jrad*
Affiliation:
Research Unity of Geo-systems, Geo-resources and Geo-environments (UR3G), Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Gabes, Gabes, Tunisia
Francesco Genua
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering ‘Enzo Ferrari’, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Isabella Lancellotti
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering ‘Enzo Ferrari’, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Cristina Leonelli
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering ‘Enzo Ferrari’, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Salah Mahmoudi
Affiliation:
Research Unity of Geo-systems, Geo-resources and Geo-environments (UR3G), Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Gabes, Gabes, Tunisia
*
Corresponding author: Zainab Jrad; Email: nourizaynab@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the potential of six illite-rich clay samples from the Lower Cretaceous outcrops of Zemlet El Beidha (southern Tunisia) as precursors for geopolymer synthesis. Τhe raw materials are predominantly illitic, although kaolinite remains a main reactive phase. Samples BHG2 and BHG5 were specifically selected for further investigation due to their relatively high kaolinite content compared to the remaining samples and due to their distinct secondary mineralogy, with BHG2 being rich in hematite and BHG5 being rich in calcite. This selection allowed for a comparative analysis of how different impurities affect geopolymerization. The samples were calcined at 550°C, 750°C and 950°C to determine the optimal dehydroxylation temperature. Alkali activation was systematically performed using 10, 12 and 14 M NaOH solutions to assess the influence of alkalinity on the polycondensation process. The 12 M NaOH was most effective for the dissolution of aluminosilicate phases without the detrimental effects of excess sodium. Structural characterization (X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy) confirmed that the greatest compressive strength (∼8 MPa) was achieved with BHG5 calcined at 750°C. Although this strength is lower than that of kaolinite-based geopolymers, it meets the requirements for non-structural applications, such as thermal insulation or lightweight masonry units. This research demonstrates a viable pathway for valorizing abundant illitic-kaolinitic Tunisian clays into sustainable construction materials.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Figure 0

Table 1. Physical and geotechnical properties of the raw clay samples.Table 1 long description.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Projection of the studied clay samples on the Holtz and Kovacs diagram (adapted from Holtz & Kovacs, 1981).Figure 1 long description.

Figure 2

Table 2. Chemical composition of the raw clays obtained by XRF (±0.01 wt.%).Table 2 long description.

Figure 3

Figure 2. XRD traces of (a) red and (b) green clay samples. C = calcite; D = dolomite; H = hematite; I = illite; K = kaolinite; Q = quartz.Figure 2 long description.

Figure 4

Table 3. Mineralogical composition (±3 wt.%) of the raw clay samples.Table 3 long description.

Figure 5

Figure 3. ATR-FTIR spectra of (a) red and (b) green raw clay samples.Figure 3 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Thermal analysis of raw clays: (a) BHG125, (b) BHG225, (c) BHG325, (d) BHG425, (e) BHG525 and (f) BHG625. The horizental green lines denote the baselines used to determine the mass loss steps for each thermal event. TG = thermogravimetry.Figure 4 long description.

Figure 7

Table 4. Particle-size distributions (±1 wt.%), MB SSA and BET specific surface area (SBET) of BHG225 and BHG525 at various calcination temperatures.Table 4 long description.

Figure 8

Figure 5. XRD traces of the selected clay samples before and after calcination: (a) BHG2 and (b) BHG5. C = calcite; Cr = cristobalite; D = dolomite; Di = diopside; H = hematite; I = illite; K = kaolinite; Mu = mullite; Plg = plagioclase; Q = quartz; Sp = spinel; Wo = wollastonite.Figure 5 long description.

Figure 9

Figure 6. XRD traces of 28 day NaOH-activated pastes (10, 12 and 14 M) prepared from the bulk clays (a) BHG525, (b) BHG5550, (c) BHG5750, (d) BHG5950, (e) BHG225, (f) BHG2550, (g) BHG2750 and (h) BHG2950. C = calcite; Cr = cristobalite; crn = corundum; D = dolomite; Di = diopside; fau-Na = Na-faujasite; feld = feldspars; grn-Na = garronite; H = hematite; Hs = hydrosodalite; I = illite; K = Kaolinite; Mu = mullite; P = portlandite; Plg = plagioclase; Pss = pirssonite; Q = quartz; Sp = spinel; Wo = wollastonite.Figure 6 long description.

Figure 10

Figure 7. FTIR spectra (KBr pellet) of geopolymers synthesized from clay fractions (a–d) BHG5 and (e–h) BHG2. Precursors were calcinated at 25°C, 550°C, 750°C and 950°C and activated with 10, 12 and 14 M NaOH solutions.Figure 7 long description.

Figure 11

Table 5. Compressive strength values (error ±0.05 MPa) of hardened geopolymer pastes synthesized from BHG2 and BHG5 clays calcined at various temperatures (550°C, 750°C and 950°C) and activated with various NaOH concentrations.Table 5 long description.

Figure 12

Figure 8. SEM micrographs of alkali-activated samples (a) 10GBHG2950, (b) 14GBHG2950, (c) 12GBHG5750 and (d) 12GBHG5750 at high magnification.Figure 8 long description.

Supplementary material: File

Jrad et al. supplementary material

Jrad et al. supplementary material
Download Jrad et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.3 MB