Developmental care pathway for hospitalised infants with CHD: on behalf of the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a Special Interest Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative

Amy J. Lisanti; Dorothy J. Vittner; Jennifer Peterson; Andrew H. Van Bergen; Thomas A. Miller; Erin E. Gordon; Karli A. Negrin; Hema Desai; Suzie Willette; Melissa B. Jones; Sherrill D. Caprarola; Anna J. Jones; Stephanie M. Helman; Jodi Smith; Corinne M. Anton; Laurel M. Bear; Lauren Malik; Sarah K. Russell; Dana J. Mieczkowski; Bridy O. Hamilton; Meghan McCoy; Yvette Feldman; Michelle Steltzer; Melanie L. Savoca; Diane L. Spatz; Samantha C. Butler

doi:10.1017/S1047951123000525

Developmental care pathway for hospitalised infants with CHD: on behalf of the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a Special Interest Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2023

Amy J. Lisanti

Dorothy J. Vittner ,

Jennifer Peterson

Andrew H. Van Bergen ,

Suzie Willette and

Amy J. Lisanti*: Affiliation:
Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA Research Institute, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Dorothy J. Vittner: Affiliation:
Egan School of Nursing and Health Studies, Fairfield University Fairfield, CT, USA, Connecticut Children’s, Hartford, CT, USA
Jennifer Peterson: Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
Andrew H. Van Bergen: Affiliation:
Advocate Children’s Heart Institute, Advocate Children’s Hospital, Oak Lawn, IL, USA
Thomas A. Miller: Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
Erin E. Gordon: Affiliation:
Inpatient Cardiac Neurodevelopment Program, Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Karli A. Negrin: Affiliation:
Department of Therapeutic and Rehabilitative Services, Nemours Children Hospital, Wilmington, DE, USA
Hema Desai: Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Services, CHOC Children’s Hospital, Orange, CA, USA
Suzie Willette: Affiliation:
Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Melissa B. Jones: Affiliation:
Cardiac Critical Care, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
Sherrill D. Caprarola: Affiliation:
Heart Institute, Children’s Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
Anna J. Jones: Affiliation:
Office of Advanced Practice Providers, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA, Heart Center, Children’s Health, Dallas, TX, USA
Stephanie M. Helman: Affiliation:
Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Jodi Smith: Affiliation:
Parent Representative, The Mended Hearts, Inc., Program Director, Richmond, VA, USA
Corinne M. Anton: Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA Department of Cardiology, Children’s Health, Dallas, TX, USA
Laurel M. Bear: Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children’s Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Lauren Malik: Affiliation:
Department of Acute Care Therapy Services, Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Sarah K. Russell: Affiliation:
Department of Therapeutic and Rehabilitative Services, Nemours Children Hospital, Wilmington, DE, USA
Dana J. Mieczkowski: Affiliation:
Department of Therapeutic and Rehabilitative Services, Nemours Children Hospital, Wilmington, DE, USA
Bridy O. Hamilton: Affiliation:
Department of Therapeutic and Rehabilitative Services, Nemours Children Hospital, Wilmington, DE, USA
Meghan McCoy: Affiliation:
Pediatric and Congenital Heart Center, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
Yvette Feldman: Affiliation:
Nursing & Patient Care Center of Excellence, St. Luke’s Health System, Boise, ID, USA
Michelle Steltzer: Affiliation:
Single Ventricle Center of Excellence, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
Melanie L. Savoca: Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Diane L. Spatz: Affiliation:
Department of Family & Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, The Center for Pediatric Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Samantha C. Butler: Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry (Psychology), Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
*: Author for correspondence: Amy J. Lisanti, Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, 734 Schuylkill Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA. Tel: +1 610 368 4788. E-mail: lisanti@upenn.edu

Article contents

Abstract
Initiate and document developmental and psychosocial screening on admission
Initiate and document daily evidence-based bundle of care
Continue bundle of care daily until discharge
Discussion and conclusions
Supplementary material
Financial support
Conflicts of interest
References

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

Infants and children born with CHD are at significant risk for neurodevelopmental delays and abnormalities. Individualised developmental care is widely recognised as best practice to support early neurodevelopment for medically fragile infants born premature or requiring surgical intervention after birth. However, wide variability in clinical practice is consistently demonstrated in units caring for infants with CHD. The Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a Special Interest Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative, formed a working group of experts to create an evidence-based developmental care pathway to guide clinical practice in hospital settings caring for infants with CHD. The clinical pathway, “Developmental Care Pathway for Hospitalized Infants with Congenital Heart Disease,” includes recommendations for standardised developmental assessment, parent mental health screening, and the implementation of a daily developmental care bundle, which incorporates individualised assessments and interventions tailored to meet the needs of this unique infant population and their families. Hospitals caring for infants with CHD are encouraged to adopt this developmental care pathway and track metrics and outcomes using a quality improvement framework.

Keywords

CHD developmental care family-centered care infant parent neurodevelopment

Information

Type: Original Article
Information: Cardiology in the Young , Volume 33 , Issue 12 , December 2023 , pp. 2521 - 2538

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951123000525 [Opens in a new window]
Creative Commons: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright: © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Developmental care for hospitalizsed infants is a family-centered care approach that supports individualised care via observation and interpretation of the infant’s behaviour and modification of the environment and caregiving to meet the needs of infants and their families. Developmental care is widely recognised as best practice for medically fragile infants born prematurely or who require surgical intervention after birth;^{Reference Milette, Martel, Ribeiro da Silva and Coughlin McNeil1,Reference Kenner and McGrath2} however, implementation of developmental care practices occurs mainly in neonatal iICUs and less often for sub-specialty paediatric cardiac ICUs. Over the past decade, literature has emerged calling for developmental care to be integrated into the care of infants with CHD.^{Reference Torowicz, Lisanti, Rim and Medoff-Cooper3–Reference Butler, Huyler, Kaza and Rachwal7} The Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Collaborative recently identified a priority for the CHD field to adapt and implement developmental care interventions in the CHD population.^{Reference Cassidy, Butler and Briend8} However, wide variability in the clinical practice of developmental care has been consistently demonstrated.^{Reference Sood, Berends and Butcher9–Reference LaRonde, Connor, Cerrato, Chiloyan and Lisanti12} Barriers identified for paediatric cardiovascular healthcare providers include lack of education, resources, and competing priorities to support developmental care with this specific infant population.^{Reference Sood, Berends and Butcher9,Reference Miller, Lisanti and Witte10} Given the well-documented risks for neurodevelopmental abnormalities associated with CHD,^{Reference Marino, Lipkin and Newburger13} and the similarities in brain maturity and structure between infants with CHD and infants born prematurely,^{Reference Licht, Shera and Clancy14,Reference Wernovsky and Licht15} developmental care is a critical aspect to clinical practice during infant hospitalisation for cardiac surgery.^{Reference Lisanti, Vittner, Medoff-Cooper, Fogel, Wernovsky and Butler6}

One method to reduce variability in practice is a clinical pathway, which is a structured plan of care utilised by the interdisciplinary team to support clinical decision making with detailed steps and evidence-based guidelines.^{Reference Rotter, Kinsman and James16} Clinical pathways support standardisation in care, with improved patient outcomes and reduced complications.^{Reference Rotter, Kinsman and James16–Reference Trimarchi, Caruso, Magon, Odone and Arrigoni18} The Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a Special Interest Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative, formed a working group of experienced paediatric cardiovascular clinicians and parents to create an evidence-based developmental care pathway to guide clinical practice in hospital settings caring for infants with CHD. Members represented the following paediatric sub-specialties: nursing, psychology, cardiology, critical care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech language pathology, nutrition, and parents. Members were assigned specific sections of the pathway based on their area of expertise and completed comprehensive reviews of the literature for each section. This paper presents the clinical pathway content generated by the working group based on evidence in the literature and/or expert consensus where evidence does not exist in the extant literature. The pathway was developed based on underlying assumptions and definitions (Table 1). The “Developmental Care Pathway for Hospitalized Infants with Congenital Heart Disease” (Fig 1) contains three sections:

I. Initiate and Document Developmental and Psychosocial Screening on Admission
II. Initiate and Document Daily Evidence-based Bundle of Care
III. Continue Bundle of Care Daily Until Discharge. Repeat Formal Developmental and Psychosocial Screening Prior to Discharge.

Figure 1.

Developmental care pathway.

Table 1.

Key assumptions and definitions of the developmental care pathway for hospitalized infants with CHD

PT: Physical therapist, OT: Occupational therapist, SLP: speech language pathologist, ICU: intensive care unit.

We describe each section in detail below and more granular information is available in the tables.

I. Initiate and document developmental and psychosocial screening on admission

Upon admission to the hospital, we recommend formal developmental and psychosocial screening for infants and their parents including documentation of findings in the medical record.

Formal developmental evaluation

Observable infant behaviour is an expression of neurobehavioural status and brain function that can be used to identify infants at risk for developmental delays.^{Reference Spittle and Treyvaud19} Neurobehavioural assessments are used to determine infants’ developmental strengths and vulnerabilities as well as infants’ ability to attend and engage with environmental stimuli.^{Reference Butler, Sadhwani and Stopp20} Neurobehavioural assessments may use observation or a facilitated examination to identify patterns of behaviour of infants. An important consideration is to be mindful of the infant’s level of stress during the interaction, as well as understanding what strategies the infant uses to actively participate.^{Reference Browne, Jaeger and Kenner21} Most infant neurobehavioural assessments require additional training and certification prior to use in clinical settings with infants and families.^{Reference Lisanti, Vittner, Medoff-Cooper, Fogel, Wernovsky and Butler6,Reference Als22} To fully assess infant state, motor skills, autonomic stability, self-regulation, and social interaction, we recommend developmental assessment measures that are based on the Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale.^{Reference Brazelton and Nugent23} Other developmental assessment measures are listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Suggested instruments and clinical tools.

Parent mental health and psychosocial needs assessment

Parents of infants with CHD are at increased risk for mental health challenges such as traumatic stress, anxiety, and depression,^{Reference Woolf-King, Anger, Arnold, Weiss and Teitel24,Reference Uzark and Jones25} and those who lack social support and resources are more likely to endorse higher stress levels.^{Reference Visconti, Saudino, Rappaport, Newburger and Bellinger26} Following birth, parents of infants with CHD are exposed to multiple stressors including the ICU environment, cardiac disease diagnosis, newborn cardiac surgery, financial and vocational stress, hospitalisations and critical illness, increased caregiving demands, and disruption to the family system.^{Reference Golfenshtein, Srulovici and Medoff-Cooper27–Reference Logan, Sahrmann, Gu and Hartman29}

We recommend routine parental mental health and psychosocial screening to identify psychosocial services to benefit families during infant hospitalisation and post-discharge.^{Reference Lisanti30} Examples of parent mental health screening tools are listed in Table 2. Psychosocial assessments include screening for insurance needs, transportation insecurity, food insecurity, housing status, childcare for siblings, employment status, educational concerns, family support, supportive coping strategies, attachment and bonding, understanding of infant clinical status, and potential barriers to adjustment. Psychosocial team members can be utilised for support and resource identification, caregiver support groups, and continued screening and support following hospital discharge.^{Reference Lumsden, Smith and Wittkowski31}

Interdisciplinary developmental care rounds

Many organisations and hospital systems utilise interdisciplinary developmental care rounds as best practice to foster education and collaboration with families and healthcare professionals in providing developmentally appropriate care (Supplementary Table 1).^{Reference Peterson4,Reference Butler, Huyler, Kaza and Rachwal7,Reference Sood, Berends and Butcher9,Reference Lisanti, Cribben, Connock, Lessen and Medoff-Cooper32} When establishing and performing interdisciplinary developmental care rounds, we recommend identifying consistent team members and timing for rounds to facilitate family presence and participation.^{Reference Butler, Huyler, Kaza and Rachwal7,Reference Sood, Berends and Butcher9,Reference Griffiths, James-Nunez and Spence33} We recommend initiating interdisciplinary developmental care rounds on admission to establish a baseline and continuing on a regular basis during infant hospitalisation for ongoing care. Documentation and dissemination of recommendations to the bedside care team and family should be provided.

II. Initiate and document daily evidence-based bundle of care

We recommend a daily bundle of care to support individualised developmental care that responds to the changing strengths and areas of concern of the infant and family throughout the hospitalisation. A bundle of care is a group of structured evidence-based interventions that are provided together by the multidisciplinary team to improve patient outcomes. This bundle of care to support individualised developmental care includes both assessment of the infant and family across multiple domains and recommendations for tailored interventions based on the assessments. We review each domain below.

Continuous behaviour state assessment

Assessment

Infant behaviour should be continuously observed (sometimes called cue-based care) to guide the infant’s plan of care and to determine infant strengths and vulnerabilities. Infant behaviour is composed of five subsystems of functioning: autonomic, motor, state, attention/interaction, and self-regulation (Supplementary Table 2). These sub-systems exist simultaneously and mutually influence each other, occurring in continuous interaction with the environment based on the Synactive Theory of Development.^{Reference Als34} Infant functioning is described and understood in terms of organisation or competencies and disorganisation or vulnerabilities.^{Reference Als34}

Interventions

Consider opportunities to create a calm, nurturing, and welcoming environment.^{Reference Lisanti, Vittner, Medoff-Cooper, Fogel, Wernovsky and Butler6} Optimise opportunities to cluster and pace caregiving tasks based on infant behaviour to enhance the infant’s emotional development of building trust and security.^{Reference Browne, Jaeger and Kenner21} Provide the infant with opportunities to respond, pausing after initial greeting, and facilitate behavioural responses that support the infant to self-soothe (e.g., bring their hands to mouth).^{Reference Browne, Jaeger and Kenner21}

Pain, withdrawal, sedation, and delirium assessment

Assessment

Infants with CHD face a variety of painful experiences during their hospitalisations. These unpleasant or unexpected sensory and emotional experiences during early development may lead to permanent alterations in brain processing and development.^{Reference Anand and Carr35–Reference Maxwell, Fraga and Malavolta38} Optimal pain management requires a multimodal approach. We recommend the use of objective pain assessment tools (Table 2) to avoid untreated pain or excessive analgesia.^{Reference Hall and Anand37} Typically, acute postoperative pain is greatest in the first 48 hours with a progressive decline over the course of 7 days.^{Reference Brasher, Gafsous and Dugue39}

The assessment and treatment of pain in children can reduce the risk and severity of delirium, a nonspecific disturbance of cognition and consciousness resulting from critical illness and ICU exposure.^{Reference Smith, Brink, Fuchs, Ely and Pandharipande40} Delirium affects 49% patients in paediatric cardiac ICUs, with 64% of those less than 1 year of age.^{Reference Smith, Brink, Fuchs, Ely and Pandharipande40} Delirium predisposes patients to long-term complications including decreased verbal and spatial memory and sustained attention, and impaired executive function.^{Reference Smith, Brink, Fuchs, Ely and Pandharipande40–Reference Staveski, Pickler and Lin42} Delirium is well-studied in paediatric populations, and validated screening instruments exist (Table 2) to enable early recognition.

Interventions

Ultimately, the goal is to prevent, reduce, or limit acute pain in the perioperative period by utilising a combination of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions.^{Reference Patel, Trujillo-Rivera and Faruqe43} Sedative medications are a mainstay therapy in the ICU to help patients tolerate the environment and medical/nursing interventions and to reduce anxiety. Sedation should be tailored to the patients’ individual needs utilising goal-directed therapy.^{Reference Zuppa and Curley44} Sedation levels and assessment for withdrawal should be examined using validated instruments (Table 2). Consideration should be paid to the total dosage and duration of sedation and analgesia medications due to the increased risk of morbidities (withdrawal, altered sleep, delirium, immobility, and potential neurotoxicity).^{Reference Patel, Trujillo-Rivera and Faruqe43} Specifically, judicious use or avoidance of benzodiazepines may reduce the likelihood of developing delirium.^{Reference Smith, Besunder and Betters45,Reference Feroz and Donnelly46}

We recommend the incorporation of non-pharmacologic comfort measures into the care of CHD infants to prevent and manage pain and agitation in acute postoperative setting or with treatment of withdrawal and delirium (Table 3).^{Reference Smith, Besunder and Betters45} Non-pharmacologic comfort measures include a broad range of interventions, with varying degrees of evidence for each.^{Reference McNair, Campbell-Yeo, Johnston and Taddio47,Reference Mangat, Oei, Chen, Quah-Smith and Schmolzer48} Our recommendation is to include as many as possible, based on the individualised infant response to the intervention and parental preferences.^{Reference McNair, Campbell-Yeo, Johnston and Taddio47} Encouraging parents to provide non-pharmacologic measures increases parental engagement to provide comfort to their child.^{Reference McNair, Campbell-Yeo, Johnston and Taddio47} Non-pharmacologic comfort measures should not replace adequate analgesia, but should be used in combination,^{Reference McNair, Campbell-Yeo, Johnston and Taddio47} and may also be effective to treat withdrawal and delirium symptoms by normalising the environment.^{Reference Feroz and Donnelly46}

Table 3.

Non-pharmacologic comfort interventions.

Assess physical and sensory environment: thermoregulation

Assessment

Although minimal research has studied thermoregulation in infants with CHD, the National Association of Neonatal Nurses developed general guidelines for temperature assessment in medically fragile newborns and infants (Table 2).⁴⁹ Infants with CHD, whether born premature or full-term, require close monitoring of temperature during hospitalisation due to risks of heat loss in the ICU / intraoperative environment and the associated interventions of critical illness.

Interventions

Infants receiving artificial heat sources in the pre or postoperative period should receive continuous temperature assessment while in use.^{49,Reference Knobel and Holditch-Davis50} Newly born infants with CHD who are >34 weeks’ gestation and not at risk for increased oxygen consumption should be admitted onto a pre-warmed radiant warmer/bed surface in servo control mode.^{49,Reference Kusari, Han and Virgen51} If there are concerns about the artificial heat reaching the infant because of sterile drapes or other procedures like echocardiograms, consider a thermal warming pad. Thermal warming pads may provide heat for up to two hours but may need to be replaced sooner depending on manufacturer guidelines. Place a single layer blanket in between the infant and the thermal warming pad. Incubators are helpful when infants with CHD are unable to maintain a body temperature of 36.5 °C axillary, unable to demonstrate adequate weight gain, are <34 weeks’ gestation or <1500 g, or are from an outside hospital and previously maintained in an incubator.^{49,Reference Altimier52} Consider an incubator for infants ≥34 weeks’ gestation who are demonstrating signs of increased oxygen consumption.^{49,Reference Flenady and Woodgate53}

Consider use of the following during patient transport: pre-warmed artificial heat source, power supply attached to artificial heat source, warm blankets, hat, pre-warming infant prior to transport (goal temperature 36.5 °C), and thermal warming pad.^{49,Reference Brozanski, Piazza and Chuo54–Reference Harer, Vergales, Cady, Early, Chisholm and Swanson57} When transitioning out of any artificial heat source into an open crib, infants should be dressed and bundled with a blanket(s) and demonstrate normothermia and weight gain for 2–3 days before discharge.^{49,Reference Shankaran, Bell and Laptook58} While maintaining continuous temperature monitoring, manually assess axillary temperature frequently until the infant’s temperature is stable.^{49,Reference Shankaran, Bell and Laptook58} Evidence varies related to device mode (air versus servo control) during weaning.⁴⁹

Assess physical and sensory environment: environmental sensory stimulation

Assessment

Infant behaviour should be continuously observed (Supplementary Table 2) to determine the infant’s sensory experience and its influence on the infant and to provide opportunities for environmental modification. Interpretation of infant responses to sensory stimulation allows for direct attention to and response to demands from the physical and sensory environment that influence infant behavioural patterns.^{Reference Butler, Huyler, Kaza and Rachwal7,Reference Als34} Thus, all actions and reactions are dependent on the ability to interpret and respond to sensory information to support the infant’s self-regulation and thresholds of coping.^{Reference Browne, Jaeger and Kenner21}

Interventions

Sensory interventions should aim to regulate the exposure to environmental stimuli, but not devoid the environment of all stimuli, with a goal of creating a home-like environment. We recommend the provision of low ambient light during the day and darkness at night, low sound levels, and gentle sensory input during care, including: four-handed care (involving two individuals in caregiving where one completes the care and one supports the infant), facilitated tucking, containment, massage, soft voices, and gentle touch. To support the auditory system, we support the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics committee on environmental health:⁵⁹

1. Incorporating a system of regular sound assessment in the ICU and within incubators. Ideally, a sound level exceeding 45 dB is avoided.
2. ICUs should develop and maintain a programme of sound reduction and management. This can include decreasing the sound levels in the entire unit, decreasing sound within the infant’s bedside, reducing loud alarms and phone ringers, lowering voices to a soft whisper, reducing the sounds of machinery, running water, and closing lids/doors.^{Reference Graven60}
3. Care practices should provide opportunities for the infant to hear parent voices live during parent–infant interaction, including book reading.^{Reference Neri, De Pascalis and Agostini61,Reference Erdei, Klass and Inder62} Earphones and other devices attached to the infant’s ears for sound transmission should always be avoided.^{Reference Graven60,Reference Morag and Ohlsson63}

To support the visual system, remember that the ideal focal distance for term infants is 10–12 inches and gradually increases with time.^{Reference Graven and Browne64} A parent’s face is the most important visual input. Color perception does not fully develop until 2–3 months of age. Closely monitor infant reactions to determine if they are regulating appropriately and tolerating stimuli. High color-contrast toys and mobiles should only be used for short periods of time (approximately 10–15 minutes) based on infant cues for tolerance. Bright lights disrupt infant rest and sleep.^{Reference Kenner and McGrath2} We recommend providing cycled lighting, which is low ambient light during daylight hours and darkness at night. This improves weight gain and increases sleep time in hospitalised infants.^{Reference Morag and Ohlsson63} When infants are in incubators, the incubators can be partially covered at night to support the development of the infant’s circadian rhythm while allowing visualisation of the infant.

Smell and taste are powerful sensory inputs that develop prenatally and are important in the transition to postnatal feeding. In addition to the importance in recognition of the mother, smell and taste initiate metabolic pathways that promote digestion and metabolic control.^{Reference Bloomfield, Alexander, Muelbert and Beker65} Young infants who are hospitalised and especially those on tube feedings should receive the taste and smell of mother’s milk and smell of family while held skin-to-skin during feeding, even tube feedings. Providers should also be mindful of the taste and smell of hand cleaning materials, medications, materials placed on infant lips and face, and perfumes on staff.

The vestibular system begins to develop in the womb. Postnatally, the infant is strengthened and stimulated through movement and changes in position. Throughout infancy and toddlerhood, movements like rocking, swinging, rolling, crawling, walking, and running all provide input for a healthy vestibular system.^{Reference Pineda, Roussin, Heiny and Smith66} Given the potential for those movements to be limited in hospitalisation, maintaining changes in position and movement are important for continued development of the vestibular system, with interventions such as therapeutic positioning, range of motion, movement of the extremities or body, or therapeutic facilitation of the muscles.^{Reference Browne, Jaeger and Kenner21} Attention should also be paid to the tactile sensitivity of an infant and particularly passive touch (sensitivity to stimulation imposed on the skin).^{Reference Browne, Jaeger and Kenner21} The hospitalised infant is exposed to many tactile stimulations and often show higher sensitivity to tactile stimuli.^{Reference Andre, Durier and Beuchee67} We recommend consideration of all objects touching the infant’s skin and body. Allow for the availability of infant hands, face, and other areas of skin to remain as free from lines, tubing, and tape as possible so they can feel their own body, the skin of their parents, and soft materials/blankets.

Developmental and motor supports

Assessment

Infants with CHD who undergo surgery in the first six months of life are at risk for delayed motor development as well as musculoskeletal impairments.^{Reference Clifton, Cruz, Patel, Cahalin and Moore68} A developmental evaluation by a physical and/or occupational therapist integrates many aspects of a standardised assessment, including examination of environmental factors, motor function, neuromotor development, sensory processing, range of motion, reflex integrity, social interaction, and family needs.⁶⁹ A developmental evaluation is specifically tailored to respect the unique needs of a critically ill infant, minimising stress and monitoring physiologic state throughout.^{Reference Sweeney, Heriza, Blanchard and Dusing70}

Interventions

We recommend a physical and/or occupational therapy consult upon admission as well as ongoing evaluation at regular intervals to ensure individualised developmental therapy supports are initiated early in the infant’s hospitalisation.^{Reference Jara, Jacobs and Reilly71} These team members specialise in movement and posture, providing a unique opportunity to affect the shape of the musculoskeletal system and motor organisation of infants and concurrently supporting parents and caregivers to optimise infant neurodevelopment.^{Reference Clifton, Cruz, Patel, Cahalin and Moore68}

We further recommend intentional therapeutic positioning of infants bundled with routine nursing care that includes head in midline, extremities flexed towards midline, and use of supports to provide boundaries and containment.^{Reference Jara, Jacobs and Reilly71} Providing boundaries to mimic the resistance in utero such as a swaddle or supports for positioning will allow dynamic activity to occur. This promotes a calm state and allows for improved self-regulation which can optimise cognitive and social-emotional outcomes.^{Reference Waitzman72} Facilitated positioning throughout the hospitalisation promotes gross motor skills. Without proper positioning, abnormalities may occur in the musculoskeletal system such as retracted shoulders, hyperextension of the head and neck, plagiocephaly, and external rotation of the lower extremities.^{Reference Jara, Jacobs and Reilly71} Motor abnormalities are also observed such as poor head control, poor reaching skills, and resistance to postural changes.^{Reference Lisanti, Vittner, Medoff-Cooper, Fogel, Wernovsky and Butler6} Position of infant should be changed every 2 to 3 hours or with bundled nursing care times as appropriate. Positioning an infant in one position for an extended period can contribute to skeletal deformity, muscle shortening, and restricted mobility of joints.^{Reference Gerard, Harris and Thach73}

Consider early mobility which includes range of motion exercises (active, passive, and active assisted), massage, and out of bed experiences (holding, infant seat, swing, etc.).^{Reference Cameron, Ball and Cepinskas74,Reference Kanejima, Shimogai, Kitamura, Ishihara and Izawa75} Tummy time, or prone positioning, should be encouraged preoperatively and when prone precautions are cleared.^{Reference Jennings, Sarbaugh and Payne76,Reference Uzark, Smith, Yu, Lowery, Tapley, Romano and Butcher77} Prone positioning has multiple benefits, such as improving ventilation and decreasing work of breathing.^{Reference Clifton, Cruz, Patel, Cahalin and Moore68} Research supports more timely attainment of gross motor skills for infants placed in prone positioning.^{Reference Jennings, Sarbaugh and Payne76,Reference Uzark, Smith, Yu, Lowery, Tapley, Romano and Butcher77} Tummy time progression, as well as plagiocephaly and torticollis prevention strategies can be demonstrated with parents even when infant mobility is restricted due to sternal precautions while hospitalised.^{Reference Waitzman72}

Developmentally supportive feeding

Assessment

Breastfeeding assessment/use of human milk. We recommend parents experience the process of informed decision making for the use of human milk^{Reference Nyqvist, Haggkvist and Hansen78} using the Spatz 10 Step Model for Human Milk and Breastfeeding for Vulnerable Infants (Supplementary Table 3).^{Reference Spatz79} This model has been effectively implemented globally for infants requiring intensive care,^{Reference Spatz80} and in 2021 was adapted as the national model for human milk and breastfeeding in the United States by the Association of Women’s Health Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.^.81 The model demonstrated improved human milk and breastfeeding outcomes exceeding national targets in several high-risk infant surgical groups.^{Reference Edwards and Spatz82–Reference Froh, Schwarz and Spatz84}

Pre-feeding readiness assessment. We recommend all infants with CHD receive a pre-feeding readiness assessment prior to introducing oral feeding during hospitalisation. An infant is ready to be fed orally when demonstrating the following conditions:

Awake and alert state: Active engagement for efficient and safe oral feeding is highly dependent on the ability of the infant to achieve and maintain awake state.^{Reference Thoyre, Pados, Shaker, Fuller and Park85} Oral feeding efficiency improves in alert state compared to sleep state prior to oral feeding in stable preterm infants.^{Reference Griffith, Rankin and White-Traut86}
Demonstrating feeding cues with established non-nutritive suck on a pacifier: The infant must achieve and maintain autonomic and state organisation to maintain stability in increasingly complex motor tasks such as non-nutritive sucking. We recommend attention to stress cues during engagement in non-nutritive suck, which may include increased respiratory rate, arching, munching, and pulling off or away from pacifier.^{Reference Gennattasio, Perri, Baranek and Rohan87,Reference Ross and Philbin88}
Maintain physiologic stability with attention to level of respiratory support: Infants with tachypnoea may have challenges regulating a coordinated suck/swallow/breathe sequence. Limited evidence exists on feeding safety on non-invasive positive pressure respiratory support, with currently no research exclusive to the full-term cardiac infant.^{Reference Canning, Clarke, Thorning, Chauhan and Weir89} Without sufficient guidelines for feeding infants on respiratory support, careful consideration of the infant’s clinical picture is needed for smaller bolus oral feeding when on stable respiratory support.^{Reference Raminick and Desai90}

We recommend the Readiness section of the early feeding skills assessment be administered by a feeding therapist to objectively determine if the infant can demonstrate appropriate motor state and feeding cues prior to offering breast or bottle.^{Reference Thoyre, Pados, Shaker, Fuller and Park85}

Oral feeding assessment. We recommended utilising a cue-based feeding assessment, with continuous evaluation of infant behavioural state, infant cues to engage and disengage from feeding, oral motor function for latching, sucking and milk extraction, and regulation of swallowing and breathing.^{Reference Thoyre, Holditch-Davis, Schwartz, Melendez Roman and Nix91–Reference Shaker93} Further oral feeding assessment includes response to feeding supports, haemodynamic and respiratory stamina and stability with feeding activity, and sustaining endurance for adequate oral intake to maintain growth and development.^{Reference Griffith, Rankin and White-Traut86} Infants with CHD are at risk for tachypnoea, tachycardia, and decreased oxygen saturations during oral feedings, resulting in difficulties maintaining appropriate and safe suck/swallow/breath coordination during oral feeds, as well as have a higher prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in comparison to those without CHD.^{Reference Pereira Kda, Firpo and Gasparin94,Reference Jones, Desai and Fogel95} This necessitates continuous screening and evaluation for swallowing difficulty/aspiration risk and gastroesophageal reflux. Oxygen desaturations, increased work of breathing, and coughing/choking during feeds are overt signs of swallowing difficulties, placing infant at high risk for aspiration.^{Reference Pereira Kda, Firpo and Gasparin94} Common symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux include discomfort, irritability, excessive crying, back arching, feeding refusal, and/or frequent emesis.^{Reference Pados and Davitt96}

To date, no standardised objective feeding assessments specific to the unique needs of infants with CHD have been validated; however, assessments specific to preterm newborns exist and may have applicability with infants who have CHD.^{Reference Jones, Desai and Fogel95,Reference Jadcherla, Vijayapal and Leuthner97,Reference Malkar and Jadcherla98} Standardized assessments and algorithms evaluate feeding readiness, oral motor function, swallowing skills, and respiratory regulation to determine the infant’s challenges for appropriate feeding and to guide intervention (Table 2).^{Reference Thoyre, Pados, Shaker, Fuller and Park85,Reference Ehrmann, Harendt and Church99,Reference Lau and Smith100}

“Red Flags” during oral feeding. Red flags are signs to discontinue oral feeding or to consider feeding modifications or additional supports. Continued feeding when red flags are present can result in negative oral feeding experiences and ultimately oral aversion.

Behavioural state and subsystem changes (Supplementary Table 2)
Clinical signs of dysphagia: milk dribbling from the mouth, coughing during feeding, wet breath sounds, milk residual in oral cavity, fatigue, gulping, multiple swallows, pulling off the nipple, desaturations, cyanosis^{Reference Pereira Kda, Firpo and Gasparin94}
Signs of feeding intolerance or gastroesophageal reflux: discomfort, irritability, excessive crying, vomiting, back arching, feeding refusal, mouthing, stridor^{Reference Gulati and Jadcherla101}

Interventions

Breastfeeding/use of human milk. Follow the Spatz 10 Step Model for human milk and breastfeeding for vulnerable infants (Supplementary Table 3) to support parents in their use of human milk and/or breastfeeding.^{Reference Spatz79}

Pre-feeding readiness interventions. Oral care with colostrum has known benefits in premature infants, including decreased inflammatory response in postsurgical infants, stimulation of the infant’s immune system, decreased risk of infection, and faster attainment to full oral feeding.^{Reference Gephart and Weller102} We recommend administering fresh colostrum via a saturated sterile cotton swab (0.2 ml total) on the tongue, gums, and inner cheeks and repeating every 3–4 hours if the infant is tolerating well.^{Reference Gephart and Weller102–Reference Sauer and Altmiller104} Even while intubated, oral care, and stimulation with colostrum/breast milk is beneficial in newborn infants^{Reference Thibeau and Boudreaux105} with a decreased incidence of thrush and ventilator-associated pulmonary infections in infants after cardiothoracic surgery.^{Reference Yu, Huang and Xu106}

Oral stimulation includes non-nutritive sucking and offering a pacifier dipped in expressed human milk or formula. A combination of oral stimulation may improve readiness for initiation of oral feeding, attainment of total oral nutrition, reduce time to full oral feeding, and reduce length of stay following cardiac surgery.^{Reference Gennattasio, Perri, Baranek and Rohan87,Reference Yu, Huang and Xu107,Reference Coker-Bolt, Jarrard, Woodard and Merrill108}

Cue-based feeding. We recommend use of infant cue-based feeding as the standard oral feeding intervention for infants with CHD. This approach emphasises the quality of the feeding experience over the volume consumed. Cue-based feeding intervention involves observing an infant’s subsystem signs of organisation to initiate and advance oral feeding while understanding stress signs or subsystem disorganisation to alter oral feeding techniques and provide additional support for the infant and parents (Supplementary Table 2). Research demonstrates that cue-based feeding reduces length of stay and improves weight gain in preterm infants.^{Reference Lubbe92}

Individualised feeding plans. We recommend use of individualised feeding plans that are attentive to the infant’s unique developmental and physiologic needs in line with family-centered care. Individualised feeding plans are associated with improved oral feeding outcomes^{Reference Jadcherla, Peng and Moore109,Reference Lubbe, Van der Walt and Klopper110} and should be frequently reevaluated by the feeding team with interdisciplinary collaboration based on the infant and family’s unique needs. Example feeding plan interventions may include:

Prioritisation of feeding the infant at the breast if that is the parent’s goal.
Infants should be prepared for direct breastfeeding through skin-to-skin care and non-nutritive experience at the breast.
Modification of the rate of milk flow from a bottle nipple, which may improve physiologic stability during bottle feeding in term and preterm infants.^{Reference Daley and Kennedy111,Reference Pados, Park and Dodrill112}
Side-lying positioning stabilises oxygen saturation during oral feeding, improve chest wall movement by decreasing the effects of gravity on rib cage expansion. This position may be beneficial for slowing bolus flow by decreasing hydrostatic pressure in the bottle compared to upright positioning.^{Reference Park, Thoyre, Knafl, Hodges and Nix113}
Co-regulation/paced feeding provides regular pauses or breaks for breathing during an oral feed to allow for improved minute ventilation and decreased respiratory effort.^{Reference Thoyre, Holditch-Davis, Schwartz, Melendez Roman and Nix91}

Oral aversion prevention and intervention. Prevention of oral feeding aversion and compromised feeding is imperative for successful oral feeding and influenced by care practices during hospitalisation for infants with CHD.^{Reference Goldstein, Watkins and Lowery114} To reduce risk of prolonged feeding challenges, both early exposure to feeding opportunities and early identification of infant vulnerabilities during feeding, gastrointestinal issues and swallowing disorders is imperative.^{Reference Gulati, Sultana and Jadcherla115,Reference Pados, Hill, Yamasaki, Litt and Lee116} Interventions that support prevention of oral aversion include:

Early identification of infant stress during feeding: Stressful feeding experiences can result in establishment of altered neural pathways especially during the initial stages of oral feeding trials which can lead to negative consequences on feeding skill development and desire to feed orally.^{Reference Shaker93}
Early identification of gastrointestinal issues: Infants with CHD are at increased risk of feeding and swallowing disorders and gastrointestinal complications.^{Reference Jadcherla, Vijayapal and Leuthner97,Reference Malkar and Jadcherla98,Reference Rosen, Vandenplas and Singendonk117} Diagnostic assessments in collaboration with a paediatric gastroenterologist can be beneficial to assess potential underlying mechanisms which may contribute to feeding challenges.^{Reference Rosen, Vandenplas and Singendonk117}
Early management of swallowing disorders: Infants with CHD are at high risk for swallowing difficulties and should be clinically evaluated by a healthcare professional specialising in dysphagia using diagnostic studies (Table 2).

Nutrition and growth

Infants with CHD are known to be at risk for poor growth,^{Reference Anderson, Beekman and Eghtesady118–Reference Williams, Zak and Ravishankar122} which negatively influences neurodevelopment.^{Reference Medoff-Cooper, Irving and Hanlon123,Reference Ravishankar, Zak and Williams124} Infants with CHD may experience growth failure secondary to a variety of factors including suboptimal energy intake, oral aversion, early satiety, increased metabolic demands, and gastrointestinal disturbances impairing motility and/or absorption.

Assessment

Close assessment of growth is imperative to monitor the adequacy of nutrition intake. Routine anthropometric assessments should include daily measures of weight and at least weekly measurement of head circumference and length and consideration of weight-for-length metrics.^{Reference Green Corkins and Teague125–Reference Goldberg, Becker and Brigham127} Anthropometrics are vital to assist in weight-adjusting nutrition provisions to maintain adequate growth velocity and to identify early concerns for growth failure. Daily intake of calories, proteins, lipids, and macro- and micro-nutrients should be closely monitored and adjusted based on individualised needs.^{Reference Schwalbe-Terilli, Hartman and Nagle128–Reference Wong, Ong, Han and Lee131} Registered dietitians are essential members of the interdisciplinary team who collaborate to individualise recommendations to optimise nutrition support, monitor growth of infants during hospitalisations, and provide support for feeding intolerance.^{Reference Gentles, Mara and Diamantidi132,Reference Lisanti, Savoca and Gaynor133}

Interventions

We recommend the use of clinical nutrition pathways as a standardised approach to nutrition considering the positive outcomes demonstrated in infants with CHD.^{Reference Wong, Ong, Han and Lee131,Reference Gentles, Mara and Diamantidi132,Reference Brown, Forbes, Vitale, Tirodker and Zeller134,Reference Hamilton, McAleer and Ariagno135} Specifically, clinical nutrition pathways for infants with CHD have (1) shortened the time to achieve goal calories,^{Reference Braudis, Curley and Beaupre136,Reference Furlong-Dillard, Neary and Marietta137} (2) increased the percent of patients meeting their calorie and protein goals,^{Reference Kaufman, Vichayavilas and Rannie138} (3) decreased the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis,^{Reference del Castillo, McCulley and Khemani139} (4) decreased the duration of postoperative parenteral nutrition,^{Reference Braudis, Curley and Beaupre136,Reference Furlong-Dillard, Neary and Marietta137} (4) decreased hospital length of stay,^{Reference Simsic, Carpenito and Kirchner129,Reference del Castillo, McCulley and Khemani139} and (5) improved weight-for-age Z-score change over hospital length of stay.^{Reference Ehrmann, Harendt and Church99,Reference Lisanti, Savoca and Gaynor133,Reference Kaufman, Vichayavilas and Rannie138} Despite variation in content across published pathways,^{Reference Slicker, Hehir and Horsley140} standardised nutrition pathways minimise variability of nutrition care between providers within institutions.

Institutional pathways for both implementing feeding and nutrition are helpful. Key components in a pathway should include the safety of preoperative enteral feeding, use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in the postoperative period, frequent anthropometric measurements, avoidance of ad lib oral feeding without clearly defined volume and caloric goals, and consultation with a registered dietitian. Following cardiac surgery, infants often require parenteral and enteral nutrition until clinical status and postoperative dysphagia improves and the infant is demonstrating pre-feeding readiness.^{Reference Lisanti, Savoca and Gaynor133,Reference Slicker, Hehir and Horsley140} While infant cue-based feeding is an integral component to developmental care, infants in the postoperative period that are ad lib feeding should ideally have defined volume and calorie goals to prevent suboptimal nutrition intake. Infants experiencing difficulties meeting nutrition goals should be supplemented with enteral tube feedings to prevent undernutrition. Enteral nutrition may also be indicated in infants with vocal cord dysfunction or gastrointestinal difficulties.^{Reference Lisanti, Savoca and Gaynor133,Reference Marino, Johnson and Davies141,Reference Savoca, Horsley, Konek and Becker142}

Parent engagement/caregiving

Assessment

An underlying assumption of this pathway is that parents are the primary caregivers for their infants (Table 1). Unfortunately, infants are often separated from their parents, which contributes to parental stress arising from parental role alteration.^{Reference Lisanti, Golfenshtein and Medoff-Cooper28} Parental role alteration is a perceived stressor that has repeatedly been found in the cardiac ICU setting to uniquely contribute to both anxiety and depressive symptoms in parents.^{Reference Lisanti, Allen, Kelly and Medoff-Cooper143–Reference Lisanti, Kumar and Quinn145} We recommend that the interdisciplinary team regularly review parent participation at the bedside to determine how to best support families in the care of their child.

Interventions

We recommend that parents be incorporated into all aspects of care, including but not limited to decision making for the plan of care, medical and developmental rounds, emergent and non-emergent medical procedures, comfort measures, and routine infant care such as feeding, diaper changing, dressing, positioning, and holding.^{Reference Lisanti, Allen, Kelly and Medoff-Cooper143–Reference Lisanti, Kumar and Quinn145} We also recommend removing any organisational barriers for parent presence. Parents should be encouraged and supported to provide direct care to their infants during hospitalisation, including any of the non-pharmacologic comfort measures described in this pathway (Table 3). We recommend supporting parent–infant interactions to promote comfort and reduce stress for infants and their parents. One specific measure that can be uniquely provided by parents is skin-to-skin care, or kangaroo care, which occurs when an infant dressed only in a diaper is held on a parent’s bare chest. Parents participating in skin-to-skin care report positive social-emotional responses, decreased perceived stress, increased parent–infant attachment, decreased post-partum depression, and increase breast milk production.^{Reference Lisanti, Demianczyk and Costarino146,Reference Ludington-Hoe147} Evidence-based standards and procedures for holding and skin-to-skin care are carefully reported and described.^{Reference Lisanti, Helman and Sorbello148,Reference Lisanti, Buoni and Steigerwalt149} Research demonstrates that skin-to-skin care in infants with CHD in the pre- and post-operative periods is safe and beneficial.^{Reference Harrison and Brown150–Reference Lisanti, Demianczyk and Costarino152} We recommend that centres caring for infants with CHD develop evidence-based holding guidelines and procedures for safe transfer and parental holding opportunities to promote parental bonding and holistic care.^{Reference Harrison5} Reevaluation of holding or skin-to-skin care readiness is recommended to occur daily on rounds. If the infant is very ill and should remain in the bed, parents and caregiving staff are recommended to provide positive sustained touch.^{Reference Harrison5,Reference Harrison, Williams, Berbaum, Stem and Leeper153,Reference Harrison, Brown and Duffey154}

Discharge readiness

Assessment

Comprehensive discharge planning for infants with CHD includes individualised content regarding the developmental and psychosocial needs of infants and their families. Discharge readiness assessment includes ongoing evaluation of the medical home during the inpatient hospitalisation and assessment of parent educational and resource needs.¹⁵⁵ This includes daily evaluation of the family (social support, resources, and coping strategies) during the ICU stay and as the infant is de-intensified. Parents may have educational or language barriers, experience emotional struggles, and complex family systems impacting their processing of discharge information and safe transition home. Parents require comprehensive information prior to discharge including, but not limited to, infant medical care (such as infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation, placement and management of supplemental tube for medications and feedings, home equipment orientation, and other medical needs such as oxygen, and special formula instructions), infant safety and caregiving (safe sleep, bathing, monitoring weight, and feeding), and supports for neurodevelopment including referrals to early intervention services, anticipatory guidance on the infant’s developmental opportunities at home, and connection with outpatient developmental services.^{Reference Mannarino, Michelson, Jackson, Paquette and McBride156}

Interventions

We recommend incorporating the developmental and psychosocial needs of the infant and family into the discharge planning process. An integral part of the discharge readiness plan is ensuring a consistent and smooth transition plan of care across service lines (e.g., cardiac ICU to acute care unit to home), utilising available resources and key interdisciplinary team members. As the infant recovers, providers can gradually remove positioning devices to model safe sleep guidelines. Parents or other family caregivers should be provided a comfortable space to room-in with their infant prior to discharge.^{Reference Jaafar, Ho and Lee157} Rooming-in would ideally be offered as early and as often as possible to provide parents ongoing contact with their child, opportunities to increase bonding with their child, as well as learn, practice, and become confident in the skills required to care for a medically complex infant after discharge.

All follow-up appointments including developmental follow-up and early intervention should be scheduled prior to discharge. Discharge planning should include arranging timely follow-up appointments with primary care, cardiology and other specialist teams, therapists, nutrition, and social work, as needed.^{Reference Hartman and Medoff-Cooper158} Comprehensive neurodevelopmental follow-up is critical to the ongoing evaluation following discharge of infants with CHD and can include cardiac, post-intensive care, or other neurodevelopmental follow-up team.^{Reference Marino, Lipkin and Newburger13} For all infants with a supplemental feeding tube, we recommend close follow-up by a registered dietitian and feeding therapist to closely monitor growth and weight-adjust feeding regimens. Research has demonstrated that despite referral by practitioners for early intervention, only about half of high-risk infants with CHD receive early intervention services post-discharge at the time of outpatient neurodevelopmental evaluation and many never received early intervention.^{Reference Lipkin and Macias159} Discharge education and paperwork should clearly outline the developmental care plan, referral to early intervention, and contact information for the neurodevelopmental follow-up team.

III. Continue bundle of care daily until discharge

Repeat formal developmental and psychosocial screening prior to discharge

As described in previous sections, the components of the developmental care bundle should be continued throughout the infant’s hospitalisation and individualised based on the changing needs of the infant and family. We further recommend repeating a developmental assessment of the infant as well as psychosocial screening of parents (Table 2) prior to discharge to ensure that the family is connected with the appropriate resources post-hospitalisation.

Discussion and conclusions

Neurodevelopmental concerns are highly prevalent in infants with CHD.^{Reference Marino, Lipkin and Newburger13} After thoroughly reviewing current literature and forming expert and stakeholder consensus, the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a Special Interest Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative, generated an evidence-based developmental care pathway for hospitalised infants with CHD. The pathway includes standardised developmental assessment and parent mental health screening, along with the implementation of a daily developmental care bundle, which incorporates individualised assessments and interventions to tailor care to the needs of infants with CHD and their families. Hospitals caring for infants with CHD are encouraged to adopt this developmental care pathway and track predetermined metrics and outcomes using a quality improvement framework. Many metrics could be followed based on the assessments and instruments outlined in Table 2. We encourage any hospital, centre, or inpatient unit adopting this pathway to closely examine whether documentation fields are available for all developmental care practices and ensure that fields are created where needed in the electronic health record.^{Reference Miller, Elhoff and Alexander11} Future work is recommended to generate both short- and long-term neurodevelopmental and psychosocial outcomes of this pathway that would greatly add to the body of literature on developmental care for infants with CHD. We acknowledge that where research was lacking in CHD, we applied literature from other populations such as prematurely born or critically ill infants. Continued evaluation of developmentally supportive care interventions through implementation and dissemination of high-quality research and quality improvement investigations are crucial to develop evidence to support best practices in this vulnerable population of infants and their families.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951123000525

Acknowledgements

The members of the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network would like to thank the Publications Committee of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative for their thoughtful review of this manuscript.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

Milette, I, Martel, MJ, Ribeiro da Silva, M, Coughlin McNeil, M. Guidelines for the institutional implementation of developmental neuroprotective care in the neonatal intensive care unit. Part A: Background and rationale. A joint position statement from the CANN, CAPWHN, NANN, and COINN. Can J Nurs Res. 2017; 49: 46–62. DOI: 10.1177/0844562117706882.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kenner, C, McGrath, JE. Developmental care of newborns and infants: guide for health professionals. Mosby, 2010.Google Scholar

Torowicz, D, Lisanti, AJ, Rim, JS, Medoff-Cooper, B. A developmental care framework for a cardiac intensive care unit: a paradigm shift. Adv Neonatal Care 2012; 12 Suppl 5: S28–32. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318265aeef.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Peterson, JK. Supporting optimal neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants and children with congenital heart disease. Crit Care Nurse. 2018; 38: 68–74. DOI: 10.4037/ccn2018514.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harrison, TM. Improving neurodevelopment in infants with complex congenital heart disease. Birth Defects Res 2019; 1: 1128–1140. DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1517.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lisanti, AJ, Vittner, D, Medoff-Cooper, B, Fogel, J, Wernovsky, G, Butler, S. Individualized family-centered developmental care: an essential model to address the unique needs of infants with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019; 34: 85–93. DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000546.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Butler, SC, Huyler, K, Kaza, A, Rachwal, C. Filling a significant gap in the cardiac ICU: implementation of individualised developmental care. Cardiol Young. 2017; 27: 1797–1806. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951117001469.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cassidy, AR, Butler, SC, Briend, J, et al. Neurodevelopmental and psychosocial interventions for individuals with CHD: a research agenda and recommendations from the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative. Cardiol Young 2021; 31: 1–12. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951121002158.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sood, E, Berends, WM, Butcher, JL, et al. Developmental care in north american pediatric cardiac intensive care units: survey of current practices. Adv Neonatal Care. 2016; 16: 211–219. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000264.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, TA, Lisanti, AJ, Witte, MK, et al. A collaborative learning assessment of developmental care practices for infants in the cardiac intensive care unit. J Pediatr. 2020; 220: 93–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.01.043.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, TA, Elhoff, JJ, Alexander, NM, et al. Developmental care practice and documentation variability in the cardiac ICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23: e180–e185. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002881 .CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

LaRonde, MP, Connor, JA, Cerrato, B, Chiloyan, A, Lisanti, AJ. Individualized family-centered developmental care for infants with congenital heart disease in the intensive care unit. Am J Critic Care Off Publ Am Assoc Critic Care Nurses 2022; 31: e10–e19. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2022124.Google Scholar PubMed

Marino, BS, Lipkin, PH, Newburger, JW, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012; 126: 1143–1172. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318265ee8a.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Licht, DJ, Shera, DM, Clancy, RR, et al. Brain maturation is delayed in infants with complex congenital heart defects. J Thorac Cardiov Sur 2009; 137: 529–36. discussion 536-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.025.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wernovsky, G, Licht, DJ. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease—what can we impact? Pediatr Crit Care Me 2016; 17: S232–S242.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rotter, T, Kinsman, L, James, E, et al. Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 CD006632. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006632.pub2.Google Scholar PubMed

Rotter, T, Kugler, J, Koch, R, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of clinical pathways on length of stay, hospital costs and patient outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 265. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-265.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Trimarchi, L, Caruso, R, Magon, G, Odone, A, Arrigoni, C. Clinical pathways and patient-related outcomes in hospital-based settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Biomed 2021; 92: e2021093. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.10639.Google Scholar PubMed

Spittle, A, Treyvaud, K. The role of early developmental intervention to influence neurobehavioral outcomes of children born preterm. Semin Perinatol. 2016; 40: 542–548. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.006.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Butler, SC, Sadhwani, A, Stopp, C, et al. Neurodevelopmental assessment of infants with congenital heart disease in the early postoperative period. Congenit Heart Dis. 2019; 14: 236–245. DOI: 10.1111/chd.12686.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Browne, JV, Jaeger, CB, Kenner, C, on behalf of the Gravens Consensus Committee on Infant and Family Centered Developmental Care. Executive summary: standards, competencies, and recommended best practices for infant- and family-centered developmental care in the intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2020; 40: 5–10. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-020-0767-1.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Als, H. Program Guide-Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP): An education and training program for health care professionals. NIDCAP Federation International, 2021.Google Scholar

Brazelton, TB, Nugent, JK. Neonatal behavioral assessment scale. Clinics in Developmental Medicine. 4th edn. Mac Keith Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Woolf-King, SE, Anger, A, Arnold, EA, Weiss, SJ, Teitel, D. Mental health among parents of children with critical congenital heart defects: a systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e004862. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004862.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Uzark, K, Jones, K. Parenting stress and children with heart disease. J Pediatr Health Care. 2003; 17: 163–168. DOI: 10.1067/mph.2003.22.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Visconti, KJ, Saudino, KJ, Rappaport, LA, Newburger, JW, Bellinger, DC. Influence of parental stress and social support on the behavioral adjustment of children with transposition of the great arteries. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2002; 23: 314–321. DOI: 10.1097/00004703-200210000-00003.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Golfenshtein, N, Srulovici, E, Medoff-Cooper, B. Investigating parenting stress across pediatric health conditions - a systematic review. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 2015 1–49. DOI: 10.3109/01460862.2015.1078423.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lisanti, AJ, Golfenshtein, N, Medoff-Cooper, B. The pediatric cardiac intensive care unit parental stress model: refinement using directed content analysis. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2017; 40: 319–336. DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000184.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Logan, GE, Sahrmann, JM, Gu, H, Hartman, ME. Parental mental health care after their child’s pediatric intensive care hospitalization. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020; 21: 941–948. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002559.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lisanti, AJ. Parental stress and resilience in CHD: a new frontier for health disparities research. Cardiol Young. 2018; 28: 1142–1150. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951118000963.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lumsden, MR, Smith, DM, Wittkowski, A. Coping in parents of children with congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. J Child Family Stud. 2019; 28: 1736–1753. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-019-01406-8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lisanti, AJ, Cribben, J, Connock, EM, Lessen, R, Medoff-Cooper, B. Developmental care rounds: an interdisciplinary approach to support developmentally appropriate care of infants born with complex congenital heart disease. Clin Perinatol. 2016; 43: 147–156. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2015.11.010.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Griffiths, N, James-Nunez, K, Spence, K, et al. The evolution of an interdisciplinary developmental round in a surgical neonatal intensive care unit. Adv Neonatal Care 2021; 21: E2–E10. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000741.CrossRef Google Scholar

Als, H. Toward a synactive theory of development: promise for the assessment of infant individuality. Infant Ment Health J 1982, 229–243.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRef Google Scholar

Anand, KJ, Carr, DB. The neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neurochemistry of pain, stress, and analgesia in newborns and children. Pediatr Clin N Am. 1989; 36: 795–822. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36722-0.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Anand, KJ, International Evidence-Based Group for Neonatal P. Consensus statement for the prevention and management of pain in the newborn. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001; 155: 173–180. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.155.2.173.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hall, RW, Anand, KJ. Pain management in newborns. Clin Perinatol. 2014; 41: 895–924. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.010.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maxwell, LG, Fraga, MV, Malavolta, CP. Assessment of pain in the newborn: an update. Clin Perinatol. 2019; 46: 693–707. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2019.08.005.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brasher, C, Gafsous, B, Dugue, S, et al. Postoperative pain management in children and infants: an update. Paediatr Drugs. 2014; 16: 129–140. DOI: 10.1007/s40272-013-0062-0.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, HA, Brink, E, Fuchs, DC, Ely, EW, Pandharipande, PP. Pediatric delirium: monitoring and management in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2013; 60: 741–760. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2013.02.010.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bryant, KJ. Pediatric delirium in the cardiac intensive care unit: identification and intervention. Crit Care Nurse 2018; 38: e1–e7. DOI: 10.4037/ccn2018947.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Staveski, SL, Pickler, RH, Lin, L, et al. Management of pediatric delirium in pediatric cardiac intensive care patients: an international survey of current practices. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018; 19: 538–543. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001558.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Patel, AK, Trujillo-Rivera, E, Faruqe, F, et al. Sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade: an assessment of practices from 2009 to 2016 in a national sample of 66,443 pediatric patients cared for in the ICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21: e599–e609. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002351.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zuppa, AF, Curley, MAQ. Sedation analgesia and neuromuscular blockade in pediatric critical care: overview and current landscape. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2017; 64: 1103–1116. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2017.06.013.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, HAB, Besunder, JB, Betters, KA, et al. Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on prevention and management of pain, agitation, neuromuscular blockade, and delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the ICU environment and early mobility. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23: e74–e110. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002873.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Feroz, S, Donnelly, KM. Not just to survive but to thrive: delirium in the pediatric cardiac ICU. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020; 35: 70–75. DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000690.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McNair, C, Campbell-Yeo, M, Johnston, C, Taddio, A. Nonpharmacologic management of pain during common needle puncture procedures in infants: current research evidence and practical considerations: an update. Clin Perinatol. 2019; 46: 709–730. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2019.08.006.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mangat, AK, Oei, JL, Chen, K, Quah-Smith, I, Schmolzer, GM. A review of non-pharmacological treatments for pain management in newborn infants. Children (Basel) 2018; 5: 10.3390/children5100130.Google Scholar PubMed

NANN. Thermoregulation in the Care of Infants Guideline for Practice. National Association of Neonatal Nurses, Chicago, IL, 2021, 31 Google Scholar

Knobel, R, Holditch-Davis, D. Thermoregulation and heat loss prevention after birth and during neonatal intensive-care unit stabilization of extremely low-birthweight infants. Adv Neonatal Care 2010; 10: S7–14. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e3181ef7de2.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kusari, A, Han, AM, Virgen, CA, et al. Evidence-based skin care in preterm infants. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019; 36: 16–23. DOI: 10.1111/pde.13725.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Altimier, L. Thermoregulation: what’s new? what’s not? Newborn Infant Nur Rev 2012/03/01/ 2012; 12: 51–63. DOI: 10.1053/j.nainr.2012.01.003.CrossRef Google Scholar

Flenady, VJ, Woodgate, PG. Radiant warmers versus incubators for regulating body temperature in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003 Cd000435. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.Cd000435.Google Scholar PubMed

Brozanski, BS, Piazza, AJ, Chuo, J, et al. STEPP IN: working together to keep infants warm in the perioperative period. Pediatrics 2020; 145: 10.1542/peds.2019–1121.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Guidash, JC, Berman, L, Panagos, PG, Sullivan, KM. Engaging frontline providers prevents hypothermia and improves communication in the postoperative neonate. Adv Neonatal Care 2021; 21: 379–386. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000839.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dalal, PG, Porath, J, Parekh, U, et al. A quality improvement project to reduce hypothermia in infants undergoing MRI scanning. Pediatric radiology. 2016; 46: 1187–1198. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-016-3592-0.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harer, M W, Vergales, B, Cady, T, Early, A, Chisholm, C, Swanson, J R. Implementation of a multidisciplinary guideline improves preterm infant admission temperatures. J Perinatol. 2017; 37: 1242–1247. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2017.112.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shankaran, S, Bell, EF, Laptook, AR, et al. Weaning of moderately preterm infants from the incubator to the crib: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. 2019; 204: 96–102.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.079.CrossRef Google Scholar

Health CoE. Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn. Pediatrics. 1997; 100: 724–727. DOI: 10.1542/peds.100.4.724.CrossRef Google Scholar

Graven, SN. Sound and the developing infant in the NICU: conclusions and recommendations for care. J Perinatol 2000; 20: S88–93. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200444.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Neri, E, De Pascalis, L, Agostini, F, et al. Parental book-reading to preterm born infants in NICU: the effects on language development in the first two years. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 10.3390/ijerph182111361.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Erdei, C, Klass, P, Inder, TE. Reading aloud with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a unit-based program to enhance language enrichment and support early foundational relationships. Am J Perinat 2021; 40: 255–259. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731043.Google Scholar PubMed

Morag, I, Ohlsson, A. Cycled light in the intensive care unit for preterm and low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 10: CD006982. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006982.pub4 .Google Scholar

Graven, SN, Browne, JV. Sensory development in the fetus, neonate, and infant: introduction and overview. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2008; 8: 169–172. DOI: 10.1053/j.nainr.2008.10.007.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bloomfield, FH, Alexander, T, Muelbert, M, Beker, F. Smell and taste in the preterm infant. Early Human Dev. 2017; 114: 31–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.09.012.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pineda, R, Roussin, J, Heiny, E, Smith, J. Health care professionals' perceptions about sensory-based interventions in the NICU. Am J Perinatol. 2019; 36: 1229–1236. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676536.Google Scholar PubMed

Andre, V, Durier, V, Beuchee, A, et al. Higher tactile sensitivity in preterm infants at term-equivalent age: a pilot study. PloS One 2020; 15: e0229270. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229270.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Clifton, A, Cruz, G, Patel, Y, Cahalin, LP, Moore, JG. Sternal precautions and prone positioning of infants following median sternotomy: a nationwide survey. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2020; 32: 339–345. DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000734.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Occupational therapy’s role in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Occup Ther 2018; 72: 7212410060p1–7212410060p9. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2018.72S204.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sweeney, JK, Heriza, CB, Blanchard, Y, Dusing, SC. Neonatal physical therapy. Part II: Practice frameworks and evidence-based practice guidelines. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010; 22: 2–16. DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181cdba43.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jara, AM, Jacobs, JP, Reilly, M. Physical therapy management of a critically-ill infant after cardiac surgery: a case report and literature review. J Acute Care PhysTher. 2018; 9: 163–170. DOI: 10.1097/jat.0000000000000084.CrossRef Google Scholar

Waitzman, KA. The importance of positioning the near-term infant for sleep, play, and development. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2007; 7: 76–81. DOI: 10.1053/j.nainr.2007.05.004.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gerard, CM, Harris, KA, Thach, BT. Spontaneous arousals in supine infants while swaddled and unswaddled during rapid eye movement and quiet sleep. Pediatrics 2002; 110: e70–e70. DOI: 10.1542/peds.110.6.e70.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cameron, S, Ball, I, Cepinskas, G, et al. Early mobilization in the critical care unit: a review of adult and pediatric literature. J Crit Care. 2015; 30: 664–672. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.03.032.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kanejima, Y, Shimogai, T, Kitamura, M, Ishihara, K, Izawa, KP. Effect of early mobilization on physical function in patients after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 10.3390/ijerph17197091.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jennings, J, Sarbaugh, B, Payne, N. Conveying the message about optimal infant positions. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2005; 25: 3–18. DOI: 10.1300/J006v25n03_02.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Uzark, K, Smith, C, Yu, S, Lowery, R, Tapley, C, Romano, JC, Butcher, J. Evaluation of a "tummy time" intervention to improve motor skills in infants after cardiac surgery. Cardiol Young 2021; 32: 1–6. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951121003930.Google Scholar PubMed

Nyqvist, KH, Haggkvist, AP, Hansen, MN, et al. Expansion of the baby-friendly hospital initiative ten steps to successful breastfeeding into neonatal intensive care: expert group recommendations. J Hum Lact. 2013; 29: 300–309. DOI: 10.1177/0890334413489775.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spatz, DL. Ten steps for promoting and protecting breastfeeding for vulnerable infants. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2004; 18: 385–396. DOI: 10.1097/00005237-200410000-00009.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spatz, DL. Beyond BFHI: the Spatz 10-step and breastfeeding resource nurse model to improve human milk and breastfeeding outcomes. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2018; 32: 164–174. DOI: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000339.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Association of Women’s Health O, Neonatal N. The use of human milk during parent-newborn separation. J Obstetr Gynecol Neonat Nurs 2021; 50: e9–e42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2021.06.003.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, TM, Spatz, DL. An innovative model for achieving breast-feeding success in infants with complex surgical anomalies. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2010; 24: 246–53. quiz 254-5. DOI: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181e8d517.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Martino, K, Wagner, M, Froh, EB, Hanlon, AL, Spatz, DL. Postdischarge breastfeeding outcomes of infants with complex anomalies that require surgery. J Obstetr Gynecol Neonat Nurs. 2015; 44: 450–457. DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12568.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Froh, EB, Schwarz, J, Spatz, DL. Lactation outcomes among dyads following participation in a model of group prenatal care for patients with prenatally diagnosed fetal anomalies. Breastfeed Med Off J Acad Breastfeed Med. 2020; 15: 698–702. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0061.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thoyre, SM, Pados, BF, Shaker, CS, Fuller, K, Park, J. Psychometric properties of the early feeding skills assessment tool. Adv Neonatal Care 2018; 18: E13–E23. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000537.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Griffith, T, Rankin, K, White-Traut, R. The relationship between behavioral states and oral feeding efficiency in preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care 2017; 17: E12–E19. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000318.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gennattasio, A, Perri, EA, Baranek, D, Rohan, A. Oral feeding readiness assessment in premature infants. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2015; 40: 96–104. E9-10. DOI: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000115.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ross, ES, Philbin, MK. Supporting oral feeding in fragile infants: an evidence-based method for quality bottle-feedings of preterm, ill, and fragile infants. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2011; 25: 349–57. quiz 358-9. DOI: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e318234ac7a.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Canning, A, Clarke, S, Thorning, S, Chauhan, M, Weir, KA. Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21: 83. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02531-4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Raminick, J, Desai, H. High flow oxygen therapy and the pressure to feed infants with acute respiratory illness. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2020; 5: 1006–1010. DOI: 10.1044/2020_persp-19-00158.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thoyre, SM, Holditch-Davis, D, Schwartz, TA, Melendez Roman, CR, Nix, W. Coregulated approach to feeding preterm infants with lung disease: effects during feeding. Nurs Res. 2012; 61: 242–251. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31824b02ad.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lubbe, W. Clinicians guide for cue-based transition to oral feeding in preterm infants: an easy-to-use clinical guide. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018; 24: 80–88. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12721.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shaker, CS. Infant-guided, co-regulated feeding in the neonatal intensive care unit. Part I: Theoretical underpinnings for neuroprotection and safety. Semin Speech Lang. 2017; 38: 96–105. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599107.Google Scholar PubMed

Pereira Kda, R, Firpo, C, Gasparin, M, et al. Evaluation of swallowing in infants with congenital heart defect. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 19: 55–60. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1384687.Google Scholar PubMed

Jones, CE, Desai, H, Fogel, JL, et al. Disruptions in the development of feeding for infants with congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young. 2021; 31: 589–596. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951120004382.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pados, BF, Davitt, ES. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants and nonpharmacologic strategies for symptom management. Nurs Womens Health. 2020; 24: 101–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2020.01.005.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jadcherla, SR, Vijayapal, AS, Leuthner, S. Feeding abilities in neonates with congenital heart disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol. 2009; 29: 112–118. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2008.136.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Malkar, MB, Jadcherla, S. Neuromotor mechanisms of pharyngoesophageal motility in dysphagic infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Res. 2014; 76: 190–196. DOI: 10.1038/pr.2014.68.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ehrmann, DE, Harendt, S, Church, J, et al. Noncompliance to a postoperative algorithm using feeding readiness assessments prolonged length of stay at a pediatric heart institute. Pediatr Qual Saf 2017; 2: e042. DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000042.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lau, C, Smith, EO. A novel approach to assess oral feeding skills of preterm infants. Neonatology. 2011; 100: 64–70. DOI: 10.1159/000321987.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gulati, IK, Jadcherla, SR. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in the neonatal intensive care unit infant: who needs to be treated and what approach is beneficial? Pediatr Clin N Am. 2019; 66: 461–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.12.012.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gephart, SM, Weller, M. Colostrum as oral immune therapy to promote neonatal health. Adv Neonatal Care. 2014; 14: 44–51. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000052.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rodriguez, NA, Vento, M, Claud, EC, Wang, CE, Caplan, MS. Oropharyngeal administration of mother’s colostrum, health outcomes of premature infants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16: 453. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0969-6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sauer, S, Altmiller, G. Colostrum swabbing as an infection prevention strategy: a retrospective study. Int J Hum Caring. 2018; 22: 3–9. DOI: 10.20467/1091-5710.22.1.pg58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thibeau, S, Boudreaux, C. Exploring the use of mothers' own milk as oral care for mechanically ventilated very low-birth-weight preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013; 13: 190–197. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318285f8e2.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yu, XR, Huang, ST, Xu, N, et al. Comparison of the effect of breast milk and sodium bicarbonate solution for oral care in infants with tracheal intubation after cardiothoracic surgery. Breastfeed Med Off J Acad Breastfeed Med. 2021; 16: 568–572. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0239.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yu, XR, Huang, ST, Xu, N, et al. The effect of early oral stimulation with breast milk on the feeding behavior of infants after congenital cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 15: 309. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01355-0.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Coker-Bolt, P, Jarrard, C, Woodard, F, Merrill, P. The effects of oral motor stimulation on feeding behaviors of infants born with univentricle anatomy. J Pediatr Nurs. 2013; 28: 64–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2012.03.024.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jadcherla, SR, Peng, J, Moore, R, et al. Impact of personalized feeding program in 100 NICU infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012; 54: 62–70. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182288766.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lubbe, W, Van der Walt, CS, Klopper, HC. Integrative literature review defining evidence-based neurodevelopmental supportive care of the preterm infant. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2012; 26: 251–259. DOI: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3182650b7e.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Daley, HK, Kennedy, CM. Meta analysis: effects of interventions on premature infants feeding. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2000; 14: 62–77. DOI: 10.1097/00005237-200012000-00006.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pados, BF, Park, J, Dodrill, P. Know the flow: milk flow rates from bottle nipples used in the hospital and after discharge. Adv Neonatal Care. 2019; 19: 32–41. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000538.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Park, J, Thoyre, S, Knafl, GJ, Hodges, EA, Nix, WB. Efficacy of semielevated side-lying positioning during bottle-feeding of very preterm infants: a pilot study. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2014; 28: 69–79. DOI: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000004.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goldstein, SA, Watkins, KJ, Lowery, RE, et al. Oral aversion in infants with congenital heart disease: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23: e171–e179. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002879.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gulati, IK, Sultana, Z, Jadcherla, SR. Approach to feeding difficulties in neonates and infants: a comprehensive overview. Clin Perinatol. 2020; 47: 265–276. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2020.02.006.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pados, BF, Hill, RR, Yamasaki, JT, Litt, JS, Lee, CS. Prevalence of problematic feeding in young children born prematurely: a meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21: 110. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02574-7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rosen, R, Vandenplas, Y, Singendonk, M, et al. Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018; 66: 516–554. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001889.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, JB, Beekman, RH, Eghtesady, P, et al. Predictors of poor weight gain in infants with a single ventricle. J Pediatr 2010; 157: 407–13, 413 e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.012.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Anderson, JB, Iyer, SB, Schidlow, DN, et al. Variation in growth of infants with a single ventricle. J Pediatr 2012; 161: 16–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.009.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Medoff-Cooper, B, Irving, SY, Marino, BS, et al. Weight change in infants with a functionally univentricular heart: from surgical intervention to hospital discharge. Cardiol Young. 2011; 21: 136–144. DOI: 10.1017/S104795111000154X.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Steward, DK, Ryan-Wenger, N, Harrison, TM, Pridham, KF. Patterns of growth and nutrition from birth to 6 months in infants with complex congenital cardiac defects. Nurs Res 2020; 69: S57–S65. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000460.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Williams, RV, Zak, V, Ravishankar, C, et al. Factors affecting growth in infants with single ventricle physiology: a report from the Pediatric Heart Network Infant Single Ventricle Trial. J Pediatr 2011; 159: 1017–22 e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.05.051.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Medoff-Cooper, B, Irving, SY, Hanlon, AL, et al. The association among feeding mode, growth, and developmental outcomes in infants with complex congenital heart disease at 6 and 12 months of age. J Pediatr 2016; 169: 154–9 e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.10.017.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ravishankar, C, Zak, V, Williams, IA, et al. Association of impaired linear growth and worse neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with single ventricle physiology: a report from the pediatric heart network infant single ventricle trial. J Pediatr 2013; 162: 250–6 e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.048.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Green Corkins, K, Teague, EE. Pediatric nutrition assessment. Nutr Clin Pract. 2016; 32: 40–51. DOI: 10.1177/0884533616679639.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Becker, PJ, Nieman Carney, L, Corkins, MR, et al. Consensus statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: indicators recommended for the identification and documentation of pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition). J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014; 114: 1988–2000. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.08.026.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldberg, DL, Becker, PJ, Brigham, K, et al. Identifying malnutrition in preterm and neonatal populations: recommended indicators. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018; 118: 1571–1582. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.006.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schwalbe-Terilli, CR, Hartman, DH, Nagle, ML, et al. Enteral feeding and caloric intake in neonates after cardiac surgery. Am J Crit Care Off Publ Am Assoc Crit Care Nurses 2009; 18: 52–57. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2009405.Google Scholar PubMed

Simsic, JM, Carpenito, KR, Kirchner, K, et al. Reducing variation in feeding newborns with congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis. 2017; 12: 275–281. DOI: 10.1111/chd.12435.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wong, JJ, Cheifetz, IM, Ong, C, Nakao, M, Lee, JH. Nutrition support for children undergoing congenital heart surgeries: a narrative review. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2015; 6: 443–454. DOI: 10.1177/2150135115576929.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wong, JJ, Ong, C, Han, WM, Lee, JH. Protocol-driven enteral nutrition in critically ill children: a systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014; 38: 29–39. DOI: 10.1177/0148607113502811.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gentles, E, Mara, J, Diamantidi, K, et al. Delivery of enteral nutrition after the introduction of practice guidelines and participation of dietitians in pediatric critical care clinical teams. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014; 114: 1974–80 e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.04.027.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lisanti, AJ, Savoca, M, Gaynor, JW, et al. Standardized feeding approach mitigates weight loss in infants with congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 2021; 231: 124–130 e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.12.047.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brown, A-M, Forbes, ML, Vitale, VS, Tirodker, UH, Zeller, R. Effects of a gastric feeding protocol on efficiency of enteral nutrition in critically ill infants and children. ICAN Infant Child Adolesc Nutr 2017; 4: 175–180. DOI: 10.1177/1941406412446699.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hamilton, S, McAleer, DM, Ariagno, K, et al. A stepwise enteral nutrition algorithm for critically ill children helps achieve nutrient delivery goals*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014; 15: 583–589. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000179.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Braudis, NJ, Curley, MA, Beaupre, K, et al. Enteral feeding algorithm for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome poststage I palliation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009; 10: 460–466. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318198b167.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Furlong-Dillard, J, Neary, A, Marietta, J, et al. Evaluating the impact of a feeding protocol in neonates before and after biventricular cardiac surgery. Pediatr Qual Saf 2018; 3: e080. DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000080.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kaufman, J, Vichayavilas, P, Rannie, M, et al. Improved nutrition delivery and nutrition status in critically ill children with heart disease. Pediatrics 2015; 135: e717–e725. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-1835.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

del Castillo, SL, McCulley, ME, Khemani, RG, et al. Reducing the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome with the introduction of an enteral feed protocol. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010; 11: 373–377. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181c01475.Google Scholar PubMed

Slicker, J, Hehir, DA, Horsley, M, et al. Nutrition algorithms for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome; birth through the first interstage period. Congenit Heart Dis. 2013; 8: 89–102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2012.00705.x.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marino, LV, Johnson, MJ, Davies, NJ, et al. Improving growth of infants with congenital heart disease using a consensus-based nutritional pathway. Clin Nutr. 2020; 39: 2455–2462. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.10.031.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Savoca, M, Horsley, M. Chapter 14: Cardiology. In: Konek, SH, Becker, PJ (eds). Samour & King’s Pediatric Nutrition in Clinical Care, 5th edn. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2019: 325–350.Google Scholar

Lisanti, AJ, Allen, LR, Kelly, L, Medoff-Cooper, B. Maternal stress and anxiety in the pediatric cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Am J Crit Care Off Publ Am Assoc Crit Care Nurses 2017; 26: 118–125. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2017266.Google Scholar PubMed

Lisanti, AJ, Demianczyk, AC, Vaughan, K, et al. Parental role alteration strongly influences depressive symptoms in mothers of preoperative infants with congenital heart disease. Heart Lung. 2021; 50: 235–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.12.003.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lisanti, AJ, Kumar, A, Quinn, R, et al. Role alteration predicts anxiety and depressive symptoms in parents of infants with congenital heart disease: a pilot study. Cardiol Young 2021; 31: 1–8. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951121001037.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lisanti, AJ, Demianczyk, AC, Costarino, A, et al. Skin-to-skin care is associated with reduced stress, anxiety, and salivary cortisol and improved attachment for mothers of infants with critical congenital heart disease. J Obstetr Gynecol Neonat Nurs 2021; 50: 40–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.09.154.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ludington-Hoe, SM. Thirty years of Kangaroo Care science and practice. Neonatal Netw. 2011; 30: 357–362. DOI: 10.1891/0730-0832.30.5.357.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lisanti, AJ, Helman, S, Sorbello, A, et al. Holding and mobility of pediatric patients with transthoracic intracardiac catheters. Crit Care Nurse. 2020; 40: 16–24. DOI: 10.4037/ccn2020260.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lisanti, AJ, Buoni, A, Steigerwalt, M, et al. Kangaroo Care for hospitalized infants with congenital heart disease. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2020; 45: 163–168. DOI: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000612.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harrison, TM, Brown, R. Autonomic nervous system function after a skin-to-skin contact intervention in infants with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Nursing 2017; 32: E1–E13. DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000397.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harrison, TM, Chen, CY, Stein, P, Brown, R, Heathcock, JC. Neonatal skin-to-skin contact: implications for learning and autonomic nervous system function in infants with congenital heart disease. Biol Res Nurs. 2019; 21: 296–306. DOI: 10.1177/1099800419827599.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lisanti, AJ, Demianczyk, AC, Costarino, A, et al. Skin-to-skin care is a safe and effective comfort measure for infants before and after neonatal cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21: e834–e841. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002493.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harrison, LL, Williams, AK, Berbaum, ML, Stem, JT, Leeper, J. Physiologic and behavioral effects of gentle human touch on preterm infants. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23: 435–446. DOI: 10.1002/1098-240X(200012)23:.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harrison, TM, Brown, R, Duffey, T, et al. Effects of massage on postoperative pain in infants with complex congenital heart disease. Nurs Res 2020; 69: S36–S46. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000459.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on F, Newborn. Hospital discharge of the high-risk neonate. Pediatrics. 2008; 122: 1119–1126. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-2174.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mannarino, CN, Michelson, K, Jackson, L, Paquette, E, McBride, ME. Post-operative discharge education for parent caregivers of children with congenital heart disease: a needs assessment. Cardiol Young. 2020; 30: 1788–1796. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951120002759.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jaafar, SH, Ho, JJ, Lee, KS. Rooming-in for new mother and infant versus separate care for increasing the duration of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016: CD006641. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006641.pub3.Google Scholar PubMed

Hartman, DM, Medoff-Cooper, B. Transition to home after neonatal surgery for congenital heart disease. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2012; 37: 95–100. DOI: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e318241dac1.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lipkin, PH, Macias, MM, Council On Children With Disabilities SOD, Behavioral P. Promoting optimal development: identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders through developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics 2020; 145: 10.1542/peds.2019–3449.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lester, BM, Tronick, EZ, Brazelton, TB. The neonatal Intensive Care Unit network neurobehavioral scale procedures. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 641–667.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hogan, WJ, Winter, S, Pinto, NM, et al. Neurobehavioral evaluation of neonates with congenital heart disease: a cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018; 60: 1225–1231. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13912.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gakenheimer-Smith, L, Glotzbach, K, Ou, Z, et al. The impact of neurobehavior on feeding outcomes in neonates with congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 2019; 214: 71–78 e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.047.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Massaro, AN, Glass, P, Brown, J, et al. Neurobehavioral abnormalities in newborns with congenital heart disease requiring open-heart surgery. J Pediatr 2011; 158: 678–681 e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.11.060.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lambert, LM, Pemberton, VL, Trachtenberg, FL, et al. Design and methods for the training in exercise activities and motion for growth (TEAM 4 growth) trial: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cardiol. 2022; 359: 28–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.018.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Campbell, K, Malik, L, Jones, C, et al. Abnormal infant neurobehavior and later neurodevelopmental delays in children with critical CHD. Cardiol Young 2022 1–10. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951122002013.Google Scholar PubMed

Nugent, JK, Keefer, CH, Minear, S, Johnson, LC, Blanchard, Y. Understanding newborn behavior and early relationships: The Newborn Behavioral Observations (NBO) system handbook. Paul H Brookes Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar

Butler, SC, Sadhwani, A, Rofeberg, V, et al. Neurological features in infants with congenital heart disease. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022; 64: 762–770. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15128.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Piper, MC, Pinnell, LE, Darrah, J, Maguire, T, Byrne, PJ. Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Can J Public Health 1992; 83 Suppl 2: S46–50.Google Scholar PubMed

Fourdain, S, Simard, MN, Dagenais, L, et al. Gross motor development of children with congenital heart disease receiving early systematic surveillance and individualized intervention: brief report. Dev Neurorehabil. 2021; 24: 56–62. DOI: 10.1080/17518423.2020.1711541.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Long, SH, Harris, SR, Eldridge, BJ, Galea, MP. Gross motor development is delayed following early cardiac surgery. Cardiol Young. 2012; 22: 574–582. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951112000121.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Campbell, SK. The Test of Infant Motor Performance . In version 2.0 ed. Infant Motor Performance Scales. LLC, 2005.Google Scholar

Tripathi, T, Harrison, TM, Simsic, JM, Cabral, TI, Heathcock, JC. Screening and evaluation of neurodevelopmental impairments in infants under 6 months of age with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2022; 43: 489–496. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02745-4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Einspieler, C, Prechtl, HFR, Bos, AF, Ferrari, DFM, Cioni, M. Prechtl’s Method on the Qualitative Assessment of General Movements in Preterm, Term and Young Infants. Mac Keith Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Huisenga, DC, Van Bergen, AH, Sweeney, JK, Wu, YC, Hadders-Algra, M. The quality of general movements in infants with complex congenital heart disease undergoing surgery in the neonatal period. Early Hum Dev 2020; 151: 105167. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105167.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Als, H. Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP): new frontier for neonatal and perinatal medicine. J Neonat Perinat Med. 2009; 2: 135–147. DOI: 10.3233/npm-2009-0061.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelso Damond, G. Occupation-based developmentally supportive care for infants with congenital heart disease in the hospital environment. Infants Young Children. 2022; 35: 54–67. DOI: 10.1097/iyc.0000000000000207.CrossRef Google Scholar

Varni, JW, Sherman, SA, Burwinkle, TM, Dickinson, PE, Dixon, P. The PedsQL Family Impact Module: preliminary reliability and validity. Health Qual Life Out 2004; 2: 55. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-55.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tadros, HJ, Rawlinson, AR, Martin, E, et al. Family functioning in pediatric heart transplantation: variables associated with poor outcomes. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24: e13883. DOI: 10.1111/petr.13883.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kaugars, A, Shields, C, Brosig, C. Stress and quality of life among parents of children with congenital heart disease referred for psychological services. Congenit Heart Dis. 2018; 13: 72–78. DOI: 10.1111/chd.12547.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Henry, JD, Crawford, JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2005; 44: 227–239. DOI: 10.1348/014466505X29657.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ware, J, Butcher, JL, Latal, B, et al. Neurodevelopmental evaluation strategies for children with congenital heart disease aged birth through 5 years: recommendations from the cardiac neurodevelopmental outcome collaborative. Cardiol Young. 2020; 30: 1609–1622. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951120003534.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Callahan, K, Steinwurtzel, R, Brumarie, L, Schechter, S, Parravicini, E. Early palliative care reduces stress in parents of neonates with congenital heart disease: validation of the "Baby, Attachment, Comfort Interventions. J Perinatol. 2019; 39: 1640–1647. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-019-0490-y.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Blue, GM, Kasparian, NA, Sholler, GF, Kirk, EP, Winlaw, DS. Genetic counselling in parents of children with congenital heart disease significantly improves knowledge about causation and enhances psychosocial functioning. Int J Cardiol. 2015; 178: 124–130. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.119.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Streisand, R, Braniecki, S, Tercyak, KP, Kazak, AE. Childhood illness-related parenting stress: the pediatric inventory for parents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2001; 26: 155–162. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/26.3.155.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Choi, Y, Lee, S. Coping self-efficacy and parenting stress in mothers of children with congenital heart disease. Heart Lung. 2021; 50: 352–356. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.01.014.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vrijmoet-Wiersma, CM, Ottenkamp, J, van Roozendaal, M, Grootenhuis, MA, Koopman, HM. A multicentric study of disease-related stress, and perceived vulnerability, in parents of children with congenital cardiac disease. Cardiol Young. 2009; 19: 608–614. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951109991831.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cox, JL, Holden, JM, Sagovsky, R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987; 150: 782–786. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wu, Y, Kapse, K, Jacobs, M, et al. Association of maternal psychological distress with in utero brain development in fetuses with congenital heart disease. Jama Pediatr 2020; 174: e195316. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5316.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Re, JM, Dean, S, Mullaert, J, Guedeney, A, Menahem, S. Maternal distress and infant social withdrawal (ADBB) following infant cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2018; 9: 624–637. DOI: 10.1177/2150135118788788.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Solberg, O, Dale, MT, Holmstrom, H, et al. Emotional reactivity in infants with congenital heart defects and maternal symptoms of postnatal depression. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2011; 14: 487–492. DOI: 10.1007/s00737-011-0243-1.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Weiss, D, Marmar, C. The impact of event scale-revised. In: W., JP, T.M., K (eds). Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD: A Practitioner’s Handbook. Guilford, 1997: 399–411, 21.Google Scholar

Rychik, J, Donaghue, DD, Levy, S, et al. Maternal psychological stress after prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't.. J Pediatr 2013; 162: 302–7 e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.023.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pai, AL, Patino-Fernandez, AM, McSherry, M, et al. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0): psychometric properties of a screener for psychosocial distress in families of children newly diagnosed with cancer. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008; 33: 50–62. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm053.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hearps, SJ, McCarthy, MC, Muscara, F, et al. Psychosocial risk in families of infants undergoing surgery for a serious congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young. 2014; 24: 632–639. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951113000760.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hummel, P, Puchalski, M, Creech, SD, Weiss, MG. Clinical reliability and validity of the N-PASS: neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale with prolonged pain. J Perinatol. 2008; 28: 55–60. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211861.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ambuel, B, Hamlett, KW, Marx, CM, Blumer, JL. Assessing distress in pediatric intensive care environments: the COMFORT scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992; 17: 95–109. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/17.1.95.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

van Dijk, M, de Boer, JB, Koot, HM, et al. The reliability and validity of the COMFORT scale as a postoperative pain instrument in 0 to 3-year-old infants. Pain. 2000; 84: 367–377. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00239-0.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, HA, Boyd, J, Fuchs, DC, et al. Diagnosing delirium in critically ill children: validity and reliability of the Pediatric Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Med. 2011; 39: 150–157. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feb489.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, HA, Gangopadhyay, M, Goben, CM, et al. The preschool confusion assessment method for the ICU: valid and reliable delirium monitoring for critically ill infants and children. Crit Care Med. 2016; 44: 592–600. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001428.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Traube, C, Silver, G, Kearney, J, et al. Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium: a valid, rapid, observational tool for screening delirium in the PICU*. Crit Care Med. 2014; 42: 656–663. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a66b76.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Staveski, SL, Pickler, RH, Khoury, PR, et al. Prevalence of ICU delirium in postoperative pediatric cardiac surgery patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021; 22: 68–78. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002591.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Curley, MA, Harris, SK, Fraser, KA, Johnson, RA, Arnold, JH. State Behavioral Scale: a sedation assessment instrument for infants and young children supported on mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006; 7: 107–114. DOI: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000200955.40962.38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lebet, R, Hayakawa, J, Chamblee, TB, et al. Maintaining interrater agreement of core assessment instruments in a multisite randomized controlled clinical trial: the randomized evaluation of sedation titration for respiratory failure (RESTORE) trial. Nurs Res. 2017; 66: 323–329. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000224.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lincoln, PA, Whelan, K, Hartwell, LP, et al. Nurse-implemented goal-directed strategy to improve pain and sedation management in a pediatric cardiac ICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020; 21: 1064–1070. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002505.CrossRef Google Scholar

Franck, LS, Harris, SK, Soetenga, DJ, Amling, JK, Curley, MA. The Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1): an assessment instrument for monitoring opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms in pediatric patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008; 9: 573–580. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31818c8328.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Franck, LS, Scoppettuolo, LA, Wypij, D, Curley, MAQ. Validity and generalizability of the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1) for monitoring iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in pediatric patients. Pain. 2012; 153: 142–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.10.003.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sinclair, JC. Servo-control for maintaining abdominal skin temperature at 36C in low birth weight infants. Cochrane Db Syst Rev 2002, CD001074. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001074.Google Scholar PubMed

Joseph, RA, Derstine, S, Killian, M. Ideal site for skin temperature probe placement on infants in the NICU: a review of literature. Adv Neonatal Care. 2017; 17: 114–122. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000369.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lefrant, JY, Muller, L, de La Coussaye, JE, et al. Temperature measurement in intensive care patients: comparison of urinary bladder, oesophageal, rectal, axillary, and inguinal methods versus pulmonary artery core method. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29: 414–418. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1619-5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fonkalsrud, EW, Clatworthy, HW Jr. Accidental perforation of the colon and rectum in newborn infants. N Engl J Med 1965; 272: 1097–1100. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM196505272722104.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Palmer, MM, Crawley, K, Blanco, IA. Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment scale: a reliability study. J Perinatol. 1993; 13: 28–35.Google Scholar

Pados, BF, Thoyre, SM, Estrem, HH, Park, J, McComish, C. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the neonatal eating assessment tool-bottle-feeding (NeoEAT-Bottle-Feeding). Adv Neonatal Care. 2018; 18: 232–242. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000494.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pineda, R, Harris, R, Foci, F, Roussin, J, Wallendorf, M. Neonatal Eating Outcome Assessment: tool development and inter-rater reliability. Acta Paediatr. 2018; 107: 414–424. DOI: 10.1111/apa.14128.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pham, V, Connelly, D, Wei, JL, Sykes, KJ, O'Brien, J. Vocal cord paralysis and Dysphagia after aortic arch reconstruction and Norwood procedure. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 150: 827–833. DOI: 10.1177/0194599814522413.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kwa, L, Willette, S, Schroeder, JW Jr. Evaluating dysphagia in infants with congenital heart disease using Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 152: 111004. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.111004.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harrison, D, Beggs, S, Stevens, B. Sucrose for procedural pain management in infants. Pediatrics. 2012; 130: 918–925. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-3848.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

de Sousa Freire, NB, Garcia, JBS, Lamy, ZC. Evaluation of analgesic effect of skin-to-skin contact compared to oral glucose in preterm neonates. Pain. 2008; 139: 28–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.031.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stevens, B, Yamada, J, Ohlsson, A, Haliburton, S, Shorkey, A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 7: CD001069. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub5.Google Scholar PubMed

Pillai Riddell, RR, Racine, NM, Gennis, HG, et al. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2017: CD006275. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006275.pub3.Google Scholar

Shah, PS, Herbozo, C, Aliwalas, LL, Shah, VS. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12: CD004950. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004950.pub3.Google Scholar PubMed

Friedrichsdorf, SJ, Goubert, L. Pediatric pain treatment and prevention for hospitalized children. Pain Rep 2020; 5: e804. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000804.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harrison, D, Reszel, J, Bueno, M, et al. Breastfeeding for procedural pain in infants beyond the neonatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 10: CD011248. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011248.pub2.Google Scholar PubMed

Graf, T, Duffey, E, Spatz, D. Development of an interprofessional policy on the use of human milk and breastfeeding for pain relief. Adv Neonatal Care. 2021; 21: 267–273. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000793.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Benoit, B, Martin-Misener, R, Latimer, M, Campbell-Yeo, M. Breast-feeding analgesia in infants: an update on the current state of evidence. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017; 31: 145–159. DOI: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000253.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Johnston, C, Campbell-Yeo, M, Disher, T, et al. Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2: CD008435. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008435.pub3.Google Scholar PubMed

Johnston, CC, Filion, F, Campbell-Yeo, M, et al. Kangaroo mother care diminishes pain from heel lance in very preterm neonates: a crossover trial. BMC Pediatr 2008; 8: 13. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-8-13.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Diego, MA, Field, T, Hernandez-Reif, M. Procedural pain heart rate responses in massaged preterm infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2009; 32: 226–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.12.001.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Field, T, Hernandez-Reif, M, Diego, M, Schanberg, S, Kuhn, C. Cortisol decreases and serotonin and dopamine increase following massage therapy. Int J Neurosci. 2005; 115: 1397–1413. DOI: 10.1080/00207450590956459.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ferber, SG, Laudon, M, Kuint, J, Weller, A, Zisapel, N. Massage therapy by mothers enhances the adjustment of circadian rhythms to the nocturnal period in full-term infants. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2002; 23: 410–415. DOI: 10.1097/00004703-200212000-00003.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lee, HK. The effects of infant massage on weight, height, and mother-infant interaction. Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2006; 36: 1331–1339. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2006.36.8.1331.Google Scholar PubMed

van Sleuwen, BE, Engelberts, AC, Boere-Boonekamp, MM, et al. Swaddling: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2007; 120: e1097–e1106. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-2083.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Polkki, T, Korhonen, A. The effectiveness of music on pain among preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012; 10: 4600–4609. DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-428.Google Scholar PubMed

Sun, Y, Zhang, J, Chen, X, et al. Effectiveness of gentle human touch for pain control during examination for retinopathy of pre-maturity: a randomized controlled trial. Front Pediatr 2020; 8: 608378. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.608378.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Torowicz, DL, Seelhorst, A, Froh, EB, Spatz, DL. Human milk and breastfeeding outcomes in infants with congenital heart disease. Breastfeed Med Off J Acad Breastfeed Med. 2015; 10: 31–37. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0059.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Davis, JA, Spatz, DL. Human milk and infants with congenital heart disease: a summary of current literature supporting the provision of human milk and breastfeeding. Adv Neonatal Care. 2019; 19: 212–218. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000582.CrossRef Google Scholar

Elgersma, KM, McKechnie, AC, Gallagher, T, et al. Feeding infants with complex congenital heart disease: a modified Delphi survey to examine potential research and practice gaps. Cardiol Young. 2021; 31: 577–588. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951120004370.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spatz, DL, Froh, EB, Schwarz, J, et al. Pump early, pump often: a continuous quality improvement project. J Perinat Educ. 2015; 24: 160–170. DOI: 10.1891/1058-1243.24.3.160.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Froh, EB, Lee, R, Spatz, DL. The critical window of opportunity: lactation initiation following cesarean birth. Breastfeed Med Off J Acad Breastfeed Med. 2021; 16: 258–263. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0155.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spatz, DL, Robinson, AC, Froh, EB. Cost and use of pasteurized donor human milk at a children’s hospital. J Obstetr Gynecol Neonat Nurs 2018; 47: 583–588. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.11.004.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Froh, EB, Deatrick, JA, Curley, MA, Spatz, DL. Making meaning of pumping for mothers of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Obstetr Gynecol Neonat Nurs 2015; 44: 439–449. DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12564.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gramszlo, C, Karpyn, A, Christofferson, J, et al. Supporting parenting during infant hospitalisation for CHD. Cardiol Young 2020; 30: 1–7. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951120002139.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marino, BL, O'Brien, P, LoRe, H. Oxygen saturations during breast and bottle feedings in infants with congenital heart disease. J Pediatr Nurs. 1995; 10: 360–364. DOI: 10.1016/s0882-5963(05)80033-8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chrupcala, KA, Edwards, TM, Spatz, DL. A continuous quality improvement project to implement infant-driven feeding as a standard of practice in the newborn/infant intensive care unit. J Obstetr Gynecol Neonat Nurs 2015; 44: 654–664. DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12727.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Figure 1. Developmental care pathway.

Table 1. Key assumptions and definitions of the developmental care pathway for hospitalized infants with CHD

Table 2. Suggested instruments and clinical tools.

Table 3. Non-pharmacologic comfort interventions.

Lisanti et al. supplementary material

Lisanti et al. supplementary material 1

File 15.9 KB

Lisanti et al. supplementary material

Lisanti et al. supplementary material 2

File 16.6 KB

Lisanti et al. supplementary material

Lisanti et al. supplementary material 3

File 14.3 KB

Article contents

Developmental care pathway for hospitalised infants with CHD: on behalf of the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a Special Interest Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative

Abstract

Keywords

Information

I. Initiate and document developmental and psychosocial screening on admission

Formal developmental evaluation

Parent mental health and psychosocial needs assessment

Interdisciplinary developmental care rounds

II. Initiate and document daily evidence-based bundle of care

Continuous behaviour state assessment

Assessment

Interventions

Pain, withdrawal, sedation, and delirium assessment

Assessment

Interventions

Assess physical and sensory environment: thermoregulation

Assessment

Interventions

Assess physical and sensory environment: environmental sensory stimulation

Assessment

Interventions

Developmental and motor supports

Assessment

Interventions

Developmentally supportive feeding

Assessment

Interventions

Nutrition and growth

Assessment

Interventions

Parent engagement/caregiving

Assessment

Interventions

Discharge readiness

Assessment

Interventions

III. Continue bundle of care daily until discharge

Repeat formal developmental and psychosocial screening prior to discharge

Discussion and conclusions

Supplementary material

Acknowledgements

Financial support

Conflicts of interest

References

Lisanti et al. supplementary material

Lisanti et al. supplementary material

Lisanti et al. supplementary material

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests