Meeting National Needs in English Language Teacher Education: Global Perspectives in Malaysian Initiatives

doi:10.1017/9781108856218.005

4 - Meeting National Needs in English Language Teacher Education: Global Perspectives in Malaysian Initiatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 October 2020

Wei Keong Too ,

Malachi Edwin Vethamani and

Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan

Edited by

Amy Bik May Tsui

Show author details

Amy Bik May Tsui: Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong

Book contents

Get access

Summary

English is the second most important language in education in Malaysia. The teaching and learning of English is emphasized at all levels of education. Though it is not compulsory for primary and secondary school students to pass the English subject in the national examinations, they must meet the minimum requirements in order to pursue studies in higher education institutions. English is also seen as essential in science, technology, economy and development. Understandably, Malaysia has, since its independence in 1957, introduced various policies, standards, developments and practices to improve the teaching and learning of the language at all levels of education. This chapter critically examines the significant elements in English language teacher education, which is a major catalyst for the improvement of English language teaching and learning in Malaysia. The discussion is carried out through the lens of globalization and its related challenges and how local stakeholders have responded to these challenges. The authors conclude that the Malaysian government has continuously and systematically responded to the highlighted challenges through its various policies, as well as long-term and short-term initiatives and projects. They also highlight the critical issues that have emerged.

Keywords

dual language policy medium of instruction policy Malaysian Teacher Standards Pedagogy Standards for English Language Teaching Teaching Maths and Science using English (ETeMS)dual language policy

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: English Language Teaching and Teacher Education in East Asia
Global Challenges and Local Responses
, pp. 75 - 92

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108856218.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arumugam, K. (2017). Teaching math, science in English won’t help B40 Indians. The Malay Mail, February 17. www.malaymail.com/news/what-you-think/2017/02/17/teaching-maths-science-in-english-wont-help-b40-indians-k-arumugam/1317023 Google Scholar

Bajunid, I. A. (2004). Professional development of school principals for revitalizing schooling in Malaysia. In Cheng, Y. C., Chow, K. W. & Mok, M. C. (Eds.), Reform of Teacher Education in the Asia-Pacific in the New Millennium, 197–217. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Cambridge English Language Assessment. (2013). Cambridge Baseline 2013: English Language in Malaysian Schools. Cambridge: Cambridge English Language Assessment.Google Scholar

Chan, S. H. & Tan, H. (2006). English for mathematics and science: Current Malaysian language-in education policies and practices. Language and Education, 20(4), 306–321.Google Scholar

David, M. K. & Govindasamy, S. (2007). The construction of national identity and globalization in multilingual Malaysia. In Tsui, A. B. M. & Tollefson, J (Eds.), Language Policy, Culture and Identity in Asian Contexts, 55–72. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

English Language Teaching Centre (2013). Pedagogy Standards for English Language Teaching. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar

Gaudart, H. (1988). English language teacher education in Malaysia. The English Teacher, 17, 1–10.Google Scholar

Gill, S. K. (2002). English Language Challenges for Malaysia: International Communication. Serdang: Univesiti Putra Malaysia Press.Google Scholar

Gill, S. K. (2004). Medium of instruction policy in higher education in Malaysia: Nationalism versus internationalization. In Tsui, A. B. M. & Tollefson, J (Eds.), Medium of Instruction Policy: Whose Agenda? Which Agenda?, 135–152. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gill, S. K. (2014). Language Policy Challenges in Multi-ethnic Malaysia (Multilingual Education Series). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Hazita, A. (2016). Implementation and challenges of English language education reform in Malaysian primary schools. 3 L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 22(3), 65–78.Google Scholar

Hepple, E., Alford, J., Henderson, D. et al. (2017). Developing intercultural learning in Australian pre-service teachers through participating in a short term mobility program in Malaysia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 273–281.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kabilan, M. K. (2007). English language teachers reflecting on reflections: A Malaysian experience. TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 681–705Google Scholar

Kabilan, M. K. (2013). A phenomenological study of an international teaching practicum: Pre-service teachers’ experiences of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 198–209.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kabilan, M. K. & Veratharaju, K. (2013). Professional development needs of primary school English-language teachers in Malaysia. Professional Development in Education, 39(3), 330–351.Google Scholar

Kabilan, M. K., Hallijah, H., Nooraishah, Z., Anna, C. A. Hairul, N. I. & Mahbub, A. K. (2017). International teaching practicum in Bangladesh: An investigation of TESOL pre-service teachers’ professional development experiences. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (Special issue on Graduate Students Research on Education), 117–140.Google Scholar

Lucas, T., Villegas, A. M. & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373.Google Scholar

Mardziah, H. & Mohamed, K. (2017). Stop, look, go: On the road to better language proficiency. New Straits Times, December 6. www1.nst.com.my/education/2017/12/311309/stop-look-go-road-better-language-proficiency Google Scholar

MOE (Ministry of Education Malaysia). (1967). Education Statistics of Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.Google Scholar

MOE (Ministry of Education Malaysia) (1982). The Philosophy of Teacher Education in Malaysia (Report of the National Workshop and Survey). Kuala Lumpur: Teacher Education Division Malaysia.Google Scholar

MOE (Ministry of Education Malaysia) (2009). Malaysia Teacher Standards. Kuala Lumpur: Teacher Education Division Malaysia.Google Scholar

MOE (Ministry of Education Malaysia) (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025 (Preschool to Post-secondary Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.Google Scholar

MOE (Ministry of Education Malaysia) (2015a). Perlaksanaan rintis Programme Dwibahasa atau Dual Language Programme (DLP) di sekolah pada tahun 2016 [The implementation of pilot programme for Programme Dwibahasa or Duo Language Programme (DLP) at the school level in 2016]. www.moe.gov.my/images/pekeliling/2015/circularfile_file_001343.pdf Google Scholar

MOE (Ministry of Education Malaysia) (2015b). English Language Reform in Malaysia: The Roadmap 2015–2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.Google Scholar

MOE (Ministry of Education Malaysia) (2015c). SK Standard One English Language Standard Curriculum and Assessment Document. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.Google Scholar

MOE (Ministry of Education Malaysia) (2016). Dasar memartabatkan Bahasa Melayu memperkukuh Bahasa Inggeris (MBMMBI) [Policy of Upholding the Malay Language and Strengthening the English Language]. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar

MOE (Ministry of Education Malaysia) (2017). Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013–2025: Annual Report 2016. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar

MQA (Malaysian Qualifications Agency). (2014). Education Programme Standards. Petaling Jaya: MQA.Google Scholar

MQA (Malaysian Qualifications Agency) (2017). Malaysia Qualifications Register. www2.mqa.gov.my/mqr/Google Scholar

Napisah, K. (2017). Quality Malaysian English language teachers: Examining a policy strategy. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 187–209.Google Scholar

National University of Malaysia. (2018). Bachelor of Education with Honours Teaching English as a Second Language (TESL). Faculty of Education website. www.ukm.my/fpendidikan/en/program-prasiswazah/programme-offered/bachelor-of-education-with-honours-teaching-english-as-a-second-language/Google Scholar

Ngui, A. (2015). Putrajaya defends teaching science and maths in Malay policy. The Sun Daily, 3 May. www.thesundaily.my/news/1406682 Google Scholar

Normazidah, C. M., Koo, Y. L. & Hazita, A. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. Gema Online, 12(1), 35–51.Google Scholar

Omar, A. H. (1992). The Linguistic Scenery in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Google Scholar

Ong, S. L. & Tan, M. (2008). Mathematics and science in English: Teachers experience inside the classroom. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan [The Journal of Educators and Education], 23, 141–150.Google Scholar

Pandian, A. (2002). English language teaching in Malaysia today. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(2), 35–52.CrossRef Google Scholar

Radzuwan, A. R., Shireena, B. & Kamariah, Y. (2017). Reforms in the policy of English language teaching in Malaysia. Policy Futures in Education, 15(1), 100–112.Google Scholar

Pang, E. S. (2000). The financial crisis of 1997–98 and the end of the Asian developmental state. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 22(3), 570–593.Google Scholar

Singh, M., Singh, M. & Eng, L. S. (2015). Effectiveness of Oral Proficiency in English for Secondary Schools (OPS-English) programme in improving English language vocabulary among secondary school students. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(6), 201–208.Google Scholar

Tangen, D., Henderson, D., Alford, J. et al. (2017). Shaping global teacher identity in a short-term mobility programme. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 23–38.Google Scholar

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. (2018). Faculty of Education, www.fp.utm.my/academic/BPA201819/sppl/index.htm Google Scholar

Vethamani, M. E. (2004). Changing tides: Teaching literature in English in Malaysian secondary schools. In David, M (Ed.), Teaching of English in Second and Foreign Language Settings: Focus on Malaysia, 52–58. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Vethamani, M. E. (2007). The ebb and flow of English language education in Malaysia. In Vethamani, M. E. & Perumal, R (Eds.), Teaching English in Malaysia: A Special 25th MELTA Anniversary Publication, 1–10. Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi Sdn. Bhd.Google Scholar

Vethamani, M. E. (2011). Teacher education in Malaysia: Preparing and training of English language teacher educators. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 8(4), 85–110.Google Scholar

Yunus, M. M. & Sukri, S. I. A. (2017). The use of English in teaching mathematics and science: The PPSMI policy vis-à-vis the DLP. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(1), 133–142.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.