Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-dqfph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T09:10:24.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CULTURAL ENCOUNTER IN THE MORTUARY LANDSCAPE OF A TIWANAKU COLONY, MOQUEGUA, PERU (AD 650–1100)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2018

Sarah I. Baitzel*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive 1114, St. Louis, MO 63130 (sbaitzel@wustl.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeological studies of culture contact often presuppose culture change. Contact that did not result in culture change is difficult to identify archaeologically, but it merits our attention for understanding how and why change failed to materialize in the wake of cultural encounter. In this paper, I examine the occurrence of contact without change on the frontier of the south-central Andean Tiwanaku state (AD 400–1100). Tiwanaku settlers who colonized the uninhabited middle Moquegua valley in the seventh century AD shared a mortuary landscape with coastal sojourners at the site of Omo M10, even though their interactions were otherwise limited. Complex regional histories and divergent economic interests explain why contact between highland and coastal groups was confined to mortuary rituals during the initial stage of contact, following a Tiwanaku pattern in Moquegua of ritualizing culture contact. Later generations of Tiwanaku colonists may have reinitiated contact with coastal communities for access to marine resources, and accepting foreigners into their community. This case study presents a framework for identifying culture contact without culture change. It demonstrates the utility of regional histories and careful contextual analysis for hypothesizing the nature and consequences of cultural encounters that did not follow expected trajectories of change.

Los estudios arqueológicos sobre contacto cultural frecuentemente presuponen la ocurrencia de un cambio cultural. Los contactos que no resultan en un cambio cultural son difíciles de identificar arqueológicamente. Sin embargo, este tipo de contacto merece nuestra atención para esclarecer cómo y por qué no llegó a realizarse un cambio como resultado del encuentro cultural. En este trabajo se examina un ejemplo de contacto sin cambios en las fronteras del estado Tiwanaku (400-1100 dC) de los Andes centro-meridionales. Los colonos Tiwanaku ocuparon las zonas deshabitadas del sector medio del Valle de Moquegua en el siglo siete dC. Estos colonos compartieron el paisaje cultural mortuorio con viajeros costeños en el sitio de Omo M10, a pesar de que las interacciones entre los grupos fueron limitadas en otros aspectos. Complejas historias regionales e intereses económicos divergentes explican por qué las interacciones entre los grupos de la sierra y de la costa estuvieron limitadas a los rituales mortuorios durante las etapas iniciales de contacto, siguiendo un patrón típico de Tiwanaku en Moquegua que consiste en ritualizar el contacto cultural. Las posteriores generaciones de colonos Tiwanaku pudieron haber reiniciado el contacto con las comunidades costeras para acceder a los recursos marinos, con el resultado de aceptar grupos foráneos dentro de sus comunidades. Este caso de estudio presenta un marco teórico para identificar el contacto cultural sin cambio cultural. Se muestra la utilidad de las historias regionales y de un cuidadoso análisis de los contextos para generar hipótesis acerca de la naturaleza y las consecuencias de los encuentros culturales que no siguieron las trayectorias de cambio esperadas.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by the Society for American Archaeology 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of Moquegua Valley and location of sites mentioned in text (Map by S. Baitzel using GoogleEarth source data).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Planview of Omo M10 site: Tiwanaku-style cemeteries, non-Tiwanaku cemeteries. (Map by S. Baitzel using GoogleEarth source data).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Planview of Unit 719 in Cemetery M10X showing superposition of burials.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Planview drawing and photo of Burials X-17.3 (Drawing, photo by S. Baitzel).

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) fragments of band made from warp-face plainweave camelid-fiber structure found on frontal bone of infant in Burial M10X-16; (b) ornaments from Burials M10X-20 and M10X-23; (c) shell whistles from Burial M10X-9; (d) fishhooks from Burials M10X-30 and M10X-34.

Supplementary material: File

Baitzel supplementary material 1

Supplementary Table

Download Baitzel supplementary material 1(File)
File 18.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Baitzel supplementary material 2

Supplementary Table

Download Baitzel supplementary material 2(File)
File 10.8 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Baitzel supplementary material 3

Supplementary Figure

Download Baitzel supplementary material 3(Image)
Image 2 MB