Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:44:47.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of long-term tillage, terminating no-till and cropping system on organic C and N, and available nutrients in a Gleysolic soil in Québec, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2018

S. S. Malhi
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), P.O. Box 1240, Highway 6 South Melfort, Saskatchewan S0E 1A0, Canada
A. Légère
Affiliation:
AAFC, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0X2, Canada
A. Vanasse
Affiliation:
Département de phytologie, Université Laval, Faculté des sciences de l'agriculture et de l'alimentation, 2425 rue de l'Agriculture, Québec, QC G1 V 0A6, Canada
G. Parent*
Affiliation:
AAFC, 2560, boul. Hochelaga, Québec, QC G1 V 2J3, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: G. Parent, E-mail: gaetan.parent@agr.gc.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some biological and chemical properties of a Gleysol were examined after 24 years of soil tillage (chisel plough – CP, mouldboard plough – MP, no-till – NT) and that of ploughing the 24-yr NT (P-NT) once, in two cropping systems (conventional – CONV, organic – ORG) applied over 4 years (2007–2010) of a long-term experiment (autumn 1987–autumn 2011) at La Pocatière, Québec, Canada. The 0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm soil depths were sampled in autumn 2011 after a maize trial. Tillage affected light fraction organic carbon (LFOC), light fraction organic nitrogen (LFON) and mineralizable N (Nmin) in soil, with the lowest LFOC, LFON and Nmin values in the MP treatment. No-till had lower soil pH than the other tillage systems in the 10–20 and 20–30 cm soil depths. Tillage affected the amounts of nitrate-N in 0–10 and 10–20 cm soil depths, with the lowest amounts for MP (4.3 kg nitrate-N/ha) compared with NT (7.2 or 8.5 kg nitrate-N/ha) or CP (7.7 kg nitrate-N/ha). The P-NT had no negative impact on organic C and N, or available nutrients in soil. Cropping system had no effect on soil organic C and N, available nutrients or pH. Findings suggest that long-term NT or CP may result in greater storage of organic C and N in soil and improve available nutrients compared with MP. Ploughing 25-year-old NT plots redistributed available nutrients in the profile but had no negative effect on soil organic C or N.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, and Cambridge University Press 2018. Published by Cambridge University Press 2018

Introduction

Long-term performance and sustainability of crop production are linked to soil physical, chemical and biological properties, which in turn are influenced strongly by soil organic matter (SOM) (Weil and Magdoff, Reference Weil, Magdoff, Magdoff and Weil2004). Soil organic matter improves soil properties and is a source of plant nutrients and energy for microorganisms. Quantity and quality of soil organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) are affected by soil and crop management practices (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Hebert, Hashemi, Zhang and Ding2006).

Tillage can affect the amounts of organic C stored in soil. For example, incorporation of crop residue under intensive tillage, especially mouldboard plough (MP), can cause substantial decrease in soil organic C and N by increasing decomposition rate (Douglas et al., Reference Douglas, Allmaras, Rasmussen, Ramig and Roager1980; Collins et al., Reference Collins, Rasmussen and Douglas1992; Soon Reference Soon1998; Reference Soon2007). Leaving crop residue at the soil surface under no-tillage (NT) may restrict its decomposition, resulting in accumulation of SOM in the topsoil under NT (Liang et al., Reference Liang, McConkey, Campbell, Curtin, Lafond, Brandt and Moulin2004; Malhi and Lemke, Reference Malhi and Lemke2007; Malhi et al., Reference Malhi, Nyborg, Goddard and Puurveen2011, Reference Malhi, Nyborg, Goddard and Puurveen2012). Practicing MP tillage for 5–10 years may not cause any significant reduction in soil organic C and N compared with NT but may result in its redistribution in the soil profile (Angers et al., Reference Angers, Bolinder, Carter, Gregorich, Drury, Liang, Voroney, Simard, Donald, Beyaert and Martel1997).

Long-term NT may cause stratification of P in the surface soil and reduce its availability to crops (Crozier et al., Reference Crozier, Naderman, Tucker and Sugg1999; Baan et al., Reference Baan, Grevers and Schoenau2009). In areas where large amounts of crop residue or straw are produced, accumulated crop residue at the soil surface under NT may hinder seeding operations, resulting in poor/sporadic germination, especially when proper direct-seeding drills are not available to facilitate seeding. In addition, relatively cool and wet surface soil in spring under NT (Johnson and Lowery, Reference Johnson and Lowery1985) may delay seeding and slow crop emergence and early growth and increase potential nutrient loss in surface water run-off (Ferguson et al., Reference Ferguson, Pearson and Reynolds1996).

Current interest in low-input cropping systems often implies an increased use of tillage for weed control. Use of low-input or organic systems is also associated with a partial to total dependence on organic nutrient inputs. Application of organic manure can improve soil physical, chemical and biological properties, and the nutrient supplying power of the soil (Yanan et al., Reference Yanan, Emteryd, Dianqing and Grip1997; Whalen et al., Reference Whalen, Chang and Olson2001; Yang et al., Reference Yang, Malhi, Li, Suo, Xu, Wang, Xiao, Jia, Guo and Wang2007; Heitkamp et al., Reference Heitkamp, Raupp and Ludwig2011). Organic cropping systems that include application of manure can increase organic C and N, and availability of nutrients in soil even after short-term (3 years) additions (Malhi, Reference Malhi2012).

At some point, producers could be interested in tilling long-term NT fields, partly because of the above-mentioned potential problems related to long-term use of NT, but also to make use of accumulated nutrients in surface soil under NT, particularly if transitioning to an organic cropping system. Effects of tillage applied to long-term NT on crop yield and nutrient uptake, available nutrients in soil, and persistence of organic C in soil that was gained/stored under NT have been investigated previously (Davidson and Ackerman, Reference Davidson and Ackerman1993; Campbell et al., Reference Campbell, Thomas, Biederbeck, McConkey, Selles, Spurr and Zentner1998; VandenBygaart and Kay, Reference VandenBygaart and Kay2004; Baan et al., Reference Baan, Grevers and Schoenau2009). However, effects of terminating NT with a ploughing operation on these variables in contrasted cropping systems (using conventional vs. organic inputs) have not been documented under the agro-environmental conditions of eastern Québec. The objective of the current study was to determine the effects of previous cropping system (conventional and organic), long term tillage (chisel plough (CP), MP), long-term NT and terminating NT (P-NT: NT ploughed once after 24 years) on soil organic C and N fractions (total organic C (TOC) and N (TON), light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) and nitrogen (LFON), and mineralizable N (Nmin)) and available nutrients in soil (ammonium-N, nitrate-N and extractable P) in the 0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm depths of a Gleysolic soil in Québec, Canada.

Materials and methods

The present study was initiated in autumn 1987 at the Centre de Développement Bioalimentaire du Québec, at La Pocatière, Québec, Canada (47°E 21′N, 70°E 02′W, 204 m a.s.l.), on a Kamouraska clay (Typic humic Gleysol, mineralogy dominated by illite and chlorite (400 g/kg), quartz and feldspars (300 g/kg) and smectites (170 g/kg) (De Kimpe et al., Reference De Kimpe, Laverdière and Martel1979); 100 g/kg sand, 300 g/kg silt, 600 g/kg clay (clay texture) in the surface horizon; pH = 5.9; organic matter = 45 g/kg; P-Mehlich 3 extractable = 94 kg/ha, K-Mehlich 3 extractable = 305 kg/ha). Tillage treatments included: MP (15–18 cm depth) in autumn, followed by spring secondary tillage; CP (12–15 cm depth) in autumn, followed by spring secondary tillage; and NT. Mouldboard plough and CP plots were ploughed every other year in the first phase of the study (1987–1995), and every year thereafter.

In 2007, the tillage plots were used to determine the feasibility of applying low-input cropping systems to mature conservation tillage plots (Légère et al., Reference Légère, Vanasse and Stevenson2013). Two cropping systems were compared: (1) a system based on agronomic practices used in organic agriculture (ORG) (nutrients supplied as dry granular poultry manure and mechanical weed control), and a conventional cropping system (CONV) using synthetic nutrients and herbicide-based weed control. A 4-year crop rotation [barley (2007)/red clover (2008) (managed as a forage crop)/maize (2009)/soybean (2010)] was selected with the assumption that the initial barley/red clover years would provide good weed suppression as well as N input in support of the more demanding and less competitive maize crop.

Cropping system treatments were assigned randomly in strips perpendicular to the original tillage plots (plot size: 5 × 13 m2) within each replicate, resulting in a strip plot design with four replicates. On 3 November 2010, each NT plot was further split in half lengthwise (2.5 × 13 m2). One randomly selected half of NT was mouldboard ploughed (P-NT), whereas the other half remained in NT. This division created an additional treatment, i.e. terminated NT, to the existing tillage treatments (CP, MP and a non-terminated NT treatment) increasing the total number of tillage treatments in the experiment to four. On 10 June 2011, plots with MP, CP and P-NT were harrowed, and glyphosate-tolerant maize (Hybrid Fusion RR 2100-2400 CHU) was planted at 82 300 seeds/ha in 76 cm six rows. A reduced rate of fertilizer (220 kg/ha 27-18-0 N-phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5)–potassium oxide (K2O)) was side-banded at planting to all plots to allow the expression of residual effects of previous cropping systems. Maize was harvested in autumn at maturity before frost kill. Details of the cropping system by tillage study are found in Légère et al. (Reference Légère, Vanasse and Stevenson2013). Treatments considered for the current soil study included MP, CP, NT and P-NT tillage in CONV and ORG cropping systems, for a total of eight treatments.

Soil sampling and sample preparation

On 27 October 2011, soil cores from five locations in the centre of plots were collected from the 0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm depths, using a 2.5 cm internal diameter corer. Bulk density of the soil was determined by the core method (Culley, Reference Culley and Carter1993). Soil samples were air-dried at room temperature after removing any coarse roots and easily detectable crop residues, and ground to pass through a 2-mm sieve. Sub-samples were pulverized in a vibrating-ball mill (Retsch, Type MM2, Brinkman Instruments Co., Toronto, Ontario) for determination of organic C and N in various fractions.

Organic carbon and nitrogen analysis

For TON, soil samples were digested in concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4) plus one Keltab (containing 1.5 g potassium sulphate (K2SO4) and 0.15 g copper sulphate pentahydrate (CuSO4.5H2O)), and the ammonium in the digest was measured by using method of Technicon Industrial Systems (1977). Light fraction organic matter (LFOM) was separated using a sodium iodide (NaI) solution of 1.7 t/m3 specific gravity, following the method described by Janzen et al. (Reference Janzen, Campbell, Brandt, Lafond and Townley-Smith1992) and modified by Izaurralde et al. (Reference Izaurralde, Nyborg, Solberg, Janzen, Arshad, Malhi, Molina-Ayala, Lal, Kimble, Follett and Stewart1998). The TOC, and C and N in LFOM (LFOC, LFON) were measured for the 0–10 and 10–20 cm depths by Dumas combustion using a Carlo Erba instrument (Model NA 1500, Carlo Erba Strumentazione, Italy). Soil samples of all depths for TOC and TON analyses were also tested to detect any inorganic C using dilute HCl (hydrochloric acid), but none was found.

Mineralizable N in soil for the 0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm depths was estimated from the quantities of ammonium-N and nitrate-N that were mineralized from an unfumigated sample during 10-day incubation at 25 °C and a soil water potential of −30 J/kg (Campbell et al., Reference Campbell, Lafond, Zentner and Biederbeck1991). The concentrations of ammonium-N and nitrate-N were measured with a Technicon Analyzer II (Technicon Industrial Systems, 1973a, 1973b).

Chemical analysis

For chemical properties, prepared soil samples were analysed for pH, ammonium-N (NH4-N), nitrate-N (NO3-N) and extractable P (phosphate-P – PO4-P). Soil pH was measured in dilute solution of calcium chloride (CaCl2; 0.01 m) with a Fisher AR20 pH meter (San Diego, CA, USA). Nitrate-N and ammonium-N were extracted using 1:5 soil:2 m potassium chloride (KCl) solution and their concentrations in extracts determined with a Technicon Autoanalyzer II (Technicon Industrial Systems, 1973a, 1973b). Phosphorus was extracted using Kelowna soil extractant (Qian et al., Reference Qian, Schoenau and Karamanos1994) and measured colorimetrically on a Technicon Autoanalyzer (Technicon Industrial Systems, 1977).

Statistical analysis

The data on TOC, TON, LFOC and LFON were calculated using the equivalent soil mass technique (Ellert and Bettany, Reference Ellert and Bettany1995). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted separately for each depth using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (Littell et al., Reference Littell, Milliken, Stroup and Wolfinger2006; SAS Institute, 2011). The analysis considered the effects of replicate, replicate by tillage and replicate by cropping system as random, the effects of cropping system and tillage were fixed, and used a Gaussian error distribution. The fixed effects were considered to be cross-classified factors for the analysis. Exploratory analysis indicated the possibility of heterogeneous variances among tillage systems for some of the tillage by depth combinations. The AICc (corrected Akaike's Information Criterion) was used to confirm the benefit of modelling variance heterogeneity (Littell et al., Reference Littell, Milliken, Stroup and Wolfinger2006). Mean separation was performed using a protected least significant difference (LSD) test.

Results

The ANOVA table for the probabilities of significance for various parameters indicated that there was no significant tillage by cropping system interaction for all variables, except for pH in the 20–30 cm soil depth and LFON in the 0–10 cm soil depth (Table 1). Mean effect of tillage treatment was significant for LFOC and LFON in the 0–10 and 10–20 cm soil depths, pH in the 10–20 and 20–30 cm depths and Nmin in all soil depths, and nitrate-N in the 0–10, 10–20 and 0–30 cm depths. Mean effect of cropping system treatments was significant only for TOC in the 0–10 cm soil depth (although the effect for TON was almost significant at P = 0.057). The results on various soil parameters are discussed in the following paragraphs.

Table 1. Probability of significance for tested treatment effects of tillage, cropping system and tillage × cropping system interaction on total organic C (TOC), total organic N (TON), light fraction organic C (LFOC), light fraction organic N (LFON), pH, mineralizable N (Nmin), nitrate-N (NO3-N), ammonium-N (NH4-N) and extractable P in the 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 0–20 and 0–30 cm soil depths in autumn 2010 (after 24 growing seasons) in a field experiment established in autumn 1987 at La Pocatière, Québec, Canada

*, **, *** and ns refer to significant treatment effects in ANOVA at P ⩽ 0.05, P ⩽ 0.01, P ⩽ 0.001 and not significant, respectively.

The mass of TOC and TON varied with cropping system only in the 0–10 cm soil depth (Table 2). In the 0–10 cm soil depth, TOC in ORG (27.54 t C/ha) was 1.63 t C/ha greater (P = 0.015) than that in the CONV (25.91 t C/ha) cropping system. The effect of tillage on LFOC and LFON varied with soil depth (Table 2). In the 0–10 cm soil depth, TOC and TON values for MP tended to be lower (although not significantly) than for the other three tillage systems. In the 0–10 cm soil depth, LFOC and LFON in NT and CP were approximately twofold that in MP. In the P-NT treatment, mass of LFOC was similar to that of NT and CP, whereas mass of LFON was intermediate to that of MP v. CP and NT. In the 10–20 cm soil depth, mass of LFOC and LFON for MP and P-NT were nearly twofold that for NT and CP. Overall, LFOC and LFON were evenly distributed over the two soil layers in MP, predominant in the 0–10 cm depth for CP and NT, with intermediate values for P-NT which were 1.5 times greater in the 0–10 cm depth than that of 10–20 cm depth.

Table 2. Effect of tillage and cropping system on mass of total organic C (TOC), total organic N (TON), light fraction organic C (LFOC) and light fraction organic N (LFON) in the 0–10, 10–20 and 0–20 cm soil depths in autumn 2010 in a field experiment established in autumn 1987 at La Pocatière, Québec, Canada

*, ** and ns refer to significant treatment effects in ANOVA at P ⩽ 0.05, P ⩽ 0.01 and not significant, respectively.

Tillage affected soil pH in the 10–20 and 20–30 cm soil depths, whereas cropping system had only a small effect on soil pH (Table 3). In the 10–20 and 20–30 cm soil depths, soil pH was lower in NT and P-NT than in MP and CP treatments. Also, in the 0–10 cm depth, soil pH tended to be lower in the P-NT and NT treatments, especially compared with the CP treatment.

Table 3. Effect of tillage and cropping system on pH, mineralizable N (Nmin), nitrate-N (NO3-N) and ammonium-N (NH4-N) in the 0–10, 10–20, 20–30 and 0–30 cm soil depths in autumn 2010 (after 24 growing seasons) in a field experiment established in autumn 1987 at La Pocatière, Québec, Canada

*, **, *** and ns refer to significant treatment effects in ANOVA at P ⩽ 0.05, P ⩽ 0.01, P ⩽ 0.001 and not significant, respectively.

The Nmin value for MP was lower than for the other three tillage treatments in the 0–10 cm soil depth, lower for MP than for CP and P-NT in the 10–20 cm depth, and lower for MP than for NT and P-NT in the 20–30 cm depth (Table 3). No significant differences in Nmin were observed among the other three tillage systems in all soil depths. Tillage affected nitrate-N only in the 0–10 and 10–20 cm soil depths, but again this effect varied with soil depth (Table 3). In the 0–10 cm depth, nitrate-N for MP was lower than that for other tillage treatments whereas in the 10–20 cm depth, nitrate-N was lower for MP and NT than for P-NT, and not different from CP. Tillage and cropping system had no effect on ammonium-N (Table 3) or extractable P, although MP and P-NT tended to have lower extractable P in the 0–10 cm soil depth than NT and CP treatments (Table 4).

Table 4. Effect of tillage and cropping system on extractable P in the 0–10, 10–20, 20–30 and 0–30 cm soil depths in autumn 2010 (after 24 growing seasons) in a field experiment established in autumn 1987 at La Pocatière, Québec, Canada

ns refer to not significant treatment effects in ANOVA.

Discussion

Soil organic carbon and nitrogen

Both quantity and/or quality of organic matter in soil can be altered by tillage (Havlin et al., Reference Havlin, Kissel, Maddux, Claassen and Long1990; Malhi and Lemke, Reference Malhi and Lemke2007), crop rotation or cropping systems (Campbell et al., Reference Campbell, Selles, Lafond, Biederbeck and Zentner2001; Liang et al., Reference Liang, McConkey, Schoenau, Curtin, Campbell, Moulin, Lafond, Brandt and Wang2003; Malhi et al., Reference Malhi, Brandt, Lemke, Moulin and Zentner2009). Tillage, especially MP, increases oxidation of SOM (Doran and Scott-Smith, Reference Doran, Scott-Smith, Follett, Stewart and Cole1987), while NT reduces its oxidation because of less mixing with the soil (Doran, Reference Doran1980). Therefore, one would expect a decrease of organic C and/or N in soil under MP or CP compared with NT (Douglas et al., Reference Douglas, Allmaras, Rasmussen, Ramig and Roager1980; Soon Reference Soon1998, Reference Soon2007). Similarly, in the present study after 25 years, the amounts of LFOC and LFON in soil, particularly in the 0–10 cm soil layer, were lower under MP than NT. But there were generally no significant differences in the amounts of TOC, TON, LFOC and LFON in soil between CP and NT systems. This could be due to the absence of inversion in CP, and to the depth of tillage/plough, which was shallower with CP (about 15 cm deep) than MP (about 20 cm deep).

In a review paper, Davidson and Ackerman (Reference Davidson and Ackerman1993) summarized results from a number of studies varying in duration of tillage/cultivation of NT soils ranging from 3 to 100+ years, and in soil texture ranging from sandy loam to clay. It would appear that long-term untilled soils could lose 20–40% of their original organic C following tillage/cultivation (Davidson and Ackerman, Reference Davidson and Ackerman1993). However, in the present study, there was no significant negative effect of one-time ploughing on TOC, TON, LFOC and LFON in soil compared with the long-term NT treatment. Actually, one-time ploughing of NT resulted in increased productivity, as maize yield in 2011 was greater in P-NT than NT (Légère et al., Reference Légère, Vanasse and Stevenson2013). The absence of one-time ploughing effect on TOC, TON, LFOC and LFON in soil was also suggested by Baan et al. (Reference Baan, Grevers and Schoenau2009) in their study in Saskatchewan, Canada. The soil in the present study was Humic Gleysol with a clay texture, whereas the soils in the Baan et al. (Reference Baan, Grevers and Schoenau2009) study belonged to the Brown Chernozem, Black Chernozem and Gray Luvisol Great Groups, with loam, fine loam and silty clay loam/clay loam texture, respectively. In the Baan et al. (Reference Baan, Grevers and Schoenau2009) studies, long-term NT soils were tilled/ploughed only once. It is anticipated that one-time ploughing of NT may increase both TOC and LFOC in soil in the future, because of its immediate beneficial effects on crop productivity (i.e., returning more crop residue to soil), due to the release/mineralization of nutrients tied in the LF organic matter.

Among the other dynamic fractions examined in the current study, Nmin was also lower under MP than NT at 0–10 and 20–30 cm soil depths. This suggests that the soil N-reserve would improve with NT but diminish with MP. Soil N availability is usually the most limiting factor for crop production (Pastor et al., Reference Pastor, Aber, McClaugherty and Melillo1984). Because the majority of available N used for synthesis of plant biomass is produced by mineralization from native soil organic N, this source of N should be considered when determining nutrient requirements of crops (Uri et al., Reference Uri, Löhmus and Tullus2003). In the present study, greater soil Nmin in NT than in MP suggests that the N-reserve of soil can be improved by reducing or eliminating tillage. There was a weak and non-significant correlation coefficient between crop yield and Nmin in the 0–30 cm soil depth. For the other soil properties, the correlation coefficient between crop yield and soil properties was significant only for soil NO3-N in the 0–30 cm depth.

In the present study, the amounts of soil TOC in the 0–10 cm depth were greater under the ORG than the CONV cropping system. This was probably due to the application of manure in the organic cropping system (Campbell et al., Reference Campbell, Schnitzer, Stewart, Biederbeck and Selles1986; McGill et al., Reference McGill, Cannon, Robertson and Cook1986; Yanan et al., Reference Yanan, Emteryd, Dianqing and Grip1997; Whalen et al., Reference Whalen, Chang and Olson2001; Assefa et al., Reference Assefa, Schoenau and Grevers2004; Heitkamp et al., Reference Heitkamp, Raupp and Ludwig2011; King et al., Reference King, Schoenau and Malhi2015). Similarly, research in Saskatchewan, Canada, has also shown that ORG cropping systems, which include application of manure, can increase organic C and N, and availability of nutrients in soil even after short-term (3 years) additions (Malhi, Reference Malhi2012). However, in another 12-year long-term field research experiment in Saskatchewan where manure was applied occasionally, cropping system had no effect on TOC and TON in soil, although soil LFOC and LFON tended to be slightly greater under ORG than CONV cropping system (Malhi et al., Reference Malhi, Brandt, Lemke, Moulin and Zentner2009), which is consistent with results of the present study. Manure has both direct and indirect input of C to soil, in some cases because of increased crop yields (Watson et al., Reference Watson, Atkinson, Gosling, Jackson and Rayns2002). This was not the case in the present study since previous silage maize (2009) and soybean (2010) yield in ORG was reduced when compared with the CONV cropping system (Légère et al., Reference Légère, Vanasse and Stevenson2013). However, silage maize yield in 2011 (the present study) was similar across both cropping systems (Légère et al., Reference Légère, Vanasse and Stevenson2013).

Light fraction organic matter in soil reflects a balance between crop residue input, and their decomposition and persistence, depending on the soil-climatic conditions (Gulde et al., Reference Gulde, Chung, Amelung, Chang and Six2008). The decomposition of LFOM is relatively faster than total organic matter in soil (Sollins et al., Reference Sollins, Spycher and Glassman1984), and this could provide an increased supply of plant-available N and other nutrients to plants, maintain high microbial populations, enzyme activity and soil respiration rate, and improve soil physical properties (Gregorich et al., Reference Gregorich, Carter, Doran, Pankhurst and Dwyer1997; Angers et al., Reference Angers, Edwards, Sanderson and Bissonnette1999; Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Cohen, Fredeen, Patterson and Martin2005a, Reference Lynch, Voroney and Warman2005b; Marriott and Wander, Reference Marriott and Wander2006). Management practices can have a greater effect on LFOC and LFON than on TOC and TON (Malhi et al., Reference Malhi, Brandt and Gill2003a, Reference Malhi, Harapiak, Nyborg, Gill, Monreal and Gregorich2003b, Reference Malhi, Harapiak, Nyborg, Gill, Monreal and Gregorich2003c). Similarly, in the present study, the decreases in organic C and N for MP compared with NT were relatively more pronounced for LFOC and LFON than TOC, in spite of maize silage yield being similar across both tillage treatments (Légère et al., Reference Légère, Vanasse and Stevenson2013). Also, yield of previous soybean (2010) and silage maize (2009) for NT was similar to MP yield for CONV cropping systems (Légère et al., Reference Légère, Vanasse and Stevenson2013). The changes in LFOC and LFON can be considered good indicators of positive changes/build-up of organic C and N as a result of NT compared with MP (Hassink, Reference Hassink1994; Gagnon et al., Reference Gagnon, Lalande and Fahmy2001; Willson et al., Reference Willson, Paul and Harwood2001; Griffin and Porter, Reference Griffin and Porter2004). Monitoring the changes in LFOC and LFON in the surface soil would appear to be a good strategy to determine the potential for N supplying power, and improvement in soil quality/health. The higher organic C and N in light organic fractions than their total organic fractions under NT was most likely due to much slower decomposition of crop residue (straw, chaff, roots) under NT compared with MP treatment (Doran, Reference Doran1980; Doran and Scott-Smith, Reference Doran, Scott-Smith, Follett, Stewart and Cole1987).

Overall, the findings of the present study suggest some potential of NT or CP in building-up of organic C and N in soil. This was associated with the improvement in some soil properties, such as nutrient supplying power (Nmin). The increase in organic C and N in soil may also have some additional potential benefits, such as improvement in soil biodiversity in NT as evidenced by earthworm communities (Eriksen-Hamel et al., Reference Eriksen-Hamel, Speratti, Whalen, Légère and Madramootoo2009), and soil aggregation and water infiltration as well as decrease in water runoff and soil erosion, thereby increasing the sustainability of crop production (Malhi et al., Reference Malhi, Lemke, Wang and Chhabra2006; Singh and Malhi, Reference Singh and Malhi2006; Malhi and Lemke, Reference Malhi and Lemke2007).

Soil chemical properties

A trend of slow acidification (not significant) of surface soil under NT was observed after 12 annual applications of moderate rates of N fertilizer to annual crops in the Canadian prairies (Malhi et al., Reference Malhi, Brandt, Lemke, Moulin and Zentner2009). Similarly, in the present study, there was a slight decrease in soil pH to a depth of 30 cm under NT compared with CP or MP, most likely due to minimum disturbance and/or absence of mixing of surface/subsurface soil under NT compared with MP or CP for 24 years. Acidification of the surface soil from N fertilizer application does not appear to be a serious problem for cereal and oilseed crops at this site but may be an issue in the long run for optimum production of acid-sensitive crops. There was essentially no effect of cropping system on soil pH in the present study, as also suggested in a previous study where there was no consistent effect of crop diversity on soil pH decrease (Malhi et al., Reference Malhi, Brandt, Lemke, Moulin and Zentner2009).

Treatments under long-term NT management have shown greater amounts of available P in the surface thin soil layer (0–5 cm or less) than mouldboard ploughing (Eckert, Reference Eckert1985; Weil et al., Reference Weil, Benedetto, Sikora and Bandel1988). Indeed, there was a trend for lower extractable P with MP compared with CP or NT in the present study. Maintaining higher concentration of readily plant-available P in soil near the surface should thus be facilitated where tillage is eliminated. This also suggests the need for additional application of P fertilizer under NT particularly in early years, because inorganic P at the soil surface under NT may not become fully available to the crop due to its relatively high immobility in the soil profile.

In the present study, the lower amounts of nitrate-N under MP compared with other tillage treatments could be due to a dilution effect of mixing soil to deeper depth, in addition to a greater potential of immobilization of N by straw (Malhi et al., Reference Malhi, Nyborg and Solberg1996), nitrate leaching to a deeper depth below 30 cm and gaseous N losses (Heaney et al., Reference Heaney, Nyborg, Solberg, Malhi and Ashworth1992) under MP compared with CP or NT. Amounts of nitrate-N were relatively small even after 25 annual applications of N fertilizer. This could be due to moderate rate of N fertilizer in the present study, immobilization of applied N into the soil organic N pool, release of gaseous N over the winter and especially in early spring after snow melt and/or after occasional heavy rains in the growing season, and to nitrate-N leaching below the 30 cm depth. Downward movement of nitrate-N in the soil profile was not documented, because soil samples were taken only to 30 cm depth.

Conclusions

Long-term NT or CP would result in greater storage of organic C or N in soil and improve available nutrients in soil compared with MP. The one-time ploughing of long-term NT had no negative impact on organic C or N and available nutrients in soil. Elimination of tillage tended to cause some reduction in soil pH, especially in the 10–20 and 20–30 cm depths which may interfere with growth of acid-sensitive crops. Cropping system had little or no effect on soil organic C and N, available nutrients and pH.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Valérie Bélanger, Christine Juge and Maxime Boucher for field sampling, K. Strukoff for technical help, D. Leach and Dr F. C. Stevenson for statistical analyses and the field crew of the Centre de Développement Bioalimentaire du Québec in La Pocatière for their technical and field assistance.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

Footnotes

*

Present address: Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H1, Canada.

References

Angers, DA, Bolinder, MA, Carter, MR, Gregorich, EG, Drury, CF, Liang, BC, Voroney, RP, Simard, RR, Donald, RG, Beyaert, RP and Martel, J (1997) Impact of tillage practices on organic carbon and nitrogen storage in cool, humid soils of eastern Canada. Soil & Tillage Research 41, 191201.Google Scholar
Angers, DA, Edwards, LM, Sanderson, JB and Bissonnette, N (1999) Soil organic matter quality and aggregate stability under eight potato cropping sequences in a fine sandy loam of Prince Edward Island. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 79, 411417.Google Scholar
Assefa, BA, Schoenau, JJ and Grevers, MCJ (2004) Effects of four annual applications of manure on Black Chernozemic soils. Canadian Biosystems Engineering 46, 6.396.46. Identifier: c0403.Google Scholar
Baan, CD, Grevers, MCJ and Schoenau, JJ (2009) Effects of a single cycle of tillage on long-term no-till prairie soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 89, 521530.Google Scholar
Campbell, CA, Lafond, GP, Zentner, RP and Biederbeck, VO (1991) Influence of fertilizer and straw baling on soil organic matter in a thin Black Chernozem in western Canada. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 23, 443446.Google Scholar
Campbell, CA, Schnitzer, M, Stewart, JWB, Biederbeck, VO and Selles, F (1986) Effects of manure and P fertilizer on properties of Black Chernozem in southern Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 66, 601613.Google Scholar
Campbell, CA, Selles, F, Lafond, GP, Biederbeck, VO and Zentner, RP (2001) Tillage-fertilizer changes: effect on some soil quality attributes under long-term crop rotations in a thin Black Chernozem. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 81, 157165.Google Scholar
Campbell, CA, Thomas, AG, Biederbeck, VO, McConkey, BG, Selles, F, Spurr, D and Zentner, RP (1998) Converting from no-tillage to pre-seeding tillage: influence on weeds, spring wheat grain yields and N, and soil quality. Soil & Tillage Research 46, 175185.Google Scholar
Collins, HP, Rasmussen, PE and Douglas, CL Jr (1992) Crop rotation and residue management effects on soil carbon and microbial dynamics. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56, 783788.Google Scholar
Crozier, CR, Naderman, GC, Tucker, MR and Sugg, RE (1999) Nutrient and pH stratification with conventional and no-till management. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 30, 6574.Google Scholar
Culley, JLB (1993) Density and compressibility. In Carter, MR (ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 529549.Google Scholar
Davidson, EA and Ackerman, IL (1993) Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils. Biogeochemistry 20, 161193.Google Scholar
De Kimpe, CR, Laverdière, MR and Martel, YA (1979) Surface area and exchange capacity of clay in relation to the mineralogical composition of Gleysolic soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 59, 341347.Google Scholar
Doran, JW (1980) Soil microbial and biochemical changes associated with reduced tillage. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 765771.Google Scholar
Doran, JW and Scott-Smith, MS (1987) Organic matter management and utilization of soil and fertilizer nutrients. In Follett, RF, Stewart, JWB and Cole, CV (eds), Soil Fertility and Organic Matter as Critical Components of Production Systems. SSSA Special Publication no. 19. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 5372.Google Scholar
Douglas, CL Jr, Allmaras, RR, Rasmussen, PE, Ramig, RE and Roager, NC Jr (1980) Wheat straw composition and placement effects on decomposition in dryland agriculture of the Pacific Northwest. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 833837.Google Scholar
Eckert, DJ (1985) Effects of reduced tillage on the distribution of soil pH and nutrients in soil profiles. Journal of Fertilizer Issues 2, 8690.Google Scholar
Ellert, BH and Bettany, JR (1995) Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 75, 529538.Google Scholar
Eriksen-Hamel, NS, Speratti, AB, Whalen, JK, Légère, A and Madramootoo, CA (2009) Earthworm populations and growth rates related to long-term crop residue and tillage management. Soil & Tillage Research 104, 311316.Google Scholar
Ferguson, AJD, Pearson, MJ and Reynolds, CS (1996) Eutrophication of natural water and toxic algal blooms. Issues of Environmental Science and Technology 5, 2741.Google Scholar
Gagnon, B, Lalande, R and Fahmy, SH (2001) Organic matter and aggregation in a degraded potato soil as affected by raw and composted pulp residue. Biology and Fertility of Soils 34, 441447.Google Scholar
Gregorich, EG, Carter, MR, Doran, JW, Pankhurst, CE and Dwyer, LM (1997) Biological attributes of soil quality. Developments in Soil Science 25, 81113.Google Scholar
Griffin, TS and Porter, GA (2004) Altering soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in intensively tilled two-year rotations. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39, 366374.Google Scholar
Gulde, S, Chung, H, Amelung, W, Chang, C and Six, J (2008) Soil carbon saturation controls labile and stable carbon pool dynamics. Soil Science Society of America Journal 72, 605612.Google Scholar
Hassink, J (1994) Effects of soil texture and grassland management on soil organic C and N and rates of C and N mineralization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26, 12211231.Google Scholar
Havlin, JL, Kissel, DE, Maddux, LD, Claassen, MM and Long, JH (1990) Crop rotation and tillage effects on soil organic carbon and nitrogen. Soil Science Society of America Journal 54, 448452.Google Scholar
Heaney, DJ, Nyborg, M, Solberg, ED, Malhi, SS and Ashworth, J (1992) Overwinter nitrate loss and denitrification potential of cultivated soils in Alberta. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24, 877884.Google Scholar
Heitkamp, F, Raupp, J and Ludwig, B (2011) Soil organic matter pools and crop yields as affected by rate of farm yard manure and use of biodynamic preparation in a sandy soil. Organic Agriculture 1, 111124.Google Scholar
Izaurralde, RC, Nyborg, M, Solberg, ED, Janzen, HH, Arshad, MA, Malhi, SS and Molina-Ayala, M (1998) Carbon storage in eroded soils after five years of reclamation techniques. In Lal, R, Kimble, JM, Follett, RF and Stewart, BA (eds), Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 369385.Google Scholar
Janzen, HH, Campbell, CA, Brandt, SA, Lafond, GP and Townley-Smith, L (1992) Light-fraction organic matter in soils from long-term crop rotations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56, 17991806.Google Scholar
Johnson, MD and Lowery, B (1985) Effect of three conservation tillage practices on soil temperature and thermal properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49, 15471552.Google Scholar
King, T, Schoenau, JJ and Malhi, SS (2015) Effect of application of liquid swine manure on soil organic carbon and enzyme activities in two contrasting Saskatchewan soils. Sustainable Agriculture Research 4, 113.Google Scholar
Légère, A, Vanasse, A and Stevenson, FC (2013) Low-input management and mature conservation tillage: Agronomic potential in a cool, humid climate. Agronomy Journal 105, 745754.Google Scholar
Liang, BC, McConkey, BG, Campbell, CA, Curtin, D, Lafond, GP, Brandt, SA and Moulin, AP (2004) Total and labile soil organic nitrogen as influenced by crop rotations and tillage in Canadian prairie soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39, 249257.Google Scholar
Liang, BC, McConkey, BG, Schoenau, J, Curtin, D, Campbell, CA, Moulin, A, Lafond, GP, Brandt, SA and Wang, H (2003) Effect of tillage and crop rotations on the light fraction organic carbon and carbon mineralization in Chernozemic soils of Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 83, 6572.Google Scholar
Littell, RC, Milliken, GA, Stroup, WW and Wolfinger, RD (2006) SAS® System for Mixed Models, 2nd Edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Liu, X, Hebert, SJ, Hashemi, AM, Zhang, X and Ding, G (2006) Effects of agricultural management on soil organic matter and carbon transformation – a review. Plant, Soil and Environment 52, 531543.Google Scholar
Lynch, DH, Cohen, RDH, Fredeen, A, Patterson, G and Martin, RC (2005 a) Management of Canadian prairie region grazed grasslands: soil C sequestration, livestock productivity and profitability. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 85, 183192.Google Scholar
Lynch, DH, Voroney, RP and Warman, PR (2005 b) Soil physical properties and organic matter fractions under forages receiving composts, manure or fertilizer. Compost Science and Utilization 13, 252261.Google Scholar
Malhi, SS (2012) Short-term residual effects of various amendments on organic C and N, and available nutrients in soil under organic crop production. Agricultural Sciences 3, 375384.Google Scholar
Malhi, SS and Lemke, R (2007) Tillage, crop residue and N fertilizer effects on crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil quality and nitrous oxide gas emissions in a second 4-yr rotation cycle. Soil & Tillage Research 96, 269283.Google Scholar
Malhi, SS, Brandt, S and Gill, KS (2003 a) Cultivation and grassland type effects on light fraction and total organic C and N in a Dark Brown Chernozemic soil. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 83, 145153.Google Scholar
Malhi, SS, Brandt, SA, Lemke, R, Moulin, AP and Zentner, RP (2009) Effects of input level and crop diversity on soil nitrate-N, extractable P, aggregation, organic C and N, and nutrient balance in the Canadian Prairie. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 84, 122.Google Scholar
Malhi, SS, Harapiak, JT, Nyborg, M, Gill, KS, Monreal, CM and Gregorich, EG (2003 b) Light fraction organic N, ammonium, nitrate and total N in a thin Black Chernozemic soil under bromegrass after 27 annual applications of different N rates. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 65, 201210.Google Scholar
Malhi, SS, Harapiak, JT, Nyborg, M, Gill, KS, Monreal, CM and Gregorich, EG (2003 c) Total and light fraction organic C in a thin Black Chernozemic grassland soil as affected by 27 annual applications of six rates of fertilizer N. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 66, 3341.Google Scholar
Malhi, SS, Lemke, R, Wang, ZH and Chhabra, BS (2006) Tillage, nitrogen and crop residue effects on crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil quality, and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil & Tillage Research 90, 171183.Google Scholar
Malhi, SS, Nyborg, M, Goddard, T and Puurveen, D (2011) Long-term tillage, straw and N rate effects on quantity and quality of organic C and N in a Gray Luvisol soil. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 90, 120.Google Scholar
Malhi, SS, Nyborg, M, Goddard, T and Puurveen, D (2012) Long-term tillage, straw management and N fertilization effects on macro organic matter and mineralizable C and N in a Black Chernozem soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 43, 26792690.Google Scholar
Malhi, SS, Nyborg, M and Solberg, ED (1996) Influence of source, method of placement and simulated rainfall on the recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizers under zero tillage. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 76, 93100.Google Scholar
Marriott, EE and Wander, M (2006) Qualitative and quantitative differences in particulate organic matter fractions in organic and conventional farming systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38, 15271536.Google Scholar
McGill, WB, Cannon, KR, Robertson, JA and Cook, FD (1986) Dynamics of soil microbial biomass and water-soluble organic C in Breton L after 50 years of cropping to two rotations. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 66, 119.Google Scholar
Pastor, J, Aber, JD, McClaugherty, CA and Melillo, JM (1984) Aboveground production and N and P cycling along a nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin. Ecology 65, 256268.Google Scholar
Qian, P, Schoenau, JJ and Karamanos, RE (1994) Simultaneous extraction of phosphorus and potassium with a new soil test: a modified Kelowna extraction. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 25, 627635.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2011) SAS/STAT® 9.3 User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Singh, B and Malhi, SS (2006) Response of soil physical properties to tillage and residue management on two soils in a cool temperate environment. Soil & Tillage Research 85, 143153.Google Scholar
Sollins, P, Spycher, G and Glassman, CA (1984) Net nitrogen mineralization from light- and heavy-fraction forest soil organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 16, 3137.Google Scholar
Soon, YK (1998) Crop residue and fertilizer management effects on some biological and chemical properties of a Dark Grey Solod. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 78, 707713.Google Scholar
Soon, YK (2007) Straw removal increases the light fraction and mineralizable C and N compared with moldboard ploughing. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 87, 113115.Google Scholar
Technicon Industrial Systems (1973 a) Ammonium in Water and Waste Water. Industrial Method No. 90-70W-B. Revised January 1978. Tarrytown, NY: Technicon Industrial Systems.Google Scholar
Technicon Industrial Systems (1973 b) Nitrate in Water and Waste Water. Industrial Method No. 100-70W-B. Revised January 1978. Tarrytown, NY: Technicon Industrial Systems.Google Scholar
Technicon Industrial Systems (1977) Industrial/Simultaneous Determination of Nitrogen and/or Phosphorus in BD Acid Digests. Industrial method no. 334-74W/Bt. Tarrytown, NY: Technicon Industrial Systems.Google Scholar
Uri, V, Löhmus, K and Tullus, H (2003) Annual net nitrogen mineralization in a grey alder (Alnus incana (L.) moench) plantation on abandoned agricultural land. Forest Ecology and Management 184, 167176.Google Scholar
VandenBygaart, AJ and Kay, BD (2004) Persistence of soil organic carbon after plowing a long-term no-till field in southern Ontario, Canada. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 13941402.Google Scholar
Watson, CA, Atkinson, D, Gosling, P, Jackson, LR and Rayns, FW (2002) Managing soil fertility in organic farming systems. Soil Use and Management 18, 239247.Google Scholar
Weil, RR and Magdoff, F (2004) Significance of soil organic matter to soil quality and health. In Magdoff, F and Weil, RR (eds), Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 143.Google Scholar
Weil, RR, Benedetto, PW, Sikora, LJ and Bandel, VA (1988) Influence of tillage practices on phosphorus distribution and forms in three Ultisols. Agronomy Journal 80, 503509.Google Scholar
Whalen, JK, Chang, C and Olson, BM (2001) Nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization potentials of soils receiving repeated annual cattle manure applications. Biology and Fertility of Soils 34, 334341.Google Scholar
Willson, TC, Paul, EA and Harwood, RR (2001) Biologically active soil organic matter fractions in sustainable cropping systems. Applied Soil Ecology 16, 6376.Google Scholar
Yanan, T, Emteryd, O, Dianqing, L and Grip, H (1997) Effect of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on nitrogen uptake and nitrate leaching in a Eum-orthic anthrosols profile. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 48, 225229.Google Scholar
Yang, S-M, Malhi, SS, Li, F-M, Suo, D-R, Xu, M-G, Wang, P, Xiao, G-J, Jia, Y, Guo, T-W and Wang, J-G (2007) Long-term effects of manure and fertilization on soil organic matter and quality parameters of a calcareous soil in NW China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 170, 234243.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Probability of significance for tested treatment effects of tillage, cropping system and tillage × cropping system interaction on total organic C (TOC), total organic N (TON), light fraction organic C (LFOC), light fraction organic N (LFON), pH, mineralizable N (Nmin), nitrate-N (NO3-N), ammonium-N (NH4-N) and extractable P in the 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 0–20 and 0–30 cm soil depths in autumn 2010 (after 24 growing seasons) in a field experiment established in autumn 1987 at La Pocatière, Québec, Canada

Figure 1

Table 2. Effect of tillage and cropping system on mass of total organic C (TOC), total organic N (TON), light fraction organic C (LFOC) and light fraction organic N (LFON) in the 0–10, 10–20 and 0–20 cm soil depths in autumn 2010 in a field experiment established in autumn 1987 at La Pocatière, Québec, Canada

Figure 2

Table 3. Effect of tillage and cropping system on pH, mineralizable N (Nmin), nitrate-N (NO3-N) and ammonium-N (NH4-N) in the 0–10, 10–20, 20–30 and 0–30 cm soil depths in autumn 2010 (after 24 growing seasons) in a field experiment established in autumn 1987 at La Pocatière, Québec, Canada

Figure 3

Table 4. Effect of tillage and cropping system on extractable P in the 0–10, 10–20, 20–30 and 0–30 cm soil depths in autumn 2010 (after 24 growing seasons) in a field experiment established in autumn 1987 at La Pocatière, Québec, Canada