Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T12:34:02.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Business politics is usually about attempts to exert influence rather than power. Evidence from Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2024

Stephen Bell
Affiliation:
School of Political Science and International Studies, University of Queensland, Australia
Andrew Hindmoor*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Sheffield, UK
*
Corresponding author: Andrew Hindmoor; Email: A.Hindmoor@sheffield.ac.uk

Abstract

We argue that the everyday language distinction drawn between power and influence is meaningful and significant. There is good reason to believe that much corporate lobbying activity which is currently described under the heading of business power is better understood as attempts to secure negotiated agreements based on exerting influence rather than power and that the latter is usually used only when attempts to use influence have failed. We develop an analytical distinction between influence, understood as successful efforts at persuasion, and power using Keith Dowding’s work on power. Drawing upon findings from interviews with corporate professionals operating at the coalface of business and government interaction in Australia, we show that lobbyists generally seek “quiet” behind-the-scenes accommodations with governments via attempts to exert influence rather than power.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Vinod K. Aggarwal

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable