Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-grvzd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T14:00:08.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Star formation in interacting galaxy systems: UVIT imaging of NGC 7252 and NGC 5291

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2025

Geethika Santhosh
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, N.S.S. College, Pandalam (Affiliated to University of Kerala), Kerala, India
Rakhi Rajalakshmi*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, N.S.S. College, Pandalam (Affiliated to University of Kerala), Kerala, India
Koshy George
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
Smitha Subramanian
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India
Kavila Indulekha
Affiliation:
School of Pure and Applied Physics, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala, India
*
Corresponding author: Rakhi Rajalakshmi, Email: rakhi@nsscollegepandalam.ac.in.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interactions play a significant role in the formation and evolution of galaxies in the Universe. The galaxy systems, NGC 7252 and NGC 5291, are two nearby interacting systems that are hosting tidal dwarf galaxies (TDGs) and star-forming knots. The present work aims (a) to determine the attenuation-corrected star formation rate (SFR) of the interacting system NGC 7252, (b) to compare the star formation in the NGC 7252 system with that of the NGC 5291 system, and (c) to explore the relation between surface densities of gas and SFR in these two systems. The study utilises high-resolution FUV and NUV imaging data from the ultraviolet imaging telescope on board AstroSat. Six star-forming regions, including the merger remnant, were identified in the NGC 7252 system. The SFR corrected for attenuation of the knots in the NGC 7252 system is determined using the continuum slope $\beta$ calculated from the FUV-NUV colour. It has been observed that the attenuation-corrected SFR values of the knots in this system fall within the range of SFR values determined for the NGC 5291 knots. The TDGs in both systems adhere to the same Kennicutt–Schmidt relation as regular spiral galaxies.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Astronomical Society of Australia
Figure 0

Table 1. NGC 7252 and NGC 5291: UVIT observations.

Figure 1

Figure 1. UVIT NUV images of the (a) NGC 7252 and (b) NGC 5291 systems. North is up and east is towards the left of the image. The colour scale is in units of erg/s/cm$^2/$Å. (a) The NGC 7252 system: Two tidal tails, the eastern tail and the north-western tail, extend from the NGC 7252 remnant (labeled NGC 7252). Star-forming knots are visible along these tails. (b) The NGC 5291 system: Several star-forming knots extend toward the north, south and west tracing a fragmented ring structure.

Figure 2

Figure 2. NGC 7252 FUV image with segment contours overlaid.

Figure 3

Figure 3. NGC 7252 FUV image with selected knots marked. D is the main body NGC 7252 remnant. North is up and east is towards the left of the image.

Figure 4

Figure 4. NGC 5291 FUV image with segment contours overlaid.

Figure 5

Figure 5. The $\beta$ distribution of the star forming regions including the TDGs (diamonds) in the NGC 7252 system.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Distribution of $\beta$ of the star forming regions in the NGC 7252 and NGC 5291 systems.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Distribution of NUV-r colour of the star-forming regions in the NGC 5291 and NGC 7252 systems. The regions with NUV-r $\gt$ 3 are the resolved star forming regions of the galaxy main bodies.

Figure 8

Figure 8. NUV-r colour of the star forming regions (including the main body) (a) NGC 7252 and (b) NGC 5291 systems. The markers are resized to show the relative sizes of the star-forming regions. Contour at level 22 mag/arcsec$^{2}$ from the z-band image is overlaid.

Figure 9

Table 2. Estimated parameters of the star-forming regions in the NGC 7252 interacting system.

Figure 10

Figure 9. SFR surface density, $\Sigma_{SFR_{FUV}}$, across the location of the knots (circles) and TDGs (diamonds) in the NGC 7252 system. The black cross marks the location of the remnant. (a) $\Sigma_{SFR_{FUV}(uncorr)}$, uncorrected for Galactic extinction and internal attenuation and (b) $\Sigma_{SFR_{FUV}(corr)}$, corrected for both Galactic extinction and internal attenuation.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Histograms of area of the knots.

Figure 12

Figure 11. Comparison of (a) UV Slope $\beta$, (b) $A_{FUV}(Internal)$, (c) $SFR_{FUV} (uncorr)$, (d) $SFR_{FUV}(corr)$, (e) $\Sigma _{SFR_{FUV}} (uncorr)$ and (f) $\Sigma _{SFR_{FUV}} (corr)$ of the NGC 7252 post merger system with NGC 5291 interacting system.

Figure 13

Table 3. SFR of the knots and the main body of the interacting system NGC 5291 and post-merger system, NGC 7252.

Figure 14

Table 4. Atomic, molecular and total hydrogen gas content in NGC 5291 and NGC 7252 interacting systems (Malphrus et al. 1997; Braine et al. 2001; Lelli et al. 2015).

Figure 15

Table 5. Gas surface densities and SFR densities of TDGs of the NGC 5291 and NGC 7252 systems (Kovakkuni et al. 2023).

Figure 16

Figure 12. The location of TDGs on the Kennicutt-Schmidt relation (Gray markers, Kennicutt 1998). The blue dashed line with slope N = 1.4 is the original fit to the data (normal spirals and starbursts) from Kennicutt (1998).

Figure 17

Table A1. Observed FUV, NUV and DECaLS r band fluxes for the star forming regions in NGC 5291 system (raw fluxes uncorrected for Galactic extinction and internal attenuation).

Figure 18

Table A2. Observed FUV, NUV and DECaLS r band fluxes for the star forming regions in NGC 5291 system (raw fluxes uncorrected for Galactic extinction and internal attenuation). The FUV and NUV fluxes are the same as given in the Appendix of Rakhi et al. (2023).