Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-8mwbx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-26T07:40:14.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase variation in nasal airways resistance assessed by active anterior rhinomanometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

G. S. Kenyon
G. S. Kenyon*
Affiliation:
(Guildford)
*
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Surrey Country Hospital, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XX.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Measurements of nasal airways resistance in normal subjects have shown a significant difference between values obtained in the two respiratory phases. Higher overall values are found during expiration in both the unprepared and decongested nose but these differences fail to maintain statistical significance after application of a decongestant. This indicates that the phase of respiration in which measurement is made must be routinely recorded especially when measurement is made without decongestant, and comparisons of data made only with recordings from equivalent parts of the nasal cycle.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 101 , Issue 9 , September 1987 , pp. 910 - 916
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arbour, P., Bilgen, E., and Girardin, M. (1985) Experimental study of velocity fields in a human nasal fossa by laser anemometry. Rhinology, 23: 201–207.Google Scholar
Broms, P., Malm, L., and Svensson, G. (1981) Nasal airway resistance in perennial non-allergic rhinitis. Rhinology, 18: 73–79.Google Scholar
Broms, P., Jonson, B., and Lamm, C. J. (1982) Rhinomanometry: A system for numerical description of Nasal Airway Resistance. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), 94: 157–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busser, G. O., and Schibli, R. A. (1973) Rhino-manometrie. Methodik and Normalwerte. Deutsche Mediziinishce Wochenschrift (Stuttgart), 98: 719–723.Google Scholar
Clement, P. A. R. (1984) Committee report on standardisation of rhinomanometry. Rhinology, 22: 151–155.Google ScholarPubMed
Dallimore, N. S., and Eccles, R. (1977) Changes in Nasal Resistance associated with Exercise, Hyper-ventilation and Rebreathing. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), 84: 416–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichler, J., and Lenz, H. (1985) Comparison of coefficients and units in rhinomanometry. Rhinology, 23: 149–157.Google ScholarPubMed
Grieg, E. W. (1985) Personal communication; information on file, Mercury Electronics (Scotland) Ltd.Google Scholar
Lenz, H., Eichler, J., and Wegener, U. (1983) Normalwerte der Nasenatmung gemessen mit einem neu entwickelten Rhinorheomanometer mit modifiziertem Prandtlschen Staurohr und linearer Kenngrosse. Laryngologie, Rhinologie, Otologie (Stuttgart), 62: 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masing, H., Laacke, R., and Leykauf, R. (1974) Nasal pressure flow studies in adults and children. Rhinology, 12: 137–143.Google Scholar
Moe, R. (1941) The effect on the respiratory functions of the nose of the lumen dilating nasal operations. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), Supplement 45: 55–74.Google Scholar
Salman, S. D., Proctor, D. R., Swift, D. L., and Evering, S. A. (1971) Nasal Resistance: Description of a method and effect of temperature and humidity changes. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 80: 736–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoksted, P. (1953) Measurements of resistance in the nose during respiration at rest. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), Supplement 109: 143–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed