Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-5ngxj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T00:36:27.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Are the Origins of Indo-European Languages Explained by the Migration of the Yamnaya Culture to the West?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2017

Leo S. Klejn ,
Wolfgang Haak ,
Iosif Lazaridis ,
Nick Patterson ,
David Reich ,
Kristian Kristiansen ,
Karl-Göran Sjögren ,
Morten Allentoft ,
Martin Sikora  and
Eske Willerslev
Leo S. Klejn
Affiliation:
Saint Petersburg University, Russia
Wolfgang Haak
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Iena, Germany
Iosif Lazaridis
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, USA
Nick Patterson
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, USA
David Reich
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, USA
Kristian Kristiansen
Affiliation:
Department of Historical Studies, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Karl-Göran Sjögren
Affiliation:
Department of Historical Studies, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Morten Allentoft
Affiliation:
Centre for Geogenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
Martin Sikora
Affiliation:
Centre for Geogenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
Eske Willerslev
Affiliation:
Centre for Geogenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two co-authored articles in Nature (Haak et al., 2015; Allentoft et al., 2015) caused a sensation. They revealed genetically the mass migration of steppe Yamnaya culture people in the Early Bronze Age to central and northern Europe. The authors considered this event as the basis of the spread of Indo-European languages. In response, the Russian archaeologist, Leo S. Klejn, expresses critical remarks on the genetic inference, and in particular its implications for the problem of the origins of Indo-European languages. These remarks were shown to the authors and they present their objections. Klejn, however, has come to the conclusion that the authors’ objections do not assuage his doubts. He analyses these objections in a further response.

Deux articles parus dans la revue Nature (Haak et al., 2015 ; Allentoft et al., 2015) firent sensation. Ils révélaient, du point de vue génétique, qu'une migration de masse de peuples des steppes appartenant à la culture Yamna affecta l'Europe du centre et du nord à l’âge du Bronze Ancien. Leurs auteurs tiennent cet évènement comme formant la base de la diffusion des langues indo-européennes. En réponse, Prof. L.S. Klejn, archéologue à Saint Pétersbourg (Russie), émit certaines critiques à l’égard des déductions basées sur la génétique, en particulier ses répercussions sur la question des origines des langues indo-européennes. Ses remarques furent soumises aux auteurs des deux articles, qui à leur tour présentèrent leurs contre-arguments. Cependant Klejn en vint à conclure que les objections de ces auteurs n'ont pas atténué ses doutes, ce qui l'amène à une seconde réponse. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Zwei Artikel, welche die Zeitschrift Nature in 2015 veröffentlichte (Haak et al., 2015; Allentoft et al., 2015), haben großes Aufsehen erregt. Diese lassen, aus genetischer Sicht, eine Massenmigration der Steppenvölker der Jamnaja-Kultur nach Mittel- und Nordeuropa in der Bronzezeit erkennen. Nach Auffassung der Verfasser bildet dieses Ereignis die Grundlage der Verbreitung der indoeuropäischen Sprachen. Als Antwort darauf äußerte sich Prof. L.S. Klejn (Archäologe in Sankt Petersburg, Russland) kritisch über die genetischen Rückschlüsse, besonders über die Auswirkungen auf die Frage des Ursprungs der indoeuropäischen Sprachen. Diese kritischen Bemerkungen wurden den Verfassern der Artikel vorgelegt und die Letzteren haben dann ihre Einwände dargelegt. Klejn ist aber zum Schluss gekommen, dass die Einwände der Verfasser ihn nicht überzeugen, und untersucht diese Gegenargumente in einer zweiten Antwort. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Keywords

Indo-European languagesmigrationYamnaya cultureBronze Agelangues indo- européennesmigrationculture Yamnaâge du Bronzeindoeuropäische SprachenMigrationJamnaja-KulturBronzezeit

Information

Type
Comments
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 3 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allentoft, M.E., Sikora, M., Sjögren, K.-G., et al. 2015. Population Genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature, 522: 167–72. doi: 10.1038/nature14507 Google Scholar
Bouckaert, R., Lemey, P., Dunn, M., et al. 2012. Mapping the Origins and Expansion of the Indo-European Language Family. Science, 337: 957–60. doi: 10.1126/science.1219669. Corrections and Clarifications. Science, 342 (2013): 1446. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6165.1446-a CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, W., Cathcart, C., Hall, D. & Garrett, A. 2015. Ancestry-constrained Phylogenetic Analysis Supports the Indo-European Steppe Hypothesis. Language, 91: 194–244.Google Scholar
Chernykh, E.N. & Orlovskaya, L.B. 2004a. Radiouglerodnaya khronologiya drevneyamnoy obshchnosti i istoki kurgannykh kultur. Rossiyskaya Arkheologiya, 1: 84–99.Google Scholar
Chernykh, E.N. & Orlovskaya, L B. 2004b. Radiouglerodnaya khronologiya katakombnoy kulturno-istoricheskoy obshchnosti (sredniy bronzovyj vek). Rossiyskaya Arkheologiya, 2: 15–29.Google Scholar
Frȋnculeasa., A., Preda, B. & Heyd, V. 2015. Pit-graves, Yamnaya and Kurgans along the Lower Danube: Disentangling IVth and IIIrd Millennium bc Burial Customs, Equipment and Chronology. Praehistorische Zeitschrift, 90: 45–113.Google Scholar
Fu, Q., Posth, C. Hajdinjak, M., et al. 2016. The Genetic History of Ice Age Europe. Nature, 534: 200–05. doi: 10.1038/nature17993 Google Scholar
Furholt, M. 2003a. Absolutchronologie und die Entstehung der Schnurkeramik. Online 16 December 2003 <http://www.jungsteinsite.uni-kiel.de/pdf/2003_furholt.pdf> [accessed 16 May 2017].+[accessed+16+May+2017].>Google Scholar
Furholt, M. 2003b. Die absolutchronologische Datierung der Schnurkeramik in Mitteleuropa und Südskandinavien. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Gray, R.D. & Atkinson, Q.D. 2003. Language-tree Divergence Times Support the Anatolian Theory of Indo-European Origins. Nature, 426: 435–38. doi:10.1038/nature02029 Google Scholar
Haak, W., Lazaridis, I., Patterson, N., et al. 2015. Massive Migration from the Steppe Was a Source for Indo-European Languages in Europe. Nature, 522: 207–11. doi: 10.1038/nature14317 Google Scholar
Heyd, V. 2011. Yamnaya Groups and Tumuli West of the Black Sea. In: Müller-Celka, S. & Borgna, E., eds. Ancestral Landscapes: Burial Mounds in the Copper and Bronze Ages (Central and Eastern Europe – Balkans – Adriatic – Aegean, 4th–2nd millennium bc). Lyon: Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée, pp. 236–55.Google Scholar
Ivanova, S.V. 2004. Istoricheskaya rekonstruktsiya i arkheologicheskie realii (Yamnaya kulturno-istoricheskaya oblast) [Historical Reconstruction and Archaeological Reality (Yamnaya Cultural and Historical Area)]. Naukovi praci istorichnogo fakultetu Zaporiskogo universitetu, 18: 330–59.Google Scholar
Jones, E.R., Gonzales-Fortes, G., Connell, S., et al. 2015. Upper Palaeolithic Genomes Reveal Deep Roots of Modern Eurasians. Nature Communications, 6: article no. 8912. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9912 Google Scholar
Klejn, L.S. 2015a. Arkheologicheskaya osnova stepnoy gipotezy proiskhozhdeniya indoevropeytsev: kriticheskiy vzglyad [Archaeological Basis of the Steppe Hypothesis of Indo-European Origin: Critical View] [à propos of K. Kristiansen's article]. Genofond, August 2015 [online] [accessed 5 April 2017]. Available at: <http://xn--c1acc6aafa1c.xn--p1ai/?page_id=4424>' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Klejn,+L.S.+2015a.+Arkheologicheskaya+osnova+stepnoy+gipotezy+proiskhozhdeniya+indoevropeytsev:+kriticheskiy+vzglyad+[Archaeological+Basis+of+the+Steppe+Hypothesis+of+Indo-European+Origin:+Critical+View]+[à+propos+of+K.+Kristiansen's+article].+Genofond,+August+2015+[online]+[accessed+5+April+2017].+Available+at:+>Google Scholar
Klejn, L.S. 2015b. Archkheolog v odnoy komande s genetikami [Archaeologist in One Team with Geneticicts]. Interview of Kristian Kristiansen by Leo Klejn in August 2015. Genofond, September 2015 [online] [accessed 5 April 2017]. Available at: <http://xn--c1acc6aafa1c.xn--p1ai/?page_id=4535>>Google Scholar
Klejn, L.S. 2015c. Otkrytie drevnego stepnogo vklada v genetiku evropeyskogo naseleniya – uspekhi i slozhnosti [The Discovery of the Ancient Steppe Contribution to the Genomic Pool of the European Population – Successes and Problems]. Conversation with Wolfgang Haak, Part I. Genofond, November 2015 [online] [accessed 16 May 2017]. Available at: <http://www.genofond.ru>..>Google Scholar
Koncha, S.V. 2004. Perspektivi etnogenetichnich rekonstruktsiy za kam'yanoy dobi (materiali indoevropeistiki) [Perspectives on the Ethnogenetic Reconstruction of the Stone Age (Indo-European Materials)]. Kam'yana doba Ukraini [Ukrainian Stone Age], vol. 5. Kiev: Shlyakh, pp. 191–293.Google Scholar
Koncha, S.V. 2005. Ario-kelto-italski zv'yazky (za leksichnymy danymy) [Aryan-Celtic-Italian Communication]. Magisterium, Arkheologichni Studii, 20: 47–52.Google Scholar
Koncha, S.V. 2017. Indoevropeytsi: Piznannya doistorii [Indo-Europeans: Lessons from History]. Kiev.Google Scholar
Kushniarevich, A., Utevska, O., Chuhryaeva, M., et al. 2015. Genetic Heritage of the Balto-Slavic Speaking Populations: A Synthesis of Autosomal, Mitochondrial and Y-Chromosomal Data. 2015/9/2. PLoS ONE, 10(9): e0135820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135820 Google Scholar
Lazaridis, I., Nadel, D., Rollefson, G., et al. 2016. Genomic Insights into the Origin of Farming in the Ancient Near East. Nature, 536: 419–24.Google Scholar
Lazaridis, I., Patterson, N., Mittnik, A., et al. 2014. Ancient Human Genomes Suggest Three Ancestral Populations for Present-day Europeans. Nature, 513: 409–13. doi: 10.1038/nature13673 Google Scholar
Morgunova, N.L. 2013. Radikarbonnaya khronologiya yamnoy kultury Volgo-Uralskogo mezhdurechya [Radiocarbon Chronology of the Yamnaya Culture at the Volga-Ural interface]. Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii (Moskva) , 230: 5–22.Google Scholar
Nikolova, A.V. 2012. Absolyutna khronologiya yamnoy kultury Pivnichnogo Nadchornomor’’ ya v svitli dendrodate [Absolute Chronology of the Yamnaya Culture in North Nadchornomor in the Light of Dendrodates]. Archeologiya (Kyiv) , 4: 14–31.Google Scholar
Pospieszny, L, Sobkowiak-Tabaka, I., Price, T.D., et al. 2015. Remains of a Late Neolithic Barrow at Kruszyn. A Glimpse of Ritual and Everyday Life in Early Corded Ware Societies of the Polish Lowland. Praehistorische Zeitschrift, 90: 185–213.Google Scholar
Poznik, G.D., Xue, Y., Mendez, F.L., et al. 2016. Punctuated Bursts in Human Male Demography Inferred from 1244 Worldwide Y-Chromosome Sequences. Nature Genetics, 48: 593–99. doi: 10.1038/ng.355 Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S., Allentoft, M.E., Nielsen, K., et al. 2015. Early Divergent Strains of Yersinia pestis in Eurasia 5000 Years Ago. Cell, 163: 571–82. doi: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.009> [accessed 16 May 2017].Google Scholar
Sjögren, K.-G., Price, T.D. & Kristiansen, K. 2016. Diet and Mobility in the Corded Ware of Central Europe. PloS ONE, 11(5): e0155083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155083 Google Scholar
Skoglund, P., Malmström, H., Omrak, A., et al. 2014. Genomic Diversity and Admixture Differs for Stone-Age Scandinavian Foragers and Farmers. Science, 344: 747–50. doi: 10.1126/science.1253448 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starostin, S. 2007. Indo-European among Other Language Families: Problems of Dating, Contacts and Genetic Relationships. In: Starostin, S.A., ed. Trudy po yazykoznaniyu [Works on Linguistics]. Moskva: Nauka, pp. 806–20.Google Scholar
Stöckli, W.E. 2002. Absolute und relative Chronologie des Früh- und Mittelneolithikums in Westdeutschland (Rheinland und Rhein-Main-Gebiet). Basel: Archäologie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Swadesh, M. 1955. Towards Greater Accuracy in Lexicostatistic Dating. International Journal of American Linguistics, 21: 121–37.Google Scholar
Vendryès, J. 1917. Les correspondences de vocabulaire entre l'indo-iranien et l'italo-celtique. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 20: 265–85.Google Scholar
Zaliznyak, L.L. 2005. Ukraine and the Problem of the Proto-Indo-European Original Homeland. In: Zaliznyak, L.L. & Carter, J.C., eds. Archaeology at Kiev-Mohyla Academy. Kiev: Stilos, pp. 12–37.Google Scholar